Posts made by bi4smooth

@geobear40 said in The truth about liberal media:

@bi4smooth

Define "accident pregnancies" without using excuses that are up to poor planning or plain old stupidity.

Are you for real?

Define accidental pregnancy?

• Accidental pregnancies are pregnancies that are mistimed, unplanned or unwanted at the time of conception.

Just what else could it mean?

Come on, Humpty Dumpty, tell the rest of us what "Accidental Pregnancy" really means!

(For reference: Humpty Dumpty is a reference to a character in Lewis Carroll's "Through the Looking Glass, ca. 1871 - he is an egg-shaped character who argues with Alice about the meanings of words. His famous quote is specifically:

• "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less."

It is considered a "childish rant" about the deliberate misuse and/or misapplication of words. It has been used in arguments in both British and American courts - including the US Supreme Court - and I use it here in that same spirit.)

@geobear40 said in The truth about liberal media:

@bi4smooth said in The truth about liberal media:

Statistically speaking, in America, the chances are pretty good (well over 50%) that your mother didn't get pregnant with you on purpose. It was, maybe, a happy accident - but an accident, nonetheless.
Personally, virtually all of my children was mine - on purpose - ... because I adopted them. I would venture to say that most, if not all, of their biological parents were probably surprised by the pregnancy that created them (which explains why they were such terrible parents!)

Do you not believe in personal responsibility? Accidental pregnancies are such a small percentage of the total. A "happy accident" is only an excuse for poor planning and use if birth control.

I am so glad people such as yourself will adopt these kids who are unwanted by their biological parents.

"Accidental pregnancies are such a small percentage of the total."

You actually believe that bullshit?

You're a clueless one, aren't you!

I'm sorry, I don't even have to say more than that! If you believe that, then - well, you are far less informed than any adult male over the age of 25 that I've ever met! Enough said!

@espadajizz said in What happned to my ratio?:

i downloaded a few torrent on free leech.. im just wondering a if i downloaded the torrent on free leech and then the free leech time expired will it affect my ratios?

This is a common question, but the answer is simple:

• WATCH CLOSELY when the FREELEECH period ends!
• Data downloaded while the FREELEECH is active is FREE
• Data downloaded after the FREELEECH expires is NOT!

@eobox91103 said in Keeping your backside clean:

We can do better than off-the-shelf Charmin; see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpXtAhiKHBE

Hilarious! Thanks for that!

So I entered puberty at age 9 (very early) - I can document this because they took class pictures throughout Elementary school... you know the ones: smaller kids sitting on the floor, legs criss-cross, a row of kids behind them on their knees, and another row in the back with the tallest kids standing... the teacher off to the side, and a little sign in front showing the teacher's name, the grade, and the school.

Well, in 3rd grade, my class pic looks like there are 2 teachers... except the tall one opposite the teacher was me - quickly approaching 6-feet-tall!

My 4th grade class picture was similar, but I've lost my 5th Grade class photo... But, I will say this: my 6th Grade English teacher told me she passed me because I was "too big" to hold back!

So there I was, 6-ft in the 3rd Grade, age 9 - and my neighbor was a family with a 12 y/o girl, a 13 y/o boy, and a 15 y/o girl.

I was walking home from school one day and happened across that 12/yo girl in a wooded area (it was a shortcut path all the kids from my neighborhood took)... anyway, she was curious, I was curious, so she showed me her 12 y/o growing tits and little patch of hair over her pussy, and I showed her the little patch of hair over my grown (maybe still growing - I don't really recall) dick. I got it hard for her and she was ecstatic. It didn't happen THAT DAY, but later we started fucking...

The following fall, she started Middle School (6th Grade) and started fucking "older" boys (no doubt, with bigger dicks - I may have had a "man's dick" at 9, but it was still - and remains to this day - a totally average-sized penis... nothing to write home about, LOL.

When I was 11, the brother and I were playing in my backyard pool... one thing led to another, and we sucked each other off... later that week, we fucked in his bedroom (on his waterbed!)

So: 9 with a girl, 11 with a boy.

I've had an "active" sex life ever since - with both men and women - but last had sex with a woman in 2011 (with my now ex-wife). I'm open to it again, but since I'm dating a man currently, I'm hoping it never goes there!

@kekkaishi said in Why people use the phrase "w/" to mean "with"?:

@bi4smooth Thanks for the explanation.I genuinely believe that people use it because it's trendy, not because it's easier

Well, not to "pop your bubble" on this one, but when I mentioned it's use by my mother - it was 40+ years ago, and it was while being written longhand, not on a keyboard (much less a phone or tablet!) - so while it may be a "trendy" item today, if so it's a re-trend (or a borrowed trend?)

