@raphjd: Your argument is weak and invalid because you have an irrational fixation on bringing gender equality into a discussion that has absolutely nothing to do with gender equality. The discussion is primarily focused on the fact that women of different races can relate to one another and as a result, some women may relate much stronger than necessary and change themselves to feel more connected to a group or individuals within a group that they identify strongly with; as was the case of Rachel Dolezal.
Posts made by royalcrown89
-
RE: Rachel Dolezal is Broke and on Food Stamps
-
RE: Oprah running for president
Are you guys serious? No, Oprah should most definitely not be president and I would never vote for her. If Democrats even think of boosting her up, I'd happily sit it out even if it meant helping #45 get reelected. That would be continuing the horrible track we're currently on. Why would you want to vote for another super rich person knowing they'd most likely be super corrupt? Democrats need someone who would be able to speak to the problems of everyone and who will be at least a little less biased than someone like Oprah. Nope, she needs to keep her butt in entertainment where she belongs. Plus, she gives off this weird anti-man vibe that has always rubbed me the wrong way.
-
RE: Rachel Dolezal is Broke and on Food Stamps
Having female body parts does not justify women having special rights over men. Especially when they are screaming for gender equality.
White people are racially profiled too. Try being white and going into certain areas and see how fast the police pull you over and search you. Whites are profiled for meth. People are always profiled based on various things.
AA allows blacks regardless of background to do worse than other races and still get into college before them.
Of course people of all types share human experiences.
After this response, I'm no longer replying to you like this because I don't think you're capable of basic reading comprehension at this point. I tried having a logical, sound argument with you and each time you've brought up unrelated things which leads me to the conclusion you're either an irrational person with a serious chip on his shoulder or simply someone who lacks basic reading comprehension. I NEVER SAID HAVING FEMALE BODY PARTS IS A REASON FOR WOMEN DESERVING SPECIAL RIGHTS OVER MEN. NONE OF THIS WAS EVEN ABOUT WOMEN HAVING SPECIAL RIGHTS OVER MEN. I said women could simply relate to one another because some of their issues regarding the body parts that they have that we don't may be something they have in common and relate to one another over; not so they could gain special rights but so they could realize they have specific common struggles. How did you possibly misconstrue that point? Why are you stuck on this stupid men vs. women argument when that's not even close to the point I'm making in this thread?
WHAT ABOUT THE MANY BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE HIGHLY QUALIFIED AND WERE ONLY ABLE TO SUCCEED BECAUSE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION? Are you suggesting that even someone like Condoleezza Rice was wrongly given admission into the University of Denver and/or the University of Notre Dame as if it were just to fill a quota and not because she was bright and deserved to be in those schools? I differ in opinion on a lot of issues with her I'm sure, but I would never question her intelligence or the legitimacy of her education. I'm not sure that she benefited from affirmative action, but if she did, isn't it excellent that she was able to become the extraordinary person she is today and not left behind because the system didn't see her potential? Going off of your argument, every single black person in America has some sort of intelligence shortcoming and absolutely needs affirmative action because they wouldn't gain an opportunity without it. Are you arguing that black people by nature are inferior to white people? If so, you'd be the dictionary example of a racist; something you accused me of being with absolutely no basis to substantiate the claim.
Lastly, you gave an example of classism when you said white people get profiled, too. White people are not profiled just for being white, that is a major lie and you could never even prove such a thing in America. You messed up when you said, "going into certain areas." That means they don't look like they can afford to belong in a certain place or appear in a way that more well-off whites or well-off people of color would find suspicious; therefore, they were profiled for possibly being of a lower socioeconomic class and most people tie being of a lower class to being a troublemaker or drug user. And none of what you said has anything to do with wealthy men of color such as Sean Combs and Colin Powell being racially profiled. Black people are profiled by race and when profiled by black officers, it's usually a combination of race and class. You're once again trying to deny real instances of racism by deflecting the point with a weak and often times wholly irrelevant argument.
My next replies to you will be simple and 100% dismissal in nature, just like your weak replies to me. Here's an example:
Your arguments are weak because you constantly deviate from what this topic is about.
-
RE: Rachel Dolezal is Broke and on Food Stamps
I saw this on a job posting today. As a white guy it pisses me off….
