• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2104
    • Best 326
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • RE: THIS or THAT: the game

      @andergarcia said in THIS or THAT: the game:

      @dvt

      Yes, I do it with my boyfriend and we both get really horny (again) sharing our cum πŸ˜‰

      Do you like being fucked and sucked at the same time or not?

      I've only had that happen with 3-ways and more-ways. When I was a much younger man, I was capable of autofellatio, so I could do this for my bottom (though it was difficult, and made it hard to thrust while also sucking)...

      I DO find it pleasurable - but then I like being the "center of attention" in a 3-way πŸ™‚

      Ball-play: rough or tender? (me? tender - I do not like pain, and my balls are very sensitive!)

      posted in Forum Games
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Whats a good Torrent Maker for Mac?

      It looks like you replied before I posted - no worries, it looks from what you posted like you got it most of the way thru, but you didn't do the last step - you have to re-download the .torrent file from the tracker to get the version that's stamped for you!

      Good luck! It looks like you're close to paydirt!

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Whats a good Torrent Maker for Mac?

      @jeffnsf said in Whats a good Torrent Maker for Mac?:

      Ive been on here for years and get tons of reseed requests but I cant figure out how to reseed or upload new torrents to the site to share.
      All the instructions and suggestions I've found on here are PC based..

      The process to create a NEW torrent isn't substantially any different for a MAC than for PCs, except that you cannot use the "QTM" tool on this website - it's designed for one specific client on PC systems...

      Not to fret, I don't use it either! πŸ™‚

      Let's start with this tutorial:

      • First, you already use a Torrent Client... I use qBittorrent across multiple platforms (esp. Linux), but you probably use something else... either way, it's how you're downloading files now, and I'm not going to go into details about your client here... almost any Torrent Client program will do!
      • So now, you already know how you download a .torrent from the GT.ru tracker, open the .torrent file in your Torrent Client program, and it proceeds to download your file(s) from the seeders (if there are any).
      • You will use your same Torrent Client program to CREATE a .torrent file.
        A .torrent file contains information - including checksums - about the file (or files) in your torrent. That's it! It doesn't contain anything else, and whatever torrent client you're using, it'll have its own way of creating the "new" torrent. (It's usually in a File, Tools, or Utility drop-down menu in your client)
        One important step: you will need to identify the tracker you'll be using for your torrent: For us (GT.ru) its: http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru:2710/announce
      • Once you have the .torrent file created, you'll need to upload it to the "tracker" (again, in this case, GT.ru). But that's not all... the .torrent file has all kinds of data about the file(s) in your torrent that are important for the computers, but not the kinds of data that OTHER PEOPLE would use to determine if they want to download it.
        In the Upload function of this site (Torrents drop-down -> Uploads -> Upload Page link (in yellow?), you'll select a Category for your torrent from the drop-down, and that will make a BUNCH of other options available.
        SPECIAL NOTE: This tracker's policy is that you must upload a PICTURE from your torrent - for me, this is usually me going to the site where the video originated from (e.g.: https://www.helixstudios.net), finding the video, and snagging a pic from there...
        Everything else you should be able to guess at and be pretty close... the title of the torrent is (by convention) the file name (or the folder name if multiple files)...
        At the end (bottom), you will upload your .torrent file - the one you created in your Torrent Client above...
        ... but you're still not done! This tracker keeps records, and wants to "stamp" your upload to differentiate it from anyone else's... so, once your .torrent and descriptions and photos are uploaded, the system is going to ALTER the .torrent file... which means you now have to DOWNLOAD your OWN TORRENT to get the right tracker information!
      • Click the download link - and now here's the "trick" - you have to point your Torrent Client to the same location where your source file (or folder) are located! The client SHOULD recognize that the files are already there, and CHECK THEM against the torrent file...
        If the check passes, you will immediately start seeding (and your torrent becomes visible to others!)
        If the check does not pass, either you changed something having to do with your torrent (renamed a file, deleted one, etc.) or you didn't tell the Torrent Client the right place to find your file (it's not uncommon to accidentally choose a folder above or below the right one...)
      • You can throw away the .torrent file you created initially

      You also mentioned re-seeding... say there is a file you downloaded 6-months ago: abc.mkv, that has a great flick on it that you've kept... and then, lo-and-behold, someone asks for a re-seed. Here's how you do that:

      • Use the re-seed request message itself to find the file on the tracker - it's likely dead now (unless others have already started re-seeding)... so the link is the best place to start
      • Re-download the .torrent file from the tracker
      • In your Torrent Client program, locate where you've stored the file (abc.mkv) so that the tracker - just like when you uploaded your own torrent - immediately sees that the file is already there! The Tracker Client will check that the files are still the same, and immediately start seeding.

