• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. royalcrown89
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 45
    • Posts 697
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by royalcrown89

    • RE: "Donald Trump is attacking President Obama…...

      @pppucci:

      I will admit my ignorance on Facebook's algorithms, but were they trying to bury all negative stories on Hillary or the unsubstantiated "fake news" ones I referenced above?

      They ended up blocking a lot of conservative and non-partisan stories that contained factual criticisms of Hillary. I've seen some of those reports and there was nothing fake about them. Yes, fake news stories were blocked but so were a lot of legitimate ones. They've claimed to have made changes but they haven't. Facebook is very biased and if Zuckerberg runs for president and gains the Democratic nomination, I will not vote Democrat in 2020. That would mean the Democratic Party has lost its way in the same manner the Republican Party did in 2016, allowing someone wholly unqualified and clearly incompetent to serve as its nominee. We already have a maniac in office, we don't need another.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      @raphjd:

      dindu nuffin.

      Was this really necessary, raphjd? I hope you're not suggesting every black person speaks this way because I do not and I don't know anyone who does. Please reconsider these kinds of actions in your future responses. I'm all for free speech, you know this, but that was clearly in poor taste.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: "Donald Trump is attacking President Obama…...

      @raphjd:

      Facebook admitted they buried stuff.    They created a special algorithm to do it.

      Facebook is so shitty and yes, they did admit to burying stuff. No disagreements on that.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: DOJ report - Ferguson PD

      @pppucci:

      @raphjd:

      @sutieday:

      You are purposely forgetting that the PD was targeting people of color disporportianately for ticketing.

      As I pointed out in my OP. according to FBI stats, whites are nearly all the people who are charged with statutory rape, despite having the 2nd lowest rate of underage pregnancy.

      Where are your screams of "oppression of white people"?

      Nobody gives a fuck when whites are targeted.

      What FBI stats?  According to this report from the FBI in 2012, the racial distribution for arrests for statutory rape was very similar to that of the general population:

      https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2012/table-pdfs/sex-offense-offenders-statutory-rape-sex-and-race-by-age-2012/view

      Do you any other references?

      And no one called you a racist.  Actually, I do not think you are a racist, you are perhaps something more dangerous–a racism denier.  You refuse to admit that racism exists and you see claims about it as unfair attack on whites.  Your defense of Ferguson as no more different than . any other city is more of an indictment of American society as a whole.

      Thank you for saying this, pppucci. Being a racism denier is extremely dangerous because while they do not realize it's harm, they are backing up the people who are racists. We're not going to be able to have a discussion on this without some serious self-reflection. Raphjd, these are deep, complex topics that cannot be summed up in "well I'm not 'this' because you're 'this'." If you're not willing to truly debate this but instead to spew out inaccurate statements then it would appear you're only trying to flame us with this thread.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: DOJ report - Ferguson PD

      Black people have had problems with the police for many periods of time for many different reasons. You cannot minimize those problems the way you're trying to do raphjd, it's much too complicated of an issue. We do not trust the police because of the many times the police have wrongfully treated us historically and presently. Many, many police departments were linked to white supremacist groups and often aided murderers to lynch black people based on false convictions as recent as 60 years ago. No, that does not happen today but the problem was never really addressed and no efforts were made to restore the trust. Fast-forward to today, you have some black people committing heinous crimes against other black people because they do not view black life as important enough to preserve and protect. They know if they commit a crime against another black person, it will not be taken as seriously as a crime against a white person. Do you want to guess why that is?

      Another thing is you're acting like this is a strict black and white issue when in reality, it's not. Are you not aware of black police officers treating black people unfairly? The Atlanta police departments have many, many black officers and black people in leadership, yet the same problems are present there. This is an institutional problem. This is a self-worth problem. Once again, do you want to have the discussion of why some black people do not view other black lives as important enough or worthy of even living?

