Posts made by pppucci

I listened to few of the ones you mentioned.  They both are bigoted, but I didn't hear a call to violence.  If you find the one calling for the massacre pf whites, let me know. I am sure we could find some white on black bigotry still up there as well.

@mhorndisk:

I just want to briefly say that I believe the issue of agriculture is something to be discussed regarding policies that affect politics, as our lawmakers work with such agencies as the USDA, especially since global warming is a big piece of it. I didn't necessarily bring that piece in originially, because I knew it would come about. If you like to eat chicken, like some of you have stated, so does Trump, and I don't hate either of you for it. I do believe that it is better for our bodies to stop shoveling meat into our mouths (unless it's cock of course) so much, it is better for the environment, and it is the leading cause of environmental destruction. I also have been critical of Leonardo DiCaprio and other Limousine Liberals on here. So here I will agree with the liberal side on this, and not so much with Trump. That's all I wanted to say. I can't even say something that shows I'm not necessarily your enemy without being ganged up on, so I am going to focus on other stuff because it really seems kinda pointless.

Nobody ganged up on you dude.  If you had brought up the agriculture/global warming aspect no one would have protested its presence on this board.  The other jokes were about the subject in general and not made at your expense.  It didn't help that this was one of the umpteenth in a day, including some with very inflammatory titles.  I think you will find your posts better received if you keep them fewer and focused.  Otherwise, the human reaction is to tune out.
And remember not everyone here, or maybe  even most people here will not agree with you.  Don't take it personally.  If you don't attack me personally, I won't attack you personally.

Then they are wrong. The TOS clearly bans any incitement to violence.  Do you have the link to that video–I am curious.

@raphjd:

YouTube sees no problem with black people being racist toward whites.   Black Hitler, Cynthia G and all manner of channels are filled with blacks being extremely racist against whites and YouTube defends the content.

Jack Dorsey (Twitter founder) defends banning for racism, but defends allowing anti white racism to remain.

Facebook has a similar policy.

Social media is run by well known liberals.

+++++

As for the video on my channel, someone had to flag it as racism/hate speech.    I doubt it's a conservative who did it.

YouTube has an algorithm that only checks for copyrighted material from businesses who pay for the service.     You get a copyright strike and a completely different email for that.

Terrence doesn't care if you post his videos as long as you don't monetize them.

I suspect that YouTube does very little independent evaluation if the video is flagged and could be considered racist.  I suggest you flag Black hitler or one of the others and see what happens.

@strangeloop:

@sutieday:

I've attacked his posts and his argument (Supporting veganism whilst also supporting #45).

As far as I know, there has been no U.S. president that has EVER been vegan/vegetarian.  And yet I'm sure tons of vegetarians vote and support various presidents.  This is one of your weakest arguments yet, and that's saying something:

Mhorndisk: "I'm vegetarian and think people shouldn't eat meat"
Sutieday: "You support Trump, therefore ARUGMENT INVALID!"

Really?  That's the hill you want to die on here?  This topic has been made so pointlessly tribalistic by you and others here, totally without any valid reason.

And yes, that is sick.  The extreme tribalism you so casually demonstrate is a sickness that has gripped the U.S. and the world at large of late.

I think sutieday was referring to mhorndisk's other vegan thread which was moved to rants and raves.  In that post, mhorndisk actually mentions that he has given trump a pass on his meat-loving.
https://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=51108.msg278190#new

To clarify a few points.  The testicles, besides producing the male hormones produce sperm (the little guys) only.  Any supplement that only strengthens or increases sperm count will not increase the volume of cum.  The prostate produces the seminal fluid, which together with the sperm make up semen.  It is the volume of the seminal fluid that you want to increase to shoot further, because the   "pump is primed." That is why abstaining produces more cum, because you give the prostate more time to fill up the seminal vesicles.  However, the pump itself is composed of the muscles of the pelvic floor.  You can strengthen them with "Kegel exercises"
http://www.askmen.com/dating/love_tip_60/67_love_tip.html
An easy one is to start urinating, stop the stream, hold it for 3-5 seconds, release and prepeat.  You also can do the same thing several times a day. when you are not urinating..