      I know it's not simple and straightforward, but it's also not THAT complicated!
      If you need help with your Torrent Client, post back here which one you use and I'll try to help...

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: "Healthy at any size" vs C-19

      @raphjd said in "Healthy at any size" vs C-19:

      @bi4smooth

      I disagree.

      Men have it just as bad (worse now in places like London) when it comes to what men are told they must look like.

      The only reason that you, and people like you, believe that women have it worse is because of the constant pity parties we have for them. If the narrative was focused on men, then you would think that men have it worse.

      It's like how black people and liberals think that cops are running around murdering every black person they see, despite the statistics proving otherwise.

      So we agree that body shaming is bad (awful) behavior.... and we want to argue about who has it worse?

      Pass... its bad, always bad, regardless of male, female, trans, gay, str8, bi, pan, etc.

      For every example of an internet meme you can post that says how bad guys have it, I can match you with one that shows how bad women have it...

      I DO agree it's actually getting WORSE! Men are now starting to wear makeup! (I didn't like my women to wear heavy makeup - declined once to see a girl a 2nd time because she wore heavy makeup TO THE BEACH! (NOTE: I'm pansexual, not "totally" gay - was happily married [to a woman] for 15 years.. well, happily for about 12! 😞 )

      I will say again: standards of "beauty" change over time - sometimes slowly, sometimes quickly! But they ALWAYS change!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: THIS or THAT: the game

      @dvt said in THIS or THAT: the game:

      @andergarcia

      I prefer length πŸ˜›

      Snowballing yay or nay? πŸ™‚

      Not so much.... I like my cum "fresh" -- pretty much, once it's out, it's either in me or it's not going to be! πŸ™‚ I love to swallow a fresh, hot load... I'm not so much for licking it up later!

      As a bottom, can you feel a difference after a guy cums inside you (assuming he's done so, and assuming the top doesn't just pull out)?
      If so, is the feeling a good one or a gross one?

      (Did I just sneak in a double? sorry!)

      posted in Forum Games
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: "Healthy at any size" vs C-19

      @raphjd said in "Healthy at any size" vs C-19:

      @bi4smooth

      Umm, are you saying that men don't have to live up to unrealistic body examples?

      How many times are we gonna see David Gandy in his underwear or speedo as a benchmark for male looks?!

      I bet you didn't know that when the London mayor banned women in skimpy clothing, he didn't do the same for men. The "beach body ready" ad hung up right next to an ad with David Gandy in a white speedo, but only 1 was "oppression".

      Not that it doesn't exist, but it isn't as pervasive. Nor is it an image that is LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to achieve!

      Agreed that body shaming is a bad thing regardless of gender. The ONLY person who should be telling you to lose weight should be your physician, and then it should be for HEALTH reasons, not cosmetic ones!

      In the early 20th Century, skinny girls were WHOLLY unattractive (as were "tan" bodies)... the EPITOME of attractiveness were women "with curves" and whose skin was "ivory white" (the source of the IVORY soap name!)...

      Tastes change... in the 1970's "attractive" gay men were muscular, had hairy chests, and mustaches! In the 2000's they were skinny and hairless (practically women!)... now, hair (and tattoos! yech!) is back!

      There was even a brief time, during the HIV/AIDS crisis, when men with a little extra fat were considered more desirable! This was, however, because it was believed that the "extra weight" was an indicator that you didn't have AIDS (which had a terrible symptom of wasting-syndrome)...

