Posts made by hubrys

Must you come here and regurgitate everything you hear on Tucker Carlson's show?

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/15/here-is-latest-baseless-voter-fraud-allegation-brought-you-by-trump-tucker-carlson/](link url)

@raphjd said in MyPillow Guy, Mike Lindell, is Caca for Cuckoo Puffs:

Mind you, the courts actively worked against Trump by using legal technicalities rather than having the courage to actually let the cases be heard and ruling on the merits.

I'm not being insincere or sarcastic. I would genuinely like to know what "legal technicalities" you think the courts used to prevent Trump's case from being heard.

@bb99919 said in Trans Penis is not Penis. It's a fake dick.:

You've made probably around a dozen threads like this now.

Is this not a violation of the forum rules? He's started at least 15 virtually identical threads. This is very disruptive to anyone who's trying to follow other threads in this Forum.

@lololulu19 said in MyPillow Guy, Mike Lindell, is Caca for Cuckoo Puffs:

Actually, vagina breath, there is quite a future for President Trump. He may decide to run as a House Representative in 2022. If he did, he would win. If he won and the Republicans became the majority in the House - Trump would likely replace Pelosi as the Speaker of the House. Imagine watching a State of the Union Address with #senilejoe with Trump sitting behind him - rolling his eyes and shaking his head.
Then, regardless of what Trump does in 2022.. he will be re-elected president in 2024.

Actually, labia farts, if you read the original post, then you would see that I'm criticizing Mike Lindell's conspiracy theory that Trump is going to be reinstated as President THIS AUGUST. He isn't talking about running for the House in 2022. He isn't talking about running for President in 2024. Mike Lindell is pushing a whack-a-doodle theory that Trump is somehow magically going to be President of the US come August.

That is not happening. There is no lawful mechanism for that to ever happen. All of the GOP and Trumpettes that think differently are delusional.

[https://uproxx.com/viral/mike-lindell-trump-reinstatement-date/](link url)

Can we please get a pillowed cell in the looney bin for the MyPillow guy?

There is absolutely NO way absent a violent coup that Trump will ever be reinstated into the White House this August. Not even if God himself came down and exposed an infernal contract signed by every Democrat in the country in baptized baby blood, would there be a legal mechanism for removing Joe Biden and replacing him with Donald Trump.

Will conservatives please stop living in fantasy land? Even when we liberals hated Trump and wanted him gone, we still acknowledged that impeaching him would just make Pence president. No one thought Hillary Clinton would somehow magically take the White House.

And in anticipation of a certain person here (whom I'm still not convinced is a real person and not a Russian AI bot), "fraud" and the proving of such is not a cure-all that will put Trump back into the White House. There is no mechanism for a court, part of the co-equal JUDICIAL BRANCH, to strip the president of the presidency and install someone else of its choosing. That's not how Constitutional Separation of Powers and Checks-and-balances work.

@manhandler said in Hundreds of THOUSANDS in CHINA CAMPS: Muslims:

Wow the Conservatives are really BAD!!! Forget that those Chinese are holding Muslims in CAMPS, bleeding them DRY. Forget that those Chinese are FORCING them into LABOR for PROFIT. Forget all about that. We're liberal. We don't care about SLAVERY in CHINA. WE LOVE IT AND WE'LL BUY IT BECAUSE WE'RE SHIT PEOPLE.

What did you do today to stop Nestle, Hershey's, and Mars's use of child slave labor in the production of its chocolate products? I want concrete, discrete actions that you took today. Simply not buying their product is not enough. What signs did you carry in front of their corporate offices? Did you go into a convenience store and destroy the candy racks in protest?

If you did nothing to stop this child slave labor, then you're an asshole piece of trash and all of your opinions are void.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/business/hershey-nestle-mars-chocolate-child-labor-west-africa/](link url)

What did you do today to stop Nestle, Hershey's, and Mars's use of child slave labor in the production of its chocolate products? I want concrete, discrete actions that you took today. Simply not buying their product is not enough. What signs did you carry in front of their corporate offices? Did you go into a convenience store and destroy the candy racks in protest?

