Porn is entertainment
Sex is entertainment
Porn is FANTASY
Sex is real-life
People who cannot tell the difference are a danger to themselves and others...
Porn is entertainment
Sex is entertainment
Porn is FANTASY
Sex is real-life
People who cannot tell the difference are a danger to themselves and others...
MY PERSONAL definition of a twink is a lithe (skinny), smooth body, likely a little smaller than average, and often moderately to more effeminate.
MY PERSONAL definition doesn't include age...
I LOVE TWINKS OF ALL AGES! :) :) :two_hearts:
You assume I'm a Democrat.
You are again a finalist in the "Miss Taken" pageant! We'll try to get you another sash, but we're running low. :)
I'm a conservative, I'm just not a conspiracy-confused one.
I believe in science: facts don't lie, but people who interpret them often do.
I believe in Democracy (even when i lose).
I believe in the general goodness of the average person.
I believe that Joe Biden won the recent election fair and square.
I do not believe that nationalism works in anyone's best interests.
I do not believe in racism - especially as a political tool.
I do not believe in absolutes.
I do not believe in secret cabals of child molesting politicians, threatening our children - primarily because they belong to the other party.
I personally know very fine politicians of both political parties here in the US. Honorable men and women who do not agree (not with me, and certainly not with each other), and yet, remain friends.
To my misguided (sometimes mis-labeled) Conservative friends who believe whole-heartedly that Donald Trump is their savior, I say this: Repent of your sins now, before your God judges you!
I also offer this: count the letters - compromise is not a 4-letter word!
That's a favorite of mine - WolfieKitty
He's on chatturbate, and there are some files available on here (search WolfieKitty)
Word to the wise: he is STRAIGHT, and while he loves his fans of all stripes, his GIRLFRIEND does appear in some of his videos!
He sucks, he cums, he swallows... for someone who USED TO COULD do that too, he's amazingly agile and HOT!
@ricky Having uploaded 76,000,000,000,000 (76 TB) of stuff, I'm not worried about 1 seedpoint. It is frustrating to see the images I uploaded get shoved to the back.
If it is your upload, you can edit the torrent listing and remove the offending pics.. that said, if they are legit pics of your upload, you should be judicious in doing so... but you can ALSO then re-upload the "main" pic you want seen.
Just to add my 2-cents worth - I had this happen to me once, and it turned out that the older torrent, by the time it was looked at, was essentially dead: no seeders and no leechers. So they deleted the ORIGINAL, which made my duplicate report "invalid" (according to the explanation I was given).
Is that all there is to your argument?
BTW, did you join the site just so you could post that crap? I mean, you post that 2 minutes after you joined the site.
EDIT: You have been a member for many years, but you just made your first ever post.
LOL - what can you say, @raphjd , your bombastic "every match lit is a raging forest-fire" style of commentary just motivates people to join in!
I wish something more could be done to prevent the sudden removal of fansite stuff right after posting. I mean there was a rip of Iggy Lopez's stuff and it didn't even begin to download and seed because it was removed so fast. :(
So unless I'm mistaken, once the connection is made between seeder and leecher, the tracker is no longer a required part of the equation. And the DMCA (as well as duplicate) removals just take them away from the tracker - they have no way to infiltrate the seeder's systems and remove content!
So: if you're seeing a torrent come up, and it's seeder starts to seed, and you get connected to that seeder, and while you're still downloading, the site removes the torrent (for whatever reason), your download should continue until completion.
Because the torrent was removed, you won't be "charged" for the download, but you won't be able to SEED it either, upon completion.
I know people are often confused about this part of torrenting: the tracker doesn't contain any part of the actual files! All of the content is on other users' computers! The tracker is just an "arbiter" - connecting people who want to people who have!
When you "browse" torrents here, you're just looking at a catalog of material people are seeding. (Thousands of users means many thousands of seeded items)... When you "download" from the site, you're actually just downloading a "descriptor" of the contents (including file checksums - to make sure you're getting valid content)... your torrent client program then use that descriptor, and a connection to the "tracker," to establish DIRECT connections to the seeders.
From that point on, all of the data transfers are between seeder and leecher - with no action happening on (or through) the tracker, except that both report TO the tracker that they are talking/trading data. (That is where/how the quotas are established/maintained).
So, when a torrent is removed from the tracker, the list of seeders the leecher got are still valid, and the seeders are still seeding (they don't need access to the tracker, except that the tracker is how leechers "hear/learn about" the seeder). Thus, the torrent is "unregistered" - not dead.
Long story short, once you are leeching, if the tracker removes the torrent, your leech should be able to continue... unless the SEEDER also (typically out of frustration) deletes the torrent from their client, in which case, they are no longer seeding and the torrent really IS dead.