      Lastly, no one in this discussion is calling you a racist. We're pointing out how biased and flawed your arguments are. When I called your statements racist in other threads, it was usually because you were using one black person to say they spoke for all black people which is a racist thing to do. If you can say one black person speaks for me, then why can't I say David Duke speaks for you? David Duke does NOT speak for you so no black person–-except myself---speaks for me. Simple as that.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      I hate having to say this again, but this isn't going to work if we continue to come at each other assuming bad intentions every single time we reply to one another. We all need to pitch in and make at least a tiny effort to bring more civility to this forum, and we can start by not automatically assuming the absolute worst about one another. I did not create this thread to "get everyone to agree with me." One reason why I created this thread is because everyone on this site, including the ones who do not participate in this forum, know for a fact that this forum is toxic and needs a turnaround so that more people will want to participate. You're lying to yourself if you believe this forum has been effective at anything other than being petty and as uncivil as possible at times.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Wisconsin Taking a Step in the "Right" Direction

      @mhorndisk:

      The one problem with your statement is that you insinuate that conservatives are claiming someone's race shouldn't exist.

      I can't tell you how many recent articles I've read about that kind of speech coming from liberals. Just look for them.

      "No whites allowed: Blacks-only HS assembly outrages white parents, so how did principal defend it?"
      http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/03/08/no-whites-allowed-blacks-only-hs-assembly-outrages-white-parents-so-how-did-principal-defend-it-185199

      No Whites Allowed: Seattle ‘Yoga Class for People of Color’ Excludes Caucasians
      https://www.infowars.com/no-whites-allowed-seattle-yoga-class-for-people-of-color-excludes-caucasians/

      I could go on but there are literally hundreds of examples of whitey must die, whitey is responsible for everything, whitey is this, whitey is that, we need to eliminate whitey. It just goes on and on and on and on and on. Nothing like that ever comes from conservatives and if you just don't see it or get it, I don't have time to show you what you just don't want to see. It's like trying to tell someone that cigarettes are bad for you. It doesn't matter.

      What the hell are you talking about? I mentioned "someone" as in someone individually, not a conservative. You do realize my argument could mean ANYONE, right? It could also apply to black people who claim they don't want whites to exist, or Asians who say they don't want anyone other than Asian's to exist. I'm talking about white supremacists like Richard Spencer. I'm talking about black supremacists like Louis Farrakhan. Where did I say conservatives make the argument that a race shouldn't exist? This is why I'm calling for more civility, these wild accusations without proof are getting way out of hand. You completely misconstrued my point and I believe you did it on purpose.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      @mhorndisk:

      This is really a dumb poll. Quit being crybabies. Just because someone doesn't agree with you and thinks your stupid doesn't mean they're uncivil. Have you ever seen a movie with the young Padawan or the young apprentice who's wiser counterpart didn't test him? You just want everyone to agree with you and pet you like a princess. It's not real. That's not how life works.

      This has nothing to do with getting people to agree with each other 100% of the time, it's about getting people to defend their arguments without childishness and flaming posts. What you just posted is a perfect example of that mhorndisk. No, we are not crybabies. I have agreed with others on here who do not share my views on a lot of issues and of course I've also disagreed with them; but lately I have been mindful of how I disagree with them. After realizing NO ONE in this forum was getting anywhere by constant name calling and irrational bickering, I decided to call for more civility; not a call for everyone to agree with me. We can agree and disagree with each other without being uncivil. The constant name calling on both sides has to end and if you're not willing to do that, then you are a part of the problem. Why can't you form an argument without deflection and childishness? We are adults mhorndisk, not middle school children.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • Wisconsin Taking a Step in the "Right" Direction

      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/21/wisconsin-assembly-debates-bill-on-campus-free-speech.html

