Are you by any chance using a VPN? I'm starting to think that perhaps your provider may be throttling you as soon as they detect P2P traffic on their network. This is a fairly common practice in North America, but I'm not sure about where you are located.
The limit of 10 rule for post-upload picture uploads seems to have been lifted. I've approved as many as 20 new added pictures at a time.
Have you tried Google Image Search?
What you say is correct of what is commonly referred to as Type 2 HIV, which is also most commonly found within Africa. There is also another main type, known as Type 1, which is more commonly found within North America. While both major versions of it carry pretty well the same complications, there are actually some variances between the two major types. In fact, it's even possible (as I know someone with it) to be infected with both types at the same time. Unlike 2 strains of the same type, both types can survive independently of one another.
Also, the more common pre-AIDS name that the disease carried was commonly referred to as GRID (Gay Related Infection Disease), at least within North America for some time….
Lastly, I want to point out one point of technicality. Although it is common thought that HIV is required to constitute AIDS, do not fool yourself. Technically, the CDC does not require the presence of HIV to constitute AIDS.... By technical medical definition according to the CDC, AIDS is nothing more than a CD4 count that has dropped below 200, regardless of the presence of HIV. That being said though, HIV itself is what makes things much more interesting once the CD4 count drops below 200, which is why it is regarded in such a manner that one requires the other, despite the technical difference.
I just thought I'd point that out in case it's of any use or value to you..... Aside from those couple of minor things, yes.... You are correct. 
Ah yes…. I feel your frustrations with the picture sizing. As I recall, it's a topic that has been much discussed many a times. From what I recall, the system auto resizes images when they're uploaded. How it does exactly I'm not sure, but it's something that currently the user (and mods) have no control over. Maybe it's something worth suggesting in the programming requests section that the system maybe somehow cap out at a maximum size somehow, without loosing the aspect ratio?
Or maybe our geneous programmers could somehow manage to find a way to change the maximum display size of the picture based on the screen resolution of the device trying to view the popup box with the picture? It would be a really great idea. 
There is nothing that currently prohibits the upload of a Man's Best video. That being said however, there is a rule against posting content with under age models. As long as the particular video(s) in question do not have under age models, then there is technically no violation.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/prevention_research_malecircumcision.pdf
That one seems to go most in depth, and it comes straight form the CDC. Although the rates vary from one STD to the next, the general consensus is that you're twice as likely to contract any STI with foreskin than you are to contract it without foreskin. Other references that vouch that circumcision actually reduces the risk include:
http://www.webmd.com/men/news/20090325/circumcision-cuts-stds
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a12466/circumcision-std-risk/
http://healthland.time.com/2013/04/17/why-circumcision-lowers-risk-of-hiv/
I'm a naughty boi…. By far the naughtiest thing that I've ever done was to have sex with a cop in the back of his cruiser in exchange for not giving me a ticket for doing 73 mph (117 km/h) in a posted 45 mph (70 km/h) zone... Who would have thought that at 2 AM in the bible belt of North Carolina that I'd get the only gay cop on the force? LOL
It was kinda hot actually, especially with the whole thrill of almost getting caught by his supervisor.
Canada isn't all that much different from the USA with respect to the topic of circumcision. There are a few interesting statistics that are worth pointing out when it comes to that topic.
First up on the list would be the risk of contracting an STD. Believe it or not, but an uncircumcised guy as the top of the sexual relation is statistically 200% more likely to contract an STD through the pocket under the foreskin than that of a circumcised guy. This is largely due to the fact that the foreskin creates a trap (or pocket) for lack of a better term where bacteria and other such foreign substances can get trapped, particularly if you do not clean under the foreskin. By this same token, speaking as a guy who has not had the little snip snip, I can attest that if you are not very careful to clean out under the foreskin very well on a regular basis, you'll find yourself at an increased risk and frequency of infections such as strep throat bacteria or yeast infections under the foreskin, which can become rather painful.
On the flip side of that, although the risk of running around with a germ trap is much higher with an uncircumcised penis, there are also drawbacks to getting the little snip snip. One of the biggest downsides that I know of to having the foreskin removed is that a number of people that I know who have had it done later on in life report that the sensitivity in the head of their penis is either non-existent or otherwise severely reduced by comparison after having the foreskin removed. The other most common down side that I have heard of is in cases where the doctor, moyle, etc that is doing the circumcision doesn't do it correctly, thus taking off a little too much skin. In this type of situation, getting an erection can actually be painful as the remainder of the skin gets stretched out much more than it otherwise should, which can cause painful sensations if the procedure is not done correctly. Sadly, it is my understanding that this down side is rather common.
Quand vous avez plus que 120 GB à partager avant que vous arrivant à votre ratio minimum, c'est completement normale. Il vas prendre beaucoup à voire la change dans votre ratio.
Yeah…. It's rather interesting to see how some studios change over time either to follow new and emerging trends, or to otherwise try to make a name for themselves. Personally, I'll never understand the whole business model of some studios.
