Porn is entertainment
Sex is entertainment
Porn is FANTASY
Sex is real-life
People who cannot tell the difference are a danger to themselves and others...
Porn is entertainment
Sex is entertainment
Porn is FANTASY
Sex is real-life
People who cannot tell the difference are a danger to themselves and others...
MY PERSONAL definition of a twink is a lithe (skinny), smooth body, likely a little smaller than average, and often moderately to more effeminate.
MY PERSONAL definition doesn't include age...
I LOVE TWINKS OF ALL AGES!
You assume I'm a Democrat.
You are again a finalist in the "Miss Taken" pageant! We'll try to get you another sash, but we're running low.
I'm a conservative, I'm just not a conspiracy-confused one.
I believe in science: facts don't lie, but people who interpret them often do.
I believe in Democracy (even when i lose).
I believe in the general goodness of the average person.
I believe that Joe Biden won the recent election fair and square.
I do not believe that nationalism works in anyone's best interests.
I do not believe in racism - especially as a political tool.
I do not believe in absolutes.
I do not believe in secret cabals of child molesting politicians, threatening our children - primarily because they belong to the other party.
I personally know very fine politicians of both political parties here in the US. Honorable men and women who do not agree (not with me, and certainly not with each other), and yet, remain friends.
To my misguided (sometimes mis-labeled) Conservative friends who believe whole-heartedly that Donald Trump is their savior, I say this: Repent of your sins now, before your God judges you!
I also offer this: count the letters - compromise is not a 4-letter word!
That's a favorite of mine - WolfieKitty
He's on chatturbate, and there are some files available on here (search WolfieKitty)
Word to the wise: he is STRAIGHT, and while he loves his fans of all stripes, his GIRLFRIEND does appear in some of his videos!
He sucks, he cums, he swallows... for someone who USED TO COULD do that too, he's amazingly agile and HOT!
@ricky Having uploaded 76,000,000,000,000 (76 TB) of stuff, I'm not worried about 1 seedpoint. It is frustrating to see the images I uploaded get shoved to the back.
If it is your upload, you can edit the torrent listing and remove the offending pics.. that said, if they are legit pics of your upload, you should be judicious in doing so... but you can ALSO then re-upload the "main" pic you want seen.
Just to add my 2-cents worth - I had this happen to me once, and it turned out that the older torrent, by the time it was looked at, was essentially dead: no seeders and no leechers. So they deleted the ORIGINAL, which made my duplicate report "invalid" (according to the explanation I was given).
Is that all there is to your argument?
BTW, did you join the site just so you could post that crap? I mean, you post that 2 minutes after you joined the site.
EDIT: You have been a member for many years, but you just made your first ever post.
LOL - what can you say, @raphjd , your bombastic "every match lit is a raging forest-fire" style of commentary just motivates people to join in!
If the torrent is still on the tracker, but is just dead (no seeders, no leechers) - e.g.: you can still SEARCH for it, but you have to use the "including dead" option on the right), then you can start to re-seed the file simply by re-downloading the .torrent, and then pointing the client to the already-present file.
The "techincal" term for this is "scraping" the file - that is, you download the torrent, but already HAVE the content, so your client winds up CHECKING the torrent (vs. downloading it), and almost instantly starts SEEDING it.
You upload a .torrent file to the tracker, but the tracker has to make CHANGES to the file, so you have to download the MODIFIED .torrent file, and "scrape" it in order to start seeding it!
The issue here, if you dig deeper, isn't as controversial as it appears at first glance. FIRST OF ALL: the report is not that they under-reported ALL COVID deaths by 50%! No, they under-counted the deaths IN NURSING HOMES by up to 50%. BIG DIFFERENCE THERE!
If you can remember back, at the early part of the pandemic, NY was taking COVID patients who couldn't be helped (or didn't need ICU attention) in hospitals and sending them to long-term care facilities - many of which were nursing homes. The issue was, they needed the beds in the hospitals, and we didn't know yet that the virus was spread by aerosol (we still thought, at the time, that it was a contact thing).
