Best posts made by frostycab

I use the report button when I see some of these. Yes, it's a pic, but it's an utterly worthless pic, so doesn't comply with the site rules.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

Turns out.. I was right!

Based on previous offerings I'd say this is unlikely, but I'll play along. Statistically it's got to happen eventually...

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

https://amburnlaw.com/does-copyright-protect-pornography/

...but not today, it seems.

Congratulations on citing an article in the belief that it 100% supports your argument, but not bothering to even read the whole paragraph your provided. You waste your time looking for a law firm website to back you up, and then don't even read it properly. "...it remains an open question whether copyright protection extends to pornographic movies deemed obscene by the trier of fact."

Of course, as usual you've done exactly what the damn Freedom Fairies always do and forget that there is a whole wide world out there beyond the county line. Please check this link to see why everyone rolls their eyes every time you come within a mile of this subject.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

@john32123666 in some countries, they execute homosexuals.

Once again, this isn't just a simple red herring, nor is it even a school of herring. It's akin to Jesus and the feeding of the 5 thousand with the number of herring you bring to the table.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

In some countries, they have a senile, bribe taking, influence peddling, document stealing, ice cream licking, hair sniffing pedophile with dementia as president.

The site already has a P&D cesspool where your type of humour seems appreciated. I know you try and throw these lines in ever so often to try and appeal to your like-minded countrymen, but do you really think it does anything to make you seem more credible to anyone else? Try and keep it there and stay on the <<<FUCKING TOPIC>>> for once in your bloody life.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

I suggest that anybody who believes that DMCA applies to gay porn, should LEAVE this site, because that is what this site is!

Not going anywhere, sorry. Feel free to leave yourself if you like though. Just write to these guys and I'm sure they'll help. Do you want a hand with packing?

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

There should be a CHECKBOX when joining this site that says:
"DO YOU BELIEVE THAT SHARING TORRENTS OF GAY PORN IS ILLEGAL?" and if the person checks YES, then their membership should be denied and they should redirected to the Disney Channel - where they will sue your ass in a second if you ever share any of THEIR content.

Are you ever going to accept that whatever law you think supports not just this but any argument is not universal? You keep doing this, finding one lawyer who weakly backs up your assertions, forgetting that the law they might refer to doesn't apply anywhere else. It cannot be applied globally. Quoting something from a law firm in Detroit does not mean that anyone in the UK, Egypt, China, India or anywhere else gives a damn about it because it doesn't matter to any of them. That firm could probably come out with truckloads of laws that don't even apply outside of Michigan, let alone the rest of the US, but you still 100% believe that you've won your case.

The issue of obscenity is the other problem. You haven't defined it. If you've tried in the past then it almost certainly didn't pass the same test I just brought up. I think you have a basic misunderstanding of the difference between "the law" and beliefs and values.

I have a question. Have you ever downloaded pirated films, music, books, software or anything else? Please don't try to be clever and lie because nobody will believe you. Do you not think your statement above should apply to those sources too? After all, you're not going try and argue that those things aren't covered by DMCA, are you?

I would like to finish by saying that in the case of this post I'm strangely proud of you. Unlike many of your more controversial posts you have at least returned to try to engage with responses rather than simply stride into the room and leave a steaming turd on the floor before walking out and watching from the window while everyone loudly complains about how much it stinks. So yeah, points for that.

@pupkinvasya said in Need help ID-ing this guy:

This is Randall

In my head I heard Gerard Butler in "300" when I read that.

I think @john32123666 is probably right. Some of the new scenes from various studio include limited hard-coded subs, but they don't add much. In all honesty I suspect it would involve much less time and effort to just learn the language than it would to find subs for most of them.

@raphjd Thanks for the input. I think what I'm really asking here is whether or not the specific type of thing I described is worth reporting en-masse. Like I said, I don't want to deprive users of content, but it does seem to have become a free-for-all where people can upload any number of random videos in a blatant attempt to get upload credit. Similarly, I don't want to become the guy who fills the report inbox to the point where the mods all think "Oh no, another petty report from that tit!" It's just that whenever I've taken a punt on downloads like these there is absolutely nothing to tie any of them together.

@lololulu19 I'm not about to waste my time humoring your need for attention by scouring the web until I find something that will satisfy you. Not my job.

The simple fact is that you can't get your head around the issue. According to you copyright isn't an issue at all, yet you can't stop banging on about it. I'm pretty sure you said in the past that you've had content removed for DMCA, so this all sounds like bitterness. Just get the fuck over it and move on with your damn life.

