@navyblue1632 Have you looked at the technical forums recently?
https://community.gaytorrent.ru/category/49/non-gt-ru-technical-stuff
Please don't take this the wrong way, but it does rather feel like this question comes up very frequently in multiple threads when there are already ongoing discussions. You'll probably get better information by adding to those threads and reading what's there. 
@vasco25-0 It's very simple. Take your existing .torrent files and open them in the working client. As long as you've set it up to use the same folders as the non-working one it should perform a re-check on the new torrents to determine what you've already downloaded and just continue them.
@ianfontinell-0 Controversial opinion, because I know it could end up reducing the volume of content being added to the site, but I#d like to see people start losing their uploading rights (at least temporarily) for refusing to make any attempt to curate the collections/dumps/spam they add to the site.
It raises another question for me to. Is there any point in reporting them? Some of them clearly violate the rules on collections, but to expect the mods to download all of these large collections to check them when they're reported is a lot of work and data usage, and most of the time you won't know the outcome unless you specifically go back and check after a few days.
The subject raises another thought. I think we need more feedback from the mod team when we report something on the site. We already have this when we report a duplicate, and you get a nice little message to say thanks for reporting and giving you some points.
When we report rule violations though we generally get no feedback at all. |I'm not asking for the mods to write an essay, and all we really need is some checkbox response form like
"Thanks for reporting xxxxxxxx.torrent.
Your report has been upheld/denied.
Action taken: User banned/Upload rights taken for xx days/User warned/NFA" and perhaps a chance for the mod to add an explanatory note if they like.
Feedback helps everyone. It helps users to better understand where the mods interpret the threshold to be, as opposed to rigid adherence to the rules, because some leeway is to be expected. We learn what is and isn't worth reporting, and that in turn helps the mods by filtering reports down to those that actually warrant checking. Uploaders are already anonymous, so there shouldn't be any problem with targeted campaigns against people.
The more we know the more we can help.
@OKCancel said in Removed torrents:
Even Onlyfans content can be within DMCA net.
Hang on! Nobody reply until I've been and made some popcorn and had a wee. I don't want to miss the "PoRnOgRaPhY CaNnOt Be CoPyRiGhTeD bEcAuSe It Is ObScEnE!!!" farce that I sense coming over the horizon. 
@jujulette Every time somebody uploads a file and changes its name to something cryptic it utterly fucks all of us. People end up downloading things again and again believing them to be new material when in reality it's usually just an altered title or filename. It hurts ratios, takes up valuable storage space, makes things impossible to catalogue and worst of all these files propagate across multiple trackers to the point where the "real" file gets lost in the sands of time.
I'm in the process of tidying up my library, and in the last 2 days alone I've recovered over 300Gb of space across multiple drives where I've been able to identify identical files with misleading names. Some of them I've had 5 or more copies of them, all downloaded from different sites over the years.
Yes, it's annoying when files get DMCA hits, but I'd rather see a few of those disappear than end up with terabytes of rubbish. As @tnar said, if nobody can find it then what's the point of it staying here?
@hubrys It allows anything that aligns with the ideals of those who control it.
@Dblckct said in Willing to pay:
please message me,
You might want to check the site rules:
GayTorrent.ru takes the privacy of it's members seriously. Therefore do not post your real name, address, e-mail address or IP in the torrent's presentations, torrent comments or forum. Please exchange personal information by PM only with members you trust.
@ikpooo Just a little tip for you:
If your client gives you an "unregistered torrent" error, as long as you've already connected to the swarm (and the seeder keeps it active) I think you can still download it. New people won't be able to join the swarm, but those already in it can stay connected to each other.
@makigott Not wanting to sound rude or unsympathetic, but shouting in all caps on the forum like this probably isn't the best way to resolve this.
Looking at your link, it looks like the upload has been temporarily removed from the site while it gets reviewed to make sure everyone in it is of legal age. This is something I personally 100% approve of as it protects not only the site itself but also all the members.
If you want to try and get a productive response may I suggest that you write politely to the helpdesk to ask what happens next?
@duncanlem AKAIK they don't, but when a DMCA notice is received the site operators are probably required to take some sort of action against the individual that uploaded the file. This can happen in the background without ever divulging the member's details to the copyright owner. Perhaps it's a deal struck with the industry that stop them from bringing all they have against the site as a whole, but speculation is just pointless.
Once again, I'd say that the reason things happen the way they do is probably because they have to happen that way. Asking questions here yields no meaningful answers, and I assume that is also because it has to be that way. I'd suggest that we all just accept it and not try to delve too deep into something that is presumably there to protect both the site and its members.
@lololulu19 If you've taken a course in statistics then I suggest you ask for your money back.