      We all know how problematic the left has become, particularly on college campuses. The legislation being debated and passed in the Wisconsin State Assembly by Republicans is a step in the "right" direction. I say "right" because it only has support from fellow Republicans and absolutely no support from Democrats, which is a shame. When I was in college, we went to the speeches of those who said downright hateful things because there was always a chance we'd get to speak our mind to the speaker after he or she had done their speech. No one shouted. No one threw things. No one called names. No one burned buildings or took to the streets in a riot. Yes, it is extremely difficult to hold your composure when someone is making the argument that your entire race shouldn't exist and I've been to a speech where someone was making that argument. The key things to remember are that that person cannot legally cause you harm, they are only speaking with their voice and you can always use yours to speak back, if they are not making direct threats then they are not violating free speech, and you are not in your own universe; therefore, you have no right to keep anyone from saying anything. The legislation in the Wisconsin State Assembly isn't perfect, but it is a starting point to putting an end to left-wing violence and indecency in public spaces. You go to college to brace yourself for adulthood and the real world, not to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend that only your opinion should be heard.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      Finally starting to see some toning down on here but the name calling is still too heavy. There is a huge difference in saying an idea or suggestion or piece of legislation is evil or disgusting and calling people childish names. If someone calls out an idea, suggestion or piece of legislation, then it doesn't mean that person is attacking you for supporting said idea, suggestion or piece of legislation. They are simply stating they view the idea, suggestion or piece of legislation as evil or disgusting. How about instead of childish names, we discuss why we oppose or support the idea, suggestion or piece of legislation? This constant name calling is pathetic. Claim and defend your arguments, ideas and views. This shouldn't be hard to do if you truly believe in what you say.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: The sun isn't shining today. BLAME TRUMP.

      @raphjd:

      It's funny though, that Hillary dominated in states that required no id to vote.

      That's probably because–-since many courts have determined voter ID laws often disenfranchises voters of color and poor voters of all races---those who wouldn't be able to obtain IDs easily were able to vote and they voted for Clinton. That doesn't necessarily mean they were all undocumented immigrants as there are no reputable reports of undocumented immigrants voting in huge numbers, especially not 3 million of them in one election. Some forms of ID require payment, birth certificate and various other things that can be extremely hard to obtain depending on your socioeconomic status. If you live in a rural area of a state and your state requires you to have photo ID to vote but to get that ID you need to provide a birth certificate, then you have to go through extra hurdles to vote and not everyone has the time, money or means of transportation to overcome those hurdles.

      If you go to some of these rural areas and even some cities, you will see how difficult voter ID laws make it to vote. I voted easily here in South Carolina because I have a driver's license. Do you want to guess how many family members I have who live nowhere near our state's capital, have never even driven a car, do not have money to obtain a photo ID, do not have transportation to any of the offices to obtain a birth certificate and have always used something like an electricity bill to prove residency to be able to vote prior to voter ID laws? I can tell you I've spent a lot of money in gas taking my family members who live in Edgefield County and Saluda County and Barnwell County to various places to obtain the proper things to be able to vote, and more money helping them obtain the actual photo IDs since using only a voter card no longer gets you access to a ballot. Ask yourself this: why in America does it now cost money to vote depending on who you are and where you live, and why is it disproportionately keeping certain people from casting a ballot?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • Edgar Maddison Welch, "Pizzagate" Gunman, Gets 4 Years

      Hopefully, this will be a lesson to those out there who believe conspiracy theories without doing research to learn facts. If you try to cause harm to people because of what you "believe" is the truth after someone tweeted or stated something on a blog, you go to prison. This case is a prime example of how dangerous fake news stories were in 2016 and why it's time to put an end to it now before more situations like this one happen. The people in that restaurant should not have been put in danger over a bogus conspiracy theory. You have the right to believe what you want to believe, but you do not have the right to enter a restaurant and shoot at innocent people.

      http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/pizzagate-gunman-in-dc-sentenced-to-4-years-in-prison/ar-BBD12Ey?OCID=ansmsnnews11

