Posts made by pppucci

@Frederick:

@abcddddd:

@Frederick:

The two of you are being hypocritical here.  You are offering no substantial input, but intstead just attacking other member - whomever they might be.  That is actually against the rules.  If you got a complaint, complain to the moderator.   Don't rinse out your period stained panties in the forum.

So this was supposed to be a compliment?

No wait, "substantial input"!

There is an expression that goes "you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear".  Likewise, when someone makes a 3 word comment, I sometimes can't come up with "substantial input".  In that one case, I was trying to impress upon ppussi that he should refrain from spamming the forum with his trivial retorts. Sutieday does very little more than click on Thumbs Down and occasionally adds a 3 word shot. 
I think that is enough back and forth for today.  Let's see if DrWas has dreamed up another 13 new fake topics to share with us today.   Maybe something with UFO's today.. or giant rutabagas that speak Mandarin Chinese.

Instead of you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, my grandmother used to say "You can't make jelly out of shit."  That seems especially descriptive of most of Fredericks posts.

@royalcrown89:

This is the Politics & Debate thread; therefore, if someone posts a news article or quotes from a news article, why not frame an argument against what the article says or begin a debate about the facts or false assumptions of the article? In my opinion, the only "low quality shit posts" are the ones where childish insults are thrown or massive generalizations are made such as "[certain person] makes all [certain group of people] look bad." This isn't about being politically correct, it's about being civil adults. Someone on here kept saying I deemed everything I didn't agree with as irrational and that simply wasn't the case. I deemed specific arguments irrational only after making my argument why I believed they were irrational, not by simply stating they were irrational just because or only because I disagreed. Instead of forming their argument to counter mine, they just claimed I call everything I disagree with irrational, and then they proceed to flame other posts of mine with irrelevant points that are clearly meant to derail and deflect. If you do not know how to be civil then you should rethink participating in this thread, simple as that. How can we expect to debate when one side is being extremely childish?

I  totally agree. :cheers:

@Frederick:

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

Trump hasn't been found guilty of any wrongdoing, and there isn't even any evidence that he did anything criminal.  There are just a load of libturds making assumptions and accusations.
The first thing to do is get real evidence.. then if that emerges, determine if Trump was behind it.. then determine if that was illegal. 
What Trump is being accused of is not even illegal!!

And yet.. this idiot moonbat Al Green has decided to skip all of that.. and go right to impeachment.  What a vagina this man is! 
I hope there is some sort of penalty for filing such a severe action without any merit.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-dem-drafting-articles-of-impeachment-for-trump/ar-BBCbZBE?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

First, sitting presidents cannot first be found guilty because they cannot be indicted or prosecuted wile in office.  They must be impeached first.  That all depends on the House of Representatives, which would be unlikely with the republicans in the majority.  Obstruction of justice is an impeachable crime, however, and eventually led to Nixon resigning and was a  key part
of the impeachment of Clinton

In typical moonbat fashion.. you completely re-write statements to suit your agendas.  At no time in my comment did I use the words "guilty", "indicted", or "prosecuted".   I'll try to re-state it in an simpler form.  Before impeaching someone, they must have evidence - so far, they have none.  Before impeaching, that evidence has to be for something that is impeachable - it is not.  If you are imagining that there was obstruction of justice by having Trump fire Comey - that is nonsense.  Many democraps including Pedosta and Clinton wanted Comey gone and claimed that Comey assisted Trump in getting elected.  They did this up until the very day of Comey's firing.   If Trump had obstructed justice by giving Comey orders to stop the investigation - then it was Comey's clear duty to report that obstruction of justice when it happened.. and he did NOT.  The investigation never did stop, so obviously there was no obstruction.  If you are going to cling to the premise of firing Comey… that won't work either.   The FBI director is appointed by the president, and he can fire anybody that he has appointed.  The act of firing is not obstruction.  The act of having someone killed - as dozens of Clinton foes have mysteriously had fatal accidents - is obstruction.  Lying to congress is impeachable - such as Bill and Hillary Clinton did.  Deleting over 30,000 emails which were the property of the US government off of her home computer's hard drives AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over is a major crime which would impeach a president.  Having a white house intern suck your cock in the Oral Office and stuff a cigar up her cunt and then lie about it - repeatedly - to Congress and the American people - is impeachable.  Raising funds in blatantly illegal ways is impeachable (Whitewater).   
So, you and the other moonbats need to activate a few brain cells, and find something else to bitch about. 
:fight:

Please read again your original post.  The fourth word is ''guilty." You also need to educate yourself on obstruction of justice.  The law states that the obstruction does not have to be successful to be a crime.  And finally, you might be a bit more credible if you stop calling people you disagree with you "moonbats" and other generalized derogatory epithets  :blownose:

@Frederick:

Trump hasn't been found guilty of any wrongdoing, and there isn't even any evidence that he did anything criminal.  There are just a load of libturds making assumptions and accusations.
The first thing to do is get real evidence.. then if that emerges, determine if Trump was behind it.. then determine if that was illegal. 
What Trump is being accused of is not even illegal!!