If it helps any, I've been having a lovely message pop up in Transmission from time to time recently that reads:
"Tracker gave HTTP response code 502 (Bad Gateway)"
The strange thing about this is that when I right click the torrent, then click on "Ask Tracker for More Peers", the tracker refreshes and I seem to be back on track without an issue.
I'm growing rather frustrated by two different issues that I seem to be seeing more frequently on GT.ru… Although we have no rules about over-seeding, it's getting very annoying when users are seeding 100+ torrents, as to make some of their seeds quite useless. This is the case with the following torrent:
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=d6ac0dcc904f624ffe9be73a4968c88759329b509b4d6afa
There are currently 7 seeders on this torrent, none of which I can connect to because they're all seeding over 100 torrents each. This means that although the tracker sees them as seeding this torrent, it is pretty much impossible to connect to any of them. This has been the case for a few days now.
The other two torrents seem to suffer a very similar problem. Namely, these two torrents:
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=d61d10a91470d885fe9be73a4968c8878550a2c08a6a1cbc
and
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=915477d08d24ee6afe9be73a4968c887904edae1a4a1e1cb
The problem with these two torrents seems to be that all of the seeders are either passive nodes, which I cannot seem to connect to, or are otherwise seeding too many torrents to be able to get a connection to them. This is rather frustrating to say the least. What ever happened to people seeding their torrents responsibly and actually properly setting up their network to allow people to download from them?
I know this may sound crazy, but some of us on here actually want to be able to download torrents, and it makes it very frustrating when users are irresponsible with their connection and seeding habits, thus making it incredibly difficuly for anyone to download the torrents that they are seeding….. C'mon guys... Get with the program and hop on the progress train here, because this little homo is getting REEEEEEEEEEEEALLY frustrated by the lack of cooperation that I seem to be getting from a number of users on this site as of late.
I'm willing to bet that this is another studio that takes the DMCA a little too seriously and enforces it militantly. While some studios are very strict at enforcing the DMCA, other studios are not on top of it nearly as much. As such, I suspect that this is one of the studios that is quick to have stuff removed.
True…. It just seems so weird to know that people we both regard as family are either related by blood to me or to him.... What's more fucked up is knowing that one particular branch of the family tree is actually related by blood to both of us lol
I guess that my latest addition to my hoodie collection is much more fitting for me now than ever
The funnier thing is that this was the hoodie that I was wearing when I went to the family function where as it turns out, relatives of both of our sides of the blood line were attending
I am going to remind everyone of the site rules clearly state that asking for, exchanging of, or otherwise soliciting for invites is FORBIDDEN. To be more specific, the general rules section clearly states the following:
Discussions and requests how to hack or rip a web site; crack or remove copy protections and Digital Restriction Management (DRM) systems; remove invisible watermarks in media files; and requests or offers to share passwords, logins or invitations are prohibited. Do not request or offer to share files obtained by these activities.
So, my fellow homos of the internet…. Please take this as a gentle reminder to read the rules regularly so that you don't have problems in the future.
Topic Locked
So I have a bit of a dilemma…. It's kind of funny, and kind of redneck of me all at the same time...
See, I started seeing this guy up North, completely not clueing into his last name, since I'm not all that close with my father's side of the family. I mean, I know if you go to the small town of Cochrane up North, about 2/3 of the phone book are related to me, down to and including the last name. What I didn't realize is that this connection goes even farther out in this general neck of the woods than I thought. So.... I'm a little perplexed as to what to do with this whole situation. Allow me to explain things a little more clearly, as the situation has already become quite bizarre to say the least.
So I start seeing this guy, not having any clue about the connection in the family until after about a good week of fucking non-stop. After about a week, we decide it's time to meet the family. I of course thought nothing of this really...... until I walked into the family function, only to see 4 of my relatives that I am actually related to by blood in the room and suddenly, my heart was in my throat. It was at that moment that all the pieces started to come together and it came to surface that apparently, my father's cousin married one of his cousins. Nevertheless, as much as we're technically only related by marriage (thankfully), it's still weird to see both of us calling some of the same people aunt or uncle. No matter which way you look at it (by marriage or otherwise), it's a little strange to have the whole topic of conversation steer to "so... you're fucking your cousin".
So... All of this being said, I'm a little lost as to what exactly to do here and how exactly to handle the whole situation. As it is, breaking the news to that branch of my family that I'm HIV+ was bad enough, but having to explain the whole we're technically not cousins, even though we are legally classified as such thing is a little strange to me. This is why I bring this to the masses.... Anyone have any thoughts on how to handle such a delicate situation?
Yes… Indeed it is 
It would seem that I had a bit of a brain fart and didn't keep scrolling before hitting reply :hehe:
There is one particlar lawsuit that stands out to me…. Take a look at these:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2009/07/judge-throws-book-at-usenetcom-in-riaa-lawsuit/
http://betanews.com/2007/10/18/riaa-finally-takes-aim-at-newsgroups/
http://www.theverge.com/2014/8/19/6044679/the-six-lawsuits-that-shaped-the-internet <– Not as relevant, but it touches on it
There are a small handful of other ones out there, however to my understanding, they didn't end up going anywhere because the providers were able to cough up an explanation that provided for plasible deniability due to the nature of the way that the Usenet system works.