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Mark Levin: Senate Healthcare Bill is 95% ObamaCare

      I would say it's more like 25% ObamaCare and 75% greed and evil. The Republicans are going to lose control of Congress if this passes. Even if it doesn't pass, they've used up whatever political capital they had; therefore, getting tax reform and other things done is close to impossible. No major legislation = fail. Snatching healthcare from people = fail.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: PSA: I was suspicious for a while, but I'm convinced

      @flozen:

      @royalcrown89:

      I actually don't have a problem with raphjd moderating and participating. He has never mixed the two since I've been posting on here. Like abcddddd said, he hasn't been punishing one side while ignoring the other. I've reported users and he has taken action, no matter what side their own. I did once think he had something to do with the report function acting up, but it's been working fine lately, so I apologize for that thought lol.

      royalcrown89, enjoyed your post.  I will say that I favor political forums where the moderators refrain from joining in the fracas via their own posts, whatever their political leanings.  When they do engage in posting, to me, it's a bit like having the same person as judge and lawyer on a case.  Police hats or no hats, it doesn't assuage my concerns about overlap.

      I realize that moderating-only requires sacrifice, but I have enjoyed forums where moderators concentrate solely on that craft, but alas, not on GT P&D.

      But my main reason to write is to laud you on your "encourage civility" graphic.  It looks just great, and if only it possessed magic powers to compel others.  Nicely, nicely done.

      Thank you. After falsely being labeled a member of Antifa and a communist, I decided to just do something that could not be misconstrued in anyway unless the person doing the misconstruing is trolling or looking for a way to cause trouble.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      Yet again, I have changed my signature banner. Strangeloop, if you find a reason to further link me to Antifa and left-wing extremeism due to what you think my signature says, it's YOU who is being uncivil. I am genuinely trying to make an effort here and you have been counterproductive this whole time with disgusting accusations and obviously bad intentions. And "don't be a hypocrite" does nothing to stop the constant spamming, childish name calling and intentional deflection we've all seen on here. Your deflection and derailment about my banner is a prime example of said behavior.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: PSA: I was suspicious for a while, but I'm convinced

      I actually don't have a problem with raphjd moderating and participating. He has never mixed the two since I've been posting on here. Like abcddddd said, he hasn't been punishing one side while ignoring the other. I've reported users and he has taken action, no matter what side their own. I did once think he had something to do with the report function acting up, but it's been working fine lately, so I apologize for that thought lol.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      @strangeloop:

      @royalcrown89:

      @strangeloop:

      So the language, the image, the color palette, all these three things are all associated with the violent far left.

      Also, there are many resist banners of different types and colors so it doesn't matter what colors I used, you most likely would have pulled this same stunt. Here are examples of what showed up when I clicked on your Google search link:

      http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/RESIST_digital_1200x1200_8.png
      http://i3.cpcache.com/product_zoom/2044095010/resist_womens_light_tshirt.jpg?color=LightPink&c=false
      https://resistmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/RESIST-Logo-Large.png
      https://secure3.convio.net/gpeace/images/content/pagebuilder/Banner_870x215.jpeg
      https://cdn.dribbble.com/users/120724/screenshots/3261034/resist-flag.jpg
      http://murverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/developers-will-resist.gif
      https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/691718142842818560/M4uF-40W.jpg

      Are all of those only in black and red? There was actually only 4 results on the first page of black and red resist banners, and most of the fists are of the left hand and not the right. The fist in mine is a right hand fist, not left.

      The language, the color choice and symbology are INDIVIDUALLY suggestive of antifa and far-left.  Just because a resist banner isn't in red doesn't mean it has some alternative meaning.  There are clear trends in the elements pointed out associated with the far left.  Practically every single example you just posted is anti-Trump rhetoric.  Example of greenpeace "Resist": https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/us/greenpeace-resist-banner-protest-trump.html.  Are you gonna claim that the greenpeace "Resist" is something other than it's not?

