Posts made by pppucci

Did your supply of aluminum foil to line your hat run out today?

@beast775:

Add to that most cocksuckers are whiny bitches.

Hmm… Interesting comment on a gay board.  Are you competing for the most Pig-Headed Bigot of the Year Award, or are you just settling for The Most Ill-Conceived Insult of the Year Award?

@beast775:

Arkancide is the unfortunate habit of potential witnesses to the Clintons' dirty dealings in Arkansas suddenly deciding to shoot themselves twice in the back of the head. Police and Coroners in Arkansas, notably Fahmy Malak who answered to Governor Bill Clinton, automatically described these shootings as "suicides."

http://www.arkancide.com/

I suppose the Miami Medical examiner is controlled by the Clinton's as well–by what? Svengali hypnosis?

A popular  conspiracy theory in Arkensas is a doozy:

" In 1994, The Clinton Chronicles, a propaganda video purporting to connect Bill Clinton to various crimes, was released. The deaths of Ives and Henry were among those to which Bill Clinton was supposedly connected. The Clinton Chronicles advanced the conspiracy theory that, while governor of Arkansas, Clinton had a connection to a scandal involving large shipments of cocaine, guns, and money from Central America passing through Arkansas at the Mena Intermountain Municipal Airport. It further speculated that the two boys had been murdered after stumbling upon a shipment moving through Saline County that night in August 1987."

I know facts won't persuade you, but for the reasonable minds out there:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
http://www.snopes.com/monica-petersen-killed/

Finally Beast, answer me this:  How do thirty-yea-old "conspiracies" matter in the politics of 2017?  If you can come up with a better reason than pure distraction, I'd like to hear it.

@beast775:

I like Putin.  If he ran for president of the US I'd vote for him and Obama and Hillary would both be taking  a dirt nap.

I suggest you move to Russia.  I'd be glad to start a GoFundMe page to raise the fare.

Hey Fred, you forgot the really big green blob under your name.  The one that says "WARNED."  I guess that means you have a really fine reputation.

BTW, if you are going to pick a thread to attack me, you choose one where I did not agree with you.  You have complained bitterly that sutie down-votes without reading. You go one step further and flame without reading.  Sad.

Don't be so paranoid.  Facebook prohibits multiple accounts by the same user.  They probably just figured out it was you and enforced their previous ban.  Not that I blame them.

@beast775:

Trump paid Putin to "hack" the election.  How do I know this?  I watched a gay democrat scream it at a TV.

Are you farming Seed Bonus points with your non-sensical posts?  Even Trump now admits the Russians meddled in the election, and his son was more than willing to use that information to benefit the campaign.  We all should be concerned about how to prevent it in the future, because we have no idea whose side they will attack in the next election.

I am not saying I agree with his argument, which I don't.  But if we are going to mention it, we have to get it straight:

"Councilmember Larry Gossett said he didn’t like the idea of power-washing the sidewalks because it brought back images of the use of hoses against civil-rights activists"
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/judges-complain-its-unsafe-unsanitary-outside-county-courthouse-in-seattle/

@beast775:

@pppucci:

The Miami Medical Examiner ruled his death from a gunshot wound to the head, a suicide.  Or did you not read down that far?

When they murdered Seth Rich it was only a botched robbery.

I just love the way you throw yourself behind conspiracy theories, even when well established facts contradict them . Even Hannity had to retract the ridiculous Seth Rich story.  The DC police and the FBI stated there were no DNC emails on his laptop.  The only reason behind that conspiracy is to build up a narrative that Russia did not hack the DNC.  Our president, the FBI, CIA, NSA and DNI have all said it was Russia.

As for the Haitian who committed suicide, his beef with the Clinton foundation was that the money raised was not awarded to Haitian contractors, not that it was not spent to rebuild Haiti.  (from the same article you cite):

"According to Eberwein, a paltry 0.6% of donations granted by international donors to the Clinton Foundation with the express purpose of directly assisting Haitians actually ended up in the hands of Haitian organizations. A further 9.6% ended up with the Haitian government. The remaining 89.8%  – or $5.4 billion – was funneled to non-Haitian organizations."

One wonders if after such a devastating earthquake along with its massive damage to infrastructure, Haitian contractors were even able to effectively participate in the rebuilding effort

What I find particularly objectionable is that conspiracy theorists like you call the Russian meddling "fake news, a hoax and a witch hunt," when it has been affirmed by our intelligence community, yet cling to falsehoods when it suits your world-view without batting an eyelash.