Truth be told, the "w/" was not written as unique, separate characters, it was all one stroke (I've looked online for an image, but haven't found one)... imagine writing a "w", but taking the upper-right of the w, moving the pen up and to the right very slightly, then striking a hard downward slash...

Similarly, something close to a "+" was used for "and" : imagine a plus character, with the "south" corner connected (by a curve) to the "west" corner... or, start with your pen at North, strike down, straight, to South, curve up and to the left to West, then strike straight to the right to East...

Also, w/f meant "wherefore" (a common legal tern), b/c = "because", b/f = "before", w/h = "withheld", w/f = "wherefore" (another common legal term)... and there were MANY others....

A favorite was "fu" -- which meant follow-up!

I was in my teens, and this is all from memory... there HAS to be an Internet resource for these - but I couldn't find one! My mother is a smart lady, but she didn't "invent" this shorthand! (And I don't mean the "secretarial shorthand" that is a whole other "language"!)

@raphjd said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

@bi4smooth

Transexual is not a sexual orientation as it is a state of mind about their body, not who they want to fuck.

Caitlyn Jenner is a lesbian, Blair White and Rose of Dawn are heterosexuals. Skylar is bi.

My apologies for not including @raphjd in the list of transphobic people mentioned in this thread....

Sexual Orientation applies just as much to what gender you ARE, as to what gender you ARE ATTRACTED TO...

If you believed that homosexuality was just a "state of mind", you'd be a homophobe...

If the shoe fits, wear it!

Unless you are embarrassed by your position, you should OWN the label transphobe!

@hottie124 said in Why people use the phrase "w/" to mean "with"?:

w/ is just shorthand for with...
it pairs with:
w/o is shorthand for without...

while @raphjd says it comes from food service, I first saw it in law offices (part of legal shorthand)... (not saying he's wrong - just stating where I saw it first)

Can I ask a significant question here:

How did Flavaworks get your address (since you say you received a paper mail item)?

So, let's differentiate here:

• In PORN - which is fantasy and NOT a how-to manual for sex - the "money shot" is virtually always made visible in some way (sometimes it's even faked - usually badly, see many sketchysex.com clips).
  I, for one, prefer it (in porn) when a guy being sucked off cums in/on the mouth of the sucker, and then the sucker goes back down on the cock, sucking up every last drop. It's even hotter if he keeps sucking as / until the cock starts to soften!
  Likewise, I prefer (in porn) when a guy fucking another guy pulls out just as he starts to cum (to show that he's cumming), and then stuffs it back in - especially when you can see the pulsing cock delivering another shot deep into the bottom's hole!
  What I don't enjoy - even in porn is the situation where the top fucks for a while, then pulls out - not to cum on the guy's ass or chest or stomach... no, he pulls out, re-positions himself, then jerks off (because, honestly, who can stay THAT CLOSE to orgasm while you do all of that moving around!?!) to cum on the guys's face... to me, that's a signal that the top just wasn't "feeling it" and couldn't cum fucking that bottom, so had to finish the scene jerking off...

• But, reality is another thing entirely:
  When I'm sucking a guy and he cums - it's in my mouth! You'll never see me pull off to "display" the cum... (not even on my tongue) ... I take every shot, every drop, down my throat and swallow "while its hot"... no display necessary, as the only one who's there to see it is the guy who delivered it to begin with!
  When I fuck a guy and I cum, I wouldn't DREAM of pulling out to cum on his ass or chest (much less twist around and try to cum in/on his face)! I cum in his ass - as deeply as my endowment allows - and I usually "lean into" him to kiss him while I continue to convulse!

I do admit that, when in groups, this changes... I have been sucked off my multiple guys simultaneously, and they WANTED me to cum across both their faces - so they BOTH got a taste! I was happy to oblige...
Sadly, that is not a common scenario for me (at least, not anymore!) LOL

@geobear40 said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

@bi4smooth said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

So, you agree that there are gay men, and I presume that you also agree that there are gay women (lesbians)... but you question the existence of trans?
Do you also question the existence of bisexuals?
What about Queer/Questioning or any other non-conforming "group"?
It seems to me that the only reason you believe that gay men actually exist is because you are one... for everyone else, if they don't fit into one of your "perfectly well organized world order" of labels, then they couldn't possibly exist!
That is folly and foolishness...
Trans people exist, whether you believe in them or not - and your insistence that they are "not real" is part of the definition of being transphobic!
For what it's worth, your attempt to re-label other people is also folly and foolishness! Why, you've looked "a little too long" at a naked woman or two - perhaps you're not really "gay", just a straight man who is too coward to approach a woman?
Balderdash! If you claim you're gay, I have no right to place a different label on your sexual orientation - and likewise, you have no right to refuse to accept or acknowledge the self-appointed sexual-orientation labels others choose for themselves!

