@andergarcia

Porn is entertainment
Sex is entertainment

Porn is FANTASY
Sex is real-life

People who cannot tell the difference are a danger to themselves and others...

OK, so lets get down to "brass tacks" here:

• Regardless of whether they are legally valid in a court (and that would likely be different depending on which court it was heard in), the Site Owner has told content owners that he will take down posts here that infringe on their ownership rights.
• The Site Owner wants to avoid running afoul of the law - especially the idea that this site exists primarily to facilitate illegal sharing. As a precaution, the Site Owner has given content owners wide leeway, and has prohibited the discussion of avoiding, invaliding, or otherwise getting around the protections that he (the Site Owner) believes exist under the DMCA
• the opinion of the site owner is the only opinion that matters here - and it is his opinion that this topic is not allowed on his system

Please understand that:

• this is not your site - you are but a guest here
• your continued pursuit of this topic may well get your account suspended - you have been directed to the warnings already
• you are free to start your own site if you disagree (this isn't the Politics section, but much as Trump has done with Trump Social after being banned by Facebook & Twitter), but you have no "rights" here - we area all just guests on someone else's site!

@raphjd
You assume I'm a Democrat.
You are again a finalist in the "Miss Taken" pageant! We'll try to get you another sash, but we're running low.

I'm a conservative, I'm just not a conspiracy-confused one.
I believe in science: facts don't lie, but people who interpret them often do.
I believe in Democracy (even when i lose).
I believe in the general goodness of the average person.
I believe that Joe Biden won the recent election fair and square.

I do not believe that nationalism works in anyone's best interests.
I do not believe in racism - especially as a political tool.
I do not believe in absolutes.
I do not believe in secret cabals of child molesting politicians, threatening our children - primarily because they belong to the other party.

I personally know very fine politicians of both political parties here in the US. Honorable men and women who do not agree (not with me, and certainly not with each other), and yet, remain friends.

To my misguided (sometimes mis-labeled) Conservative friends who believe whole-heartedly that Donald Trump is their savior, I say this: Repent of your sins now, before your God judges you!

I also offer this: count the letters - compromise is not a 4-letter word!

@nhuixnhuix

Excellent question.

MY PERSONAL definition of a twink is a lithe (skinny), smooth body, likely a little smaller than average, and often moderately to more effeminate.

MY PERSONAL definition doesn't include age...

I LOVE TWINKS OF ALL AGES!

@raphjd said in Scotland officially bans free speech:

@homppeliboy

Is that all there is to your argument?

BTW, did you join the site just so you could post that crap? I mean, you post that 2 minutes after you joined the site.

EDIT: You have been a member for many years, but you just made your first ever post.

LOL - what can you say, @raphjd , your bombastic "every match lit is a raging forest-fire" style of commentary just motivates people to join in!

Welcome to the forums @homppeliboy - PLEASE continue to post your thoughts (and reactions)... whether you agree with @raphjd on something or not!

@raphjd said in The truth about liberal media:

You get no argument from me that unwarranted attacks on Asian Americans are being under-reported... by ALL media in the US, liberal and conservative... but, uh, who are these people attacking Asians - accusing them of purposefully spreading (or creating) COVID-19?

In a word: Trumpites - admittedly not mainstream Trumpite Politicians, but idiots who hear "kung flu" from "He who Must Be Named" and think that all Asians are culpable for COVID-19...

Your topic heading is about LIBERAL media - and in this instance, conservative media is just as guilty

Y'all are morons - of the highest (or lowest) caliber!

Trudeau may be a Liberal, and he may want to FORCE people to protect themselves and others against COVID (thankfully, the need for that seems to be abating ... for now), but he's nothing like Putin and Russia.

And for you to want to compare the two is hilariously idiotic.

That you would stoop so low, just because he's a political rival - in a free and fair, democratic (small d) society is a clear indication of where your education stopped... 3rd Grade, maybe?

@raphjd said in Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism:

@bi4smooth said in Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism:

Y'all are morons - of the highest (or lowest) caliber!

Trudeau may be a Liberal, and he may want to FORCE people to protect themselves and others against COVID (thankfully, the need for that seems to be abating ... for now), but he's nothing like Putin and Russia.