      But I digress... body shaming is bad... love the body you're in, or work to make it one you DO love! But don't let anyone ELSE tell you that you need to change your own body!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Frequent "lost connection"

      @moonmonday said in Frequent "lost connection":

      The new forums fairly regularly tell me that the connection has been lost and to give it a moment. It's quickly enough resolved, most of the time, but it's pretty annoying and seemingly needless, as some of the times, I'm not even doing anything that would require an active connection.

      This is a new phenomenon - I suspect after some kind of update.

      I reported it in another section as well, but wanted to confirm HERE that I am seeing the same behavior.

      posted in New Forum Issues
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: "Healthy at any size" vs C-19

      @eobox91103 said in "Healthy at any size" vs C-19:

      You have a good doctor. The standard "body mass index" calculators would suggest that you are not only overweight, but just a few pounds away from being obese! You'd need to go down to 204 lbs to be considered "normal weight" for your height. I have a hunch that shedding 36 lbs would not improve your life.

      At 204lbs I would be ultra-skinny! I'm large-boned, so the BMI "tables" are off... they don't take into account other factors. I would know, because at 20 I weighed 180, and I WAS ultra-skinny! TOO THIN!

      My Dr says BMI is only 1 indicator of being "overweight" - and it's not even considered a "major" one... other health factors play a much larger role!

      I will note that, in spite of being given a "clean bill of health," I am endeavoring to lose some weight... I put some on over COVID lockdowns, and I want to shed it - not for health reasons, but for beauty ones (I want to LIKE what I see in the mirrors when I get out of the shower! LOL)

      This starts to get even more complicated. In theory I accept the idea that people should have the freedom to refuse vaccination...but only as much as I have the freedom to not be exposed to them. If someone declines vaccination and stays perpetually at home, or goes off to live in an anti-vax commune somewhere, fine. But I don't think they should go out in public, into stores, onto airplanes, and God forbid onto a cruise ship.

      I think you missed my point. I don't object to someone opting-out of a vaccination, if they have an intelligent reason (I have a neighbor who says she's allergic "to everything" and she's afraid she'll have a reaction - that's reasonable!).... thinking that the new vaccines will turn you into a robot... that's just not rational!

      I may change my tune in 2-3 years as the machine parts start to replace my human ones, but I'll take my chances??? Yeah - that's the ticket!

      It reminds me of a sign I saw at an airport security post somewhere: "You have the right to refuse security inspection. If you exercise this right, you will not be permitted into the gate area."

      Good sign... Before I closed my storefront, I had a sign on the front door that said:

      COVID-19 restrictions are enforced here.

      • You must wear a face covering over your mouth and nose at all times while inside
      • You must maintain a minimal 6-foot distance from all employees or other customers at all times
      • Your right to not adhere to these rules stops HERE - at our front door!

      Underneath, in smaller letters it read:

      Failure to adhere to our COVID-19 prevention requirements above will result in your being asked to leave.
      Failure to comply will result in a trespassing complaint that WILL be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

      And then, at the bottom, in RED print it read:
      YES! WE ARE SERIOUS!

      We turned away quite a few customers - I live in a Florida city, and we had plenty of COVID-19 non-believers... but then, my business doesn't rely on walk-up or walk-in customers... I'm a computer consultant.

      People come to me because someone ELSE has "spread the good word" πŸ™‚

      When the lockdowns first ended, and we were first able to eat in restaurants again, I was at my favorite Sunday Breakfast place, and they had tables blocked off to enforce the distancing and capacity rules. The poor young girl at the door was being totally abused by a customer who, seeing all the empty tables, was insistent that he be allowed to sit at one.

      She plainly told the man that "her job depended on her NOT seating anyone at those tables, and unless he had a better job for her RIGHT NOW, she wasn't going to let HIM endanger HER job.

      Eventually, the cook from the back came out and shooed him away... the customer yelled "I'll never come back here again!" as he stormed off, and the cook replied (loud enough to hear inside, but not likely loud enough for the guy to hear: "Good! This place is classier already!" πŸ™‚

      I tipped the girl a $20 on my way out and told her to keep up the good work! πŸ™‚

      So again, I want to say - I GET IT! Some people have LEGIT reasons NOT to wear masks (asthma? COPD?) - that's fine. Some people have LEGIT reasons NOT to take the vaccine (I have already had my 2-doses of Pfizer's), but "turning into a robot" isn't one of them....

