@raphjd said in Georgia Officials Tampered With and Deleted Hours of Ballot Box Video Before It Was Released to Investigators:
@bi4smooth
You do love voter fraud when it's against Repubs, don't you?
I guess your real name is Brenda Snipes or one of the dirty bitches she replaced in Broward County.
You're entering into one of your "childish" periods again...
No one is in favor of voter fraud, but you make childish, absurd conclusions out of literally nothing!
- Yes, there were isolated cases of real, and sometimes just attempted, voter fraud.
I don't care what election you point to: 1876, 1976, 2020, 2022! Yes! There is/was/will be some attempts at vote fraud... and some will even be successful!
- BUT that doesn't mean that voting is a waste of time, nor that it cannot be trusted!
- Statistics matter!
In 2016, Dems correctly pointed out that 50,000 mis-cast ballots in just 3 states could have tilted the election!
- Were there 50,000 ballots that could have been vote fraud? sure - that sounds about right! For the whole country, but not for those 3 States.
- If there were 50,000 ballots that could have swung the election, what are the odds that they'd ALL have been FOR Trump instead of Clinton? INCREDIBLY LOW!!
- The fact is, vote fraud isn't PARTISAN! -- by which I mean that neither Dems nor Republicans have any significant edge in vote fraud schemes! They both have pretty much the same number of idiots who think their double-vote or forged ballot is going to make the difference... which means that about 40% of vote fraud favors Republicans, and about 40% of vote fraud favors Democrats - and the rest (about 20%) is non-partisan (like Judicial races) or are about 3d-party candidates.
The PROBLEM with any kind of mass vote fraud is that you have to find ways to beat the system... only there are over 3,000 separate "voting systems" spread across the US, and some 175,000 different voting precincts (most of which have DIFFERENT ballots (because of local races)!
So, think of it this way: you hack into the Dominion voting system, and insert codes that say voters who chose "slot 2" get counted less... only in some areas of the country "slot 2" is the Democrat, and in others it's the Republican... so you have to individually hack hundreds of machines in different locations to make a statistically significant "bump" in the results...
But then, you ALSO have to make it so your efforts go unnoticed! If Trump suddenly wins - even only by a hair - in places like San Francisco, CA - well, alarm bells will go off, and you'll get caught!
And then there's the problem with the "paper trail" - those computers that do the counting don't have printers in them... and some statistical sampling is always done, where they "validate" the machine count with a hand-count...
Holy smokes, it's almost like some really smart people actually thought through these things!
Almost....