Posts made by hubrys

@raphjd You dominating this forum with your shitposts and personal attacks reminds me of a very dumb dog barking at every sound while sitting in a tiny backyard covered in his own shit.

That's you; that's how you appear to anyone who happens to stroll thru here.

If any new person did want to come in here and have an enjoyable experience, then you constantly ensure that that will never happen. Frankly, I don't know why the 3-4 people that ever come here keep interacting with you. If they would just stop, then this place could become the corpse you are trying so desperately hard to make it.

@bi4smooth Don't you understand how the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" narrative with Conservatives will go?

If the Biden Administration downplays Omicron, then it's doing it because it knows that Omicron will hurt the Dems in 2022.

If the Biden Administration plays up Omicron, then it's doing it because it knows that Omicron will hurt the GOP in 2022.

Regardless of what happens, the retards already have a working narrative to inject into their echo chambers.

@raphjd I love how Tucker Carlson's "journalistic investigation" is a guy on Twitter and a guy on YouTube just making shit up and circle jerking each other.

[https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-big-time-right-wing-trolls-andy-ngo-and-tim-pool-tied-waukesha-killings-to-black-lives-matter](link url)

From the article:

"First, Ngo insisted Brooks had shown his support for, “BLM causes, George Floyd & black nationalism,” in various old social media posts allegedly belonging to Brooks.
...
He mentioned that Brooks had shared a falsified and antisemitic Hitler quote. He’d also praised a George Floyd mural and stuck positive emojis above cartoon about racial profiling by the police. Other posts allegedly attributable to Brooks and distributed by Ngo included a soundcloud track critical of former President Trump and a photo of a fruit bowl that had been carved into a raised fist plus the letters “BLM.”

None of those posts, or others floating around online and purportedly shared by Brooks, display anything resembling participation in the Black Lives Matter movement....

But if Brooks ever attended a protest or planned political action, violent or otherwise, he didn’t bother posting about that."

More newsmen leave FOX News over the increasingly incendiary "fake news" being spewed by the network. You know it's pretty bad when the boat gets so full of shit that even the rats start jumping ship.

It's strange that ordinary Joes think that Tucker Carlson really understands them and is their advocate...you know, the Ivy League-educated heir to the Swanson fortune Tucker Carlson.

[https://www.npr.org/2021/11/21/1052837157/fox-resignations-tucker-carlson-patriot-purge-documentary](link url)

@raphjd

You sound like the assholes that want to ban The Diary of Anne Frank because she dared talk about her labia and clitoris.

[https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/17/us/florida-flagler-county-schools-all-boys-arent-blue-book/index.html](link url)

"A school board member in Florida wants someone to be criminally prosecuted for allowing a young-adult memoir for Black queer boys on school library shelves." I wish we were past this in America, but I guess we're not.

@manhandler said in Fauci put flies that laid maggots in Beagle's brains.:

Oh yea you piece of trash? So you're going to defend that? You're garbage. Pathetic excuse.

So you've chosen to make it patently clear that you're a hypocritical asshat. Okay, that's what you are now. You're all hypocritical asshattery, all the time.

Thanks for making your true colors so clear.

@manhandler said in Fauci put flies that laid maggots in Beagle's brains.:

Don't act like a lawyer for Fauci. That's EXACTLY what you're doing here. He knew EXACTLY what was going on. He's the DIRECTOR. Ok? Do you not fucking get that? He DIRECTS it.

So, your argument is that Fauci is the head of the agency, so he knows, or should know, about these atrocious acts?

You know who was also the head of the agency when these tests were performed? That's right, Trump. NIH is an Executive Branch agency, which means that Trump is the ultimate head of the organization.

I'm so glad that @ManHandler is voicing his hatred of Trump. I mean, he'd have to be against Trump on this; otherwise, it would mean he's just a huge hypocritical asshat.

@raphjd said in CDC Eviction Moratoriums are illegal says US Supreme Court:

@hubrys

Umm, did Congress expand their mandate? NO!!!

Umm, the SCOTUS case came after Trump. DUH!!! You are such a political hack that you can't see that.

Despite your stupidity, Biden's CDC went against the SCOTUS ruling. Not so with Trump.

If Trump did what Biden did, I would be against it too.

Wow, do you not understand that a court case can be heard about what the Trump Administration has done...even after Trump has left office?