"An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. Females, minorities, veterans, and persons with disabilities are strongly encouraged to apply."
That doesn't mean they are held to equal standards … The word opportunity does not mean guarantee. Also, most companies say something along those lines... Are you looking for a job? I mean the poster boy for scam artists is president, you should just go take Jordan Belfort's course on sales and become an life insurance broker for wealthy people or something... They got rid of the provision in Dodd Frank that prevents stock brokers from scamming old people out of their retirements. Be realistic, if you don't do it, somebody else will.
THANK YOU! Like I can't yell this loud enough! Opportunity means just that, opportunity. What is so wrong about offering opportunities to people who usually do not get them? This is so frustrating. If you were a fish and someone took you out of the water because you were a certain color or size or gender, meanwhile the "preferred" fish got to live; wouldn't you want to be placed back into the water before you die? If they told you there was an opportunity you could take advantage of to get back into the water, would you not take it? If you do somehow get back into the water, would you not fight for ALL fish to never experience what you've experienced? It is a very silly example, but it does somewhat illustrates the issue. Why is this so hard to understand for so many?
-
RE: "MOONLIGHT" WINS BEST PICTURE
It deserved every award it has won because not only did every actor do a phenomenal job, those actors went to every single press event and promoted the hell out of the film. They didn't just sit back and expect to win everything just because they're black, they worked hard for it. Naomie Harris didn't even want to do the part because she felt it was stereotypical, but she realized the importance and did the role. The fact that you were so quick to demonize people without even the slightest clue as to why the film was even created is just so juvenile and ignorant. I'm done with this to be honest.
-
RE: "MOONLIGHT" WINS BEST PICTURE
IMDB rating doesn't factor into Academy Award win lol. Moonlight was the most critically-acclaimed movie of 2016 by over 100 professional movie critics. It deserved Best Picture for many, many other reasons than that though. Political correctness had absolutely nothing to do with it. If that were the case, Fences or Hidden Figures would have won since those movies dealt with historical racism. Moonlight was mostly set in more recent years and had ZERO mentions of racism in it. Try again with that raggedy argument lol.
It's a movie that has an all black cast, and is homosexual related.
It was a politically correct move. Don't bullshit me.
I haven't even seen the fucking movie, and know that.
Whoa, someone's angry. And seriously, what's wrong with a movie having an all black cast and having a main gay character? Is something supposed to be wrong with a movie like that that also is liked by a lot of professional movie critics? And you haven't seen the movie, yet your angry about something. Very telling.
I never said anything is wrong with having a black cast and a gay main character. Hello?! Can't tell by my avatar I'm a gay black man?
What I mean is, the oscars, academy awards, golden globes etc. All this shit is supposedly there to award excellence in cinema.
Moonlight is not worthy in that category I'm sorry.
My point is, the movie somehow is cinematically excellent because it's pushing a politically correct agenda and removing all the current falsehods that America is a racist and homophobic, xenophobic country right now.
I'm not angry. I just really want you to wake the fuck up.
Just because I'm black and gay myself, I'm supposed to by default fawn over a black gay drama film winning best movie in a mundane award show controlled by white social marxists elites who work on politically correct ideals and motives?
I first heard about Moonlight a few months back by watching the teasers and shit and I just immediately thought of it as a cable television film, and I didn't want to waste my time with it.
Is it a bad movie? Hell no. Is it a movie that I think is what it's hyped up to be? I don't think I can say yes to that.
Upon reading synopsis and reviews and things, I felt my feelings were justified and I don't need to waste my time or piece of mind with this shit.
I'm very aghast that this film won all the awards it has and I'm sorry, I think you should be more aware and educated than that. This is completely a politically correct motive and rule to squash the lack of black centric media in white awards shows, and lack of gay media in white award shows.
The life experiences of Tarell Alvin McCraney, which Moonlight was mostly based on, are not some political agenda. HE LIVED THAT LIFE so how dare you say the movie has some political agenda? I need to wake up? You're calling someone's FACTUAL LIFE EXPERIENCES a political agenda. Ok. You're delusional.
I don't know him.
I've been through way worse shit than him as a gay black young man. I haven't written a screenplay about it.
So just because he's a gay black man that lived in an inner city area, I'm supposed to automatically empathize with him? Get real.