Also, I don't know how true it is, but men in the Caribbean swear by sugar cane juice to increase the volume of cum.  I guess it would make it sweet too. Pineapple is also supposed to help with taste.  Good Luck!
:cum: :dick:

In the news today, Mitch McConnell may reach out to democrats in the Senate to seek a compromise.  Between that story and Trump bringing up the election meddling with Putin, I almost fainted watching the news tonight.
:faint:

@Frederick:

@aadam101:

Why hasn't Trump locked her up?

I guess he was just saying all that stuff to get gullible people to vote for him.  It worked.

He might still.  He's being a nice guy right now.  A moonbat would never let anybody off the hook for anything.  Trump is being an extremely good sport.

As Mae West used to say, "Goodness had nothing to do with it." It just is not politically advantageous to do so right now.  I agree with you, Frederick that he may in the future, especially if he needs to shore up his base.  There is such deep-seated hatred of her in some groups that goes back 30 years.  Trump knows he can pump that well whenever he wants.
P.S.  I am impressed with your cooler tone, and I thank you for that. But at the risk of asking too much, how hard would it be to call us liberals or leftists instead of "moonbats?"  We all know of your disdain.  You don't need to use a deprecative noun in every post.

Raphjd, you were the first one to bring religion to this thread, which had to do with the attack on a Trump supporter.  It was the second post in the thread and even if I accept your premise, is was seriously OT.

@raphjd:

Liberals see nothing wrong with using violence to prove they are the good people.    This is why they are such fans of the "religion of peace".

@raphjd:

My YouTube channel got a community guideline strike over a video I mirrored by Terrence Williams.

YouTube said that the video was "racist hate speech".

A black man being highly critical of BLM is "racist hate

Thanks for providing the link.  I actually watched the entire video.
Call me an elitist, but I find these YouTube videos of random people speaking their minds a waste of time. Irregardless of content, even if the person in question was reciting my personal creed and philosophy of life. I just think there are better ways to seek out others opinions, including messaging boards, where some degree of interaction is possible.

Now down to your issue.  I am confused.  How does YouTube take down your video, but leave up the same one on a different channel?
I also think they may have been unfair in taking it down, but you are unfair on blaming it on liberals.  Their terms of service state:

Hate speech

We encourage free speech and try to defend your right to express unpopular points of view, but we don't permit hate speech.

Hate speech refers to content that promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on certain attributes, such as:

race or ethnic origin
religion
disability
gender
age
veteran status
sexual orientation/gender identity
There is a fine line between what is and what is not considered to be hate speech. For instance, it is generally okay to criticize a nation-state, but not okay to post malicious hateful comments about a group of people solely based on their ethnicity."

I don't think he was promoting hate, but he certainly was highly critical of black Americans and purposefully grouped them all together in a non-stop string of stereotypes that I imagine offends a lot of people, For you to defend this diatribe as a criticism of the BLM movement is disingenuous, He spent more time gnawing on that drumstick of fried chicken than he did talking about BLM.

Now we come to the "shoe on the other foot test" and I will extend you the courtesy of not assuming the answer.  If we were to take a transcript of the video and give it a white man to act out and recite, would it be considered hate speech?

"Present company" excepted, I think there are may out there who would see this video as a validation of their own racist views because they are spoken by a black man.

I think for those reasons you got dinged, but I don't understand why it is still up on another part of the site.

I think it was clear from its formation that this commission was going to validate Trump's allegation and use it to support voter suppression in the very states that gave Hillary her plurality.  Can you imagine a group chaired by Mike Pence doing anything else?  the greatest privilege of his life is serving the president.

I can find many videos of him criticizing Black Lives Matter on YouTube right now.  Was there anything exceptional about your video?