The Miami Medical Examiner ruled his death from a gunshot wound to the head, a suicide.  Or did you not read down that far?

@beast775:

Did you idiots not read the article?  It says a MISTAKE!  Do you fools think Obozo personally signed all those letters?

Yes, clearly a mistake.  At first I was going to blame it on Trump's reluctance to fill under-secretary jobs, but the letter was mistakenly sent to 200 out of 300,00 new citizens.  Sounds like an honest mistake to me.

Beast775, if you want to be treated with respect here, I suggest you refrain from cute deprecative transformations of any person or group.  The natural reaction is to tune that out along with everything that surrounds it.

@mhorndisk:

GOD DAMN. SHUT THE FUCK UP. I SHOULD TOTALLY SUE YOU FOR YOUR FRAUDULENT STATEMENT HERE.

I said earlier in this thread that we needed to pick our battles.  This might be one worth fighting, as well as the statements that follow.

I do not claim to be familiar with the software that runs the Forum, so Raph, correct me if I am wrong.  I have noticed a large number of Guests viewing this board.  I would imagine that means they would have to visit before logging in or purposefully log out of the site before coming to the forum.  Not only do they want to lurk, but they want to do so anonymously.  Have they been intimidated from posting and even showing their face?

Also, after reviewing old posts here, it became clear that there were a lot more active participants until recently . Some of that may be attributed to pre-election and immediate post-election fervor, which clearly has died down, but I wonder if we are doing everything we can to promote participation by a broad spectrum of members.
As a case in point, last night at about 1 AM there was me and 22 guests viewing the board.

What I find reprehensible is mhorndisk's defense of free speech while threatening to sue over criticism of the president. He really should move to some nice cozy  authoritarian regime like Russia or Turkey.  He will be much happier there, as long as he stays closeted.

Fred, what is your fascination with the Clintons?  Among all of the current political topics being discussed nationally today, this is very low on the list, if it even is on the list.

@Frederick:

Hmm.. how about Hillary Clinton stealing the nomination from Bernie Sanders?

Not true and not  a good analogy.  Hillary would have won the nomination even if Bernie had eked out more delegates in the primaries.  Whether you agree with the system or not, she had the vast majority of super delegates.

He was there with George W for  Presidential Scholars Forum.  No mention of Hillary.  As for her winning the presidency, I don't think Bill would have been happy being relegated to the East Wing and picking out china.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-presidents-idUSKBN19Z02N

Have you read the Bible?
The ancient texts are far less important than how they are interpreted and integrated into the modern religion. Jihadists have taken a literal interpretation of parts of the Quran that are not shared by its majority, much in the same way the fundamentalist Christians use the bible to support their extreme political views. 
I know you won't trust NPR, but this is an interesting read and is based on the analysis of a professor from Penn State.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788

Just to defend my fact checking, if you google Natalia V. visa:

https://www.google.com/search?
q=natalia+veselnitskaya+visa&oq=natalia+veselnitskaya+visa&gs_l=serp.1.0.0i3k1.8284.22403.0.24387.20.19.0.0.0.0.230.1833.13j4j1.18.0….0...1.1.64.serp..4.11.1206...30i10k1.WD4AYbmy5Ck

You will find many hits from across the media spectrum.  She was let in by the recommendation of the Department of Justice for the Southern district of NY to defend a client in Sept 2015-February 2016.  InJune she came in on a simple business or leisure visa. The only nefarious thing about he entry is the way it has been portrayed in the conservative media, just as a distraction.
The funny thing about conspiracy theories is that they are 1% fact and 99% innuendo. That is why they fail to die when the facts are proven wrong.

@raphjd:

Umm, Linda "Cockroach" Lasour called for jihad and she's one of these poor, poor victimized peace loving muslims you want us to worship.

You are driving the discussion further off topic instead of trying to guide it back. Again you misrepresent the views of liberals on this board.  The "defense"  of Islam here has been that it is fundamentally a religion based on peaceful principles and that the majority of muslims are peaceful. No one has argued that every muslim was peaceful–in fact just the opposite by emphasizing that the entire group should not be judged by the actions of a few.
By implicitly comparing mhorndisk's rant to jihad has nicely made my point.