HOWEVER, the request for seed bonus points must be honest. If you are honest about asking for SBP then you won't run afoul of the rules. I bring this up because there is a recent thread about a member who lied when asking for SBP.
At the risk of sounding like I tuned in late, what are the rules about asking for SBP? Some torrenters are rather aggressive, others say inane things like "I seed 24/7 so SBP are much appreciated." When I post a torrent, I sometimes say that I don't need any points.
I like to take pictures of good-looking guys in public–not nude, but a handsome face is a handsome face. If it's a busy setting with lots of tourists around, you won't be noticed using a telephoto lens and taking the time to get the right photo. And, since it's a public place, there's no worry about violating an "expectation of privacy." It also makes for nice travel memories.
Um, clear as mud. ;D
eobox, I'll send a few of my neighbourhood youngsters to your place for testing.
Thank you in advance! BTW, I tried to reply to you off-line, but apparently I can only send messages to you if I'm on your "friends list." So perhaps you could friend me. (Sorry to other readers for an off-topic moment.)
Sometimes it isn't clear whether a guy is a youngblood or a twink, so people make their best guess. It's ironic, though, that the category avatar for "Youngblood" shows a couple of guys that I'd probably call twinks.
I volunteer to do a personal inspection of any model to determine if he's a twink or youngblood 
31% "very kinky" here. That surprised me, as I think of myself as rather vanilla. Then again I've tried a lot of things once.
Netscape with tabs sounds good to me
But wait…on the new Firefox, the tabs are more rounded! And, they will, at times, disappear! Isn't that just amazing and fantastic!?!?!? I just can't wait to download and install this tremendous leap forward in interface design. After all, current web practice (and it would seem, browser design) now emphasizes style over substance, form over content.
Move along, folks, there's nothing to see here….
So sick of seeing the same old stuff all the time. Twinks, skaters, surfers, etc. All preened, plucked and shaved.
I agree that most Czech "models" from the last ten years look like clones, and not always attractive ones at that. But there's a lot of diversity on here. You might enjoy Vintage material produced in the US in the late 1980's/early 1990's – the guys still have hair in all the right places.
Here's a screenshot of what I see.
hXXp://imageshack.us/a/img16/6329/banners01a.jpg
I'm still having the same problem (even though I've checked the profile box to not show advertisements). In fact, I get an even more hideous sight–see screenshot below.
Since the profile option isn't working for me, I now use the AdBlockPlus plug-in for my Firefox browser to suppress advertising from the gt.ru domain, and it works perfectly. I'm not cheating the site out of advertising revenue, as I would never click on these ads anyway.
Some time back I donated to the site, and the banner advertisements went away (after I set my profile to hide them). Now, they show up again–sometimes showing straight content. (I respect everyone's preferences, but I don't really want to see female genitalia.)
Did the policy on suppressing advertisements change? I can understand that perhaps I should be more current in my support of the site. At the very least, perhaps advertisements could be tagged as gay/bi/straight, and users could opt-out/in for specific content. An ad for a straight porn site isn't going to get a click from me.
Best wishes to all!
I had about a dozen torrents seeding, and then over the last day every one eventually stopped seeding and showed ""No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it" as tracker status in my client (uTorrent 3.2.3 under Windows XP). I read this, and many other, help threads, checked my hosts file (everything was fine), looked into resetting my passkey, etc., etc., etc.
Then, I decided to just close my uTorrent client and then restart it. Now everything is fine. So, if you have this problem, try the simple stuff first. I need to remember that myself…
Then there is this charming village in northwest Austria, which has its road signs stolen more often than any other place.
(The sign under the town name warns drivers that children are present and that they should slow down…literally, "please, not so fast.")
I think that it's all about how you see them. Do you see them as an equal, or see them as being younger or older.
I think brother Quiquito has nailed it, so to speak: Age isn't important if the two guys consider themselves equal in the relationship. My last partner was 23 when we met; I was 38. But we respected each other as equals, and even though I was in a more comfortable financial position, we kept that equal as well. It was a fine and beautiful situation.
I might add that "age gaps in relationships," is quite distinct from age gaps for random, probably one-off, sexual encounters. I am flabbergasted by the number of 18-20 year olds who pursue me (I turn 45 tomorrow) with great vigour–they want to "learn" about sex and gay life, both in the theoretical and practical sense. I'm not averse to a romp with a young fellow (as long as he's legal), but with most of them, I have so little in common. I can enjoy an hour or two of sex, but a weekend in my mountain cabin? Perish the thought!
I'm not sure this is the right place to post these pics…but the guys seem youngblood-ish, and a sneak peek is always enjoyable!
Some videos are released under multiple names. I suggest checking hXXp://www.wtule.net/Intro and seeing what other names your video might have, and check to see if it's already here under a different name.
The website I mentioned previously is now located at hXXp://www.gayeroticvideoindex.com/ – it's the same information, just a different address and a different look.
First time I'm uploading cock pics of myself online. Would love to know what you think and get some feedback.
Very nice! As for feedback, you can certainly feed me…I would be happy to exchange seed bonus for your seed
the fact that he's a popular model now gives the scene the charm of a forbidden personality. Like spying a greek god, someone who "made it" and then denied it.
I'd like to hear what you think about it.
I think this is primary appeal of the scene–the fact that it was made, produced, and then vigourously suppressed. (From a sheer gay porn perspective, it's an average scene at best, probably filmed by an independent director and then sold to Clair Production.)
It is also worth noting that there appears to be a double standard here: Sylvester Stallone made straight porn films before his "legitimate" acting career, and that didn't prevent him from having a very successful mainline film career. Had those been gay films, I doubt that he would have been as successful--or had any future at all. I think this is an obvious manifestation of homophobia.
Pepin (or, most likely, his agent) made a business decision that it would be harmful to his career to have the porn material made public. While one avenue could have been to propose a cash settlement to Clair Production (i.e., pay them off to not distribute the scene), the underage argument is much more effective in suppressing any material that leaks out to third parties, such as websites or file-sharing networks.
The question then arises whether someone's appearance in an all-male porn implies anything about their sexuality. While it's true that there are many "gay for pay" actors, Pepin seemed to be taking definite pleasure in the male-male sex in that scene, and it also didn't seem like it was his first time, either. While many, if not most, male models in the print media (fashion, fragrance, etc.) are indeed gay, they don't want that known because it can be damaging to their career. This is partially homophobia, but also it can make the male model less appealing to a female audience.
One final comment about his age during the shoot (double entendre intended!): I have at times taught at the secondary school and university levels, with students aged 14 to 25+. I have learned that it's very difficult to determine someone's age by looking at them. While I would estimate Pepin's age in the scene at 20-ish, I also know that my estimations are potentially quite wrong. Having said that, though, I feel comfortable with the calculations proposed in my earlier post, and thus I'm comfortable keeping the downloaded scene on my computer. If I were presented with a strong case that he was in fact underage, I would delete the material immediately. (Given the age ambiguity, though, I will not redistribute the material, nor even show it to others.)
This has been in intriguing series of events.