      Forest Gump had it right: Stupid is as stupid does

      But I'm particularly fond of Ron White's diatribe on ugly women and plastic surgery that ends with "... you can fix almost ANYTHING! But, you can't fix stupid!"

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Rant About Single Scene Uploads Rather Than Model Packs

      @raphjd said in Rant About Single Scene Uploads Rather Than Model Packs:

      One thing that really bothers me is the loss of full movie uploads. Why does everyone seem to want to chop up movies?!

      I agree, but I blame the companies and distributors more than the uploaders...

      Helix is a perfect example... their latest "movie" is called "Beach Bums California" - but all it is is a collection of 4 or 5 previously released scenes from the "videos" portion of the site!

      The age of VHS, DVD, and even BluRay is over... nearly everything is streamed these days, and there is a loss there.

      Same thing is true of music these days... when's the last time you actually saw something resembling a concept album?

      If the content in the MOVIE wasn't just the 4-to-5 scenes slapped together, there'd be something worth downloading!

      Porn - even more than other entertainment avenues - is DRIVEN by consumer-specific demand... why do you think nearly every studio now makes bareback content!

      IT SELLS!

      Why are even twink studios now hiring models with more and more body hair?
      IT SELLS!

      posted in Rants & Raves
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Why saying β€œI don’t see race at all” just makes racism worse

      @anythingold said in Why saying β€œI don’t see race at all” just makes racism worse:

      https://ideas.ted.com/why-saying-i-dont-see-race-at-all-just-makes-racism-worse/?utm_source=pocket-newtab

      Excellent article! Thanks for sharing it! (I often like TED articles!)

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Matthieu Pique!

      @duke4172

      Another thank you!! One of my favorite NEW Bel Ami stars! Not overly muscular, no sign of steroid use, and a smile to melt your heart (and my pants) away!!! πŸ™‚

      posted in Muscle
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Rob Steel!

      @duke4172

      Thanks! I love beefy guys with average-size cocks!

      posted in Muscle
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: "Healthy at any size" vs C-19

      @eobox91103 said in "Healthy at any size" vs C-19:

      @anythingold I agree with what you're saying. My posting was a bit tangled up because there are several issues going on here:

      1. The OP said, "Despite what we've been told for the last 15 years, being obese is not healthy." I don't think that's been the message, but there has been a greater consciousness that overweight/obese people still deserve ordinary human respect, and media stereotypes that women should look anorexic are counter to that.

      Hear, hear! Some people make a habit of extrapolating data to the point of hyperbole... At 6'4, 240 is considered overweight... my doctor disagrees and say's I'm quite healthy! He considers my bloodwork and says (convincingly) that I should "keep up the good work"... even when specifically asked "Should I lose weight?" his response was "only if you want to for aesthetic reasons - there is no health risk at your height and build to being your current weight"... (yay me!)

      The issue becomes far worse when looking at women's bodies - where virtually impossible forms are often used in advertising... impossible, you say? IMPOSSIBLE! I say! They take an already thin model and then airbrush her to be even MORE thin - impossibly (and unhealthily) thin! And they then present that as the epitome of beauty! BALDERDASH!

      I'm not saying a woman who is 5'2 and weighs 300 lbs is healthy - but really, that's a discussion that needs to happen between a patient and their doctor!

      You should no more shame that woman (or a similarly built man) than you should shame someone who is bald, or has cancer, or has anything ELSE different about them from what YOU think of as ideal!

      1. The article's purported link between being overweight and COVID death rates is not the result of a study--it's anecdotal at best, and skewed because of national policy phenomena.

      COVID-19 has been around for a whole year now? Why don't we know EVERYTHING about it? I mean, surely someone has found ALL the answers on the Internet by now, right?

      I read an interview with someone who's choosing NOT to accept a COVID-19 vaccine because (and I'm not making this up): "He doesn't want to be a guinea-pig and wake-up next year a robot or something"

      Thankfully, we live in a free country, and being THAT STUPID is not illegal!