If you did nothing to stop this child slave labor, then you're an asshole piece of trash and all of your opinions are void.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/business/hershey-nestle-mars-chocolate-child-labor-west-africa/](link url)

As an attorney for many years, including both study and practice of Constitutional law, I can assure everyone here, with absolute certainty, that there is (1) no legal mechanism for a "redo" of the US presidential election at this point; (2) no way that Trump can be sworn into office as president without him having won the next presidential election; and (3) if you get rid of Biden, then Kamala Harris will become president.....Hell, even if you impeached both of them, then Nancy Pelosi would become president, NOT TRUMP! After Pelosi, it would be Patrick Leahy, the President Pro Temp of the Senate. I mean, you can go down the entire constitutionally and legislatively created line of succession for the Presidency and you won't hit Trump anywhere along the way.

The ONLY way Trump gets back into that office is if he runs AND wins a second election.

You can do all of the recounts, audits, throwing of chicken bones, consulting with the oracles, or beseeching of the bog witches magical visions....no amount of fraud is going to take Biden out and put Trump in. There is no legal mechanism for that AT ALL. End of story. Fin.

@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:

If you see wrong doing go on, and you do nothing about it, which you are, then you are perpetuating it, you are complicit. That's not some random Buddha quote. It's just fact. You see crime, and you see 78 fucking people being shot, and you don't care. That means you're fucking trash

What did you do today to stop Nestle, Hershey's, and Mars's use of child slave labor in the production of its chocolate products? I want concrete, discrete actions that you took today. Simply not buying their product is not enough. What signs did you carry in front of their corporate offices? Did you go into a convenience store and destroy the candy racks in protest?

If you did nothing to stop this child slave labor, then you're an asshole piece of trash and all of your opinions are void.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/business/hershey-nestle-mars-chocolate-child-labor-west-africa/](link url)

@manhandler

Are you taking crazy pills? What the fuck does Chicago crime have to do with the COVID vaccine?

Are you seriously trying to take the moral high ground by bringing up some random crime and death somewhere within the country and saying, because I'm not flagellating myself with whips and donning burlap penance cloaks, I must be wrong when I'm talking about vaccines.

Wow. Geez, that's a level of crazy I was NOT prepared to confront. I seriously hope that you're stocked up on tin foil hats and brain pills.

@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:

Lol, your statement says nothing. Why don't you have a problem with 78 people shot this weekend in Chicago? Because she's black and lesbian and that makes it A-OK. Anything a black lesbian does cannot be challenged. Because she's like God. Get a grip on yourself. You have no excuse, no answer for what the fuck is going on. 78 people shot this weekend and you have no complaints! Yea, because you're an idiot.

No, I've shown why your bullshit above in this post was just that, bullshit. You clearly don't know jack or shit about vaccines, mRNA vaccines, or the science around such things. You're like a poor Xerox copy of Tucker Carlson's television show, which itself is full of half-truths at best. Then, you don't even understand what he's presenting anyway. You're like a moronic game of telephone.

And to your non-sequitur above, I don't have an opinion of Lori Lightfoot, the mayor of Chicago (who I had to look up to even know who the fuck you were ranting about). I don't have an opinion of her because I don't live in Chicago, and I don't care or follow the goings-on in cities within which i don't live. I don't have a positive or negative opinion of her. To paraphrase Ayn Rand: What do I think about Lori Lightfoot? I don't. I don't think about her.

Are you really a bot? I can't imagine a real person is as nonsensical as you. Are you really Raphjd's sock puppet account? Did he have to create an account to hold conversations with himself and support his own posts?

@manhandler

If you mean "comprehensive" in the sense that I respond to nearly all of your asinine assertions and baseless claims and show why you don't know what you're talking about, then clearly I CAN "give a comprehensive response." And the fact that you've turned to a piss poor strawman with random CAPITALIZATIONS throughout makes me believe I've won here and you're done. Roll up the carpet, your show's over.