Also, since an IQ of 100 is by definition the average IQ I think you may need to reassess your moron assertion, particularly as that particular label hasn't been used in reference to the IQ scale in decades. When it was still used it referred to an IQ of between 51 and 70. Now I'm actually quite keen to know what IQ you think someone needs to have in order to be considered functional in modern society.
@lololulu19 If any studio is particularly on-point regarding DMCA infractions, there is no reason to expect them to be any less proactive regarding their older productions than they are their newer scenes.
In the case of this studio, I have noticed a real trend of them releasing "new" films/DVDs that are simply compilations of some of their old scenes. Indeed, they seem to be one of the worst studios for do so. I have seen the same scenes crop up in multiple ostensibly new films. This, to me, seems like a huge "fuck you" to those people who still purchase films rather than simply subscribe to their site as they are charging premium prices for something the customer may already have paid for. It's not unlike those wretched trading card packs for kids that are sold in newsagents. The kids end up just getting the same cards over and over again with nothing new.
Nevertheless, the studios financial interest in those scenes still exists, and as such there is no reason to expect that they will simply turn a blind eye to sharing of scenes they may have shot a decade ago. Also, while I agree that recent work isn't as good as it used to be, I don't see why that should have any bearing on their approach to DMCA breaches.
What have I started??? At this rate I'm going to have to start asking all these SB companies for kickbacks! LOL
Just a couple of things to remember:
Use the SB primarily for high-demand torrents, whether you want them personally or not. If you're grabbing something for yourself but there's little demand from other peers then you're better off downloading it directly and using the SB space for more popular files.
Keep track of when your SB subscription ends and plan accordingly. If you have loads of stuff on there that you want to keep then make sure you allow yourself enough time to FTP it all to your local storage..
Interesting to see some boxes still working once you've passed your traffic limit. Might be worth a look at the terms and conditions to see exactly what they say and whether there's a second limit that cuts off completely or if the throttle you or whatever. I must admit that know just how much traffic you can generate I would only ever get a box with unlimited traffic.
I came across this too. I don't know if it's up to date or accurate, but some of you might find it useful if you choose to try:
@macmie-0 To the best of my knowledge, total traffic relates to all traffic between all peers, so it will likely always be larger than your own upload figures
@lololulu19 No idea, but I do find myself wondering why we keep getting random shit posted to irrelevant sub-forums
@lololulu19 said in GAYtor.rent ?:
What I don't get is why completely straight stuff is here.
Because sometimes a gay man can enjoy watching a straight guy even if they have to crane their neck to see around the tits
@lololulu19 said in GAYtor.rent ?:
EVEN THEN, I don't mind if the guy is extremely cute (which is quite rare).
So in effect you are saying that all straight content should be removed/banned except straight content that you personally enjoy. I don't think that's going to work unless you want everyone to send you their files before they upload them to the site.
I check this and other sites daily, and can safely say that even on a good day 98% of what gets uploaded is of no interest to me whatsoever, but I do recognise that obviously there are others that like it. Who do you think is uploading the straight content? I can't imagine anyone thinks to themselves "Yeah, I'm totally straight and have no interest in gay porn or men, but I think I'll join a gay torrent site and upload stuff that nobody there will want, because that'll be a productive use of my time."
I get what you're saying. I truly do, but at the same time this isn't a site just for you or me or any other single user. It's for everyone.
@frostygrin I think you might have things a bit mixed up, though I'm willing to listen if you think I'm wrong about the following....
The buffer is how much you can download before you reach your own minimum ratio, which is never higher than 0.8.
Your total download on the site is used to set your Base Daily Limit for downloads. You also get extra download slots which are calculated by multiplying that BDL by how far you are above your minimum ratio. By the time you've downloaded more than 800Gb from the site your BDL is already 100, plus your extras for the ratio bonus, plus extras if you've uploaded in the past.... I doubt there are many people downloading that many torrents each and every day, even with a seedbox.
What I was trying to say is that a seedbox is a great tool for fixing a poor ratio, and for giving yourself breathing room, but people shouldn't feel like they need to chase ridiculously high ratios just for the sake of it. It's better to put yourself in a good position, and then if you have things that you want to seed then you can still seed them without the use of a seedbox, and saving some money in the process.
Looking at the search page with all categories selected there appear to have been only 2 successful additions to the site in the last 18 hours. I would surmise that something on the site has broken. I've messaged to helpdesk to ask if they're aware of any issues, but it could take a while to get a reply. You'll have to hold your horses for a while I'm afriad.
@raphjd May I suggest that the information available on the main site be amended to reflect the current situation as I believe at could be the source of the confusion? Looking that the trade-in page for points it clearly states:
For what I get points?