@OKCancel said in Removed torrents:
Even Onlyfans content can be within DMCA net.
Hang on! Nobody reply until I've been and made some popcorn and had a wee. I don't want to miss the "PoRnOgRaPhY CaNnOt Be CoPyRiGhTeD bEcAuSe It Is ObScEnE!!!" farce that I sense coming over the horizon. 
@ikpooo Just a little tip for you:
If your client gives you an "unregistered torrent" error, as long as you've already connected to the swarm (and the seeder keeps it active) I think you can still download it. New people won't be able to join the swarm, but those already in it can stay connected to each other.
@Dblckct said in Willing to pay:
please message me,
You might want to check the site rules:
GayTorrent.ru takes the privacy of it's members seriously. Therefore do not post your real name, address, e-mail address or IP in the torrent's presentations, torrent comments or forum. Please exchange personal information by PM only with members you trust.
@makigott Not wanting to sound rude or unsympathetic, but shouting in all caps on the forum like this probably isn't the best way to resolve this.
Looking at your link, it looks like the upload has been temporarily removed from the site while it gets reviewed to make sure everyone in it is of legal age. This is something I personally 100% approve of as it protects not only the site itself but also all the members.
If you want to try and get a productive response may I suggest that you write politely to the helpdesk to ask what happens next?
@lololulu19 If any studio is particularly on-point regarding DMCA infractions, there is no reason to expect them to be any less proactive regarding their older productions than they are their newer scenes.
In the case of this studio, I have noticed a real trend of them releasing "new" films/DVDs that are simply compilations of some of their old scenes. Indeed, they seem to be one of the worst studios for do so. I have seen the same scenes crop up in multiple ostensibly new films. This, to me, seems like a huge "fuck you" to those people who still purchase films rather than simply subscribe to their site as they are charging premium prices for something the customer may already have paid for. It's not unlike those wretched trading card packs for kids that are sold in newsagents. The kids end up just getting the same cards over and over again with nothing new.
Nevertheless, the studios financial interest in those scenes still exists, and as such there is no reason to expect that they will simply turn a blind eye to sharing of scenes they may have shot a decade ago. Also, while I agree that recent work isn't as good as it used to be, I don't see why that should have any bearing on their approach to DMCA breaches.
@nancledra53 If you look in your client and see "Error: unregistered torrent" or similar in the status column then that torrent has been deleted. That's your notification. 
All is not necessarily lost though. If the remaining swarm contains any seeders (or enough leechers with all the individual parts) you still have a chance of completing the download. When a torrent gets deleted from the site it stops anyone new from joining the swarm, but it has no ill effects on an existing swarm. It doesn't happen very often as people usually kill the download as soon as they see it's been deleted, but I've managed to finish a few files this way in the past. My advice is to keep them running in your client for a week or 2 if you can just to give them a chance.
@idesigay This probably isn't what you want to hear, but I think you already know the answer so I'm just going to be blunt and say it. Go and see your doctor! Assuming you live in one of the majority of countries where homosexuality isn't outlawed I can almost guarantee that they will have come across this sort of thing before so be honest about when and how it happened, as well as any and all symptoms you've had. It might be embarrassing, but doctors deal with loads of embarrassing things.
Even if you don't want to say how you think this started, still go and see your doctor! You're making a connection between a fun pokey-bum-wank several months ago, but there are other health issues that could cause similar symptoms, up to and including some cancers.
Sorry if that all seems harsh, but you need to man-up and seek medical advice, not the opinion of random forum users. Best of luck.
I can't even begin to fathom how the thought process that led to that went...
@lololulu19 said in GAYtor.rent ?:
What I don't get is why completely straight stuff is here.
Because sometimes a gay man can enjoy watching a straight guy even if they have to crane their neck to see around the tits
@lololulu19 said in GAYtor.rent ?:
EVEN THEN, I don't mind if the guy is extremely cute (which is quite rare).
So in effect you are saying that all straight content should be removed/banned except straight content that you personally enjoy. I don't think that's going to work unless you want everyone to send you their files before they upload them to the site.
