Posts made by bi4smooth

@kekkaishi said in Why people use the phrase "w/" to mean "with"?:

@bi4smooth Thanks for the explanation.I genuinely believe that people use it because it's trendy, not because it's easier

Well, not to "pop your bubble" on this one, but when I mentioned it's use by my mother - it was 40+ years ago, and it was while being written longhand, not on a keyboard (much less a phone or tablet!) - so while it may be a "trendy" item today, if so it's a re-trend (or a borrowed trend?)

Truth be told, the "w/" was not written as unique, separate characters, it was all one stroke (I've looked online for an image, but haven't found one)... imagine writing a "w", but taking the upper-right of the w, moving the pen up and to the right very slightly, then striking a hard downward slash...

Similarly, something close to a "+" was used for "and" : imagine a plus character, with the "south" corner connected (by a curve) to the "west" corner... or, start with your pen at North, strike down, straight, to South, curve up and to the left to West, then strike straight to the right to East...

Also, w/f meant "wherefore" (a common legal tern), b/c = "because", b/f = "before", w/h = "withheld", w/f = "wherefore" (another common legal term)... and there were MANY others....

A favorite was "fu" -- which meant follow-up!

I was in my teens, and this is all from memory... there HAS to be an Internet resource for these - but I couldn't find one! My mother is a smart lady, but she didn't "invent" this shorthand! (And I don't mean the "secretarial shorthand" that is a whole other "language"!)

@raphjd said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

@bi4smooth

Transexual is not a sexual orientation as it is a state of mind about their body, not who they want to fuck.

Caitlyn Jenner is a lesbian, Blair White and Rose of Dawn are heterosexuals. Skylar is bi.

My apologies for not including @raphjd in the list of transphobic people mentioned in this thread....

Sexual Orientation applies just as much to what gender you ARE, as to what gender you ARE ATTRACTED TO...

If you believed that homosexuality was just a "state of mind", you'd be a homophobe...

If the shoe fits, wear it!

Unless you are embarrassed by your position, you should OWN the label transphobe!

@hottie124 said in Why people use the phrase "w/" to mean "with"?:

w/ is just shorthand for with...
it pairs with:
w/o is shorthand for without...

while @raphjd says it comes from food service, I first saw it in law offices (part of legal shorthand)... (not saying he's wrong - just stating where I saw it first)

Can I ask a significant question here:

How did Flavaworks get your address (since you say you received a paper mail item)?

So, let's differentiate here:

• In PORN - which is fantasy and NOT a how-to manual for sex - the "money shot" is virtually always made visible in some way (sometimes it's even faked - usually badly, see many sketchysex.com clips).
  I, for one, prefer it (in porn) when a guy being sucked off cums in/on the mouth of the sucker, and then the sucker goes back down on the cock, sucking up every last drop. It's even hotter if he keeps sucking as / until the cock starts to soften!
  Likewise, I prefer (in porn) when a guy fucking another guy pulls out just as he starts to cum (to show that he's cumming), and then stuffs it back in - especially when you can see the pulsing cock delivering another shot deep into the bottom's hole!
  What I don't enjoy - even in porn is the situation where the top fucks for a while, then pulls out - not to cum on the guy's ass or chest or stomach... no, he pulls out, re-positions himself, then jerks off (because, honestly, who can stay THAT CLOSE to orgasm while you do all of that moving around!?!) to cum on the guys's face... to me, that's a signal that the top just wasn't "feeling it" and couldn't cum fucking that bottom, so had to finish the scene jerking off...

• But, reality is another thing entirely:
  When I'm sucking a guy and he cums - it's in my mouth! You'll never see me pull off to "display" the cum... (not even on my tongue) ... I take every shot, every drop, down my throat and swallow "while its hot"... no display necessary, as the only one who's there to see it is the guy who delivered it to begin with!
  When I fuck a guy and I cum, I wouldn't DREAM of pulling out to cum on his ass or chest (much less twist around and try to cum in/on his face)! I cum in his ass - as deeply as my endowment allows - and I usually "lean into" him to kiss him while I continue to convulse!