Again you miss the point. Are you sure English is your first language. I admit to having spelling issues but you have comprehension issues that need to be addressed.

I admit that those very small self identified groups exist. They had such a small political presence they needed to attach their identity to the Gay movement. The Gay movement was happy to have them. The larger the group the more political power.

In regard to your inquire of my sexual orientation. It is a free country attempt to disparage me all you want. I have the right to keep my sexual history to myself.

I think it is you who are having issues with conceptualizing what's being said: I could truly not care less about a topic than I do about your personal situation - sexually or otherwise. While I don't wish you any ill-will, it truly does not enter my thought processes (without your injecting it there) at all... and I made it clear in my post above, that it would not be right of me to attempt to label you or your sexuality.

My point - clear, I suspect, to others if not to you - was that YOU similarly have no right to assign (or attack) those labels when self-assigned by others.

Trans people are a sexual-orientation minority legitimately, and not just a "fringe group" that's "hanging on for the ride"... their numbers, when not forced to be closeted, are - I suspect - somewhat higher than you would believe.

That said, getting back to the points:

• Matt Walsh (and @geobear40) should be allowed to be trans-phobic (the argument as to whether you fit that label notwithstanding). I appreciate their willingness to express their views, as it provides ME information - for example, I will no longer be tempted to read anything else from Matt Walsh regarding human or minority rights, given that he has already proven and professed his complete ignorance on the issue.
• Twitter should not be "so quick to judge," IMHO. Specifically, his account should not have been suspended for these tweets... stupidity is annoying, and sometimes offensive - but it is not illegal!
• Twitter is within their rights to suspend any account they want to, for any reason... they are not a public accommodation, they are a private company providing a very specific service... albeit to a wide audience, but nevertheless, they do not meet the criteria for being a public accommodation, and thus legal protections for potential clients do not really exist.

@geobear40 said in Russia rejects European Court of Human Rights order to recognise same-sex unions:

@bi4smooth

You just proved my point. You don't like Trump because he expanded the GOP to be more inclusive and welcoming to the working class. I was around in the 80's so when the Reagan Democrats voted republican you cheered but after the election you were happy they stayed Democrats. You hate Trump because he brought in those Reagan Democrats and a great majority of them stayed in the GOP and you are pissed off.

I jeer Trump - not because of his views, but because of his tactics. He brought (brings) shame and discredit to our Party and to the Country, with his pedantic and self-aggrandizing outright lies, fear-mongering, and race-baiting. His policies (many of which I favor) will hopefully outlive his personality.

@geobear40 said in “Pfizer CEO: New Pill Will Have a Microchip That Transmits Info Once You Swallow It!”:

@bi4smooth

You are dilutional and in need a medical attention to remove that stick from out of your ass.

I think I am far from being dilutional - Indeed, I believe I am at full-strength!

Oh, wait - I think you may have meant DELISIONAL? ... English can be such a difficult language...

Well, as with many of your posts (@raphjd's too) that are nothing but personal attacks or name-calling, I won't bother to reply... instead, I'll let the "gentle readers" of the forum decide for themselves...

@geobear40 said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

@bi4smooth

It started out as being refered to as Gay then women wants their own label and it became Gay & Lesbian after that all the smaller "gay adjacent" groups wanted to be represented and it became LGBT. and so on and so on until we get to where it is today. A bunch of letters people use to virtue signal each other.

None of that takes anything away from me being an out gay man for over 30 years.

So, you agree that there are gay men, and I presume that you also agree that there are gay women (lesbians)... but you question the existence of trans?
Do you also question the existence of bisexuals?
What about Queer/Questioning or any other non-conforming "group"?

It seems to me that the only reason you believe that gay men actually exist is because you are one... for everyone else, if they don't fit into one of your "perfectly well organized world order" of labels, then they couldn't possibly exist!

That is folly and foolishness...

Trans people exist, whether you believe in them or not - and your insistence that they are "not real" is part of the definition of being transphobic!

For what it's worth, your attempt to re-label other people is also folly and foolishness! Why, you've looked "a little too long" at a naked woman or two - perhaps you're not really "gay", just a straight man who is too coward to approach a woman?

Balderdash! If you claim you're gay, I have no right to place a different label on your sexual orientation - and likewise, you have no right to refuse to accept or acknowledge the self-appointed sexual-orientation labels others choose for themselves!