And yet.. this idiot moonbat Al Green has decided to skip all of that.. and go right to impeachment.  What a vagina this man is! 
I hope there is some sort of penalty for filing such a severe action without any merit.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-dem-drafting-articles-of-impeachment-for-trump/ar-BBCbZBE?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

First, sitting presidents cannot first be found guilty because they cannot be indicted or prosecuted while in office.  They must be impeached first.  That all depends on the House of Representatives, which would be unlikely with the republicans in the majority.  Obstruction of justice is an impeachable crime, however, and eventually led to Nixon resigning and was a  key part
of the impeachment of Clinton

The blatant racism in this thread is quite disturbing.

@raphjd:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-39976018?SThisFB#

A doctor accused of circumcising a boy without his mother's consent should be prosecuted, a leading human rights lawyer has said.

The three-month-old boy was circumcised for religious reasons while staying with his paternal grandparents in 2013.

A police investigation was dropped but Saimo Chahal QC wants Nottinghamshire Police to take action against Dr Balvinder Mehat.

…......................

If this exact case had happened to a girl, it would be a crime.

Can the feminist cucks explain why feminists aren't screeching for equality on this?

Female circumscision is actually amputation of the clitoris intended to keep women from straying from their husbands by denying them sexual pleasure.  Male circumscision is done for religious or hygenic reasons. Cynical observers note it is an extra revenue generator for pediatricians,
In any event the male and female procedures are not comparable at all.

@raphjd:

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

The libtards won't be happy until some muslim or north Korean lunatic detonates a nuclear device at a football stadium or at the Oscars.

Until then (and probably after) they will fight for the right for all terrorist nuts to freely enter the USA whenever they please. 
Today there were two terror attacks in London.  One involved a WHITE VAN.. which to a libtard signifies that a white supremacist was behind it!  Woo Woo!   And.. anonymous sources will probably say that the white van was seen coming out of a parking garage.. owned by Donald Trump!   Arrrggh!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/breakingnews/witness-in-london-bridge-incident-says-saw-white-van-veering-into-people/ar-BBBV8iI?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

Raphjd,  Are you going to enforce dropping the tard suffix?

I do not live on this site.     I am a volunteer, not paid staff.

As I keep saying, USE THE REPORT BUTTON.

I did use the report button, but is was pointing it out to the original poster.
Also I do not think any other ridiculous name calling is conducive to discussion, but then again, I guess we are not engaged in discussion, but flame throwing.

@Frederick:

The libtards won't be happy until some muslim or north Korean lunatic detonates a nuclear device at a football stadium or at the Oscars.

Until then (and probably after) they will fight for the right for all terrorist nuts to freely enter the USA whenever they please. 
Today there were two terror attacks in London.  One involved a WHITE VAN.. which to a libtard signifies that a white supremacist was behind it!  Woo Woo!   And.. anonymous sources will probably say that the white van was seen coming out of a parking garage.. owned by Donald Trump!   Arrrggh!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/breakingnews/witness-in-london-bridge-incident-says-saw-white-van-veering-into-people/ar-BBBV8iI?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

Raphjd,  Are you going to enforce dropping the tard suffix?

@MrMazda:

AFAIK, this torrent is not currently on the list of banned clients. I know we used to have a list of banned clients somewhere, but it seems to have disappeared over time.

The one thing that I would wonder about this torrent client is does it download the contents and enable you to stream as you're downloading, or is it a stream only kind of deal? If it's a stream only kind of deal, I would caution against the use of this client, simply due to the fact that it would prove to be detrimental to your ratio. If it just downloads it in order so that you can stream it while it downloads, then keep it seeding like a normal torrent client, then I think this may be something that I might want to look into.

I tried it again with the latest SC video.  With only one seeder in the swarm, it waited until the file was fully downloaded before streaming/playing.  And yes, Popper, it does continue to seed.  I would appreciate you looking into it.

@kukashiffr:

Just like this video which has part 2 uploaded and it is missing part 1

https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=b7c9f7a196c6947f673de9860a87bd0b41fdd81c62c951e1

With those Jimmy Z videos, often Part 1 is fully clothed posing and may have been never uploaded, as too tame or boring.

@Rudric:

Is this client banned from the site? New STREAM client called WebTorrent.

https://sourceforge.net/projects/webtorrent-desktop.mirror/

I tested it with some torrent other than on this site and it works pretty good. But I removed it I don't have time for it. I didn't dig into settings so don't know about that. Seems like that type of torrent client might not be good for maintaining ratio - only leeching. But I see it can be quite handy with non-private torrent sites - one drops .torrent onto the client and streaming begins.

I just tried it as well.  It downloads the data from beginning to end, enabling streaming.  It would seem to wrk best with a well seeded torrent.  It would also be great for those movies you just cannot wait to see.
I have no idea how it handles uploads and seeding through the client.