      1. The article is also sloppy in shifting terminology from the initial mention of "overweight" to "obese."

      CNN articles are often poorly written. A favorite of their's (and FOX's as well as other news outlets who have an agenda) is to employ circular logic. It's A because of B, and A proves B!

      I had to laugh last week when CNN was attempting to berate House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy for reading a Dr. Seuss book on Zoom to a bunch of kids. They were like "there are more important things to do" - and I'm like "but this is National Read To Your Children Day!"

      Bottom line: Yes, indeed it is complicated, but many people crave simple solutions to complicated problems. The best we can do is follow the current cutting-edge medical advice to protect our own health and the health of others. I've had my two Moderna jabs...and while I'd rather have other things stuck into my body, it's still a good feeling.

      THANK YOU!

      I level head is always welcome here! (By me, anyway!)
      I am especially thankful for your statement: people crave simple solutions to complicated problems because that is the CORE of what is driving a wedge between us (politically) these days.

      It's devolved away from "what's good for the country" and into "I can't let you look good, because that'll make me look bad!" and "Whatever is good for the other guys must be bad for my team!"

      The concept of win-win is an anathema to today's politicians... If I could I'd replace the lot of 'em!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: THIS or THAT: the game

      @andergarcia said in THIS or THAT: the game:

      @dvt

      Yes, I got fucked once being drunk... I hardly remember anything from that night πŸ˜‰

      Do you like smoking pot or not?

      Pot has a strange effect on me - Dr says it's not rare, but uncommon: it makes me impotent! (that is, I can't get an erection)....

      Generally speaking, I'd rather get off than get high, so I simply abstain from pot!

      What's more important in a cock: length or girth?

      posted in Forum Games
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: New Design

      I love JUST THE FACT that you continue to tweak the design... not sure if the kudos go to @Joker (owner) or @raphjd (administrator) or someone else... but kudos and thanks all around for the continuous improvement plan!

      One thing to mention - the connection to the Forum has been iffy lately...

      I know the forum is not the primary focus of the site, nor is it the most heavily used part... but I like it, and since finding it a few weeks ago, I've come to rely on it for some diversion ...

      I'd be appreciated if someone could look into the forum status...

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: is gaytorrents net shut down?

      @japons said in is gaytorrents net shut down?:

      @bi4smooth

      I thought that might be the case because every few years on a new device it doesn't work unless you use a runaround method.

      You just have to remember to add the /latest to the end of the URL....

      posted in BitTorrent & Internet News
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • Some historical perspective: how fast times can change!

      This is long... but I think it may be informative to younger folks who haven't lived in the times that brought us here... read if you like, skip if you don't...

      I was born in the early 1960's... and that means I learned about sex and sexuality in the late 1970's. At that time (some called it the "free love era"), teenagers in my hometown in Florida were fucking everyone and everything!

      That's not to say being "gay" was ok! It most certainly was not!

      In short: free love meant you could fuck literally anyone else who wanted to - it was just sex! - but, kissing was for men and women, and having romantic feelings was also strictly male/female!

      I can still remember a neighbor of mine (a jock named Joe, with a FAT, but otherwise ugly cock) saying he wasn't coming over to my house again for a while - until he got a new girlfriend - because he wasn't gay! (So I could fuck the cum out of him every weekday after school - so long as he had a girlfriend! But, if he didn't have a girl, and we kept fucking, THAT was "gay"? Damn we were fucked-up-in-the-head! But it was "FREE LOVE, MAN!" πŸ™‚

      (Funny aside: we used to TIME each other... I would suck or fuck him for exactly 5 minutes, then he'd suck or fuck me for the same amount of time... we used one of those old "flip" clocks to time it! πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚ )

      So, in our high school, fucking guys was cool, so long as you were also fucking girls! It was easy to explain: other than herpes (the "gift that keeps on giving"), our biggest fear was getting the girls pregnant... so we fucked like teens like to do! But, we were ALWAYS horny, and you didn't have to wear a condom or pull out if it was a guy! It was all cool, so long as you ALSO fucked girls!