The new forums fairly regularly tell me that the connection has been lost and to give it a moment. It's quickly enough resolved, most of the time, but it's pretty annoying and seemingly needless, as some of the times, I'm not even doing anything that would require an active connection.
This is a new phenomenon - I suspect after some kind of update.
I reported it in another section as well, but wanted to confirm HERE that I am seeing the same behavior.
The issue here, if you dig deeper, isn't as controversial as it appears at first glance. FIRST OF ALL: the report is not that they under-reported ALL COVID deaths by 50%! No, they under-counted the deaths IN NURSING HOMES by up to 50%. BIG DIFFERENCE THERE!
If you can remember back, at the early part of the pandemic, NY was taking COVID patients who couldn't be helped (or didn't need ICU attention) in hospitals and sending them to long-term care facilities - many of which were nursing homes. The issue was, they needed the beds in the hospitals, and we didn't know yet that the virus was spread by aerosol (we still thought, at the time, that it was a contact thing).
We can argue later about the tragic consequences on sending COVID patients to nursing homes to die, and the effect that had on COVID in the other nursing home patients...
So, a hospital sends a COVID patient they cannot help to a nursing home - ostensibly to die (remember, back then we didn't have the treatments we have today - that we had just 6-10 weeks later!). And, of course, that person shortly thereafter passes away... from COVID.
Is that a death in the NURSING HOME, or is that a death from the Hospital who sent them there, essentially to die?
Some nursing homes didn't report these as "their deaths" because they weren't their patient before they got COVID! They still had to worry about those numbers being public and the fact that they still wanted to care for patients AFTER the pandemic -- and who wants to go live in a nursing home where thousands of people died from COVID?
An investigation needs to occur, most certainly. But don't expect real-world scenarios to fit neatly into your conveniently labeled boxes.
-- EDIT here -- That last comment came across as somewhat snarky when I re-read my own post. It wasn't meant as such. My point wasn't directed at any one person (@raphjd especially) - rather a point about ALL of us (even me) who would like to have "life" fit into neat, clearly defined categories... and that's just not the real world in which we live.
There is actually very little BLACK AND WHITE in our world - it's truly a RAINBOW of colors.... and while that makes organizing and categorizing (and understanding) things much more difficult, it is also what makes life so wonderful! IMHO
Sometimes I don't know how to thank a comment with good information. It's sad. I hope they do something about it.
You can post another comment to the torrent, perhaps starting with the commenter's name. The previous commenter will get a message saying that there's a new comment on that torrent, and he can then go back to the torrent page and read it.
As far as I know, there isn't a way to give seed points to another user unless they post a torrent and you give seed points to that torrent.
If memory serves, there have been earlier attempts to get the owner to broaden the ability to "trade" seedpoints (SBP) - but they have been rebuffed on several grounds.
I don't recall all of them, but the general point was that the more you allowed the "exchange" of SBP, the more open to abuse you made the whole system... a system that is designed to reward SEEDING TORRENTS, not just general good behavior.
In this case, I think a simple "Thank You" will need to suffice!
That video was taken just a few weeks ago, too!
(What do I mean about "a few weeks ago"? That video is from 2015 - only about 400 weeks ago... and when you're inflating this kind of crap, that's all within the realm of "recent")...
If this now 84 year-old woman is still (or has ever) DRIVEN for the US Government, it is certainly time to revoke her Driver's License! No argument there!
But, does that have any bearing on her ability to chair the Transportation Committee? Honestly, I think her AGE would be a bigger concern than her driving skills (or lack thereof)....
Again - I don't support her attempt to step up and be the next Chair of the Transportation Committee - but, while referencing the IRONY of a Transportation Committee-woman's poor parking skills is FUNNY, it is hardly the kind of REASONED rationale for denying her the role.
Define "accident pregnancies" without using excuses that are up to poor planning or plain old stupidity.
Are you for real?
Define accidental pregnancy?
Just what else could it mean?
Come on, Humpty Dumpty, tell the rest of us what "Accidental Pregnancy" really means!
(For reference: Humpty Dumpty is a reference to a character in Lewis Carroll's "Through the Looking Glass, ca. 1871 - he is an egg-shaped character who argues with Alice about the meanings of words. His famous quote is specifically:
It is considered a "childish rant" about the deliberate misuse and/or misapplication of words. It has been used in arguments in both British and American courts - including the US Supreme Court - and I use it here in that same spirit.)
Statistically speaking, in America, the chances are pretty good (well over 50%) that your mother didn't get pregnant with you on purpose. It was, maybe, a happy accident - but an accident, nonetheless.