      All of those things you just posted only prove the point: you aren't here for dialogue.  You can't claim you want civil dialogue while your signature blatantly signals that you want nothing to do with dialogue.  So you are a hypocrite, and I assure you that every single conservative here agrees with me and recongizes your banner for what it is.  Most liberals here probably understand your banner too, but won't admit it because tribalism.

      Your motion for more civility has failed, because you won't own up to your own incivility and bullshit.

      Does everyone see why this is so difficult? This user is focusing on petty nonsense instead of coming up with better solutions to bring more civility to this forum. I have clearly stated what my signature means and even if I were to change my signature, he would simply find another reason to make ugly broad assumptions about me. It clearly says "resist incivility" at the bottom of my banner. Why, strangeloop, are you so obsessed with associating me to Antifa and the far-left when I have never once on here taken up for them? We have to move on from this kind of behavior if we are to improve the quality of this forum. There has also been major spamming about the Ossoff/Handel special election in Georgia. One thread about the election was actually a real discussion and even I participated in that discussion and everyone who posted in that thread put in thoughtful input (https://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=50768.0).

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Georgia’s Special Election Couldn’t Look Much Closer

      Many are saying this election is a referendum on the president, but I don't believe that. The seat used to belong to Newt Gingrich and then became Tom Price's seat for a long time, which he last won reelection by a lot. The fact that it has gotten this tight shows the people who live there were fine with Price–-either simply because he was the incumbent or they truly felt he best represented them---and now they're not willing to just vote for someone with the R beside their name. I believe it's the latter; that they feel he best represented them prior to him becoming HHS Secretary. This is what happens when you have an educated set of constituents who go into an election thinking about the issues and not the petty stuff. The majority of opinion polls in that district show the voters are worried about healthcare, which means baseless petty attacks about wages and comparisons to Nancy Pelosi will not guarantee Karen Handel or Jon Ossoff a win. Having the R beside her name will not guarantee her the win just like having the D beside his name will not guarantee him the win. If she wins, I actually think it will be because the voters feel she would best represent them. If Ossoff wins, it will be for the same reason. All of the outside money will have virtually no effect on how the people in that district vote. It's just not that type of uninformed district.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      I propose we all come to an agreement on 1) no more wild accusations on what we feel someone's intentions are until after a debate; 2) absolutely no more deflection and derailment to stop a debate, it's annoying and just plain wrong; 3) clearly state your argument and defend it without personal/childish attacks; 4) no more spamming, posting the same topic over and over again in the same day; 5) no more attributing the actions of one person to an entire population of people, no one person represents millions of people unless you're talking about an elected official representing his/her constituents; and 6) address one another by our usernames and no more referring to each other with childish names like cuckservative or moonbat. These are just a few of my suggestions and I hope others will post their own suggestions.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • RE: Civility Poll

      @flozen:

      While it appears that most (of the dwindling number of) posters in Politics & Debate would like to see more civility, I'm afraid that the discussion has been sidetracked by all the back and forth about one poster's choice of graphics.

      I was hoping that the thread would open a discussion on HOW to actually achieve more civility.  The current, largely unmanaged and consequence-free state of affairs here is unlike any I have encountered on other gay sites (torrent or otherwise) that engage in political discourse.

      Is it any wonder that so few GT members choose to participate here?

      .

      Yes, it's very petty to derail this thread with communist accusations and other nonsense, but we can't let that defeat the purpose of this thread. We'd all like to see less name calling and more efforts to understand and ultimately respect our different opinions. That was my main point when I said in this thread that we have to stop assuming the absolute worst about each other based off of our own personal assumptions. We won't get anywhere with baseless bickering and ludicrous assumptions.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      royalcrown89
      royalcrown89
    • 1
    • 2
    • 13
    • 14
    • 15
    • 16
    • 17
    • 34
    • 35
    • 15 / 35