Best posts made by frostycab

@MrMazda Yup. Jedi. Definitely.

@joaolifesim Transfer the downloaded film to your PC, placing it in whichever folder your completed downloads go into. Then open the torrent file on your PC. The client should check to see if the file(s) already exist and check if they are complete. If they are then you will simply start to seed the file(s). If they are incomplete then the client will continue the download until they are. If it doesn't recognise the file(s) as part of the torrent then it will start to download from scratch.

@john32123666 Oh, you! hehe
Now this kind of post I definitely see as an issue

@bj87106 Try asking nicely in this thread

@mebgmebg No, because requests for uploads have been banned anywhere on the site for absolutely ages. Sorry.

@Dragar-0 At first glance I thought perhaps Kyler Moss a couple of years after leaving BareTwinks, but the longer I look the less I think so.

As with all such requests, it might help people out if you could provide the source of the pic to give us all a starting point

@raphjd said in Trump sued for "staggering fraud" against lenders/banks:

@hubrys

She ran on finding something/anything to get Trump on and all she could come up with was a stupid civil lawsuit.

So what's your point? He shouldn't get sued if he misrepresented his finances? So many people can't get their heads around the fact that the man isn't a god.

"You should just let him off the small stuff since you can't get him on the big stuff (yet), because I'm a huge fanboy."

I use the report button when I see some of these. Yes, it's a pic, but it's an utterly worthless pic, so doesn't comply with the site rules.

@Thesock Did you happen to check how long was left on the freeleech before you started it? Could the freeleech possibly have expired shortly after you started the download? That would be the most logical explanation.

@pupkinvasya @john32123666 Thank you both!

@raphjd My "side?" You can wind your neck in on that attitude for a start, lad.

I'm a Brit, so I don't have a side when it comes to US politics. All I can see is someone who, admittedly I have no love for, is being held to account for their actions just like every free citizen should be. What gets to me is this constant drivel being spouted by his fans who think that every other suspected criminal should be dealt with before anyone even glances sideways at Trump. It's like having the "Leave Britney alone!!!" video on repeat.

If you believe that Biden should be investigated then fine. I freely admit that I don't know know all the ins and outs of it. Just don't try to convince me that just because Biden isn't in cuffs in a witness box Trump deserves a free pass, because that's insane. Yes, politics are obviously going to play a role in how things progress, just like they always have done and probably always will.

Now then, genuine question coming up. No baiting. No agenda. Just want an honest answer and discussion...

If it is proven in a court of law that the Trump family misrepresented their financial position and did in fact commit fraud, what would you like to see happen?

@raphjd Thanks for the input. I think what I'm really asking here is whether or not the specific type of thing I described is worth reporting en-masse. Like I said, I don't want to deprive users of content, but it does seem to have become a free-for-all where people can upload any number of random videos in a blatant attempt to get upload credit. Similarly, I don't want to become the guy who fills the report inbox to the point where the mods all think "Oh no, another petty report from that tit!" It's just that whenever I've taken a punt on downloads like these there is absolutely nothing to tie any of them together.

@yababylol makes a good point. To get a sense of whether or not there's an issue here at all we'd need to know a bit more about your stats. As an example, for me 300GB of upload would result in a ratio increase of 0.002, though this would obviously decrease if there was any download traffic at all.

Found the second one. It was indeed UndieTwinks.
https://undietwinks.com/videos/utw0039_shaneallen_brendankillen?nats=My4yLjM1LjIwMi40MDMuMC4wLjAuMA

It looks like it's included in this collection:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=5e6ad9752845941531aab4170a5875fb7a08931adfc1c916&hit=1

@Drwas 5 will get you 10 that someone will soon comment that it's all the fault of "liberals." LOL

Part rant, part seeking advice form the mods on this one.

The sheer number of "collections" that aren't really collections is just getting out of hand IMO. Just now I looked at the torrent list and the most recent upload is this pile of unknown random crap (which may be good but I'm not even going to bother checking to find out!):

https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=1fb45ea17345bc6b31aab4170a5875fb105ec8d0a0cfce8b&hit=1

Now please don't get me wrong here. Not really being an uploader myself I do appreciate it when people upload to the site, but there are so many dumps of completely random files with no meaningful titles or descriptions that I've become really hesitant about grabbing a lot of them. In the above torrent for example, it is described as nothing more than "Personal selection gay video's" which tells us nothing, and even the 5 pics don't help much.

The site rules state "A COLLECTION is a group of files that have a well-defined common theme." This rule seems to be routinely disregarded. You don't have to look for long to find things like "Selection of bareback videos" or "Stuff from my hard drive." Where is the theme to these? "Bareback" is not a theme, it's a category. "Chaturbate vids from July 23" is not a theme. "UK/US Twinks" is not a theme. Some of these uploads can be enormous and have hundreds of files in them.

To my mind, a theme is something specific and defining. A collection should be things such as a bunch of vids from a studio, or featuring a specific performer or sex on a boat or SOMETHING that can tie them together.

I'm interested in what other members opinions are, and what standpoint the mods would take if I (and everyone else) started reporting them all (because there are a hell of a lot of them!) Are you all happy to put up with them, or should we all be hitting the report button multiple times every day? I have no interest in restricting the amount of stuff added to the site, but I can't help but feel it's about time that we all stop accepting the poor-quality, non-curated mountains of spam that we have to sift through to find the gems. This site, like any other, is only ever going to be as good as what's put on it, and I can't help feeling that we've all just accepted the crap for too long, allowing it to become prolific.

@thor9023 said in upload ratio help:

@frostycab yeah about that, I might just keep it running till I reach like 10.0 ratio something absurdly high

While I wouldn't say not to do it, there was a discussion somewhere in the forums a long time ago about how much is too much when it comes to ratios.

There were some well though out arguments in there, but I seem to remember the best practice was agreed to be that while "artificial" methods like seedboxes give you a boost, once you've got a healthy download buffer then enjoy that and just seed normally. This shares seeding more effectively with other users who do also need to maintain their own ratios.

For example, I have a ratio of 1.172 right now. That means I have a download buffer of over 53TB. That represents about 40% of all my downloads over the last 17 years. If you look at it another way, if I keep up the same average amount of downloading and never upload so much as a single byte that buffer would last me another 7 years before I drop to my minimum 0.8. As such, there's no real benefit to putting effort into boosting my ratio.

Like I said, there's nothing stopping you going for the record if you like, but in reality there's not much point in chasing ratio just for the sake of it.

@pupkinvasya said in Need help ID-ing this guy:

This is Randall

In my head I heard Gerard Butler in "300" when I read that.

@raphjd I think you know that I disagree with most of your posts, not because of any liberal/conservative agenda but because I see them as a stretch most of the time, and I don't bother commenting because I know that it will usually illicit a wave of abuse rather than engaging in civilised debate, but....

You want to maybe actually explain where the "white privilege" is in this story?