@lololulu19 said in The way anal sex is shown in videos...:
porn videos ... almost NEVER show anybody making the slightest attempt to clean their ASS before [fucking]
Damn, I never noticed that. And now that you have me thinking about it, I've never seen porn models clipping their toenails, applying deodorant, or putting in their contact lenses.
Maybe porn really is fake. Shucks. I used to think it was so hot.
(Ignoring the OP's covert request.)
Another good way to increase ratio is to download only a few files from a new, large torrent--maybe 10% or less of the content. Those will often download quickly, and then the tracker system will hook you up (!) with other users who are looking for that material. The results can be astounding: here's a snip from my uTorrent client showing five torrents that I've done this way:
Even if you have a ratio warning, grabbing 5% of a new fan site collection will pay off for you even if you don't want the content. For example, on that one at the bottom of the list I only selected 5% of the content, but uploaded nearly 66 times that content. If ratio were for sale, I'd be wealthy 
@F46660T It sounds like the moderators/help desk have been more than patient with you. They are very busy people, and don't have time to read long, run-on narratives asking for a favour that isn't accommodated by the site software.
I suggest that before posting on this (or any other topic), you might type out your message in a text editor, and clean up your writing to be shorter and focused on the points you want to make. You might consider using a structure like:
You'll get more attention, and possibly some action, if you do this.
Also, the bottom of your pasted in chat window says "WikiDude wrote:" and then nothing follows. If you got a response to your concern, it's not fair to omit it from your discussion.
Finally, I see that you've pasted that very long chat image to three different threads in the forum. That's probably not going to help, and it might hurt your "case" if people get pissed off.
I think this thread has run its course--the OP's question has been answered, and the topic has shifted to another fruitless rant about porn and copyrights. I suggest that the forum administrator lock the thread.
Move along, boys, there's nothing to see here....
We can do better than off-the-shelf Charmin; see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpXtAhiKHBE
@lololulu19 said in Be careful which categories you exclude:
half Chinese / half Jewish
Such an incoherent description.
I have a friend in Shanghai who is 100% Chinese and 100% Jewish. Does that mean he's two people?
The site tries to keep users anonymous for everyone's protection. You could try adding a comment to a torrent you like to the effect of, "@uploader: I like your stuff. Please send me a PM with links to any other torrents you have uploaded."
@dretafari This question isn't likely to get an official answer: The owner(s)/operator(s) of the torrent site prefer to keep the inner workings confidential, for their protection and the protection of the site. This is quite understandable given the complexity of the legal issues involved.
I have a hunch, though, that there is some robust planning to keep things going in the event of unforeseen problems. Several years ago the site vanished completely, but was back within a few months.
@tnar I think we have to distinguish two cases:
Somebody uploads a new torrent, and somebody else "jumps on" this torrent, depriving the uploader of some upload credit. This is impolite. I think the is the situation that the OP is referring to.
The torrent is old, and bears the "recycle" logo. If there's only one person seeding it, they're probably not the original seeder. In that case, "jumping on" helps the user community by getting the material out faster.
I think this thread has run its course. I think we've all concluded that:
@tnar I can't vouch for the accuracy of the article. It would be interesting to hear from a "creator" whether or not that 80% figure is true.
As for the top five creators listed, I haven't heard of any of them...and I'm not curious enough to search any of them.
https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/onlyfans-porn-site-sale-talks-8-billion-1236408046/
"OnlyFans owner Leonid Radvinsky has engaged in discussions to sell the massive porn-centric content creator site at a price tag that would value the company at around $8 billion, Variety has confirmed. ..."
The article notes that "creators" get 80% of subscription payments, which is higher than I would have thought.
Timothy McVeigh (Oklahoma City bomber in late a990;s) was also easy on the eye.I wish they had sentenced him to be my houseboy, rather than to get the needle.
@cp2000 Thanks very much for the historical perspective, which I didn't address. "Baiting" wasn't a thing 10+ years ago, and while the system is slow to adapt to the rapid pace of technology, it is indeed getting there.
There is also the ethical side to all this: I think it's rude and inconsiderate to violate the privacy of complete strangers for one's own gratification. If this is something that appeals to people, there's enough fantasy porn out there that simulates this--I'm thinking of sites like sleepingmen.com, czechhunter.com, sneakypeek.com, and others in the past.
This thread raises a number of legal issues. Here’s my two pence on three topics—admittedly a simplification.
The laws here vary by country and, in the US, by state, but they’re reasonably consistent around the “free world.” If something’s different where you live, feel free to share.
