There was an issue with the site that I raised to the appropriate channels. The issue has now been resolved.

@frostycab yeah cheers, I exclude that from my default search but like you say, they add in amateur which fills my search pages with OF content.

Cheers anyway 👍

@sirtricksalo

That is an enemy of site user/security.

The site owner would rather delete the entire site than risk security.

this is first time hearing about this

Hope it's ok to bump this. Using the browse page kind of works sometimes, but it's not consistent. At best I select one or more main categories and a 2nd required category, but even that it's giving me uploads that don't include the 2nd category. One of the mods said in the other thread that maintainers aren't computer scientists, which is entirely fair, but I am a software engineer, so I might be able to help (currently looking a request structure to see if it can be accomplished there)

@EugeneGabija-0 it is not built-in and it's also not a glitch, url.rw is no longer a dereferer tool , in fact now it is a referer tool. they need to remove it from the site code (if they ever), in the mean time you will have to copy and paste links instead of clicking.

or you can use a userscript to remove the defunct tool automatically.

@chuck75-0 ah yes, pussy jumpscare, a terrible inconvenience 😂

the main/sub category system is flawed by nature, it turns your search results into a lottery. some things you're looking for that are there will never make it to your results, while things you don't want will be all over the place.

we could even ping @Joker to make sure he's aware, but considering that it has been like this for the last 20 years, I doubt it will change.

Yes, it's broken now

@frostycab just a few topics before yours, i already saw someone complaining tha the upload page was not accepting pictures and that GUU was not working, so it seems to add up to the brainfart theory.

Perhas the site itself never went offline, but the backend stuff where uploads are processed could have faulted.

@raphjd Thanks for the update.

@geniusacamel no sir, just a smartass with one brain and a pair of eyeballs:

939ebf84-cfa3-4c42-af5e-e17c757acdc7-image.png

@Lukasjoao1 Actually, I tell a lie. You could look back through all (at the time of writing) 310211 pages of uploads and look for any highlighted entries as that will show ones that you've grabbed in the past, but even then I don't know how complete that would be. 🙂

I'm having the same problem now.
It must be an on-and-off bug because it used to work normally for me too lol.

the whole star system is pointless and stupid because it does not explicitly indicates if what is being rated is the content or the distribution itself.

Some people use the stars to rate the content, how well it fits their expectations, or how they rate the production value (framing, lighting, image quality etc), some people use it to indicate that the content is faithful to what is advertised in the torrent page.

Some people will download a torrent, not like it, and still give 5 stars because it has good previews, good description, thumbnails included, etc.

There will be torrents where the uploader has clearly put a lot of effort, and it will be rated poorly because someone didn't like the actor, or because it lacked cum scenes, or they look too bored, etc...

Long story short, it was a lazy implementation that to this day nobody really cared enough to bother fixing its problems and making it useful.

tl;dr: don't waste your time looking at ratings.

@john32123666 said in has staxus been banned from the site?:

they even misspelled prosecuted lol ...

Or maybe they meant, "prostituted?"

@ianfontinell-0 thank you

Most of the stuff, if not all, seems to be solved.👍