Best posts made by frostycab

@lololulu19 You have previously made clear your opposition to "being lumped in" with "T" most recently spouting your distaste specifically for transvestites in this thread. where you said:

What I resent is having transvestites lumped in with homosexuals. That is insulting. What's next? lumping pedophiles, necrophiliacs, and people who practice bestiality in with homosexuals?

I gave you my thoughts on your opinions there and you never bothered to come back with a counter-response, so I'm not going to waste time repeating what I said there. I do have a question though. The tone of your previous posts on related matters suggests to me that you are usually referring to males transitioning to female. Do you have the same distaste for women who transition the other way?

Your posts have always given the impression that you believe men should be men, and all men should be having sex with men regardless of their sexuality. I don't know you so don't take what I'm about to say as a personal attack, and I could be way off the mark, but the overall trend I'm seeing appears to parallel some aspects of incel thought processes. What I'm seeing is a distaste for women, at least as far their physical form or appearance is concerned, borne out by arguments you've previously made for not allowing straight porn on the site despite there being an obvious "straight guys for gay eyes" argument to the contrary. Though I can't remember if you've ever said as much, I do wonder if your objections to males presenting as females is in some way connected to that idea. Similarly, the overall trend across your posts appears to indicate a desire to vastly increase the number of men who have sex with other men, such as in this post where you suggest that guys should either do 4 years of military service or 4 years of gay porn to pay off their college loans. Note that you specifically say "gay porn" as opposed to just porn.

In another post you say that all guys should be taught about gay sex and give prostate massagers to save the planet from overpopulation.

As I've said before, many of your posts come across in such a way back up the lunatic conspiracy theories held by some people about there being a "Gay Agenda," that we all just want to turn the whole world gay so there are more guys to have sex with.

Coming back to another aspect of your post, I think most people would regard each of the letters of LGBTQIA+ as being mutually exclusive. I confess that I have never knowingly met a gay lesbian or an asexual bisexual, but perhaps one day I might. The same can also be said for S, straight. The other groups such as paedophiles, masochists, child molesters (bit redundant if paedophiles is already in the list,) wife-beaters and necrophilies are not mutually exclusive, either with each other or any of the LGBTQIA+ and S categories. They can be found in any of them, so I think it is unbelievably childish and offensive to try and suggest that they be "lumped in" with straight people as a group. Bigots have tried to make the same connections to our community, and firing back the same unreasoned arguments does little to help anyone.

Finally, and on a different subject, why did you think this post was Gay News? I know it's been moved to Chit Chat now, but seriously?

@amigaopira Can you please check your links work when you post them? Thanks

From the pics it looks like they're all fake/strap-on cocks. No genuine man-meat. My opinion is that this isn't really within the spirit of the rules, but I'll defer to @MrMazda's wisdom.

Keep checking the forums here. They had open registration periods at the start of February and April, so you might find they have another one in a month or 2. The last 2 have started on the first of the month, so make sure you check around that time each month.

@raphjd Hair and build have me thinking of Leo Lewis

@lance81 Check the site rules again. All upload requests are banned. I have seen members get banned for what looked like their first offence, so my advice would be to not even try.

Once, just once I'd like to see you take a second to genuinely think if you're posting to the wrong sub-forum.

My bad. I used the spelling from a video which was incorrect. Try this one: https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=leolouis/gender=m/leo-louis.htm

Well, it disappeared again, and now it's back for yet another go. https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=55eacbbe6873a06b31aab4170a5875fb951817e9c4cbfc39

Anyone in the know able to explain this odd behaviour?

@lololulu19 I'm pretty sure your problem is that you believe that you are entitled to gay content wherever you go. More than one guy in a stream doesn't mean you're going to get gay action, just as having 2 girls in a stream doesn't mean you'll get lesbian action.

Unless they've actually advertised that they'll be doing anything together then no, you shouldn't be pissed off, but just being in a stream together promises nothing. You would also do well to remember that it's not just guys who watch these streams, and sometimes the content creators are making content for women. The fact that gay guys might watch is just a possible route to additional revenue. If gay guys are watching that doesn't mean the streamers are obliged to provide the type of content they want to see.

@phoenixstorm I think he's appeared in a couple of Himeros vids, but not as a performer as such.

@MrMazda Thank you for investigating and taking steps. So it appears that this was just an attempt to keep bumping the upload to the front page? Damned odd, because with such a small file the amount of upload credit to be gained can hardly be worth it.