And for you to want to compare the two is hilariously idiotic.

That you would stoop so low, just because he's a political rival - in a free and fair, democratic (small d) society is a clear indication of where your education stopped... 3rd Grade, maybe?

Once again, you are name-calling to defend liberal authoritarianism.

No - I am not excusing Trudeau's overreach - I've called it out here before.

But was his overreach worse than Trump's (albeit in other areas) or Biden's (in the SAME area)??? NO!

The point wasn't whether Trudeau overstepped his authority in Canadian law and society - it's that he's not comparable to Putin and what he's doing now!

In very many (scarily many) ways, Putin's behavior here mirror's Hitlers when he invaded Poland, and just before he invaded Norway and Belgium. (Esp in the excuses he's giving for doing so...)

As a free world, we can stand up against this kind of thing - and sacrifice lives now - or, we can cater and cowtow to them and lose everything later. The choice is up to our leaders.

In 50 years, will Putin be the "Great Father" or the "Reviled Dictator"? Personally, I'd rather it be "forgotten footnote", but that'd require a very VERY skilled sniper!

Just to add my 2-cents worth - I had this happen to me once, and it turned out that the older torrent, by the time it was looked at, was essentially dead: no seeders and no leechers. So they deleted the ORIGINAL, which made my duplicate report "invalid" (according to the explanation I was given).

@lololulu19 said in Main torrent image being replaced by other users on uploads:

@ricky Having uploaded 76,000,000,000,000 (76 TB) of stuff, I'm not worried about 1 seedpoint. It is frustrating to see the images I uploaded get shoved to the back.

If it is your upload, you can edit the torrent listing and remove the offending pics.. that said, if they are legit pics of your upload, you should be judicious in doing so... but you can ALSO then re-upload the "main" pic you want seen.

@chuckBKK said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

@bi4smooth The offender and the content are connected, which is why I do not treat the continued circulation of his work as some neutral matter.

Whether he personally profits from downloads on this site is beside the point for me. The platform still chooses to host and distribute the material, and users are entitled to object to that on ethical grounds.

Let's differentiate here - you can find the content objectionable - AND you can say so in this forum - AND people can agree or disagree with what YOU find objectionable...

But let's not lose sight of the fact that virtually ALL of the content (gay sex) on this site is "morally objectionable" to a significant portion of society - larger in some areas, smaller in others, but significant in ALL areas!

Suggesting that his material be banned is one thing.
Insisting upon it is another.

Hey there! I wanted to say THANKS for pointing out this studio! They went down for a while, but I'm glad to see they're back!

This isn't a studio I'll download and keep ALL of their content (like Corbin Fisher LOL), but I'm definitely going to see if I can find these on other sites!

If I find some, I'll post here - and I might try uploading just to test the "DMCA" suspicions here... (another reason there might not be any of their content is that there just aren't any uploaders who subscribe! There's a TON of porn from sites I never see here on my HD!

Thanks again!

@chuckBKK said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

@bi4smooth said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

Corollary: When a priest is convicted of molesting an alter-boy, is the entire congregation supposed to drop the Catholic Faith in response? Were his sermons LESS valuable because of his crimes? If you're Catholic, were his absolutions in the confessional rescinded because he sinned? If so, were they rescinded when he committed his crimes, or only after his conviction?

While I agree with part of what you are saying, I do not think the priest example is equivalent.

It would be a leap to demand that an entire congregation abandon its faith because of one man’s crimes. The individual offender, however, must be held accountable and lose the position, access, and authority that made harm possible in the first place.

In your example, the priest should be defrocked, should never again be placed in a pastoral role, and should not be put in proximity to minors or other vulnerable young people. That is the relevant parallel for me. The consequences should remain with the offender instead of being imposed on every believer around him.

I think you've actually reinforced my point. It IS (IMHO) ridiculous to say that his parishioners deserve any punishment (including invalidating any of his works not associated with his crimes) - that was exactly my point! (I'm sorry my sarcasm wasn't more obvious LOL).