When the EM under examination in AL Assoc. of Realtors v. HHS was put into place, TRUMP was the President. The President is the head of the Executive Branch. The Department of Health and Human Services is an Executive Agency. In other words, TRUMP was HHS's boss when they put into place the very broad EM discussed in the case you are now touting.

TRUMP not only did what Biden is trying to do; TRUMP instituted a much broader EM than Biden has attempted.

The whole point why the Biden Administration believes that its EM will pass SCOTUS scrutiny is because, UNLIKE TRUMP's EM, Biden's EM is limited in time (2 month expiration), limited in geographic scope (doesn't include areas where transmission rates are decreasing; whereas TRUMP's EM covered all areas, even if that area had low transmission rates or was improving).

The Biden Administration's EM is doing exactly what TRUMP's did not, limits itself to only those actions necessary and proper to carry out the CDC's pandemic control powers. TRUMP's EM got struck down because it was unlimited (which the SCOTUS explained exceeded Congressional mandate). Biden's is not unlimited.

You are so fucking stupid. All of your gripes apply to what your Fuhrer did, and you look so comical now that you've decided to be offended by them now that Biden's president. Hack....you're a hack.

[https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/06/25/fact-check-posts-whos-stance-vaccinating-children-lack-context/7778033002/](link url)

...
The page was updated June 22 to include a June 15 advisory from the WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts that concluded the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is safe for anyone age 12 or older.

WHO spokesperson Tarik Jasarevic told USA TODAY that children ages 12-15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups.

"Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers," Jasarevic said via email.

The WHO has explained that vaccine supply is scarce in certain countries, which is why the agency made this recommendation.
...

First, it should be noted that the eviction moratorium that the SCOTUS reviewed in AL Assoc. of Realtors v. HHS was put in place by the TRUMP administration, not Biden's.

Second, the Court's decision was based on STATUTORY interpretation, not CONSTITUTIONAL. Specifically, the Court was tasked with determining whether the Public Health Service Act of 1944 empowered HHS to do what it had done. There was no majority opinion in the decision (In fact, there was no decision). There was a 4/4 split, with Kavanaugh's concurrence agreeing with the conservatives ending up being the controlling law. He wrote to allow the EM to expire, and that if HHS wished to extend the EM beyond the previous expiration date, then it would require a clear authorization from Congress.

The case does NOT say that EM are unconstitutional. It found that HHS exceeded its Congressional mandate, and the only thing needed to correct the problem would be an expanded mandate from Congress.

Finally, I agree with @bi4smooth when he says that this is not settled law. Remember, this prior case did not have an actual opinion rendered on it. It was decided on the SCOTUS's so-called "Shadow Docket," a series of orders and summary decisions that don't follow the normal procedural process (e.g., no oral arguments, limited briefing, and usually no explanation of the majority's reasoning). In fact, Kavanaugh's "opinion" was only three sentences long.

It should also be noted that the EM being proposed by the Biden administration is more limited in scope, time period, and manner than the EM pushed by the Trump Administration. But, I guess political hacks like @raphjd only get upset when it's not their guy doing something.

@raphjd said in Fulton County Georgia Vote Fraud Now A Matter Of FACT:

As you post crap from WaPo.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tucker-carlson-georgia-voter-fraud/

Take your pick. Do a Google News search and you can find myriad sources debunking the OP's bullshit. I suggest you pluck your head out of Tucker Carlson's ass and investigate his claims independently. He's an organ grinder's monkey, not a newsman.

Must you come here and regurgitate everything you hear on Tucker Carlson's show?

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/15/here-is-latest-baseless-voter-fraud-allegation-brought-you-by-trump-tucker-carlson/](link url)

@raphjd said in MyPillow Guy, Mike Lindell, is Caca for Cuckoo Puffs:

Mind you, the courts actively worked against Trump by using legal technicalities rather than having the courage to actually let the cases be heard and ruling on the merits.

I'm not being insincere or sarcastic. I would genuinely like to know what "legal technicalities" you think the courts used to prevent Trump's case from being heard.

@bb99919 said in Trans Penis is not Penis. It's a fake dick.:

You've made probably around a dozen threads like this now.

Is this not a violation of the forum rules? He's started at least 15 virtually identical threads. This is very disruptive to anyone who's trying to follow other threads in this Forum.