What exactly are you hoping to achieve with all the posts on this topic? Do you expect the site owners to say "Oh, well Lollicopters said we're ok, so I guess we can ignore everything else." I've got a better idea. They should just respond to all DMCA takedown notices by providing your contact details and let you deal with it. Job done, and it might give the rest of us a bit of peace and quiet!

@pupkinvasya PUPPY PRODUCTIONS!!! Well done!

Part rant, part seeking advice form the mods on this one.

The sheer number of "collections" that aren't really collections is just getting out of hand IMO. Just now I looked at the torrent list and the most recent upload is this pile of unknown random crap (which may be good but I'm not even going to bother checking to find out!):

https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=1fb45ea17345bc6b31aab4170a5875fb105ec8d0a0cfce8b&hit=1

Now please don't get me wrong here. Not really being an uploader myself I do appreciate it when people upload to the site, but there are so many dumps of completely random files with no meaningful titles or descriptions that I've become really hesitant about grabbing a lot of them. In the above torrent for example, it is described as nothing more than "Personal selection gay video's" which tells us nothing, and even the 5 pics don't help much.

The site rules state "A COLLECTION is a group of files that have a well-defined common theme." This rule seems to be routinely disregarded. You don't have to look for long to find things like "Selection of bareback videos" or "Stuff from my hard drive." Where is the theme to these? "Bareback" is not a theme, it's a category. "Chaturbate vids from July 23" is not a theme. "UK/US Twinks" is not a theme. Some of these uploads can be enormous and have hundreds of files in them.

To my mind, a theme is something specific and defining. A collection should be things such as a bunch of vids from a studio, or featuring a specific performer or sex on a boat or SOMETHING that can tie them together.

I'm interested in what other members opinions are, and what standpoint the mods would take if I (and everyone else) started reporting them all (because there are a hell of a lot of them!) Are you all happy to put up with them, or should we all be hitting the report button multiple times every day? I have no interest in restricting the amount of stuff added to the site, but I can't help but feel it's about time that we all stop accepting the poor-quality, non-curated mountains of spam that we have to sift through to find the gems. This site, like any other, is only ever going to be as good as what's put on it, and I can't help feeling that we've all just accepted the crap for too long, allowing it to become prolific.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

@frostycab You have never "wasted your time scouring the internet" for the nonsense that does not exist.. Yet you never fail to state that the internet is flooded with examples of gay porn copyright violations which have gone to trial and there was a conviction.

Maybe because people have had enough common sense to settle before their case ever sees the inside of a courtroom? Of course, if you are so convinced that your position is right then go forth and enjoy yourself safe in the knowledge that if you believe it then it must be true.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

There have been a mountain of COMPLAINTS of STRAGHT porn videos that are alledged to have violated copyrights. Almost all these complaints were made by the obscure straight porn studio "Strike 3 Holdings". Not one of their complaints ever made it to trial.

I don't know how you think this comment helps your case. You've always made a big thing of "gay" porn specifically not being able to be copyrighted to to being definitively "obscene." Now you're saying that even though a straight studio has brought cases against people those too have never made it to court. Once again, do you not think that they probably just settled rather than go through the whole waste of time and money involved in a court battle?

Interestingly, here is a quote form the law site you linked to, though in the interest of full disclosure for all the members like me who are NOT IN AMERICA AND NOT SUBJECT TO US LAW this article only consider the US legal system. I've highlighted the most relevant portions:

"Congress did not make clear if it intended to extend protection to every kind of work. Copyright law does not identify specific content that is ineligible for copyright protection. As a result, copyright law protects pornography because content-based restrictions on copyright eligibility could abridge the freedom of speech of the First Amendment. That said, obscene works do not receive First Amendment protection. In Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), the United States Supreme Court found that the First Amendment’s freedom of speech does not apply to obscenity. Specifically, under Miller, obscenity is found when the average person, using contemporary community standards, would find that a work appeals to the prurient interests, depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Thus, the First Amendment protects pornography – if it is not obscene.

This brings us back to the question of what is obscenity. Applying the above test, does the average person find depictions of gay sex offensive? Blah blah blah... There are a lot of conditions in that definition of obscenity, and they'd all need to be shown to apply for any specific piece of gay porn to be considered obscene. Now consider that all of this only applies in the US, and every other country has it's own laws and definitions.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

And again.. if someone thinks that this site is breaking the law (it is not), then that person needs to disable their account and leave.

Honestly, do you ever actually take a minute to read anything you write before you press the submit button? The site isn't breaking the law because it complies with DMCA. If it was to ignore DMCA entirely then you might just get your wish and have the whole thing put to the test in a court of law somewhere, but thankfully the powers that be aren't dimwitted buffoons who are going put the whole site at risk to satisfy your need to feel validated.