But shouldn't the same be true of Austin Wolf's legal content? To my mind, his legal works should not be removed solely because of his extracurricular crimes... heinous as they may be. (And lets not kid ourselves: Austin Wolf is NOT profiting from having his videos downloaded on this site! LOL)

@chuckBKK said in Gay adult actor Seth Peterson dies at age 28:

That is a really sad trend, and devastating for the families. A quick search mentions a staggering number.

Estimated Count: Industry blogs like Str8UpGayPorn have memorialized roughly 15 to 20 high-profile gay performers who have passed since 2021.

From Helix alone:
Lane Rogers (Blake Mitchell), 31 Dec 2025 - Casey Tanner, 28 April 2023 - Kyle Ross, 29 April 2023, Alex Riley, 22 May 2021 - Jasper Robinson, 21 Dec 2015 - Zac Stevens, 25 Nov 2015.

May they all rest in peace.

An earlier post gave some general explanation for the state of affairs in the porn industry as a whole - but it isn't just the Helix "McMansion" setup that creates the mental illness many of these boys suffer from: as a culture, the LGBTQ community idolizes youth - something ALL of us lose eventually! They think, like many of us, about TODAY, and not TOMORROW - when they'll no longer be able to earn a living selling body images. Then, they're totally unprepared when their fans move on to a newer, younger model (literally!).

In the case of Helix, many of their formers performers continue to perform in porn with other studios, some find a "sugar daddy" to support them (though, in my experience, those don't last so long either), and others turn to simple prostitution.. (I'm not suggesting these are the only options for former porn actors, only that they're common paths). Still, FEW "take the money and run" - that is to say, amass the money in their youth, and then let it work for them later in life (like when they're 25! LOL)

IMHO, this really isn't any different from pro-sports athletes - many of whom amass great wealth early on in their careers, then leave the sport - either due to injury or simply age - and within a few short years they're totally broke!

We don't have any details on Seth's death yet... if it is drug-related, we probably will never hear anything but rumours... and that's OK - families have more of a right to privacy than we have a right to know! But while he worked for Helix in the past, he was one of those who had moved on to working with other studios (Naked Sword, Next Door, Men, and others).

I, for one, usually liked his content - I love vers boys! - but was lately a little stand-offish - I followed (on X) an ex-lover of his, who also worked at Helix for a while, and who described him, after their breakup, as being physically abusive (including pictures). I hope and pray that there wasn't a violent end to his life...

@justatest90-0 said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

@ianfontinell-0 said in Austin Wolf discussion not allowed?:

This is the best place (only place tbh) to discuss that....instead of just waiting to remove off-topic comments the moderation could use the comment section to make a brief statement,

Or people can have the discussion in the only appropriate place for the discussion. Some comments make sense: "RIP Blake Mitchell" makes sense on content he's in for hopefully obvious reasons.

It's even feasible to make commentary on performers. I think a comment here is what alerted me to Johnny Rapid's behavior. But it was just a comment about the performer, and personally I think that's helpful information for deciding whether I want to download the file.

But a debate about whether such content should be allowed obviously doesn't belong on the content page itself.

Just weighing in here - remember though: my thoughts are worth only what you paid for them!

First off, THIS is the "forum" for discussion - comments sections of torrents is NOT a valid place to have a discussion.

IMHO, posting something like "RIP Blake Mitchell" on one (or all) of his vids is not the same as requesting that content should be removed. It imparts reasonable knowledge about one of the stars.

Along those lines, if you wanted to post in Austin Wolf torrents that he is now a convicted sex offender, I'm OK with that! (remember, that's MY opinion, not the site's!) Its when you go that next step and say "... AND this should be banned" that I object. The first part is informing about the video and its stars... the other is an attempt to censor content... and likely, those comments (requesting removal) should be removed. But not because they may or may not be valid, but rather that a torrent's comment section isn't the place for that!

Corollary: When a priest is convicted of molesting an alter-boy, is the entire congregation supposed to drop the Catholic Faith in response? Were his sermons LESS valuable because of his crimes? If you're Catholic, were his absolutions in the confessional rescinded because he sinned? If so, were they rescinded when he committed his crimes, or only after his conviction?