I do admit that, when in groups, this changes... I have been sucked off my multiple guys simultaneously, and they WANTED me to cum across both their faces - so they BOTH got a taste! I was happy to oblige...
Sadly, that is not a common scenario for me (at least, not anymore!) LOL

@geobear40 said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

@bi4smooth said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

So, you agree that there are gay men, and I presume that you also agree that there are gay women (lesbians)... but you question the existence of trans?
Do you also question the existence of bisexuals?
What about Queer/Questioning or any other non-conforming "group"?
It seems to me that the only reason you believe that gay men actually exist is because you are one... for everyone else, if they don't fit into one of your "perfectly well organized world order" of labels, then they couldn't possibly exist!
That is folly and foolishness...
Trans people exist, whether you believe in them or not - and your insistence that they are "not real" is part of the definition of being transphobic!
For what it's worth, your attempt to re-label other people is also folly and foolishness! Why, you've looked "a little too long" at a naked woman or two - perhaps you're not really "gay", just a straight man who is too coward to approach a woman?
Balderdash! If you claim you're gay, I have no right to place a different label on your sexual orientation - and likewise, you have no right to refuse to accept or acknowledge the self-appointed sexual-orientation labels others choose for themselves!

Again you miss the point. Are you sure English is your first language. I admit to having spelling issues but you have comprehension issues that need to be addressed.

I admit that those very small self identified groups exist. They had such a small political presence they needed to attach their identity to the Gay movement. The Gay movement was happy to have them. The larger the group the more political power.

In regard to your inquire of my sexual orientation. It is a free country attempt to disparage me all you want. I have the right to keep my sexual history to myself.

I think it is you who are having issues with conceptualizing what's being said: I could truly not care less about a topic than I do about your personal situation - sexually or otherwise. While I don't wish you any ill-will, it truly does not enter my thought processes (without your injecting it there) at all... and I made it clear in my post above, that it would not be right of me to attempt to label you or your sexuality.

My point - clear, I suspect, to others if not to you - was that YOU similarly have no right to assign (or attack) those labels when self-assigned by others.

Trans people are a sexual-orientation minority legitimately, and not just a "fringe group" that's "hanging on for the ride"... their numbers, when not forced to be closeted, are - I suspect - somewhat higher than you would believe.

That said, getting back to the points:

• Matt Walsh (and @geobear40) should be allowed to be trans-phobic (the argument as to whether you fit that label notwithstanding). I appreciate their willingness to express their views, as it provides ME information - for example, I will no longer be tempted to read anything else from Matt Walsh regarding human or minority rights, given that he has already proven and professed his complete ignorance on the issue.
• Twitter should not be "so quick to judge," IMHO. Specifically, his account should not have been suspended for these tweets... stupidity is annoying, and sometimes offensive - but it is not illegal!
• Twitter is within their rights to suspend any account they want to, for any reason... they are not a public accommodation, they are a private company providing a very specific service... albeit to a wide audience, but nevertheless, they do not meet the criteria for being a public accommodation, and thus legal protections for potential clients do not really exist.

@geobear40 said in Russia rejects European Court of Human Rights order to recognise same-sex unions:

@bi4smooth

You just proved my point. You don't like Trump because he expanded the GOP to be more inclusive and welcoming to the working class. I was around in the 80's so when the Reagan Democrats voted republican you cheered but after the election you were happy they stayed Democrats. You hate Trump because he brought in those Reagan Democrats and a great majority of them stayed in the GOP and you are pissed off.

I jeer Trump - not because of his views, but because of his tactics. He brought (brings) shame and discredit to our Party and to the Country, with his pedantic and self-aggrandizing outright lies, fear-mongering, and race-baiting. His policies (many of which I favor) will hopefully outlive his personality.

@geobear40 said in “Pfizer CEO: New Pill Will Have a Microchip That Transmits Info Once You Swallow It!”:

@bi4smooth

You are dilutional and in need a medical attention to remove that stick from out of your ass.

I think I am far from being dilutional - Indeed, I believe I am at full-strength!

Oh, wait - I think you may have meant DELISIONAL? ... English can be such a difficult language...

Well, as with many of your posts (@raphjd's too) that are nothing but personal attacks or name-calling, I won't bother to reply... instead, I'll let the "gentle readers" of the forum decide for themselves...

@geobear40 said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

@bi4smooth

It started out as being refered to as Gay then women wants their own label and it became Gay & Lesbian after that all the smaller "gay adjacent" groups wanted to be represented and it became LGBT. and so on and so on until we get to where it is today. A bunch of letters people use to virtue signal each other.

None of that takes anything away from me being an out gay man for over 30 years.

So, you agree that there are gay men, and I presume that you also agree that there are gay women (lesbians)... but you question the existence of trans?
Do you also question the existence of bisexuals?
What about Queer/Questioning or any other non-conforming "group"?

It seems to me that the only reason you believe that gay men actually exist is because you are one... for everyone else, if they don't fit into one of your "perfectly well organized world order" of labels, then they couldn't possibly exist!

That is folly and foolishness...