Personally, virtually all of my children was mine - on purpose - ... because I adopted them. I would venture to say that most, if not all, of their biological parents were probably surprised by the pregnancy that created them (which explains why they were such terrible parents!)
Do you not believe in personal responsibility? Accidental pregnancies are such a small percentage of the total. A "happy accident" is only an excuse for poor planning and use if birth control.
I am so glad people such as yourself will adopt these kids who are unwanted by their biological parents.
"Accidental pregnancies are such a small percentage of the total."
You actually believe that bullshit?
You're a clueless one, aren't you!
I'm sorry, I don't even have to say more than that! If you believe that, then - well, you are far less informed than any adult male over the age of 25 that I've ever met! Enough said!
i downloaded a few torrent on free leech.. im just wondering a if i downloaded the torrent on free leech and then the free leech time expired will it affect my ratios?
This is a common question, but the answer is simple:
So I entered puberty at age 9 (very early) - I can document this because they took class pictures throughout Elementary school... you know the ones: smaller kids sitting on the floor, legs criss-cross, a row of kids behind them on their knees, and another row in the back with the tallest kids standing... the teacher off to the side, and a little sign in front showing the teacher's name, the grade, and the school.
Well, in 3rd grade, my class pic looks like there are 2 teachers... except the tall one opposite the teacher was me - quickly approaching 6-feet-tall!
My 4th grade class picture was similar, but I've lost my 5th Grade class photo... But, I will say this: my 6th Grade English teacher told me she passed me because I was "too big" to hold back!
So there I was, 6-ft in the 3rd Grade, age 9 - and my neighbor was a family with a 12 y/o girl, a 13 y/o boy, and a 15 y/o girl.
I was walking home from school one day and happened across that 12/yo girl in a wooded area (it was a shortcut path all the kids from my neighborhood took)... anyway, she was curious, I was curious, so she showed me her 12 y/o growing tits and little patch of hair over her pussy, and I showed her the little patch of hair over my grown (maybe still growing - I don't really recall) dick. I got it hard for her and she was ecstatic. It didn't happen THAT DAY, but later we started fucking...
The following fall, she started Middle School (6th Grade) and started fucking "older" boys (no doubt, with bigger dicks - I may have had a "man's dick" at 9, but it was still - and remains to this day - a totally average-sized penis... nothing to write home about, LOL.
When I was 11, the brother and I were playing in my backyard pool... one thing led to another, and we sucked each other off... later that week, we fucked in his bedroom (on his waterbed!)
So: 9 with a girl, 11 with a boy.
I've had an "active" sex life ever since - with both men and women - but last had sex with a woman in 2011 (with my now ex-wife). I'm open to it again, but since I'm dating a man currently, I'm hoping it never goes there! :)
@bi4smooth Thanks for the explanation.I genuinely believe that people use it because it's trendy, not because it's easier
Well, not to "pop your bubble" on this one, but when I mentioned it's use by my mother - it was 40+ years ago, and it was while being written longhand, not on a keyboard (much less a phone or tablet!) - so while it may be a "trendy" item today, if so it's a re-trend (or a borrowed trend?) :)
Truth be told, the "w/" was not written as unique, separate characters, it was all one stroke (I've looked online for an image, but haven't found one)... imagine writing a "w", but taking the upper-right of the w, moving the pen up and to the right very slightly, then striking a hard downward slash...
Similarly, something close to a "+" was used for "and" : imagine a plus character, with the "south" corner connected (by a curve) to the "west" corner... or, start with your pen at North, strike down, straight, to South, curve up and to the left to West, then strike straight to the right to East...
Also, w/f meant "wherefore" (a common legal tern), b/c = "because", b/f = "before", w/h = "withheld", w/f = "wherefore" (another common legal term)... and there were MANY others....
A favorite was "fu" -- which meant follow-up! :)
I was in my teens, and this is all from memory... there HAS to be an Internet resource for these - but I couldn't find one! My mother is a smart lady, but she didn't "invent" this shorthand! (And I don't mean the "secretarial shorthand" that is a whole other "language"!)
Transexual is not a sexual orientation as it is a state of mind about their body, not who they want to fuck.
Caitlyn Jenner is a lesbian, Blair White and Rose of Dawn are heterosexuals. Skylar is bi.
My apologies for not including @raphjd in the list of transphobic people mentioned in this thread....
Sexual Orientation applies just as much to what gender you ARE, as to what gender you ARE ATTRACTED TO...
If you believed that homosexuality was just a "state of mind", you'd be a homophobe...
Unless you are embarrassed by your position, you should OWN the label transphobe!