Are liberals trolls or liars or idiots
-
https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/56240/waukesha-christmas-parade-suv-attack?page=1
Go to that thread and read the discussion I had with our resident fake conservative.
You can just focus on the Kylke Rittenhouse bit.
Notice that @bi4smooth repeatedly claims that Kyle Rittenhouse killed 3 black men in Illinois. There is not a single piece of evidence, other than some liberal media bullshit.
Kyle killed 2 white men and shot a 3rd.
This happened in Wisconsin
These are basic facts of the case, that everyone should know.
Keep this in mind when liberals claim they know the truth and anyone dare who disagrees with them is an idiot.
-
All THREE
I have a personal comment to add.. my oldest brother has always been a total asshole.. and not in a good way.
Whatever is factual and sensible and true.. he OPPOSES! He gets off thinking that he knows better than what is correct, and stands on his head trying to prove it. He is the kind of person who would insist that 2+2 = 17
There are a lot of people like that.. in fact, perhaps MOST people are like that to a degree.
The way I approach things is that I don't automatically oppose things the way my brother does, but I don't ACCEPT what other people think either. For instance, there is a criminal case, in which a person has been falsely convicted. It is way too complicated to discuss here. But, the way I have approached this case for the past 9.5 years is to CONSIDER that everything being said is TRUE! And examined it. In EVERY CASE, once I examined things further, it turned out that what was said was misinterpreted, wrong, missing facts, or blatant lies. BUT.. even then.. as the years have gone by, everytime I find something old or new about that case, I consider it to be true.. but don't accept it without examining it further. This has happened so many times that when I find new things, I don't get upset - I am confident that after closer examination, it will turn out to be false. Here is an example of what I mean. There is something about that case, which MUST be true for the person to be guilty. Something very significant happened that would have been captured on at least a dozen, if not hundreds of surveillance cameras. BUT.. I have offered $5000 to anybody who can produce even one image of what those cameras must have captured. This event was spread out between an apartment building, busy streets, a subway system, traffic cameras, cameras on many stores exteriors, an indoor mall, and a store which the supposed criminal entered which had 21 surveillance cameras! Certainly the staff of the stores, the police, an attorney, an eyewitness, a staff member of the apartment building, SOMEBODY would have come forth with at least one image or even eye-witness account. Only ONE person did! But that is even more mysterious. A person who lived in the apartment building claimed to see this event, before anybody else knew it even occurred. How is it possible that this person saw this, yet 4 surveillance cameras which MUST be passed to get in or out of the building failed to capture this? That person who was the shady eye witness - vanished over 9 years ago, and has not been seen nor heard of since. That person is the actual killer! The phrase "he who smelt it, dealt it" applies.
-
@raphjd You dominating this forum with your shitposts and personal attacks reminds me of a very dumb dog barking at every sound while sitting in a tiny backyard covered in his own shit.
That's you; that's how you appear to anyone who happens to stroll thru here.
If any new person did want to come in here and have an enjoyable experience, then you constantly ensure that that will never happen. Frankly, I don't know why the 3-4 people that ever come here keep interacting with you. If they would just stop, then this place could become the corpse you are trying so desperately hard to make it.
-
Ok dearie, if you say so.
It is an absolute lie that Kylke Rittenhouse killed 3 black men in Illinois. But I guess liberals are of the AOC mindset of "you don't have to be factually correct, just morally correct".
BTW, you are the person I referred to in another post who called me an "asshole" for not wanting gay porn in elementary school libraries. You and your girlfriends lied and said it was only in high school, which is still illegal. A simple internet search would have proved that it was in elementary, junior high, and high schools. But facts don't matter to liberals. You would have also known it was pornographic if you bothered to watch the elementary school board meeting where the mother read from the book and what threatened with arrest for "obscene language" simply for ready from the book.
I didn't call you any names, I just disagreed with you and that was your response to me. YOU, little missy, made that thread hostile, not me.
Also, I constantly get PMs from people that agree with me but refuse to post because of people like you.
-
In another thread, @bi4smooth is trying to justify spreading lies about Kyle because he was only talking about whether Kyle committed murder or self-defense.
He doesn't think he did anything wrong by spreading lies, aka gaslighting.
He also tried to create conflict over a stupid-ass word game, as seen in the other thread.
Kyle Rittenhouse, never ever, killed 3 black men in Illinois. He never ever killed even 1 black person, anywhere.
Once again, liberals are using their mantra of the facts don't matter, only the narrative matters.
Ms Feng Feng, loves to tell me how stupid I am on virtually every topic, but he can't (or won't) get the facts right in a global news story where the facts are crystal clear.
-
For the record:
@bi4smooth (me) happily admits to being @raphjd's nemesis!
Also, I admit to being wrong from time to time. Unlike @raphjd, and his hero, The Great Orange One (He's from Florida now! How ironic, and appropriate! - and notice I capitalized "He"), I don't believe that admitting my mistakes and errors diminishes me in any way. In fact, I believe that "He who must be named" makes a mockery of himself by refusing to admit his own errors.
BUT - I also don't fall for the trap that, just because I get an ancillary fact wrong, that doesn't make the rest of the argument any more or less valid! (in the case of Rittenhouse, you were arguing that he didn't KILL people because the jury said it was justified. I argued that he most certainly DID KILL people, but that the jury found that it was not MURDER. Since that time, and I'm guessing until about 2033, you've referred back to that thread arguing that the whole thing was about the race of the victims... Yeah - right - whatever you have to tell yourself in the mirror, dude!
-
Clearly, you are talking about Biden.
LOL, you are really a piece of shit.
Like in so many cases, you talk out of your ass, claiming I have no clue about what I'm talking about.
You are making excuses for your blatant lies.
You lied, just admit it.
If it was not a lie, then you are a clueless twat who just spouts what liberal media tells you.
