Posts made by tnar

@john32123666 Your statements are true, but this is different than what I was saying. Mine is about inconsistent nomenclature; yours is mostly about allocation overhead on disks and the overhead of various data formats.

@ianfontinell said in Torrent page says 1.19GB but my torrent is 1.28GB:

Since we're dealing with the word kilo that is used for international measurement, we'd assume that has a value of 1000. But since in this case we're dealing with digital data that is presented and stored in binary format, we need to base 2 instead of base 10. So instead of 10, 100, 1000 we go gor 2, 4, 8, 16... 1024... 2048, etc.

But it's important to notice that, although the binary is pretty much the standard used for most operating systems and programs, the international system measurement still exists, can be used and most definitely is used arbitrarily, creating this kind of confusion we're dealing with here.

In the digital world the one glaring (and often misleading) exception to the binary rule is storage (disk). Vendors of that tend to use the standard 1000's rather than the 1024's, no doubt because it makes their disk units seem larger... Just something to know when you buy a 1 TB disk that your O/S claims only has ~975 GB of space.

@chuckBKK No offense intended, but your AI friend is a bore who speaks in broad generalizations, but also cites specific instances of events which may or may not be relevant to the religion in general. So at this point it seems well suited to superficial conversation, but I don't see any insights or things I didn't mostly already know. In other words, it's well suited to replace popular media and most social media content

@duke4172 Looks like this is from Latino Fan Club? The second photo is called Chino... that might be a clue.

@lololulu19 It's him. See the "Stay Tuned" chest tattoo, for example.

@kco The technical things you say are all true.
I advise you to use the absence of a list as evidence that there is no practical tracking technology at your own risk.
Other torrent sites have lists of sites known to use the Xvid Autograph technology; maybe you want to look there, if you insist on a list. The management here doesn't post lists of this kind, so I'm loath to do so myself.

@Kekkaishi I'm not sure why you needed to make this political...

@lololulu19 You can find him by clicking his name a the first link.

@lololulu19
https://gayeroticvideoindex.com/video/61693
Could this be scene 5?

His videography:
https://gayeroticvideoindex.com/performer/95446

@PrototypA5 Yes, that too.
See @ianfontinell's analogy.

Also, keep in mind that this technology has been around for a few years now. People have been trying to defeat it using more sophisticated methods than have been mentioned here, more sophisticated methods than the ones that worked for earlier technologies. So far, there's no practical way to defeat it.

@bruh1-0 To add to what @john32123666 said, if you upload during the initial torrent upload,

the pics normally go through without moderator approval. If you edit the post later to add (more) pics, those will require approval. Approval requires a moderator, so it can take some time.

@PrototypA5 For the commonly used Xvid AutoGraph technology, the answer is no. Re-encoding preserves the watermark.
https://anonym.to/?https://autograph.xvid.com/

@Mtfstuff-0 The guy on the left is Daniel Montoya

@alexhugo Thanks.
Jose Culo... great name...

@kco said in Uploading a JustForFans siterip:

My question is, can you mention a porn site (or more) where two users (I presume must be not only registered, but paid subscriptions) donwload a copy of a file (image or video or audio) and each user obtain a different file personally watermaked file***?

asking for a friend?

Arad on the left; who is on the right?

@lololulu19 LOL. Because we know your theory is the only possible explanation...

@kco The "watermarking" is not necessarily visible. Check out Xvid AutoGraph technology. Several sites are reported to use this.

@jrewingwanna plus, his postings are occasionally (unintentionally) amusing.

@frostycab I expect there are good reasons the site owners don't have a list, as well as good reasons they don't share more about that or host discussion of it.