Best posts made by frostycab

@ianfontinell No need, really. It's been marked with Bareback as a secondary category, so that should be fine.

I think the creampie at then end gave away the fact that it was bareback. hehe

@joaolifesim Transfer the downloaded film to your PC, placing it in whichever folder your completed downloads go into. Then open the torrent file on your PC. The client should check to see if the file(s) already exist and check if they are complete. If they are then you will simply start to seed the file(s). If they are incomplete then the client will continue the download until they are. If it doesn't recognise the file(s) as part of the torrent then it will start to download from scratch.

@jokuihmemies He can, because he's a Jedi

"Discouraging" pretty much sums everything up this year. I wonder what word we'll be using next year. LOL

@john32123666 Oh, you! hehe
Now this kind of post I definitely see as an issue

@mebgmebg No, because requests for uploads have been banned anywhere on the site for absolutely ages. Sorry.

@MrMazda Yup. Jedi. Definitely.

I think you can edit your posts if you're quick, but after a short period of time they become uneditable. (Is that a word?) In a way it's a good thing as it stops people going back and changing the context of a post after loads of replies respond to the initial version.

@Dragar-0 At first glance I thought perhaps Kyler Moss a couple of years after leaving BareTwinks, but the longer I look the less I think so.

As with all such requests, it might help people out if you could provide the source of the pic to give us all a starting point

@Thesock Did you happen to check how long was left on the freeleech before you started it? Could the freeleech possibly have expired shortly after you started the download? That would be the most logical explanation.

@bj87106 Try asking nicely in this thread

@romantyke Oh hai!

@pupkinvasya @john32123666 Thank you both!

@yababylol makes a good point. To get a sense of whether or not there's an issue here at all we'd need to know a bit more about your stats. As an example, for me 300GB of upload would result in a ratio increase of 0.002, though this would obviously decrease if there was any download traffic at all.

I use the report button when I see some of these. Yes, it's a pic, but it's an utterly worthless pic, so doesn't comply with the site rules.

@lololulu19 You have previously made clear your opposition to "being lumped in" with "T" most recently spouting your distaste specifically for transvestites in this thread. where you said:

What I resent is having transvestites lumped in with homosexuals. That is insulting. What's next? lumping pedophiles, necrophiliacs, and people who practice bestiality in with homosexuals?

I gave you my thoughts on your opinions there and you never bothered to come back with a counter-response, so I'm not going to waste time repeating what I said there. I do have a question though. The tone of your previous posts on related matters suggests to me that you are usually referring to males transitioning to female. Do you have the same distaste for women who transition the other way?

Your posts have always given the impression that you believe men should be men, and all men should be having sex with men regardless of their sexuality. I don't know you so don't take what I'm about to say as a personal attack, and I could be way off the mark, but the overall trend I'm seeing appears to parallel some aspects of incel thought processes. What I'm seeing is a distaste for women, at least as far their physical form or appearance is concerned, borne out by arguments you've previously made for not allowing straight porn on the site despite there being an obvious "straight guys for gay eyes" argument to the contrary. Though I can't remember if you've ever said as much, I do wonder if your objections to males presenting as females is in some way connected to that idea. Similarly, the overall trend across your posts appears to indicate a desire to vastly increase the number of men who have sex with other men, such as in this post where you suggest that guys should either do 4 years of military service or 4 years of gay porn to pay off their college loans. Note that you specifically say "gay porn" as opposed to just porn.

In another post you say that all guys should be taught about gay sex and give prostate massagers to save the planet from overpopulation.

As I've said before, many of your posts come across in such a way back up the lunatic conspiracy theories held by some people about there being a "Gay Agenda," that we all just want to turn the whole world gay so there are more guys to have sex with.

Coming back to another aspect of your post, I think most people would regard each of the letters of LGBTQIA+ as being mutually exclusive. I confess that I have never knowingly met a gay lesbian or an asexual bisexual, but perhaps one day I might. The same can also be said for S, straight. The other groups such as paedophiles, masochists, child molesters (bit redundant if paedophiles is already in the list,) wife-beaters and necrophilies are not mutually exclusive, either with each other or any of the LGBTQIA+ and S categories. They can be found in any of them, so I think it is unbelievably childish and offensive to try and suggest that they be "lumped in" with straight people as a group. Bigots have tried to make the same connections to our community, and firing back the same unreasoned arguments does little to help anyone.

Finally, and on a different subject, why did you think this post was Gay News? I know it's been moved to Chit Chat now, but seriously?

Found the second one. It was indeed UndieTwinks.
https://undietwinks.com/videos/utw0039_shaneallen_brendankillen?nats=My4yLjM1LjIwMi40MDMuMC4wLjAuMA

It looks like it's included in this collection:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=5e6ad9752845941531aab4170a5875fb7a08931adfc1c916&hit=1

Back when I had potato internet which made it a nightmare to maintain a good ratio I did try using a seedbox, and only for a single month at a time. It's been ages since I had to do it, but all I did was add anything new that looked like it would become popular. (Think popular performers in the busiest categories. That sort of thing.) I'd jump onto anything that:

• Was uploaded very recently, preferably in the last few hours, and

• Had only 1 or perhaps 2 seeders with lots of leechers, and

• the bigger the download the better, (Simply means there's more upload traffic to be had)

You ignore the whole concept of downloading what you want for yourself, and concentrate on what others are hungry for, and the high speeds you get make you a very attractive peer to connect to.. As I say it's been a while but I seem to remember being able to farm in excess of TB of upload credit in a single month that way with very little effort and I'm sure I could get even higher rewards if I really tried, all for the paltry sum of about £10 to £15 for the seedbox.

As @ianfontinell-0 says, you need to look at how big your deficit is first. Then you know what it will take to fix it. If you give us some numbers I'm sure it'll be an easy task.

@raphjd Thanks for the input. I think what I'm really asking here is whether or not the specific type of thing I described is worth reporting en-masse. Like I said, I don't want to deprive users of content, but it does seem to have become a free-for-all where people can upload any number of random videos in a blatant attempt to get upload credit. Similarly, I don't want to become the guy who fills the report inbox to the point where the mods all think "Oh no, another petty report from that tit!" It's just that whenever I've taken a punt on downloads like these there is absolutely nothing to tie any of them together.

Keep checking the forums here. They had open registration periods at the start of February and April, so you might find they have another one in a month or 2. The last 2 have started on the first of the month, so make sure you check around that time each month.