Posts made by tnar

@kco The technical things you say are all true.
I advise you to use the absence of a list as evidence that there is no practical tracking technology at your own risk.
Other torrent sites have lists of sites known to use the Xvid Autograph technology; maybe you want to look there, if you insist on a list. The management here doesn't post lists of this kind, so I'm loath to do so myself.

@Kekkaishi I'm not sure why you needed to make this political...

@lololulu19 You can find him by clicking his name a the first link.

@lololulu19
https://gayeroticvideoindex.com/video/61693
Could this be scene 5?

His videography:
https://gayeroticvideoindex.com/performer/95446

@PrototypA5 Yes, that too.
See @ianfontinell's analogy.

Also, keep in mind that this technology has been around for a few years now. People have been trying to defeat it using more sophisticated methods than have been mentioned here, more sophisticated methods than the ones that worked for earlier technologies. So far, there's no practical way to defeat it.

@bruh1-0 To add to what @john32123666 said, if you upload during the initial torrent upload,

the pics normally go through without moderator approval. If you edit the post later to add (more) pics, those will require approval. Approval requires a moderator, so it can take some time.

@PrototypA5 For the commonly used Xvid AutoGraph technology, the answer is no. Re-encoding preserves the watermark.
https://anonym.to/?https://autograph.xvid.com/

@Mtfstuff-0 The guy on the left is Daniel Montoya

@alexhugo Thanks.
Jose Culo... great name...

@kco said in Uploading a JustForFans siterip:

My question is, can you mention a porn site (or more) where two users (I presume must be not only registered, but paid subscriptions) donwload a copy of a file (image or video or audio) and each user obtain a different file personally watermaked file***?

asking for a friend?

Arad on the left; who is on the right?

@lololulu19 LOL. Because we know your theory is the only possible explanation...

@kco The "watermarking" is not necessarily visible. Check out Xvid AutoGraph technology. Several sites are reported to use this.

@jrewingwanna plus, his postings are occasionally (unintentionally) amusing.

@frostycab I expect there are good reasons the site owners don't have a list, as well as good reasons they don't share more about that or host discussion of it.

@staceyr6 You need to PM him an email address (not hotmail, since that doesn't work) for an invite.

@silverstov19-0
It's @thatguyfromwalesufollow. There are lots of his videos here.

@kalayaan said in What scene is this from:

Jaxton Wheeler shag by Topher DiMaggio

Thanks for pointing this out. The upper arm tattoo had me confused - I didn't remember Jaxton having that.

BTW, OP, if you're looking, you could try the reseed button on this:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=73bfd5b719dd1c4afba031a2abda64256a9bcb5189f910a4

@eobox91103 said in co-seeding ...:

@tnar I think we have to distinguish two cases:

• Somebody uploads a new torrent, and somebody else "jumps on" this torrent, depriving the uploader of some upload credit. This is impolite. I think the is the situation that the OP is referring to.

• The torrent is old, and bears the "recycle" logo. If there's only one person seeding it, they're probably not the original seeder. In that case, "jumping on" helps the user community by getting the material out faster.

I agree. In fact, helping to reseed (your second case) seems like the right thing to do, in general.

@ianfontinell Someone posts a torrent. You have the file(s) and decide to help seed it (co-seeding). But the OP hasn't finished seeding yet, and doesn't get credit for the part you seed.