@flozen:

@sutieday:

I haven't attacked mhorndisk in this thread. I've attacked his posts and his argument (Supporting veganism whilst also supporting #45). So, being critical of someones argument/position does not mean you are attacking them directly.

Yes, agreed.  This mhorndisk thread began with the rather unusual fusing of being a vegan, and still supporting Trump, the meat eater.  And that doesn't make for viable political discourse.

As an aside, I have begun reducing my intake of animal "meat" proteins, in equal parts for health and concern for animals.  If mhorndisk wants to write more on vegetarianism or veganism in the Health and Fitness or Chit Chat boards, I certainly would have no beef with that.

Keep up the good work and don't chicken out.

@raphjd:

Free speech is not the same as terrorism, throwing gays from the roof tops and all the other things your beloved muslims love to do.

But not all of islam supports terrorism or even Sharia law.  There is a faction (and it may be a large one, but certainly not the majority) who use the religion to back up their hate of the West and gays, etc.  It is not the religion per se that is the issue, it is the underlying hatred. 
But what really amazes me is how often you chastise us for making generalizations about conservatives and the right, but so easily and confidently paint the left with a broad brush.

Devken and sutieday, I think you are both offended for different reasons.  Pretty sure raphjd's comment was sarcastic, so sutieday, you are justly offended because he is implying all muslim immigrants are terrorists, and Devken, I don't think he was defending Turkey as a religion of peace.  I personally would like him to back up a blanket statement like all liberal protests end in violence–without bringing up the Berkley riot or the mad Stanford bike-lock slasher.

BTW, I have searched the Philadelphia police blotters and can find no record of arrests for the bloody attack pictured in the OP.  I did find his twitter feed, however, and it looks like he may have been shirtless when attacked.  So I owe him the benefit of the doubt.  It should be noted that he is best known in Philadelphia for interrupting Christmas Mass in the cathedral screaming that Pizzagate was real and had to be investigated.  Now he has traded in his "Trump 2020" sign for one promoting a silent vigil for Seth Rich.  So it wouldn't surprise me if he shares culpability in starting the fight.

I know this will sound cruel, but there is something weird about the photo of the victim in this case.  The blood pattern on his chest does not correlate with a wound on the top of the scalp. Unless he was shirtless when he was attacked, what is all that blood doing on his chest anyway.  An ER nurse or physician would never allow him to bleed that way after removing his shirt, especially in Philadelphia which has some of the best hospitals in the world.  The story was carried by only one network and one secondary newspaper and then picked up by the conservative outlets.  I am not calling it a hoax, but something smells fishy.  I am waiting for the other shoe to drop.

Raphjd keeps pointing out that fascism had its origin in the far left, which is at least partially true. Does that make antifa a rightist movement since it is anti-far left?  Maybe that explains their violent tendencies.

@flozen:

@Devken:

@pppucci:

"When you're Vice-President, you can do anything–Grab'em by the nuts!"

… and bolts.

pppucci and Devken, you share honors for funniest photo caption of the day.   :laugh:   And tip of the hat to sutieday for topic generation.

Once I heard that Pence, in younger days, had experience pulling on big levers, but I credit that to the despicable liberal rumor mill, of course.   ::)

I bet his lever is tiny. ;D

"When you're Vice-President, you can do anything–Grab'em by the nuts!"

The argument made by the former AG is ridiculous.  If it were true that a statement by the president of support for a person under investigation, than not only would Obama be guilty, but Trump would be guilty ten-fold.  How many times has he said that Michael Flynn was good guy who was treated unfairly?  How many times has he stated there was no collusion?  How many times has he called the Russia investigation a hoax?  If that is not "signalling" the Justice Department as to how he wants the investigation to turn out?
We all know that if the FBI determined that Hillary should be indicted and Loretta Lynch refused to, that information would have been leaked, or Comey himself would have made a statement