Trans people exist, whether you believe in them or not - and your insistence that they are "not real" is part of the definition of being transphobic!

For what it's worth, your attempt to re-label other people is also folly and foolishness! Why, you've looked "a little too long" at a naked woman or two - perhaps you're not really "gay", just a straight man who is too coward to approach a woman?

Balderdash! If you claim you're gay, I have no right to place a different label on your sexual orientation - and likewise, you have no right to refuse to accept or acknowledge the self-appointed sexual-orientation labels others choose for themselves!

@hottie124

So there are 2 key things to keep in mind here:

• You can get some help with your ratio purely by seeding - ALL THE TIME! It doesn't matter what, or how much seed, you earn a small amount of SBP just for seeding anything!
  BUT this is a slow slow method of helping your ratio - 600 SBP (which takes a long time to collect) is just 10GB upload credit!
• Or, you can actually transmit data to other users - and one of the easiest ways to do that is with freeleeches!
  BUT THAT'S NOT THE WHOLE STORY
  When a torrent is made into a freeleech, it is usually noticed by a LOT of users, and it usually becomes VERY POPULAR. Lots of leechers = lots of people to send data to!
  BUT Lots of leechers, in a relatively short amount of time, quickly becomes lots of SEEDERS! And that's "competition" to your getting the ratio you so desperately need!

So, it's not enough to just seed freeleech torrents - to get the most "bang for your buck" you need to seed freeleeches EARLY - as-in SOON AFTER they become freeleech!

To do that, search specifically for freeleech torrents, and look for those with relatively low numbers of seeders!

@reggaeduro said in Torrent Removals & Auto Download:

someone tell me if this link is working, please...

pgkts from cam4 Vol 04

That link works now (12:30 am EST on Monday, Jan 10, 2022)

@geobear40 said in UK - Primary school teacher banned for life for funding Islamist terrorists:

@lololulu19

They do encourage them behind close doors but once the public finds out they do something about it.

https://nypost.com/2021/09/02/pro-antifa-teacher-gabriel-gipe-reportedly-will-be-fired/

When you are asked: "Is the glass half-full, or half-empty?" I'm guessing your response is: "Glass? What glass?" LOL

Cops (and teachers) are people too - they have the right to donate to causes they believe in, albeit because of their positions, there are some that might be considered a "conflict of interest"...

In general, (and I don't know the specifics here), a cop shouldn't be punished for supporting Kyle Rittenhouse's "cause", not should a teacher be fired for supporting Islamic causes....

Now, if the cop is paying to buy Kyle Rittenhouse automatic "machine guns", or the teacher is supporting Islamic terrorist organizations - that's different.

Again, I don't know the specifics, and I haven't read the articles... it's late and I want to get some sleep

@geobear40 said in “Pfizer CEO: New Pill Will Have a Microchip That Transmits Info Once You Swallow It!”:

So are you claiming that the FDA is no longer an independent agency? Then you would have to agree that everything the FDA has said since that time is political rather than Science based.

Independent of WHAT exactly? It's an agency in the Dept. of HHS! It is independent of the CDC, and of the NIH, but not independent from "the Government" - it IS the Government!!

The Federal Reserve is an Independent Organization - while the Board of Governors is appointed by the President, there is no oversight or other power over them. Once appointed, the Governors server their term, and they cannot be removed. (I'm not sure, but I don't even think they can be impeached!)

The FDA "ain't that....

If there is anything Heir Trump taught us, it is that no Governmental Agency is above being influenced by the Office of the President!

Honestly, it'll take DECADES of "good behavior" to repair the damage Trump did to the reputations of the CDC and FDA!

This is about a pill you swallow not a test or a shot. Besides if it was in a pill it would pass without gaining more then a snap shot if anything at all. They would have to administer the pill and make patients wear the receiver during the time it was in your system and return the data back to the hospital. So you as the patient would have to give consent the whole way thru.

Ummmm.... are you trying to make my point?

The goal of putting the RFID "chip" in the pill was to be able to run a detector over the psycho-patient's gut to ensure that they'd taken the medication! If it stuck around (vs. being crapped out), it wouldn't server its purpose, as you need to "evacuate" the old "chip" to make way for the new one coming in with the next dose!

But the rest of what I was posting about was in reference to the whole conspiracy theory about tracking chips in the vaccines and tests for COVID-19 that are the source of the fear-mongering that inspired the original posting!

@eobox91103 said in High school teacher charged after locking COVID-positive 13-year-old child in trunk to 'quarantine':

@amazeingrave said in High school teacher charged after locking COVID-positive 13-year-old child in trunk to 'quarantine':

I wish people could just react logically instead of getting into fist fights on planes because someone isn't wearing a mask.