We can argue later about the tragic consequences on sending COVID patients to nursing homes to die, and the effect that had on COVID in the other nursing home patients...
So, a hospital sends a COVID patient they cannot help to a nursing home - ostensibly to die (remember, back then we didn't have the treatments we have today - that we had just 6-10 weeks later!). And, of course, that person shortly thereafter passes away... from COVID.
Is that a death in the NURSING HOME, or is that a death from the Hospital who sent them there, essentially to die?
Some nursing homes didn't report these as "their deaths" because they weren't their patient before they got COVID! They still had to worry about those numbers being public and the fact that they still wanted to care for patients AFTER the pandemic -- and who wants to go live in a nursing home where thousands of people died from COVID?
An investigation needs to occur, most certainly. But don't expect real-world scenarios to fit neatly into your conveniently labeled boxes.
-- EDIT here -- That last comment came across as somewhat snarky when I re-read my own post. It wasn't meant as such. My point wasn't directed at any one person (@raphjd especially) - rather a point about ALL of us (even me) who would like to have "life" fit into neat, clearly defined categories... and that's just not the real world in which we live.
There is actually very little BLACK AND WHITE in our world - it's truly a RAINBOW of colors.... and while that makes organizing and categorizing (and understanding) things much more difficult, it is also what makes life so wonderful! IMHO
Wait a minute... you're complaining about an UNDER-count in NY because the nursing homes didn't report the hospital's cases as their own....
Then you claim there was a massive OVER-count?
I guess you CAN have your cake and eat it too! At least you can!
@bi4smooth VPNs are both a technology and an application. Many of them do not work on Mac.
Yes, VPN is a networking technology - but there is no app called simply "VPN"... there are vendors who offer applications that implement VPN technology... MOST of them support MacOS. (For example, NordVPN has an app that you install on your Mac to connect to one their VPN servers around the world and tunnel your Internet traffic through THEIR servers - privately, so others cannot track what you do on the Internet, except that you connect to those VPN servers!)
The analogy might be that Linux, Windows and MacOS are implementations of an OPERATING SYSTEM... Operating system being a technology, and the named products (Linux,Windows, MacOS) being mere implementations of that technology.
It is also possible to buy a BOX that can implement a VPN (usually tied into a router capability), and that is completely OS agnostic! (I don't recommend them - they really have a different purpose than what we're talking about a VPN for use on GT.ru would be...)
The VPN I personally recommended (NordVPN, see above) works quite well on a Mac - even REALLY old ones! Download the software and check it out! It also works quite well in Linux! (I use all 3 platforms myself... I work in IT professionally, don't ya know...)
@bi4smooth Like the other guy said- the process is way too hard. Anything with more than three simple steps is too hard.
Well then, if it's too hard, don't do it... indeed, not only do you not HAVE to upload, you don't EVEN have to seed!
There is another option: PAY instead!
But there ain't no such thing as totally free porn!
I have been seeing a trend some of the great uploads here aren't so successful with fully making their content available for anyone to download I talked to a few of them and basically the problem persist that the process of uploading are actually sooooo hard and complicated for both windows and mac users! huhuhu quite a pity that the uploaders tend to delete their upload coz more often than not right after it appeared on this site it is already labelled as dead :((( can anyone develop a far easier approach to uploading torrents hehe coz to be honest still I find it hard to follow thru as the content wont attached to the torrent link on this website!
So the issue you're describing is typically one I've seen only with NEW uploaders... because they expect to see instant results... if you want instant results, be prepared to pay a MONTHLY FEE to use the site, as the server requirements would be MUCH higher - and just really how lame is it to complain about how fast your FREE PORN site is at responding to your changes! LOL
The issue is this:
But yes, for that period of time from when you click "Do it" and upload your torrent, until that time that you validate it with the private tracker information, the torrent is technically DEAD... although, in reality it's still UNBORN
Again, most people who have been using private trackers for a while understand this process (and why it works that way)... those who are newer to the idea (and especially those who seem to think that you've magically uploaded your 100GB torrent, in its entirety, to the server in the 5 seconds it took to upload the .torrent file) often require an adjustment to their expectations...