I'm not saying he isn't talented, I'm sure he is. He doesn't pay my bills or anything.
We are both black gay men. That's where the comparisons end and shall always end.
I'm also not blaming him totally. I'm just saying that he's just the scapegoat that the film awards people used to play this scheme and game.
He also should have casted actual gay black men for the parts too.
I'm not delusional. It's called an opinion, and I'm allowed to have mine. I'm not trying to argue with you, but you should understand my opinion as I think it's very valid.
Don't trip, babe. The movie was by far superb, and the dude giving you a hard time about it is obviously one of these small-dicked panty-waste trolls that jump on any thread to be a complete and total douchebag about ANYTHING! It speaks for itself. I mean, just look at him. :afr:
So I'm a troll because I disagree with you? Very interesting. How about you just let me have my opinion. I'm not trying to fight or argue.
Don't trip, babe. The movie was by far superb, and the dude giving you a hard time about it is obviously one of these small-dicked panty-waste trolls that jump on any thread to be a complete and total douchebag about ANYTHING! It speaks for itself. I mean, just look at him. :afr:
I didn't want to call him a troll because I'm usually not quick to dismiss people like that, but you're right, he's obviously trolling. He didn't even know the movie was based on life in Miami as Tarell Alvin McCraney saw it. That movie was made to give similar young queer people of color some inspiration, not to make some big agenda argument about political correctness. His comments are so disgusting and counterproductive to anything.
You don't know what I knew. I knew the story was based on true events. What do you take me for?
I'm a young queer of color, (black american) and I don't wish to see the movie. So I am an alien or android or something? I must be.
I never said it was a bad movie, I'm just saying just because the plot is around gay black men, and I'm a gay black man, doesn't mean I have to love it. Because I don't.
Wow. You're like THE most educated person who has ever responded to me on one of these threads on here. Usually all I see are perverts in cyberspace trying to poke some animated wet dream. It's nice to know that people like you reside within my community. Thanks for your comment. Brains and brawn make a person so much more beautiful in my eyes. Enjoy your evening.
Or you should just let me have my opinions. This is me, and this is who I am. I'm sorry. I'm not a robot. I have feelings and values that I'm allowed to have.
Your argument is invalid because you came into this with the mindset that this movie was politically motivated with some "Marxist" agenda or whatever, when in reality its a look at the life Tarell Alvin McCraney similarly lived growing up in Miami. What you started on this thread was not even an opinion, it was just wrong and so disrespectful and disregarding of someone's actual life experiences. I would never dismiss someone like you in the ways you dismissed the maker of Moonlight and people like me who actually do love the film. Who are you to deny someone's experiences like that? That's the only thing I'm calling you delusional for. I know nothing of your experiences and I didn't even bring up your experiences or what you have been through. I never said you should like this movie just because it had an all black cast and is about a black gay man and his experiences growing up. That's damn sure not why I love the film. I love the film because it is one narrative being told about someone's life experiences, not because it represents every single experience of black gay men. I have no idea what reviews you've seen, but the ones I've seen were by people who actually saw the film and loved seeing a unique look into someone's life who grew up black and gay in Miami. The movie was the most critically-acclaimed film of 2016 by people who are experts at examining every single aspect of film. It is currently the 2nd, 3rd or 4th highest rated movies on many different sites since those sites began. I've seen negative reviews of the film and none of them say any of the damaging and disgusting things that you have said about it. Going off on wild tangents about people being a part of "Marxist" left-wing agendas and all that conspiracy talk is not going to help you make your point. Trust me.
-
RE: Georgia couple gets prison for racist threats at child's birthday party
Yeah the 2018 campaign ads are going to be brutal against Trump and the Republicans. The worst ones are going to be about healthcare though, with all the cancer patients and people with newly added preexisting conditions are denied health insurance on TV talking about how Obamacare worked for them and the Republicans snatched it away. Republicans are in a serious box that only a miracle could get them out of at this point.
-
RE: "MOONLIGHT" WINS BEST PICTURE
Don't trip, babe. The movie was by far superb, and the dude giving you a hard time about it is obviously one of these small-dicked panty-waste trolls that jump on any thread to be a complete and total douchebag about ANYTHING! It speaks for itself. I mean, just look at him. :afr:
I didn't want to call him a troll because I'm usually not quick to dismiss people like that, but you're right, he's obviously trolling. He didn't even know the movie was based on life in Miami as Tarell Alvin McCraney saw it. That movie was made to give similar young queer people of color some inspiration, not to make some big agenda argument about political correctness. His comments are so disgusting and counterproductive to anything.