@MrMazda:

It would appar that with this torrent, that is exactly what happened. There appear to be a few users who jumped on straight at the seeding process. For this reason, I will throw you some SBP to help offset that.

Thank You! Greatly appreciated.  I still wonder why these other seeders were more attractive than me; perhaps they were using seedboxes.  I have a highspeed cable connection and I usually max out at 1.3MB/s upload speed. I was watching the seeding process and although I was connected to about 10 peers, I was only uploading to one at about 2K/sec.

Even to date, there are 51 seeders and I have uploaded only 800MB.

@mhorndisk:

The pols really show how Americans think, don't they???

Is Trump the President???? Yes or Yes?

Yes, but I bet he will not complete his term in ofice.

@mhorndisk:

NASA says it's a sphere, then says it's a pear, then says it's an oblate spheroid. Over one million have now come to the conclusion that it's flat. Did you not get the memo? What do you think of this new philosophy? Is the Sun actually 93 MILLION miles away? Are we really spinning at 1,000 miles per hour exactly? I've got news for days about this, so if you're tired of Trump let's discuss it. I believe the Earth is NOT a sphere. This is the new topic of the world, so let us discuss. The Earth is totally flat. Am I crazy? Maybe. But I want to know what YOU think.

Now I am convinced you are just farming seed bonus points.

A criminal like Hillary will NEVER be President Again. PERIOD. Get a damn life. SORRY! LOL.      :afr:  :crazy2:  :cheers:

People in glass houses….

Specifically I am referring to https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=aef7057686aeb35d70ac6cda5479af488351774591825505
which admittedly I grabbed from another site.  Is it logical to assume the other seeders also grabbed it from the same site and proceeded to seed it, possibly in a more attractive way than me?  I cannot imagine I created even one seeder without uploading more than the original file size.
It is somewhat frustrating to go through all the trouble of creating a new torrent and have others latch on for free.

@mhorndisk:

Podesta went to the White House in 2013 to be a special counselor to Obama. That requires that you have financial disclosures every year. In his financial disclosure form in 2013, Podesta not only failed to disclose the 75,000 shares of stock that he has in Joule Energy which is funded in part by the Russian government, he also failed to disclose that he is on one of the three corporate boards that this entity has. He discloses he is on the company in Massachusetts, that he is on the board of a company in the Netherlands, but he fails to disclose that he is also on the executive order of the holding company. That’s a clear violation of the disclosure rules.

I will grant you all that.  But it is a bit different than accepting 35 million from the Kremlin.  BTW, the Trump team has not been exactly forthcoming on their disclosures.

@mhorndisk:

http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/federal-prosecutor-found-dead/

This was in Debbie Wasserman Schultz's district in Miami. This is days after she threatened DC police that "there will be consequences," for not returning the laptop they were investigating. Perhaps a ruse to distract from Seth Rich… But nonetheless, another in the LONG list of "coincidences."

I think mhorndisk is just trying to boost his seed bonus balance with a string of ridiculous posts. Every time someone remotely connected to the DNC is killed or found dead, it is a conspiracy.

@mhorndisk:

Democratic Senator Nathaniel Oaks of Maryland ARRESTED for FEDERAL WIRE FRAUD:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/federal-charges-filed-against-maryland-state-senator-accepting-payments-exchange-official

President of the Manhattan Young Democrats ARRESTED for CHILD PORN - some of the images were of young girls as old as 6 years old in sexual positions with an adult male. His father said he was already in therapy for this.

http://therightscoop.com/top-ny-democrat-leader-arrested-for-child-porn/

DRAIN THAT SWAMP!!!

Just to be clear, the Maryland senator charged is a member of the Maryland state legislature, not the US Senate.  But I agree corruption is wrong at any level.

@mhorndisk:

This is the same garbage that happened almost a year ago when the DNC was hacked and it PROVED that Bernie was screwed over. They blamed Russia for that too. The fact is that the emails PROVED they did it, and it didn't matter WHO hacked them, Russia or Seth Rich. You guys always do this! "SO WHAT if Podesta took 35MILLION from the Kremlin?" THIS NEWS ARTICLE (NOT WRITTEN BY LAWYERS) says he didn't break the law! WOW. You are just NOT GETTING IT! ARE YOU? You DON'T CARE if the DNC took MILLIONS from RUSSIA, you will still claim that it was TRUMP who had a relationship with them. WOW. This is just SO mind-boggling how you guys are so sad. Your dreams of impeaching Trump are stupid… Seriously. It will NEVER happen. You lost the election, it's over. He will NOT be impeached. If anything, Hillary and Obama will be going to jail. Sorry, but the more and more you try to propagandize his impeachment and Russia claims with zero evidence, the more you are throwing her ass in jail. So go ahead, we are grateful that you can be that dumb. Do you not see? The more you press on with this delusional garbage, the more we win!!!

You keep saying that Podesta received 35 million from the Kremlin.  The money was invested in a coproration of which Podesta was board member and owned some shares. The legally borderline activity was transferring those shares to his daughter without declaring it. You and others simply bend the truth to suit your political agenda.