A final note in reference to that last comment:
I don't know what client you use, but my qBitTorrent allows me to change the "priority" of any of the UNWANTED files to "Do Not Download" - thus, I get only the content I want - and I don't pay to download things I DO NOT want!
Even before #senilejoe stole the election, Joe was given a free pass in that he barely ever went on the campaign trail, and when you did see him, it was typically in the basement of his home reading off of a teleprompter.
That sound like sour-grapes, if you ask me... especially the snide remark about "stole the election"... you need to find a pair of big-boy-pants and grow a pair! Whether Trump woulda, shoulda, or coulda won the 2020 election, its a historical fact now... and until the election cycle in 2024 occurs, the ONLY successor to Biden will be Harris... and if that's what you want, then you're not only childish and delusional, you're spiteful even to your own detriment! (e.g.: your "cure" - Harris as President instead of Biden - is far worse than the disease! You want a SCARY Dem in the Oval Office, you could scarcely find a MORE scary one than THAT lady!)
Plus, if you think that Joe Biden ever had (or could have) the kind of rabid support Donald Trump had (and still has), you're delusional. Trump is a polarizing politician, and an autocrat: he permits no dissension within his Republican Party!
It's comparatively easy for Dems to say they support one thing about Biden and not other things... Further, they have no compulsion to defend him (as evidenced by their complete willingness to call him out when his administration "steps on it's own dick" ala these latest border incidents: HORSES? Really?)
I've said it before... Biden did not WIN the US Presidency because he had more supporters... Trump LOST the US Presidency because he had more detractors!
Trumps domestic policy (other than the fascist parts) were solid... his foreign policy was churlish - nearly childish in his not understanding of other cultures, but he wasn't DANGEROUS "out there"... his problem was that he insisted anyone who disagreed with him and spoke their mind was "disloyal" and that doing so was downright "treasonous" - which meant that EVEN the people (count me in this group) who supported many of his policies - but not ALL of them - were pushed out and pushed TOWARDS voting for "the other guy" - and it really didn't matter much WHO "the other guy" was, so long as it wasn't a DANGEROUS AUTOCRAT & FASCIST!
If you want Biden to have supporters like Trump's supporters, you'll have a long time searching thru THAT empty rabbit-hole!
For now, we need to hold the line on these huge spending programs (tho we also need to stop threatening to slash our own throats - and just pass the debt ceiling bill!) and stop as much of this liberal shopping spree as we can until we take control of Congress again in 2023 (when the 2022 winners take office)... Then Biden can start his "lame duckery" early, and we can keep him (and his Dem counterparts) at bay until 2024...
But part of that is that we need to make sure the Republican Party isn't a "Trump Only" party... because if we devolve to that, we'll lose... if not in 2022, certainly in 2024! Then we'll be in a HUGE mess! I don't even want to think about it... we need good, CONSERVATIVE (but not Trumpite) candidates to WIN in 2022!
What is the best, and cheapest, VPN for torrenting on Mac?
VPN is a networking technology, not an application. Virtually ANY of the common VPNs will work on a Mac.
I personally use NordVPN - because they allow for P2P, because they have to many servers, because they don't log, and because they're relatively cheap.
Others will likely have their own choices... if you're reading this, use a VPN, and have an alternative provider you like better - chime in! (I chose NordVPN 5+ years ago and have just renewed it... maybe there's a better option today?)
I'm sick of hearing about how victimized women are from body shaming when they do it to themselves and they do it to men.
There you go, reading into things again - You're isolating the "body shaming" as-if it was only being argued that "body shaming from men" was bad... no such specification was made or implied.
Body shaming is cruel and wrong. Regardless of the source!
And the same is true for body shaming of men! I've heard far more MEN talk about "the fat guy" or "the guy with the micro-penis" or "the guy with 2 beer-bellies" or "chrome dome" or .... the list goes on and on... guys are far harder on guys than the women are!