      Mind you, in these days, there was virtually no thought of trimming pubes, much less shaving your ass! And the idea of a condom used for anything BUT pregnancy prevention was quite-literally unheard-of! Thus, cumming INSIDE a guy was much preferable to pulling out! The cum in your pubes would dry and be a REAL PAIN to clean later when you could shower!

      But this wasn't just a "neighborhood" thing - it was a whole high school thing! I grew up in coastal Florida, and my parents were reasonably well-off: I had easy access to a boat (actually, 2 small ones, plus 1 closer to a yacht in size), and the intracoastal waters, where we lived, had dozens of little "spoil" islands where we, as teens, could go (by boat) and be "unreachable" by the adult world. "Boom boxes" were relatively new (and ate through D-cell batteries quickly), but if you knew what you were doing, you could "wire one in" to a boat's electronics and you had loud music for an entire day quite easily.

      We would all go out to these islands, typically 4+ boats at a time, typically 2-6 people per boat, strip naked, frolic in the water, sunbathe for that oh-so-impressive "all over" tan... and fuck like rabbits! (We also didn't know the skin cancer risk of all that "all over" sun exposure!)

      We didn't call it anything but an "island party" (no sex-related labels: no "orgy," no "poly-amorism," not even a "sex party"!), but we virtually always had sex at these island parties - because it was fun - and so long as the girls didn't get pregnant, we were all just happy to be getting drunk and getting our rocks off!

      Again, I want to be clear - there WERE rules! You could fuck guys and girls, or just girls, but you couldn't fuck just other guys! That was "gay" (used in a VERY derogative way) and you likely would not be invited back. (There were also rules, like not cumming inside of girls - or even getting close - and not fucking girls who were known to be "going steady" with someone else, unless he was there too... so it wasn't a complete free-for-all, but it was damned close!)

      YES: My life as a 16 & 17 y/o High School student in 1979 and 1980 was SWEET! πŸ™‚

      Then, in the fall of 1981, I moved to Atlanta for college. Unbeknownst to me, or my incoming classmates, Atlanta was in the middle of a 1-2 punch:

      • a serial killer was on the loose (Wayne Williams - a black man) - was abducting, raping, and killing young black boys - and the cops were CONVINCED it was a white man... until they weren't!... that's another topic for another day...
      • and AIDS. AIDS was discovered in 1981, and no one knew a damned thing about it. In 1981, wearing condoms for protection from anything but pregnancy was just plain dumb.

      But Atlanta was also a culture-shock for me... I had no idea how "progressive" my Florida upbringing had been! My college was more than 1/2 enrolled with certified, card-carrying Georgia Rednecks. Sure, they were smart enough to get into college, but the idea of a guy sticking his dick in another guy was gross and unthinkable depravity! Hell, getting a blowjob from your girl was considered "kinky") [How ironic that 40 years later, getting a blowjob from your girl is now considered a "goodnight kiss"!]

      Still, I joined a frat - and, as I learned only too late, one that wasn't particularly progressive in terms of the sexual revolution! Then again, none of them were back then! But, there was REAL RISK in having sex with any other member of the frat, so I didn't... but, I did find some other, like-minded guys in some of the other frats on campus (as well as a few from other Atlanta area colleges).

      BUT, for the first time in my life, I was having sex "in secret" (from anyone other than my parents). The girls I was fucking didn't know I was fucking guys (they knew I was fucking other girls, but that was OK - we weren't "going steady," after all! So, it was ok to be seeing - and fucking - other people. It was just assumed that they would be girls though! ... And, the guys I was fucking didn't know I was fucking girls (but again, it was OK to be fucking other guys)!?!?

