Posts made by tnar

Arad on the left; who is on the right?

@lololulu19 LOL. Because we know your theory is the only possible explanation...

@kco The "watermarking" is not necessarily visible. Check out Xvid AutoGraph technology. Several sites are reported to use this.

@jrewingwanna plus, his postings are occasionally (unintentionally) amusing.

@frostycab I expect there are good reasons the site owners don't have a list, as well as good reasons they don't share more about that or host discussion of it.

@staceyr6 You need to PM him an email address (not hotmail, since that doesn't work) for an invite.

@silverstov19-0
It's @thatguyfromwalesufollow. There are lots of his videos here.

@kalayaan said in What scene is this from:

Jaxton Wheeler shag by Topher DiMaggio

Thanks for pointing this out. The upper arm tattoo had me confused - I didn't remember Jaxton having that.

BTW, OP, if you're looking, you could try the reseed button on this:
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=73bfd5b719dd1c4afba031a2abda64256a9bcb5189f910a4

@eobox91103 said in co-seeding ...:

@tnar I think we have to distinguish two cases:

• Somebody uploads a new torrent, and somebody else "jumps on" this torrent, depriving the uploader of some upload credit. This is impolite. I think the is the situation that the OP is referring to.

• The torrent is old, and bears the "recycle" logo. If there's only one person seeding it, they're probably not the original seeder. In that case, "jumping on" helps the user community by getting the material out faster.

I agree. In fact, helping to reseed (your second case) seems like the right thing to do, in general.

@ianfontinell Someone posts a torrent. You have the file(s) and decide to help seed it (co-seeding). But the OP hasn't finished seeding yet, and doesn't get credit for the part you seed.

@jokuihmemies I don't look at this as a competition. There are multiple sites, so multiple opportunities to grab good stuff.

@silverstov19-0 Those two sites have the same owner, and often share models (and sometimes footage).
FWIW iafd and gevi show "Gustov" only worked for those sites... so there may not be anything more...

@cinemacapman Tools>Page Info>Media is a great tip I wasn't aware of. Thanks.

@lololulu19 maybe he doesn't bottom? I looked at ND and Chaos (where most of his work is, I think), and I don't see anything...

@semurg30
too late. He has four children with four different mothers because of his, um, traditional Christian values.

@blackheart88
I'm not sure how you got from my comments about the cost of the Arizona state senate ordered recount of the 2020 election results in Maricopa County (which cost state and the county taxpayers somewhere between $90m and $150m) to the national debt. Calling $90-$150 "tens of millions of dollars" isn't a stretch.

The rest of your uninformed diatribe stands on its own.

@eobox91103 FWIW, I also see the screenshot you posted, rather than the one posted by @john32123666

@hubrys seems that you're right about this.

@raphjd
That's a cop out avoiding the issues.

Apparently you have nothing to back up some of your deeply held views, ones for which I can find no evidence. Not sure why you can't find any either, but that's what happened here.

There are similar unproven deeply held liberal views, of course. I haven't disputed that.

You also have lots of generalizations about liberals. Some of them I agree with (and I've said that about a few things in this thread), and I'm open to believing more of them, but you've given me no leads on those.

You've also given me no examples of conservatives condemning ignorance and nonsense in their own party. I'm sure that happens here and there, but I don't see anything as widespread as you imply.

I cite examples of legitimate candidates who have recently won primary elections repeating the big lie and even wasting taxpayers money by suing government agencies over made-up issues with the 2020 elections in Arizona, claims that Cyber Ninjas, hired by the Republican super-majority state senate, could not substantiate. That little stunt cost the taxpayers of the state of Arizona and Maricopa County 10s of millions of dollars, and by the way, broke the necessary security protocols on the voting machines, requiring replacement and/or expensive recertification, also paid for by taxpayers.

All that government waste is the kind of thing conservatives I grew up with and around normally seeth and rave over, but that didn't happen in this case. Not sure why, but there's certainly no condemning of nonsense in this case.

And Hillary, who hasn't run for anything in almost 6 years, is somehow brought up in this context. Why not bring up the problems with her private mail server, where conservatives do have a point when they say national security was at risk of (or maybe was) endangered?

You say liberals spent Trumps entire presidency trying to find a link to Russia. They sure did. Conservatives spent a large part of Hillary's term as Secretary of State investigating Benghazi. There were some issues uncovered by both, but no hugely damaging bombshells. They were both mostly politically motivated wastes of time.

I could go on.

What I was actually hoping was to learn something I didn't know, or gain a better understanding of conservative thought. That's not what happened here, unfortunately.

@raphjd
well, this was fun for a while, but now you just sound like the ranting media idiots, so I guess this interesting discussion is done.