@lololulu19 said in MyPillow Guy, Mike Lindell, is Caca for Cuckoo Puffs:

Actually, vagina breath, there is quite a future for President Trump. He may decide to run as a House Representative in 2022. If he did, he would win. If he won and the Republicans became the majority in the House - Trump would likely replace Pelosi as the Speaker of the House. Imagine watching a State of the Union Address with #senilejoe with Trump sitting behind him - rolling his eyes and shaking his head.
Then, regardless of what Trump does in 2022.. he will be re-elected president in 2024.

Actually, labia farts, if you read the original post, then you would see that I'm criticizing Mike Lindell's conspiracy theory that Trump is going to be reinstated as President THIS AUGUST. He isn't talking about running for the House in 2022. He isn't talking about running for President in 2024. Mike Lindell is pushing a whack-a-doodle theory that Trump is somehow magically going to be President of the US come August.

That is not happening. There is no lawful mechanism for that to ever happen. All of the GOP and Trumpettes that think differently are delusional.

[https://uproxx.com/viral/mike-lindell-trump-reinstatement-date/](link url)

Can we please get a pillowed cell in the looney bin for the MyPillow guy?

There is absolutely NO way absent a violent coup that Trump will ever be reinstated into the White House this August. Not even if God himself came down and exposed an infernal contract signed by every Democrat in the country in baptized baby blood, would there be a legal mechanism for removing Joe Biden and replacing him with Donald Trump.

Will conservatives please stop living in fantasy land? Even when we liberals hated Trump and wanted him gone, we still acknowledged that impeaching him would just make Pence president. No one thought Hillary Clinton would somehow magically take the White House.

And in anticipation of a certain person here (whom I'm still not convinced is a real person and not a Russian AI bot), "fraud" and the proving of such is not a cure-all that will put Trump back into the White House. There is no mechanism for a court, part of the co-equal JUDICIAL BRANCH, to strip the president of the presidency and install someone else of its choosing. That's not how Constitutional Separation of Powers and Checks-and-balances work.

@manhandler said in Hundreds of THOUSANDS in CHINA CAMPS: Muslims:

Wow the Conservatives are really BAD!!! Forget that those Chinese are holding Muslims in CAMPS, bleeding them DRY. Forget that those Chinese are FORCING them into LABOR for PROFIT. Forget all about that. We're liberal. We don't care about SLAVERY in CHINA. WE LOVE IT AND WE'LL BUY IT BECAUSE WE'RE SHIT PEOPLE.

What did you do today to stop Nestle, Hershey's, and Mars's use of child slave labor in the production of its chocolate products? I want concrete, discrete actions that you took today. Simply not buying their product is not enough. What signs did you carry in front of their corporate offices? Did you go into a convenience store and destroy the candy racks in protest?

If you did nothing to stop this child slave labor, then you're an asshole piece of trash and all of your opinions are void.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/business/hershey-nestle-mars-chocolate-child-labor-west-africa/](link url)

What did you do today to stop Nestle, Hershey's, and Mars's use of child slave labor in the production of its chocolate products? I want concrete, discrete actions that you took today. Simply not buying their product is not enough. What signs did you carry in front of their corporate offices? Did you go into a convenience store and destroy the candy racks in protest?

If you did nothing to stop this child slave labor, then you're an asshole piece of trash and all of your opinions are void.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/business/hershey-nestle-mars-chocolate-child-labor-west-africa/](link url)

As an attorney for many years, including both study and practice of Constitutional law, I can assure everyone here, with absolute certainty, that there is (1) no legal mechanism for a "redo" of the US presidential election at this point; (2) no way that Trump can be sworn into office as president without him having won the next presidential election; and (3) if you get rid of Biden, then Kamala Harris will become president.....Hell, even if you impeached both of them, then Nancy Pelosi would become president, NOT TRUMP! After Pelosi, it would be Patrick Leahy, the President Pro Temp of the Senate. I mean, you can go down the entire constitutionally and legislatively created line of succession for the Presidency and you won't hit Trump anywhere along the way.

The ONLY way Trump gets back into that office is if he runs AND wins a second election.

You can do all of the recounts, audits, throwing of chicken bones, consulting with the oracles, or beseeching of the bog witches magical visions....no amount of fraud is going to take Biden out and put Trump in. There is no legal mechanism for that AT ALL. End of story. Fin.