@MrMazda said in Eating cum:

@frostycab Nah.... Pulling out is for porn! haha

Not a bad set of films. POIFP2 was my fave from the bunch

Ignore me! Why do I ALWAYS find these things 2 minutes after I ask even if I've spent hours looking for them???

https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=beecfe5729ed232031aab4170a5875fb00688d3f79f40243

@mtele31784-0 said in Previously Downloaded Torrents Not Showing in BitTorrent:

@mtele31784-0 Update: I redownloaded the torrent file for many of my previous downloads, and they are now seeding, but some of them didn't register that I have already downloaded them once before.

That means that the previously downloaded files are in the wrong place for your client to see them (or you've deleted them.) As long as they are in your client's download folder (or in another folder the client checks) it will re-check the files and only download missing pieces.

@john32123666 said in Who is this with Jorik Tautou?:

[image is subject to copyright]

I nearly spat out my morning tea when I saw you'd included that! LOL Love it!

@john32123666 Wasn't there a studio label a few years back that was something like All Teen Boys or Amateur Teen Boys?

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

Turns out.. I was right!

Based on previous offerings I'd say this is unlikely, but I'll play along. Statistically it's got to happen eventually...

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

https://amburnlaw.com/does-copyright-protect-pornography/

...but not today, it seems.

Congratulations on citing an article in the belief that it 100% supports your argument, but not bothering to even read the whole paragraph your provided. You waste your time looking for a law firm website to back you up, and then don't even read it properly. "...it remains an open question whether copyright protection extends to pornographic movies deemed obscene by the trier of fact."

Of course, as usual you've done exactly what the damn Freedom Fairies always do and forget that there is a whole wide world out there beyond the county line. Please check this link to see why everyone rolls their eyes every time you come within a mile of this subject.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

@john32123666 in some countries, they execute homosexuals.

Once again, this isn't just a simple red herring, nor is it even a school of herring. It's akin to Jesus and the feeding of the 5 thousand with the number of herring you bring to the table.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

In some countries, they have a senile, bribe taking, influence peddling, document stealing, ice cream licking, hair sniffing pedophile with dementia as president.

The site already has a P&D cesspool where your type of humour seems appreciated. I know you try and throw these lines in ever so often to try and appeal to your like-minded countrymen, but do you really think it does anything to make you seem more credible to anyone else? Try and keep it there and stay on the <<<FUCKING TOPIC>>> for once in your bloody life.

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

I suggest that anybody who believes that DMCA applies to gay porn, should LEAVE this site, because that is what this site is!

Not going anywhere, sorry. Feel free to leave yourself if you like though. Just write to these guys and I'm sure they'll help. Do you want a hand with packing?

@lololulu19 said in My position on torrenting gay porn.:

There should be a CHECKBOX when joining this site that says:
"DO YOU BELIEVE THAT SHARING TORRENTS OF GAY PORN IS ILLEGAL?" and if the person checks YES, then their membership should be denied and they should redirected to the Disney Channel - where they will sue your ass in a second if you ever share any of THEIR content.

Are you ever going to accept that whatever law you think supports not just this but any argument is not universal? You keep doing this, finding one lawyer who weakly backs up your assertions, forgetting that the law they might refer to doesn't apply anywhere else. It cannot be applied globally. Quoting something from a law firm in Detroit does not mean that anyone in the UK, Egypt, China, India or anywhere else gives a damn about it because it doesn't matter to any of them. That firm could probably come out with truckloads of laws that don't even apply outside of Michigan, let alone the rest of the US, but you still 100% believe that you've won your case.

The issue of obscenity is the other problem. You haven't defined it. If you've tried in the past then it almost certainly didn't pass the same test I just brought up. I think you have a basic misunderstanding of the difference between "the law" and beliefs and values.

I have a question. Have you ever downloaded pirated films, music, books, software or anything else? Please don't try to be clever and lie because nobody will believe you. Do you not think your statement above should apply to those sources too? After all, you're not going try and argue that those things aren't covered by DMCA, are you?

I would like to finish by saying that in the case of this post I'm strangely proud of you. Unlike many of your more controversial posts you have at least returned to try to engage with responses rather than simply stride into the room and leave a steaming turd on the floor before walking out and watching from the window while everyone loudly complains about how much it stinks. So yeah, points for that.

Almost definitely Bel Ami/Kinky Angels. Couldn't tell you what film though.