Here's an idea, why don't you go and take this up with Joker and see if you can convince him. After all, you could be preaching to the choir on the forums but that isn't going to change anything. I'm sure he will welcome the opportunity to partake of your informed and inarguable wisdom. He's not an easy person to reach though. What you need to do is contact helpdesk with this code-phrase: "Please delete my account." and they'll put you in touch. It's not a trick, I swear!

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

@john32123666
Seems to me that there is a rule on this site about impersonating a moderator.. which you have repeatedly violated... just saying.

To put the record straight, not once has he ever claimed to be a mod. If you think someone has to be a mod to tell you to stop waffling on constantly then you're wrong. Just saying.

@zagor Sorry, I don't know, but does this really need 2 posts?

@TopMachoBear-0 If other forum users are anything like me then they simply click on the "Unread" button at the top of the page to see anything new that's been added, so chances are they'd see your post regardless of where you put it. Best just to pick the most suitable forum and post in that.

There's no such thing as bad publicity...

@eobox91103 Yup, this one has gone waaaay over my head LOL

@lololulu19 Joey Mills and DeAngelo Jackson - Dick From Above
Part of this collection:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=6ddb57ddc9b7345e31aab4170a5875fbc822b7b2743bbdec&hit=1

I could wear out my keyboard naming studios or producers I don't like, but I think mainly down to the genres they represent as opposed to anything else. Men@Play, Titan Men, Missionaryboys..... each have their own main selling point, and if you don't connect with that then you're never going to like their output.

I will concede that some studios just fall flat despite perhaps ticking all the right boxes on paper. Helix, for example, used to be one of my "go to" studios back in its heyday, but over the last couple of years they've stopped making entertaining porn with at least a hint of story and seduction and chopped it back to a very formulaic format.

FratX is one of the more annoying studios for me, mainly because it's become too chaotic. It's always been choppy camerawork and editing, and that is certainly an intended MSP, but it's degraded to the point that there's no sense of continuity. By the time you realise who's fucking who, or even which way up the camera is, the shot has moved onto something else. It's become a lot noisier too. Sketchysex follows the same formula, but seems to pull it off better, though I don't doubt they both fall under the umbrella of the same producers. I suspect Face Down Ass Up and SlamRush might be related to them too. I wouldn't say I despise any of them, and occasionally I find a real gem in amongst the rubbish so I grab new stuff when it appears.

I long time ago somebody asked the same question about performers. I remember suggesting Joey Mills for being wooden in all the wrong ways, as well as Denis Reed who I would want to see watch if someone described him to me, but after seeing him on-screen ruins every scene he's in for me, and I don't know why. There's nothing wrong with him, but I can't stand him.

I tend to steer clear of Himeros too. Most of it is a little bit too tantric for me, and so many of their films have a cast without anyone I fancy in them.For me to grab one of them I need to see a particularly special screenshot that resonates at that precise moment or see someone I really like in the cast list. I admit I've grabbed stuff I know I'm going to hate 99% of simply because of a well-timed pic that makes me want to see that few seconds of video.

I've got a huge library of films, but so many of them I've only kept for a small portion of the overall movie. I keep saying to myself that I need to go through and trim the files, getting rid of the scenes I don't like, and in some cases simply keeping a short clip of one cumshot out of a 2-hour film.

@di3di3di3 Have you hit the reseed button?

@iridium85 Didn't you post this exact same question just 6 days ago?
https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/63198/so-obsessed-with-this-short-video?_=1695584945289

I'm not going to spend ages hunting for links to all of these, but a quick look through my Stashdb database suggests these might be worth looking at. Most are individual scenes though they might be ones you've missed.

Fratboy Shananigans Part 2 (MEN.com)
Dick From Above: Bareback (MEN.com)
Group Home Part 2 (MEN.com)
Bunkmates (Nasty Twinks)
Austin | Chapter 20: Tiny Guy Takes Monster Cock (Fun-Size Boys)
Bareback Bunk Bed Buddies (Hung Young Brit)
Bunkmates (Helix)
The Spunk Beds Three Way (Hung Young Brit)
Cole and Colton Tape 2 - Bunk Mates (Gaycest)
Bed Head (Trans Angels)
Elder Butler, Elder Peterson & Brother Samuels (MormonBoyz)
Bumfuck Nowhere (Helix)
Bunk Bed Wet Dreams (Latin Leche)
Bunk Bed Bareback Buddies (Baretwinks)
Joy Sticks (Helix)