Privacy: It is generally against the law to make a recording (audio, video, and/or still photo) of a person who has a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” That phrase can be subject to interpretation, but some situations are clear: Someone in a locked toilet stall clearly has an expectation of privacy; someone walking down a public sidewalk doesn’t. Laying out on a public nude beach? Probably no expectation of privacy, but IMHO it’s rude to photograph someone there. A hookup you invite into your bedroom also has an expectation of privacy, so keep that hidden video camera off. Note that the privacy rules here don't require that there be nudity or sexual activity: A person in a locked hotel room with the curtains closed has an expectation of privacy even if they are fully clothed while reading newspaper. Violations here are generally misdemeanors, which can be punishable by 6-12 months in prison and or $1000 in fines.
Consent to Distribute: Even if another party knows that you are viewing or downloading a nude or sexual image/video of them, it isn’t legal to further distribute that media to other people unless there is consent from the person(s) being recorded. The law gets quite technical here, but this applies to “bait” material and other private interactions, like Snapchat. (Some jurisdictions include these laws under a heading of “Revenge Porn,” even if there wasn’t a “revenge” motivation. Violations here are also generally misdemeanors.
Under-age porn: Even though the age of consent to sexual relations varies around the world (and from US state to US state), there’s a fairly universal prohibition of media showing nudity or sexual activity of a person under 18. (Definitions of nudity can vary—in some places, showing buttocks are considered nudity, in other places, not. Some jurisdictions consider an obvious erection underneath clothing to be nudity.) Be very, very careful here: While the maxim of the law in most “free world” jurisdictions is that one is innocent of a crime unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, prosecutors, judges, and/or juries often unconsciously shift the burden of proof to the defendant—you prove that the subject was 18+, or we consider you guilty. Violations of under-age porn law is generally a felony, which can involve multiple years in prison, public sex offender registry, etc. Even if you’re attracted to younger guys, use the maxim “if in doubt, throw it out.” The graphic from @cp2000 is a good general guide, but everyone’s different. Consider also that there’s no way to be certain about the age of a toilet stall or “bait” video subject. Most 12 year olds can operate a mobile phone camera. I’ve seen toilet stall spy videos where I suspect that the subject is a minor.
Sorry for being verbose; I dwell in a world where a document called a “brief” can be hundreds of pages long.
Disclaimer: This represents my own opinion, not that of this website. Do not consider this formal legal advice for any situation in which you find yourself. If you need such advice, contact a licensed attorney.
This used to work, but I suspect that the domain urlrw.com was bought by someone with a different business model. There are some other de-referrer sites that could be used here, but many browser security packages prevent moving from one site to another without the user's specific consent.
When want to go to an offsite link, I just copy the link as posted here as text, and then manually enter it into the address bar of my browser. It's a little clumsy, but it avoids these scammy third-party sites and still hides gt.ru as the referring source.
Does Empire of the Sun have enough a gay theme that it could be uploaded here? I have a .mp4 copy of it, but I haven't watched it. If it doesn't qualify for Gtor.rent, I can host it on a dropbox site for a while.
My favourite movie: Much less cerebral: Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
@tiatbdna4 That sounds like a great idea for new torrents. Sometimes, though, I like to freeleech an old torrent rotting in the system with myself as the only seeder. I did that just this afternoon with an "oldie but goodie" that I though more people would like to have...and about 20 people have downloaded it today. But my ratio on that torrent was about 10, so would a seedbox prevent me from sharing it with new downloaders? I don't need the upload credit, but I'd like to be able to upload it to a few other users before I drop off the system.
I apologise if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about seed boxes.
@ianfontinell-0 said in I've destroyed my ratio:
you can still contribute to other peers with the pieces you have.
...and this is an excellent way of getting a lot of upload traffic. For example, I downloaded about 1% of a 30 GB torrent a couple of weeks ago, and my ratio on that torrent alone is now over 39. I should probably archive or delete that one so that others can get upload traffic from it.
I think the title of this thread is spot-on: Francis' pastoral style was about opening doors, and allowing fresh air and light to come in. His views on LGBTQ and women's issues were quite progressive, but he was not a Vatican bureaucrat who would write rules and declare teachings in accord with his views. At best, his viiew was "crawl before you walk before you run," which is wise strategy with a large institution.
I'd like to think that his unfortunate comments about seminarians were the product of a bad day. He seems to have had no animosity against LGBT people, shown perhaps most clearly by his visit to the US some years back, where he had a private dinner with a former (male) student of his and the student's husband. This was the only private dinner on that trip, and such dinners are rare on all papal trips.
He was a pastor, not a politician, and only time will tell how much long-term influence he will have on the church. I never met him, but I think he and I would have gotten along quite well.
For full disclosure, I am an active member within the Anglican Communion, whether it be the Anglican Church of Canada, the Church of England, or the Episcopal Church in the US, depending on where I'm working or teaching. That siad, I hold the Roman Catolic Church in high regard, and I share in mourning of Catholics around the world.