I check this and other sites daily, and can safely say that even on a good day 98% of what gets uploaded is of no interest to me whatsoever, but I do recognise that obviously there are others that like it. Who do you think is uploading the straight content? I can't imagine anyone thinks to themselves "Yeah, I'm totally straight and have no interest in gay porn or men, but I think I'll join a gay torrent site and upload stuff that nobody there will want, because that'll be a productive use of my time."
I get what you're saying. I truly do, but at the same time this isn't a site just for you or me or any other single user. It's for everyone.
@raphjd May I suggest that the information available on the main site be amended to reflect the current situation as I believe at could be the source of the confusion? Looking that the trade-in page for points it clearly states:
For what I get points?
@hubrys It allows anything that aligns with the ideals of those who control it.
Rare footage of OP deciding where to post:
@flozen The really odd thing is that half the time they need to be moved twice because they get moved to the wrong place. After all, there's a whole forum entitled Jokes & Funny Stuff, though in this case I agree that this post wouldn't fit there either.
@whiteDwarf-0 Personally I avoid those files like the plague. The very fact that they used to be on the banned lists of several torrent sites has embedded itself in my brain, and even if he himself is older now you have to ask yourself if their other performers are above board given past suspicions. I do find myself wondering the same thing about quite a few OF performers, but given that sites like OF and JFF have age verification policies in place I would hope that everything you see on those sites is compliant with the law.
It does make you wonder though about how culpable an individual might be if they were to be found with questionable files downloaded from one of those sites. Could you, for example say that as the site has policies in place to ensure that all performers are of legal age you should not be held accountable? Clearly it is impossible for viewers to check a performer's ID, so should there be something akin to the UK's "Challenge 25" policy? (For the foreigners here, the Challenge 25 policy is meant to prevent underage people from buying alcohol. It means staff should check IDs for anyone who looks like they might be under 25, saving a lot of problems at the till when 18 or 19 year olds used to get offended at being asked for ID.) Of course, such a move would completely eliminate all twink porn.
It's an interesting question, probably much debated in the past when Brent Corrigan's real age was discovered after shooting some scenes for Cobra. After all, how is a viewer meant to know if someone is 17 or 18? You would think that should the police decide to try to get a conviction the onus would be on them to prove the performer was underage. When you hear in the news about underage pornography I think we all associate it with children who could never be mistaken for an adult, but it becomes much harder to discern the legality of the issue when talking about performers at the 18+ threshold.
Yep. My impression is that over the years files get moved around between so many different people on various sites that it's like a huge game of Chinese Whispers, and eventually you end up with files with names that bear nothing in common with their release titles.
Like I said, the idea is most definitely NOT to find a way around uploading duplicates. I'm becoming quite adept at recognising random uploads here that I've seen before and report them if I can verify that they're dupes. I just thing that if people can take a couple of minutes to research their uploads and name them properly before adding them to the site it would go some way to making things better for all users, even as the file propagates through other sites later on. Its so frustrating to see relatively new scenes uploaded with random titles when the real information is so easy to find.
@lololulu19 If you've taken a course in statistics then I suggest you ask for your money back.
Also, since an IQ of 100 is by definition the average IQ I think you may need to reassess your moron assertion, particularly as that particular label hasn't been used in reference to the IQ scale in decades. When it was still used it referred to an IQ of between 51 and 70. Now I'm actually quite keen to know what IQ you think someone needs to have in order to be considered functional in modern society.
@lololulu19 You do understand that taste is a thing, right? You're not suggesting that because you don't like those vids that they are no good, are you? Kudos to you though for watching each and every one of those all the way through so that you could definitively say there isn't a good one in the whole bunch. 
@hikariluan-0 I saw that comment, and it was totally out of line. If you've got a problem with another comment then I suggest you report it to the mods rather than fire thinly-veiled accusations at other members. In fact, that exactly what I did, asking the mods to have a look at the thread and step in if they felt it necessary. Apparently they decided it was necessary,
@lololulu19 said in DMCA strikes and the 90-day suspension:
if there is no USA copyright, then there is no copyright.
Wow....
(Sorry about the late response, but I had to nip down to the doctor. He told me I'd strained my eyes by rolling them too hard. )