@lololulu19 said in Upscaling - WHY?:
I wish someone would explain to me the purpose of upscaling.
@lololulu19 said in Upscaling - WHY?:
@jrewingwanna Actually, I usually am EXPLAINING something. Not asking. When I do ask, it is virtually always something that is wrong that NEEDS to be looked into
Make yer mind up 
@pupkinvasya ...which is the third scene from Darkroom Twinks, in case anyone wants the whole film.
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=80d6085d6e2fe4a831aab4170a5875fb98c35bf8263a7165&hit=1
Are they even producing new content? I see quite a bit of their older stuff being posted on various sites as new DVDs under new studio labels purporting to be new scenes. I know a lot of studios do that from time to time, but it's like they're just re-releasing their whole back catalogue and pretending it's all new. Bit of a shitty move with regards to anyone who still buys physical copies.
@raphjd I am not a liberal or conservative. I am an individual asking a valid question, but your response is loaded to the gunnels with accusatory language. I have always tried to see things from every side, and often play devil's advocate, but it's impossible to do that with someone who has put you in a box and refuses to open the lid. However, if wanting to hear about relevant, connected evidence before blindly accepting your version of things makes me a liberal then I guess I must be one.
All you've done in your original post is taken a tragedy, added your own bias and turned it into an attack by comparing it to as yet unrelated events.
@john32123666 OMFG! That's hideous, especially when you consider that it get resized to fit your screen when you view it on the site. The only thing that's worse are the ones that are only 1 tile wide but like 40 tiles vertically!
They go by the name of Thermalsis. Lots of their stuff is already on the site.
Normally when I check the site for the first time each day there's a goo 50+ uploads since I went to bed the night before. Just looked and there's only been 1 new upload in the last 11 hours. Did something break, or is it just a coincidence?
@cyberdog2014 You read the site rules, right?
@Stevedax There is. It's called "Fan Sites" but sometimes people add them as "Amateur" since most videos will often fall into several categories.
@blablarg18 said in Greta deletes 2018 tweet saying world will end in 2023:
All you've done here is play Karen saying "Greta didn't predict the world literally ends now in 2023, only that now in 2023 it's too late to change - the doom is baked into the cake, as of now in 2023".
Not what I said at all if you bother to read it, but like most conservatives you've find a way to turn things around in such a way that you can have a nice little argument about it. If I'd written "FWIW, I don't think anybody has any real clue as to if/when the planet will (or did) reach the tipping point." you'd probably still find a way to disagree.
@raphjd said in Greta deletes 2018 tweet saying world will end in 2023:
Since the earth got its atmosphere 4 billion years ago (according to the Smithsonian Inst), there has been climate change. Climate changes existed before humans and will exist long after humans.
I totally agree, it's always going to be something that happens. I think that the panic comes from people worrying not about climate change itself, but how soon it might reach a point where human life in unsustainable. I think that's a fair consideration, as climate change has led to mass extinctions in the past and will probably do so in the future. In all likelihood nobody will know the timeline or outcome until long after I've shuffled off. I don't blame them for worrying about it. Many people worry about the future for their progeny, and I get that. They're just trying to extrapolate far beyond what I think we're capable of calculating at the moment. Our opinions on any of it will be long-forgotten by the time anyone is proven right or wrong.
"Discouraging" pretty much sums everything up this year. I wonder what word we'll be using next year. LOL
@flozen Actually, why in the name of all fuckery was this pulled out of the cesspool of the P&D forum and dumped in here anyway?
@nvidia25 Not sure about the single shot of a performer. I've got no issue with people adding sensibly-scaled thumbs, but I've also see a trend where people will upload a single publicity pic of a performer which does nothing to inform users of the nature of the upload. I personally like a thumb-sheet plus a couple of well-chosen full-frame shots. The larger frames are easier to see while browsing, but the thumbs show you what actually happens. This is especially true of OF/CB/JFF uploads, where you might get 20 seconds of ass shown in a 2-hour stream.
I think you can edit your posts if you're quick, but after a short period of time they become uneditable. (Is that a word?) In a way it's a good thing as it stops people going back and changing the context of a post after loads of replies respond to the initial version.
@raphjd said in Trans teen died from vaginoplasty complications during landmark Dutch study used to justify child sex changes:
As always, you refuse to respond to the content of the article.
How is that different to the "Oh, well what about {insert unconnected subject here}...." responses so frequently bandied about by some right wingers in here?
Just to be clear though, the topic itself is something I don't profess to know enough about to give an informed opinion.