      College was my introduction to the idea (totally foreign to me at the time) that one could only be "gay" or "straight," - you absolutely could be NOT be both! I had been introduced to the terms "homosexual" and "heterosexual", but having no other guide to go by, I termed myself an "omnisexual"! A term I made up myself, but after many many years, I've decided that a more accurate label for my sexuality is pansexual - but I didn't learn that term until nearly 2000 - almost 2 decades before it started to become a common term. πŸ™‚

      So, all this deceit was new to me, and it was terribly stressful. I almost flunked out of school, so I LITERALLY shut down my entire sex-life beginning mid-way through my sophomore year until my senior year! (To me, it was a clear choice: fuck now and be poor all my life, or fuck later and make a good living the rest of my life!). How did I accomplish this? I discovered porn! Specifically: Stars magazine (a gay magazine) - ironically, in my Junior year, I would be invited to NYC for Spring Break to shoot photos for them, as well as to do 2 porn videos. (I was paid over $2500 - in 1984 dollars - for the trifecta!) The owner of Stars magazine (Glenn Turner) had seen some pics I had sent in and had been trying to get me to come up - but when I did, it was about 2 months after he had moved to CA! So, I met the photographer (Tom something-or-other who owned Man-Age Studios, a major contributor to Stars back then), but never met Glenn himself. And, they never published my photos - he sold the magazine not long thereafter... I don't know the details.

      But I remained largely celibate until my final quarter - my "graduating quarter" at college...

      How quickly things had changed!

      Given the nature of things, I honestly believe that one "benefit" from my taking a couple of YEARS off in my sexual life was that I wasn't exposed to AIDS (or, later, HIV)! It was RAMPANT in Atlanta in the early 1980's - only San Francisco and NYC were hit harder! By NOT being sexually active during that time, not only was I finishing my degree, but I was also (accidentally) insulating myself from the "gay plague!")

      So, by the time I tried to "get back into the game" at the end of my senior year, all the rules had changed. The CDC & the Surgeon General were making it clear that sex between men was causing this AIDS disease - and it was nearly ALWAYS fatal! (SCARY AS FUCK!)

      What's more, the new kids (freshmen) who were coming to the school were, quite literally, scared to have sex! Not even with girls, but ESPECIALLY with guys!

      More to the point: where the primary goal of our frat parties in 1981 was to get girls into the house, get them drunk (along with ourselves), and to get laid, that goal had changed by 1985... now, the goal was just to get drunk and "party" (which usually meant other drugs). Sex was FAR less common! And sex in front of others was suddenly forbidden! Where did all this "Victorian sexual morality" come from? (Don't ask me - that's a legit question... I don't know!)

      NOTE: I have never been into those "other drugs", and it was while in college that I learned that I have a very unhappy response to getting high on weed... I go impotent! And for someone who is normally multi-orgasmic, having a dick that won't get hard is a VERY BAD side effect! To this day, I avoid weed! I'd rather get off than get high! πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚

      When I left college and started my career, I moved back to Fla... and the scene here was equally changed: No more island (sex) parties, no more naked frolicking on the beach, and far FAR fewer people nude sunbathing... people were sexually "hunkered down"! And there had been a morality shift too... it was no longer OK for guys to fuck other guys "to relieve sexual tension"... hell, even SEEING another naked guy was "gay" (still in the most derogatory of connotations). (I used to play racquetball - in the late 1970's when I went to my dad's racquetball club, guys walked around the locker-room with their towels on their shoulders or in their hands - dicks ALWAYS flopping about! When I returned in 1986, everyone's towel was around their waist with special attention payed to ensure you stayed covered up while getting dressed!)

      However, I had a very good-paying job and there was a new technology emerging: dial-up BBSs... (Bulletin Board Systems)... While I was at college, I had discovered a UUCP NewsGroup called MOTSS : Members of the same sex - a chat room for guys who liked guys! (Girls just weren't common on computers back then, so while there MAY have been a lesbian there somewhere, I never noticed.)

      Hence, I named my BBS "Space Coast MOTSS". Over time, it grew to a few hundred users.... and through there, I found a few "swingers" - mostly people a little older than me. I also met quite a few gay men (again, mostly older). I met my first, ever, true "boyfriend" on SC-MOTSS... Michael was an electronics repair tech... 12 years older than me, but because of his mixed Native American heritage, he actually looked younger than me (except for his hands, curiously, his hands looked his age...). He also moonlighted as a bartender in a hole-in-the-wall gay bar in Cocoa Beach.

      Michael introduced me to his circle of friends, among them a very sexy guy - my age, for a change - named David, who, less than 10-months after I met him, died of AIDS.

      This was ca. 1987 now, and AIDS was at its height for killing people. We had to be careful!

