You are full of crap. I have always condemned violence from both sides.
You know what, you might be on to something. I think you're as honest as Donald Trump.
You are full of crap. I have always condemned violence from both sides.
You know what, you might be on to something. I think you're as honest as Donald Trump.
The left does love violence. We have countless examples of it and most of you guys refuse to condemn it only when your side does it. If I remember right, you demanded that Trump condemn the violence of the right, while you refused to condemn the violence from your side. We also saw how the 5 or 6 leftists here who did condemn the violence from both sides (after months of me prodding them to do it) were crapped on by the left.
Watch the video and it's clear that the mexican was politically motivated to get aggressive. It wasn't a random attack as you want everyone to believe.
Why don't you practice what you expound? I have yet to see you condemn any violence from "your side".
The left love violence…
This is dishonest, but I think you've already shown you're not interested in honest argumentation.
If the 16yo had a Hillary hat on, the Mexican wouldn't have done anything.
You have no evidence to back this up, so this is just blind speculation.
Again, it's not political, but instead a moral issue. Some people have bad morals, for example, President Trump, but that doesn't mean all people on the right have bad morals. Do you follow?
I disagree with the notion that two wrongs make a right. Doxxing individuals is not acceptable in a civil and rational society. I too have disagreements with the current administration's immigration policies, but the blame shouldn't be on those responsible for enforcing them, I.C.E.
Honestly, I think the whole "abolish ICE" theory is ridiculous. Trump will still be president and can pass his policies through other departments. I think this isn't a good issue for Dems to run on.
raphjd, what's with the open hostility and ad hominem used to disparage those you disagree with? It's kind of ironic you're becoming sort of a caricature of those whom you criticize.
I think that calling anyone a name such as the one you stated in your post is unacceptable, this shouldn't be a political issue, just a moral one.
President Donald Trump used a term from US segregationist history to describe the relationship between the Air Force and his newest military branch, the Space Force, calling it "separate but equal."
"We must have American dominance in space. Very importantly, I'm hereby directing the Department of Defense and Pentagon to immediately begin the process necessary to establish the Space Force as the sixth branch of the armed forces. That's a big step," he said in the White House East Room during a meeting of his National Space Council Monday.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/18/politics/trump-space-force-air-force/index.html
–-----------------------------------------------------------------
Why create a space force when there are other problems facing the country? Healthcare, Gun Violence, Education, etc. I think this is just to prop up the military industrial complex with more cash. I mean seriously, what threat does the U.S. face from space?
Anyone have a spare invite? I have a good ratio and connection.
Yet another example of US aggression towards the world. I'm just waiting for the next Iraq-like war.
Calling it “a relic of the 18th century,” retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens called Tuesday for the outright repeal of the Second Amendment, saying it would achieve “more effective and more lasting reform” than other efforts to curb the country’s scourge of gun violence.
In a New York Times op-ed, Stevens ― who as a high court justice dissented on a key gun rights case in 2008 ― praised the student demonstrators at Saturday’s March for Our Lives protests, saying that the thousands of marchers, led by the students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, “demand our respect.”
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/john-paul-stevens-2nd-amendment_us_5aba403ce4b008c9e5fb6cfe
–--------------------------------------------------
While extreme, I don't think this will actually solve America's gun problem. Guns have been too enshrined in American culture, specifically as a symbol of personal liberty. Personally, I support strict gun control measures, and I do feel the Supreme Court should clearly define what the second amendment means as their definition of it has changed over time.