@hottie124

So there are 2 key things to keep in mind here:

• You can get some help with your ratio purely by seeding - ALL THE TIME! It doesn't matter what, or how much seed, you earn a small amount of SBP just for seeding anything!
  BUT this is a slow slow method of helping your ratio - 600 SBP (which takes a long time to collect) is just 10GB upload credit!
• Or, you can actually transmit data to other users - and one of the easiest ways to do that is with freeleeches!
  BUT THAT'S NOT THE WHOLE STORY
  When a torrent is made into a freeleech, it is usually noticed by a LOT of users, and it usually becomes VERY POPULAR. Lots of leechers = lots of people to send data to!
  BUT Lots of leechers, in a relatively short amount of time, quickly becomes lots of SEEDERS! And that's "competition" to your getting the ratio you so desperately need!

So, it's not enough to just seed freeleech torrents - to get the most "bang for your buck" you need to seed freeleeches EARLY - as-in SOON AFTER they become freeleech!

To do that, search specifically for freeleech torrents, and look for those with relatively low numbers of seeders!

@reggaeduro said in Torrent Removals & Auto Download:

someone tell me if this link is working, please...

pgkts from cam4 Vol 04

That link works now (12:30 am EST on Monday, Jan 10, 2022)

@geobear40 said in UK - Primary school teacher banned for life for funding Islamist terrorists:

@lololulu19

They do encourage them behind close doors but once the public finds out they do something about it.

https://nypost.com/2021/09/02/pro-antifa-teacher-gabriel-gipe-reportedly-will-be-fired/

When you are asked: "Is the glass half-full, or half-empty?" I'm guessing your response is: "Glass? What glass?" LOL

Cops (and teachers) are people too - they have the right to donate to causes they believe in, albeit because of their positions, there are some that might be considered a "conflict of interest"...

In general, (and I don't know the specifics here), a cop shouldn't be punished for supporting Kyle Rittenhouse's "cause", not should a teacher be fired for supporting Islamic causes....

Now, if the cop is paying to buy Kyle Rittenhouse automatic "machine guns", or the teacher is supporting Islamic terrorist organizations - that's different.

Again, I don't know the specifics, and I haven't read the articles... it's late and I want to get some sleep

@geobear40 said in “Pfizer CEO: New Pill Will Have a Microchip That Transmits Info Once You Swallow It!”:

So are you claiming that the FDA is no longer an independent agency? Then you would have to agree that everything the FDA has said since that time is political rather than Science based.

Independent of WHAT exactly? It's an agency in the Dept. of HHS! It is independent of the CDC, and of the NIH, but not independent from "the Government" - it IS the Government!!

The Federal Reserve is an Independent Organization - while the Board of Governors is appointed by the President, there is no oversight or other power over them. Once appointed, the Governors server their term, and they cannot be removed. (I'm not sure, but I don't even think they can be impeached!)

The FDA "ain't that....

If there is anything Heir Trump taught us, it is that no Governmental Agency is above being influenced by the Office of the President!

Honestly, it'll take DECADES of "good behavior" to repair the damage Trump did to the reputations of the CDC and FDA!

This is about a pill you swallow not a test or a shot. Besides if it was in a pill it would pass without gaining more then a snap shot if anything at all. They would have to administer the pill and make patients wear the receiver during the time it was in your system and return the data back to the hospital. So you as the patient would have to give consent the whole way thru.

Ummmm.... are you trying to make my point?

The goal of putting the RFID "chip" in the pill was to be able to run a detector over the psycho-patient's gut to ensure that they'd taken the medication! If it stuck around (vs. being crapped out), it wouldn't server its purpose, as you need to "evacuate" the old "chip" to make way for the new one coming in with the next dose!

But the rest of what I was posting about was in reference to the whole conspiracy theory about tracking chips in the vaccines and tests for COVID-19 that are the source of the fear-mongering that inspired the original posting!

@eobox91103 said in High school teacher charged after locking COVID-positive 13-year-old child in trunk to 'quarantine':

@amazeingrave said in High school teacher charged after locking COVID-positive 13-year-old child in trunk to 'quarantine':

I wish people could just react logically instead of getting into fist fights on planes because someone isn't wearing a mask.

I agree that a calmer approach is needed: Instead of a fist fight, just escort the offender out of the aircraft's door. Ideally this would be done at the gate with the jetbridge attached, but it's also effective if the plane is flying at 10,000 feet.

You're going to get negative feedback on that, but I for one appreciate and enjoy the sarcasm!