Another case to consider: Brent Corrigan admitted to doing porn under-age (the level of involvement in all parties in that debacle is a debate for another time), yet he remained in the business - albeit as an adult - afterwards. IMHO, it is valid that we ban his illegal content: that is, videos that include Brent while he was under-age. But do we also ban all of his other content?

I despise SCAT porn, and generally am not a fan of FTM tranny porn. Some S&M porn gets REALLY violent - possibly illegally so, should the performer/victim want to press charges (in spite of forms signed prior to taping). Should any of these be banned? It's a slippery slope! What's more, who becomes the decider? (I'm assuming George W Bush isn't willing to perform that role!)

IMHO: when the content itself is illegal, it should be banned. If the content legal, but objectionable to some users - but is otherwise within the rules of the site, it should stay - so long as there are people seeding and downloading it, it apparently belongs here.

Again, these are my opinions - as a user here for approaching 20 years now - and if you object to them, I'll give you a 100% refund!

I absolutely HATE my local ISP... my feeds are slow, and when they detect torrent traffic, they block it.

So, I pay $5/mo for a Linux server in the cloud. I install qBitTorrent on it, and away we go!

The server only comes with 20GB of storage - so I have to download the contents every so often & "refresh it" - but the feed & speed levels (esp for seeding you greedy fuckers! ) is amazing. (I'm sometimes seeding over 10 people, each one at over 10 MB/s) I have a "friend" on here who also uses a cloud server - but he's not Linux-literate, so he got a Windows server (minimal configs) for $10/mo... he also uses qBitTorrent.

I don't get to seed my huge collections - but I do get to help seed some very popular postings at very fact speeds!

On my home end, I have a HUGE NAS server I store my porn on - I don't know why I let it get so big! Honestly, I think if I started watching today - and DIDN'T jerk off (or at least didn't stop watching after I got off) - I could watch porn non-stop until the end of my life! And then some!

On the plus side, I also torrent new movies on that server - and I've NEVER ONCE received a DMCA notice from my provider!

There is a collection of Tristan K vids from RHSB here:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=2126cfb52a8e1bb1adcd15dca940e84db01a2d855b2bb874&hit=1

I wasn't able to find any from SSB, but I didn't look THAT hard...

So, technically an Ephebophile, not so much a Pedophile...
Just as illegal, and ESP as he knew the victim from a place of authority, nearly as bad.
Not that sexually enticing post-pubescent children is OK - it is not - but there are degrees of evil...

But people, you have to be able, as an adult, to separate thought and desire from action!

When I was 19, I spent the summer (home from college) working as a lifeguard at a community pool. There was a girl who kept coming on to me - she was cute & sexy and I'd DEFINITELY have "done that". In fact, we were all set to go out on a Sat after work... UNTIL a co-worker clued me in that, while she looked 17 or 18, she was in-fact, only 14! (For clarity: I'm pansexual)

That didn't make her less attractive - or less sexually enticing - but it DID mean there was NO WAY I would have acted upon that!
In the end, I wound up hooking up with the only other MALE lifeguard who worked at that pool!

Ummm... it shocks you that ANTIFA... that is, quite literally, "Anti-Fascist"... is protesting against armed government agents detaining people - sometimes citizens - without warrants, without criminal complaints, without criminal histories...

Next thing you'll be surprised that 100% of the people attending Sunrise Service on Easter Morning are Christian!

Pretty sure this scumbag wasn't anti-Charlie Kirk because of his otherwise "liberal" views...
But honestly, 5 years isn't nearly long enough... and perps of this kind statistically have a HIGH recidivism rate!

Having raised 9 children, I am particularly "sensitive" to these kinds of crimes - and I'm often torn by the decisions the legal community makes about these offenders...

I've said in other threads recently - the problem here is that we, as a society, have "given up" on the idea of mental health. There is absolutely NO infrastructure in place (other than prisons) to treat these mentally ill people.

ALL other 1st-world countries have mental health facilities - and sick fucks like this one can be sentenced - LONG TERM - to a mental health facility and treated and monitored... for the rest of their lives!

What I know for certain, is that what we're doing now - to both prevent and punish - isn't working!