I agree that a calmer approach is needed: Instead of a fist fight, just escort the offender out of the aircraft's door. Ideally this would be done at the gate with the jetbridge attached, but it's also effective if the plane is flying at 10,000 feet.

You're going to get negative feedback on that, but I for one appreciate and enjoy the sarcasm!

@geobear40 said in Russia rejects European Court of Human Rights order to recognise same-sex unions:

@bi4smooth

So you joined the Republican party because you thought they were the elitists' you think you are. Now that they are becoming the party of the "great unwashed" so you are taking on the mission of purging the "deplorables" from your Grand Old Party.

You silly TWIT I joined the Republican Party in 1980 because I believed in the leadership of Ronald Reagan! I have never left, though I must admit to being tempted to do so as a result of the Trump "sore loser" and other aftermaths of the 2020 election!

@geobear40 said in Twitter suspends Daily Wire's Matt Walsh after he posted gender critical 'transphobic' tweets:

@bi4smooth

Being trans and being homosexual are not the same thing. Trans persons are a minority so small that they have to become part of a larger group to get any respect.

You really think that the trans community encompasses all of homosexuality?

You silly fool (and I do not use the term loosely):

• L - Lesbian (as in homosexual female)
• G - Gay (as in homosexual male)
• B - Bisexual (male or female)
• T - Transexual (or Transgender - depending on who you ask)
• Q - Questioning

You, my dear queer, are a transphobe... sad, but you've proven it!

@geobear40 said in UPDATE: Alleged Antifa member targeted Florida rally with a bomb; more explosives found at his house:

@bi4smooth
Talk about mudding the waters with the shit you spew.

No, I didn't read your article - because I live here! I watched the Sheriff's actual news conference vs reading someone else's reporting of it!

There is NO evidence (at least, not yet) that this kid is leftist or rightist, nor do they know (yet) why he was even there! As I noted, he was taken into custody running AWAY from the protest, with the IED still in his backpack. They searched the area and found no other explosives - except more in his car, and more still at his home.

The kid's a nut-job to be sure, and needed to be arrested. But attaching other labels is premature, and just Russian Propagandists feeding you lies - lies that you happily devour because it feeds into your sick head.

@eobox91103 said in Leftie NFL is trying to move the Superbowl from California to Texas:

@geobear40 said in Leftie NFL is trying to move the Superbowl from California to Texas:

@eobox91103
Not statewide but Sofi stadium is located in Los Angeles county which has some of the country's greatest restrictions on personal freedoms in the Country.

So if it's a county government thing, then we should purge this thread of mentions of the state governor (Newsom--note correct spelling).

But the essence of my question remains: "Can someone identify the most recent county-wide lockdown for us?" See https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-12-21/l-a-county-says-no-lockdown-needed-now-as-california-require-boosters-for-health-workers from about two weeks ago.

Is there a rabbit hole @raphjd won't go down to prove he isn't wrong?

But - he was wrong - plain and simple.

As noted in my first response: he's shouting "FIRE" when it's just a candle in the window!

Nothing is happening to the Super Bowl - at least, not yet!
And the plans to move it are the NFL's standard "backup plans" - so that their $billion exercise isn't wasted!

Oh! Look! There's a dog chasing a cat!

@hingstkuk said in Turn-on: Mixed condom use:

Thanks for the tip! Stealth is not really what I'm looking for though. More a consensual situation where some where condoms and some don't, preferably in the same bottom.

That's very specific... I can recall some scenes where this happened (many years ago) - when the barebacking was done by a couple, and the condom was used by the "3rd"...

In all honesty though, with the advent of PrEP, the use of condoms in porn has been on the decline for a while now... you can think that's good or bad, but that's where the industry is now!

My point is: look for content from the late 20-00's to mid 20-10's... by 2018 or 2019, most sites were already largely bareback.

In Florida (where I live and am an activist for children's rights), a mother was jailed when neighbors heard the extended screams of a child coming from a home.

It seems the mother locked her 2-year old in the bathroom - with the lights out - knowing the child was terrified of the dark - because she had "messed herself" (she was potty-training).

Neighbors reported the child's screams had persisted for over 15 minutes before police were called, and continued until police arrived about 15 more minutes later.

The "mother" was taken into custody for "aggravated child abuse", the child was put into foster care.

My point is: child abusers don't need an excuse like COVID-19 to abuse children!

Hopefully this teacher is removed from any and all professions that involve supervision of children!