Instagram is full of women using "face tune" and other techniques to alter their appearances. InformationOverload on YouTube and various websites out these people for doing it. They created an impossible version of beauty.
This is indeed an area where Social Media has been harmful to society - especially they way "mean girls" (or "mean guys") can hide behind anonymity for the most cruel and harmful posts/comments!
2 ad posters right next to each other and only 1 is banned. That is because WAHmen are victims and men don't matter. A woman in a bikini vs David Gandy in a Speedo, but only one is body shaming.
I don't know the specifics of what you're referring to, but here in the States there are some States and Cities where advertising using photoshopped models is forbidden.
That is: the girl in the bikini can be beautiful but you can't have photoshopped her hips and breasts and still use it in the advertising! She has to be her REAL self! You can remove a blemish, or a stray hair - but you cannot alter the models "appearance".
The same (in the States, anyway) goes for men - you can't photoshop in an 8-pack of abs, or grow his bulge in the speedos... you can't even photoshop out his chest hair (tho he can shave prior to the shoot)...
Even during gamer-gate, it was shown that most targeted harassment toward women was by other women. A very recent study showed the same thing. Women are evil to other women and to men.
You are awfully harsh on women... men are awful TOO! As you noted above, and I agree with: women are harder on other women than they are on men, and men are harder on other men than they are on women... but harder (aka: crueler) is not the same as being KIND to the others!
It's worth saying again:
There is no such thing as "healthy at any size" for men or "lovely and curvy" for men.
There is no such thing as "healthy at any size" for women either... but that's a MEDICAL issue! (hence the word: healthy) Thus, it should be a private matter between a man (or woman) and their physician.
The 80/20 rule is that 80% of women are deemed attractive but only 20% of men are deemed attractive.
Hmmm... I don't know what to say to that... I'm often told I'm attractive, and I'm about 30 lbs overweight and have a bald head...
I can't (and don't pretend to) speak for others... but I've been body-shamed for my weight and my hair loss... and I've also been complimented on both! I have outgrown the need to have anyone else's approval of my looks... the parts of my looks (my extra weight, for example) that I can change, I am working to change (albeit slowly - it's hard to lose weight at 57!)... the things I cannot change, I don't worry about...
But I'm not a teenage boy (or girl) trying to come to terms with my body- and self-image! That's where the real damage is done! The body-shaming of people - especially children - who aren't emotionally prepared for the cruelty of the anonymous world.
I go back to the statement above: "This is indeed an area where Social Media has been harmful to society - especially they way "mean girls" (or "mean guys") can hide behind anonymity for the most cruel and harmful posts/comments!"
@bi4smooth As background, the invitation rule you provided is from a 2007 post. It's on the same thread that notes "derailing conversations, to complain about topics or individual posters, is not allowed." Now, there's an enforcement challenge that would really amount to something.
I'm not trying to be a policeman - I'm in no position to enforce any forum rules.
Honestly, I previously had responded to just such a post - and provided an invite to another torrent site. I was subsequently chastised/warned by a Moderator that I was in violation of the forum rules - citing that very page.
I don't do that anymore: other than in the Politics section, I try NOT to annoy the moderators of the site... I like my porn!
I made no threat, not even a warning... I just posted that it was a documented violation of the rules... the same Administrator (@raphjd) who posted those rules is the current Administrator. If there have been changes in policy, I'm not aware of it - and there is no reason anyone would single me out to update the policy... Also, if the policy had changed, I'm pretty sure moderators can delete posts...
We could ask the moderators to clarify... but honestly, I've found the less you involve the "cops" and handle things yourself the better... you never know what the "cops" will do! And it's seldom exactly what you want them to do!
As for the implication that I "derailed a conversation",I'll just point you to the original post... a question... CAN I ask for an invite to gay-torrent.org... I answered that question, specifically and directly.
Sorry to get defensive...
Most likely your ISP is blocking the ports you use to connect.
In your torrent client, open up your preferences and change the port you're using.
If you have an OLD router, or have otherwise manually opened ports or configured port-forwarding, you will need to change those settings too.
This is a violation of the Forum rules: