The way I am seeing things is that you should seed not for the ratio but for the community spirit and to keep the site alive in time where access to torrents get more and more restricted.

Hello, as far as I have found out of experience no, the uploader is not priorised. I have bad connection and am seeding my torrents only until someone else downloads it than I upload peanuts. Not fair but that's how it is...

I think we can agree to disagree. I prefer by far to have a torrent available for download and to erase it just after I have downloaded it rather than not have a torrent uploaded at all because of strict naming rules.

For me the contents counts much more than the packaging.

Don't worry. It's just a stage. First you deny it. Than you accept it. Than you feel guilty. Than you enjoy it. We've all been there but some eventually not everyone gets to the entire progression some people get stuck at different phases.

People taking down the flags doesnt mean they stopped supporting Ukraine. And if you support Ukraine you don't have to show it on twitter or facebook.

I use the add-on DownThemAll on mozilla.

Not asking the right questions, just accepting everything means that one day this site is going to be down. Either by external or internal forces. Because at one point if your torrents constantly keep on getting down you will just stop uploading or visiting the site.

So what should he have done instead? Not upload the torrrent at all?

@john32123666 That's not what I am questionning. So it should be, but when an account is identified to be created and upheld only for tracking DMCA then it should be banned just as they ban all the other "fraudsters". The reason being that every single torrent here breaks DMCA rights.

By the way how comes that people and organisations with the only purpose to prosecute users in gaytor.rent are allowed to access the site? Why aren't their accounts disabled?

@bi4smooth said in Onlyfans should have gone under...:

@jujulette said in Onlyfans should have gone under...:

I take it seriously because OF slowly kills all other kinds of sources of porn. The porn quality accross the board is lowering - in terms of actors, in terms of scenario and in terms of abundance.

This is much more valid for extravagant types of porn like bdsm where we can only dream of the times 2009-2017. Most bdsm related studios and sites have stopped filming or dropped significantly the quality. I mean why would a handsome guy take a role in a bdsm film if he will get the same money for an OF video where he shows his cock?

I'm sorry, but this is just "growing pains" for the Internet!

The Music industry had a COW when people started streaming content, or sharing content on Napster! They warned it was the end of the line for musicians! They'd all starve because people wouldn't pay for albums/CDs anymore!

It didn't work out that way (though it STILL evolving)... but streaming sites pay royalties to artists when people listen to their songs, and by ADAPTING to, and LEVERAGING the Internet, artists today are sill doing pretty damned well!

Porn will adapt! It did when VHS came to market (killing the 8mm film industry), and when DVD came along. Now it's streaming and yes, torrenting... they will adapt, and new ways of enjoying sex and porn will be created...

I hope so.

@torren1 said in Asians are saving our ratios:

@lololulu19 what site yr talking about?:3

I so much agree with you. And it's getting worse.