Best posts made by frostycab

@john32123666 Sorry to be so ignorant, but can I ask what "w/c" means? You use it a lot on the forums and I can't work it out. Every time I see it I automatically insert "week commencing" which is what it normally means in the UK. LOL

If I can go off on a bit of a red herring here, 154Gb is frankly a ridiculous size.

I don't mean that your efforts won't be appreciated, but that is so big that it makes the download unattractive to many users, especially those with slower connections. It's becoming very common for even the most popular torrents to die within a few days of being uploaded, and people just aren't as willing to take a risk on large collections as they were a while back. I myself have probably wasted hundreds of Gb of download credit on torrents that I was unable to complete.

Speaking for myself and the others who don't have gigabit fibre, splitting a huge collection into smaller groups is far more likely to attract downloaders. To give you some perspective, my 14Mb/s connection allows me to grab at best 4Gb per hour IF I've got a perfect swarm to connect to, don't use the internet for anything else, and the download runs at peak speed. In reality, I can get about 30Gb per day maximum. I'd get faster internet if I could, but the infrastructure just isn't there where I live. Downloading your torrent would likely take over a week.

Keeping to parts under 30Gb might net you more downloaders in the long run. That's just my opinion.

@bi4smooth said in Film 911 movies:

@jujulette
There are no rules about collections, except that they have a common theme... Oh, and that there has to be a file list in the description.

None of which seems to be observed by anyone on here, sadly. Every day I see random "collections" of utter shite bundled together under the premise that it all came from OnlyFans (albeit from 30 separate accounts with no commonality between them), or contains bareback fucking, or simply represents the uploader's supposed favourite wanking fodder. Regarding descriptions, it now seems to be fashionable to simply copy and paste the title of the upload into the description field and leave it at that.

In short, there's been a huge increase in the number of lazy uploaders who will carelessly dump any old crap they can find onto the site, usually bundled together with even more crap because they know most people won't sift through 300 filenames in the vain hope of sorting the chaff.

It's a shame, but that seems to be where we are now.

@lololulu19 said in Three cocks.. in one ass:

His latest video seems to be "Bareback Salesman" from 2023

Don't believe everything you read. That film is probably a compilation of ancient scenes cobbled together. I suspect in reality he's long retired from professional porn.

To make the point, I looked up Dennis Reed's filmography as his name cropped up the other day. He's still being credited in around 80 films since his death in 2016, with 10 of them being released this year.

@tnar Same here. Been using BiglyBT for about 4 years with no issues.

@phoenixwing-0 I see from your forum profile that you're new here. Might I respectfully suggest that you go and take a few minutes to read the site rules and ask about any parts that you may not fully understand? Requests for uploads are banned across the entire site (forum, torrent comments, DMs...) and can lead to temporary or permanent bans when the mods spot them.

Just trying to save you any hassle.

@lololulu19 Watch out. You might get lumped in with him/her

@ianfontinell Sadly on any given day there's a good chance that you will be able to uploads breaking at least 1 or more of those 5 rules, though I admit it's far better now than it was a few years ago. A classic example is when users upload videos but then only add stock pics of the performers rather than screengrabs of the video itself.

I have to admit that when I do find a torrent that breaks one of those rules I'm usually hesitant to report it, usually for one of two reasons. Firstly, I might actually decide to take a chance on downloading it, and don't want to see it taken down when I'm at 40%, but secondly because I could report so many of them that I think the admins would end up getting sick of me (if they're not already!) It's a question of finding the line between getting new content uploaded and being petty. Unless something is blatantly misleading I often err on the side of caution.

@ianfontinell-0 Fucking too right!

It drives me up the wall, and I've pretty much stopped downloading any of that stuff because it's all just a big con imo. People are taking random OF and JFF rips of individuals and then then bundling them into even larger "collections" where most would struggle to find any commonality between them all.

Some of the worst examples are the SketchySex and FraternityX series. It feels like every few days a new collection is uploaded that is just a bunch of vids cobbled together in such a way that it doesn't quite match the dozens of already uploaded collections.

It's not just duplicating content either. One of the last ones I grabbed was part of a themed series, all of them fairly large downloads. The last one contained a "Bonus Folder" which was filled with utterly random shite that didn't match the them of the collection, and didn't even form what anyone would call a collection in and of itself.

