Best posts made by frostycab

@citydwelleer-0 Best? You're going to start an argument asking something like that! LOL I've been using BiglyBT for ages with no issues.

@ianfontinell No need, really. It's been marked with Bareback as a secondary category, so that should be fine.

I think the creampie at then end gave away the fact that it was bareback. hehe

@romantyke Oh hai!

@raphjd said in Detransitioner speaks:

@Spintendo

You're still a whiny sniveling bitch and a racist.

I'm sorry, but this goes way beyond the point of the "polite disagreement" you yourself wrote into the rules for this sub-forum. I realise that you've posted this as a personal comment and not as a mod, but I think this really crosses the line.

"If you want to call your "enemy" a cunt or the like, take it elsewhere."

@jokuihmemies He can, because he's a Jedi

@john32123666 Oh, you! hehe
Now this kind of post I definitely see as an issue

@lololulu19 You have previously made clear your opposition to "being lumped in" with "T" most recently spouting your distaste specifically for transvestites in this thread. where you said:

What I resent is having transvestites lumped in with homosexuals. That is insulting. What's next? lumping pedophiles, necrophiliacs, and people who practice bestiality in with homosexuals?

I gave you my thoughts on your opinions there and you never bothered to come back with a counter-response, so I'm not going to waste time repeating what I said there. I do have a question though. The tone of your previous posts on related matters suggests to me that you are usually referring to males transitioning to female. Do you have the same distaste for women who transition the other way?

Your posts have always given the impression that you believe men should be men, and all men should be having sex with men regardless of their sexuality. I don't know you so don't take what I'm about to say as a personal attack, and I could be way off the mark, but the overall trend I'm seeing appears to parallel some aspects of incel thought processes. What I'm seeing is a distaste for women, at least as far their physical form or appearance is concerned, borne out by arguments you've previously made for not allowing straight porn on the site despite there being an obvious "straight guys for gay eyes" argument to the contrary. Though I can't remember if you've ever said as much, I do wonder if your objections to males presenting as females is in some way connected to that idea. Similarly, the overall trend across your posts appears to indicate a desire to vastly increase the number of men who have sex with other men, such as in this post where you suggest that guys should either do 4 years of military service or 4 years of gay porn to pay off their college loans. Note that you specifically say "gay porn" as opposed to just porn.

In another post you say that all guys should be taught about gay sex and give prostate massagers to save the planet from overpopulation.

As I've said before, many of your posts come across in such a way back up the lunatic conspiracy theories held by some people about there being a "Gay Agenda," that we all just want to turn the whole world gay so there are more guys to have sex with.

Coming back to another aspect of your post, I think most people would regard each of the letters of LGBTQIA+ as being mutually exclusive. I confess that I have never knowingly met a gay lesbian or an asexual bisexual, but perhaps one day I might. The same can also be said for S, straight. The other groups such as paedophiles, masochists, child molesters (bit redundant if paedophiles is already in the list,) wife-beaters and necrophilies are not mutually exclusive, either with each other or any of the LGBTQIA+ and S categories. They can be found in any of them, so I think it is unbelievably childish and offensive to try and suggest that they be "lumped in" with straight people as a group. Bigots have tried to make the same connections to our community, and firing back the same unreasoned arguments does little to help anyone.

Finally, and on a different subject, why did you think this post was Gay News? I know it's been moved to Chit Chat now, but seriously?

@MrMazda Yup. Jedi. Definitely.

@Dragar-0 At first glance I thought perhaps Kyler Moss a couple of years after leaving BareTwinks, but the longer I look the less I think so.

As with all such requests, it might help people out if you could provide the source of the pic to give us all a starting point

@medicc Sadly the loss of their defining identity is not limited to EV. Southern Strokes used to be very similar to BareTwinks with a very American feel to it, but now it's obviously all shot in Eastern Europe and exhibiting the same sets and feel as BoyFun. BareTwinks itself has done the same. Young Bastards has gone almost exclusively South American now.

I don't know if it's a pandemic-related shift in the industry, a financial decision, demand driven or just coincidence, but many of the major studios have made a very noticeable change to what they're producing, with much of it becoming formulaic copy/paste scenes. As you say, they're all just churning out new things every few days with little thought to staying "on-brand."

Keep checking the forums here. They had open registration periods at the start of February and April, so you might find they have another one in a month or 2. The last 2 have started on the first of the month, so make sure you check around that time each month.

@bj87106 Try asking nicely in this thread

@pupkinvasya @john32123666 Thank you both!

Once, just once I'd like to see you take a second to genuinely think if you're posting to the wrong sub-forum.

I use the report button when I see some of these. Yes, it's a pic, but it's an utterly worthless pic, so doesn't comply with the site rules.

Found the second one. It was indeed UndieTwinks.
https://undietwinks.com/videos/utw0039_shaneallen_brendankillen?nats=My4yLjM1LjIwMi40MDMuMC4wLjAuMA

It looks like it's included in this collection:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=5e6ad9752845941531aab4170a5875fb7a08931adfc1c916&hit=1

@john32123666 Thanks for the response, but I think you might have misunderstood my question.

I'm curious about how much people get paid for gay porn, and if there's an overall difference between tops and bottoms.

For example, I'd like to know what a relatively new performer might earn for a scene against a studio's star performers. I'm thinking of people like Kyle Ross (RIP) who was a Helix exclusive model and became synonymous with the brand.

Then you have guys like Daniel Hausser, Austin Avery, Dakota Lovell.... They spread themselves around various studios and are obviously in demand, but is this down to low pay and the need to shoot as many scenes as they can?

Also, is there a difference in pay-scales between top, bottom and vers guys? Do performers earn more for fucking or being fucked, or is it entirely down to there looks and fanbase? I would imagine that they would be able to expect more for doing certain things like fisting. Would you expect to be paid the same for a 1 on 1 scene as you would for letting 10 tops take turns on you? And if so, what sort of numbers are we talking about?

@lololulu19 I'm pretty sure your problem is that you believe that you are entitled to gay content wherever you go. More than one guy in a stream doesn't mean you're going to get gay action, just as having 2 girls in a stream doesn't mean you'll get lesbian action.

Unless they've actually advertised that they'll be doing anything together then no, you shouldn't be pissed off, but just being in a stream together promises nothing. You would also do well to remember that it's not just guys who watch these streams, and sometimes the content creators are making content for women. The fact that gay guys might watch is just a possible route to additional revenue. If gay guys are watching that doesn't mean the streamers are obliged to provide the type of content they want to see.