      Michael had grown up (sexually) in the same "moral times" as I had, and he was very used to the free-wheeling, openly sexual way of the 1970s... but this was 1987, and AIDS was very real. While Michael loved to have sex with other guys, the common belief at the time was that only anal sex transmitted the disease. (It was in error, but that's what Michael and I believed at the time)... so Michael would occasionally "hookup" and blow some other guy while he worked at his bar. And I was happy having someone who liked to fuck as much as I did - and since we had anal sex nearly every night, I was "satisfied" with just Michael.

      Michael and I broke up after about 2 years, and I moved away. There's a ton of other history to share about the 1990's and 2000's... but this is the 2020's and HIV is a completely manageable disease (not unlike diabetes: it won't likely be the cause of your death unless you fail to manage it!)

      But the DAMAGE done to the American gay & bi-sexual male psyche over the 30 years it took to gain "control" (such as it is) of HIV/AIDS remains evident.

      • there is still a "life or death" stigma associated with "casual" sex
      • there are morals police (usually in their 30's and 40's) who still insist that the only "acceptable" sex is between monogamous partners who use condoms
      • there are kids (mostly in their teens and 20's) who have been raised by HIV/AIDS epidemic-traumatized parents to fear and loathe sex

      In MY (recent) experience, there are VERY FEW people under the age of 50 who have a healthy attitude about sex (that is: sex is natural and something we're genetically programmed to enjoy and to seek out! But there are STDs that can be damaging, if not deadly, so some care has to be taken. Like everything else enjoyable in life, it needs to be enjoyed with some degree of care, moderation, and reason.) And, still in complete honesty, there aren't many OVER the age of 50 that haven't been tainted by the horrors of the HIV/AIDS epidemic either!

      I don't know that American Society will ever get back to a "free love" kind of acceptance of human sexuality that we found in the 1970's... but the past 40 years seems to have destroyed 200+ years of progress towards it!

      That said, the trajectory looks promising:

      • transgendered people were mostly vilified and ostracized in the 1970's - even by many "regular" gay men!
      • gay men in the 1970's were often assumed to be pedophiles (The term for young gay men back then was chicken, not twink!)
      • openly gay and lesbian couples weren't accepted (outside the gay sub-culture) in the 1970's. Not only couldn't they marry, but they would be looked down upon with suspicion if they even lived together!
      • gays in the 1970's were considered automatic security risks (and couldn't hold government security clearances!)
      • interracial couples were still uncommon and usually looked down upon in the 1970's

      What a long, strange trip it has been!

      posted in Chit Chat
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Spying on Straight Men | Gym, Airport , Bathroom (With pic)

      There are people here.. the forum isn't as popular as the torrents, but I suspect there may just not have been a lot of interest in this particular fetish...

      posted in Voyeurism
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: is gaytorrents net shut down?

      @di3di3di3 said in is gaytorrents net shut down?:

      @john32123666 ohh whats this lifehack? πŸ˜„ thank u

      They purposefully don't keep a "front page" web page - keep out the non-members by appearing to not even exist.

      posted in BitTorrent & Internet News
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: THIS or THAT: the game

      @dvt said in THIS or THAT: the game:

      @andergarcia

      Nope, never.

      Have you ever fucked a guy (or being fucked) in a parking lot?

      I used to have sex in lots of public places - often VERY public, just "obscured" (like in the middle of a busy public park, but obscured behind shrubbery.

      I've had sex in cars too many times to count - sometimes in a parking lot, but the most memorable was while I was driving home from Disney World at one of the original "Gay Days" at Disney World... Thinking ca. 1985? plus or minus a year maybe... we didn't fuck until we got home, but he sucked me for most of the way home, and got me off about 15 minutes from my house... he was certain I was "done for the night" -- LOL! We fucked the rest of the night at my house! He was as surprised as I was that we were both multi-orgasmic!

      So, that leads to my follow-on:

      • Ever had sex (oral, anal, or even JO) in an amusement park?
      posted in Forum Games
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 89
    • 90
    • 91
    • 92
    • 93
    • 105
    • 106
    • 91 / 106