People are constantly padding their uploads or just blatantly gaming the system to dupe people into downloading content they already grabbed many times before. It's shitty behaviour, but often manages to sit just on the right side of the fence when it comes to the rules. I have no idea how to combat it without inundating the mods with reports of dubious uploads.

Never mind. I found it!
Hardkinks - Cheating Twinks - Alec Loob, Mark Fontana & Rafa Marco
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=c17b4e34bc86ba4f31aab4170a5875fbc2d0177ceff3929d&hit=1

Typical. I always seem to find things just after asking, no matter how long I've been looking for them. LOL

@john32123666 I have tried that strategy in the past, but results haven't been much better. I just seem to get much higher upload speeds on torrents from the .net site, regularly seeing speeds in excess of 15Mb/s whereas on here I rarely get much over 1 or 2. It could just be luck of the draw, but thought I'd see if there might be something I'm missing in my client.

@ianfontinell-0 It was one of the main reasons I started using StashDB to organise my whole library. It takes some effort to scrape all the data and/or enter the missing info yourself, but it has made it so much easier for me to check if I already have something when a new upload looks familiar. I can search by performer, studio, date range, my own tags, and even if I get a couple of hundred results it only takes a brief look at the thumbnails to jog my memory.

There's a valid argument that any upload can be said to add value to the site's offerings, but at the same time a bad upload takes away almost as much as it gives, and can easily lead to people getting sent to ratio-jail for downloading huge volumes of misleading or hidden files. I've just remembered a forum thread from a few weeks ago about an upload that was billed as something like "Massive collection of bareback videos" and the uploader couldn't see the argument that bareback is itself a category rather than a theme suitable for a collection. Using their logic I'd estimate that you could bundle roughly 70-80% of the videos on this site into a single collection and upload that, whereas I believe the intent is to provide more focused material that represent a subset of the whole.

To the uploaders of these torrents I'd say please think of the other members, not just your own ratio. Take a little bit of time and actually curate your uploads so that downloaders aren't overwhelmed with bloat. To the ones that are just dumping this stuff on the site to help their ratios I'd say please just go and spend the price of a cup of coffee and get a seedbox for a month. That will do more for your ratio just with your usual downloads than any number of rubbish uploads will ever do.

@darkheart Wrong sub-forum for this really. You'll probably get better replies in https://community.gaytorrent.ru/category/170/who-is-this-what-video-is-this

@jujulette That's a question that appears over and over again, and nobody has ever been given a definitive answer, I would postulate that there is a very good reason for this and the best approach is to simply accept it for what it is and try not to think about it.

@MrMazda said in Circumventing duplicates aka Fansite collections:

So... When it comes to these collections, I would encourage you to bring such cases to my attention, and I'd be happy to review them on a case by case basis and handle them accordingly. We try to keep things fair for all users, so I'd be more than happy to dig deeper into this if you can give me examples of what you're referring to.

"Guys I liked on Chaturbate 18" https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=9e4d6284d419192431aab4170a5875fb6d77546602171f15

"Big Chaturbaters collection 231" https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=9384ad3a067b7d7231aab4170a5875fbee12d5d03711ac4a

"My cock is hard, fuck me hard" https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=4bf0655d6a8d300431aab4170a5875fb36c87606ae629604

This is probably the best example. It's old now, but huge at 436GB and just seems to be random cam shows. The description translates as "Basically the same as before with more videos, names in photos and sorted by date": "Chaturbate videos update" https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=02f713e15767701731aab4170a5875fb985ee6683183b238

I don't want to start a witch-hunt, and I don't know which side of the rule fence torrents like these sit on, but Given time I could find better examples. I notice there was one that I previously reported for padding the theme with a "bonus folder" has been removed, so it seems I was right once at least.

@MrMazda Except it can't. LOL Here's the corrected link: https://www.gaytorrent.ru/uploadguide.php

Was browsing and found this one
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=c4cc6fea02a7437731aab4170a5875fbf068d206920dd11b

@thatguyclose-0 I do recognise him, but I can't zone in on his name. The full session is on the site here: https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=290cdcf3ea52cb5231aab4170a5875fb24727d7ed3fac47b

@MrMazda My apologies! I must have clicked the link just as my session expired, so I got 404'd and linked to the old page. Logged back in and your link works fine.