@manhandler

Every industry assigns a value to life when making a cost-benefit analysis if that industry's products are going to affect people's health and safety. Hell, Tylenol kills about 500 people a year and sends 50,000+ people to the hospital. It doesn't mean that we should ban Tylenol.

I don't see you railing against the auto industry, and they've been caught making the same cost-benefit analysis malfeasances you're accusing the pharmaceutical industry of, e.g., the Pinto, GM's ignition failures, Firestone tires, Toyota's sudden acceleration recall, the Ford Bronco II's tipping over problem, etc. I mean, if you're going to be crazy like you are, then you should at least be consistent. If you think you are, then we can assume you don't use automobiles at all.

Nearly every governmental agency in the US has an official value of human life that it uses to evaluate the effects of regulations. It's known as the VSL, or value of statistical life. If you're just now discovering the business and industry place values on life to make cost-benefit analyses, then I envy the sheltered and naïve bubble you grew up in.

And, I assume the Johnson and Johnson case you're referencing is the talc powder $2 billion judgment. That wasn't for "drugging" Americans. It was for not warning them that baby powder may contain asbestos particles, which can migrate up inside a woman and give her cancer.

Again, you say a lot of things, but you only seem to know or understand about 5% of the things you reference.

@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:

His name is Kary Mullis you asshole. He INVENTED the PCR test. Now here is where you stop responding because I destroy you. Kary Mullis said that his invention (the Polymerase Chain Reaction) will show that 100% of humans will test positive for EBOLA, or ANY molecule that exists on Earth. This is WHY the CDC finally admitted that over 90% of the PCR tests showing positive for Covid were FALSE. Because it's run by cycles (magnifications under a microscope by the trillions of magnifications). You simply take a sample of a cell and it shows other molecules (all of them when you magnify it high enough). It does not mean that you "HAVE" Covid, you moron. It simply is an example of the Buddhist philosophy that all is one, and all is contained within all. This is just for starters. The inventor of the PCR test, which is used by Fauci to claim all these people are positive and there is a Pandemic is bullshit. A PCR test will show that you have a molecule of Nickel, does that mean that there is a Nickel poisoning epidemic? No. You clearly don't like to actually listen to the scientists, because you obviously have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. You just don't agree with science because Orange Man Bad.

First, you don't understand what Kary Mullis was saying when he made the comments you are misconstruing. Kary Mullis was an HIV-denier, i.e., he did not believe that HIV caused AIDS. He was essentially answering the question: "If doctors are using PCR techniques and finding HIV in AIDS patients, then doesn't that mean that HIV is causing AIDS." He's answer, which you are incorrectly paraphrasing is basically, "Someone who has been promiscuous enough to get the retrovirus HIV in them (which is only within a very small subset of humans), then they have probably got a whole lot of other sexually transmitted diseased in them as well. Just because PCR can be used to replicate a lot of the HIV in the patient doesn't mean it isn't any one of the other viruses or bacteria also present in the AIDS patient. You can use PCR to replicate any DNA present in the AIDS patient."

This is the link to the YouTube video of Mullis saying what has been misconstrued: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc0Kysti6Kc](link url)

Here's the Irish press disproving manhandler's version of Mullis's quote: [https://www.thejournal.ie/kary-mullis-pcr-testing-factcheck-debunk-hse-5271830-Nov2020/](link url)

Second, you clearly don't understand how PCR works. It isn't cycles of increasingly smaller and smaller magnifications or whatever bullshit you were saying. PCR works by heating up genetic material, which causes the double-helixes to denature and separate. DNA is proteins. Heat makes proteins denature. That's why when you crack an egg (full of protein) into your frying pan, the clear fluid quickly becomes white and opaque. That's the proteins in the egg denaturing.

Then the material is cooled and chemicals are used to make the newly split two halves of the DNA (split apart by the heating step above) to couple with free nucleotides (the proteins making up DNA) in the solution. So, basically, you started with one strand of DNA. Split it apart so that it reformed into two identical DNA helixes. Then you heat it up again, which splits those two helixes apart. Cool down and now you have 4 helixes of DNA. Heat again, cool again....now you have 8 helixes of DNAs. Eventually, you will have enough DNA that the pile of it becomes observable to the lab technician (you see, DNA is VERY tiny, and most labs don't have electron microscopes to see things that small.)

Basically, assume you want to see what color a single piece of hay is in the field across the street from you. The single strand of hay is too small laying somewhere out in that field for you to see. But imagine if you could make that strand of hay duplicate itself over and over again until it was the size of a bale of hay. Then you can see it from your window. That's PCR.

Finally, in regard to your reliance upon statements of the "inventor of mRNA," you must be talking about Dr. R.W. Malone, the disputed discoverer of nanoparticals could transfect mRNA into cells. I find it funny that you anti-vax people will rail against "Big Pharma" and castigate its science because it is profit-driven, yet you readily hitch your wagon to Malone, who with his partner, run several research and pharmaceutical manufacturing ventures trying to sell generic drugs as treatments for COVID. Chiefly, they're trying to push Ivermectin (a ringworm medicine used mostly in horses) and Famotidine (a histamine-2 in Pepcid products) as COVID cures.....read: hydroxychloroquine: the sequel.

The TL:DR of it all: Manhandler is full of shit and doesn't know what he's talking about.

So, you guys are full-on anti-vax retarded, then?

I looked up the actual case cited by the linked article, Green v. Alachua Cty., 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 8634, on LexisNexis.

First, the original thread headline is misleading. The court did not find that mask mandates are unconstitutional based on the United States' Constitution. It was analyzing the law under Florida's Constitution, which has a very broad "Right of Privacy" provision, Fla. Const. Art. I, Section 23.

Second, the case doesn't actual create the state of the law that the article assumes. The case was heard by a three panel appellate court. It had two justices agreeing to the result, but with different reasonings, and one dissenting justice. Of the two justices agreeing upon results, each agreed to the other's opinion as a concurrence. This means that the "opinion" of the court will (by the rules of stare decisis) mean the case will be interpreted based on whichever concurring opinion has the least effect on the already established law. Meaning, the crazy ass judge that wrote the portions quoted in the original article isn't going to be the opinion followed by the lower courts.

Interestingly, if we are to accept the crazy judge's legal theory, then he would see all public decency laws struck down as violative of Florida's Constitution. Forcing people to wear clothing in public would violate his interpretation of Article I of Florida's Constitution. I fully expect that this case will either be appealed en banc (making all of the justices on the appellate court hear the case again, not just the three justice panel) or will go up to a higher court since it has already been certified up since it conflicts with other Florida appellate districts' interpretation of the law.

I know that's a boring rundown, and most won't read it, so if you take nothing away, take away this: you anti-mask loonies still haven't scored a win here.

@raphjd

This case was not decided under the 2nd Amendment. Guns were only incidentally involved in the facts of the case.

The legal issue in the case was the 4th Amendment's search and seizure clause. Both the liberal justices and the conservative justices are generally against warrantless searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment, hence the 9-0 decision.

I love when conservatives bitch about the debt, citing Medicare, but then conveniently forget that it was their boy, George W. Bush, that created the last, large entitlement program, Medicare Part D.

@raphjd

Can you imagine how stupid a President would have to be, with our soaring debt, to propose a $2 trillion infrastructure bill.....oops...

[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-31/trump-calls-for-2-trillion-infrastructure-bill-to-create-jobs](link url)

@raphjd

"What the new recording does not do is present a substantively different picture of what Trump was up to on that call than the Post’s original story. Trump, though, is savvy about the fact that most people will only vaguely remember the details, will mix the Raffensperger and Watson calls up, and will see reports of a correction regarding Trump’s Georgia phone call. Those sympathetic to Trump or skeptical of the media will wonder if he got a bad rap regarding that larger story. He did not."

https://www.vox.com/2021/3/16/22333805/washington-post-correction-trump-georgia