-
RE: Rachel Dolezal is Broke and on Food Stamps
Clearly, you view gender equality as sexist. The women in my life know I'm adamant about equality.
What you call "black experience" isn't what all blacks face. Sean "Puffy" Combs (sp?) grew up in a better area and had more money than most white kids. My black friends grew up just as middle class as I did. They hate BLM and similar groups more than I do. They are the ones other blacks call "coons", "whitewashed" and other hate filled things.
White privilege doesn't exist when non-whites can freely, and in front of the police without fear of arrest, force white kids to walk through a creek to get to class. BLM and the other prove black and female privilege, while totally disproving white and male privilege.
Sorry, I think Rachel is a liar who got busted. BUT, as I said before she is nowhere near as bad as Talcum X.
No, I view you making every single issue dealing with women about "women hating men" as stupid. There are issues that women deal with that have nothing to do with men because, quite frankly, men don't have a pussy or ovaries or a uterus. You don't have the same hormonal makeup as a woman, so you have no idea what women can and can't relate to one another about.
Anyway, thank you for making my main point. I said the black experience is unique and that black culture is the experience good, bad and in between. I never said it was a monolithic experience. The experiences differ individually but collectively they form black culture. Condoleezza Rice and her experience is a part of black culture. Ben Carson being a renown surgeon and now being our U.S. Secretary of HUD and each and every one of his other experiences are a part of black culture, for better or worse. No, they did not make their advancements because they were black, but because they are brilliant at what they do. They've shown that given the right opportunities, black people can excel and go on to do great things, which is the opposite of what many racists believe. You also made my point by bringing up Sean Combs, he did indeed grow up with better opportunities but that did nothing to stop him from being wrongly profiled by police in New York City as a young man. Colin Powell was also racially profiled by police numerous times. Are you denying their detailed experiences of racial profiling by police officers? I would only call a black person a coon if they agree with racists who openly deny opportunities to other black people. If a black person willingly denied or sat back and watched a white colleague deny a highly qualified black person for a position and give that position to a white person who has zero qualification for that position, that black person is a coon and complicit in racial bias. If a white person gives a black person an opportunity and that black person has zero qualifications; meanwhile, there was a white candidate for that position, I would call that white person immoral for manipulating the cause of affirmative action. The program should solely be in place to make sure QUALIFIED people who normally get looked over don't get looked over for people who have way less qualifications and/or experience than the person picked over them. Abuse in the system is a huge problem, but I myself have benefited from the system working the right way given I had way higher SAT scores and a much higher GPA than many of the white students I ended up getting into the same college with; like exponentially higher.
I don't know what you're trying to get at with that "white kids walking through a creek" situation, but you have used it approximately 25 times on here and it's further proof that you attribute one incident to an entire race of people. When I talk about racism and for example its role in denying black people the right to vote, I never say all white people did this because that would be wholly inaccurate. It wasn't even a majority of white people who did that because not every white person had the position to deny giving a ballot to a black voter, only those in positions to do that. Beyond that, it was mainly an issue in the South so that makes the number even smaller. Still, it was significant enough to cause lynchings, beatings and a whole host of other bad things during that time period. Why do you attribute isolated incidents to an entire population of people unless you're talking about black people who view other blacks exactly the way you do?
Rachel did lie but only to hide from the complication of race in this country. Something in her personal life got her to that point, and she related to black culture for a reason. My belief is that she truly did it because she deeply compared her struggles as a white woman to the struggles of black people or more specifically black women. If I were living in Brazil right now because I couldn't come back to the U.S. because I was in love with a Brazilian man who couldn't get legal U.S. citizenship status due to illegal immigration and the problems it has caused, I would be in a similar situation to you and I'd hope you would be able to say "I can relate to that," and that you'd offer me some words of advice. Sorry you're in that situation, by the way.
-
RE: "MOONLIGHT" WINS BEST PICTURE
IMDB rating doesn't factor into Academy Award win lol. Moonlight was the most critically-acclaimed movie of 2016 by over 100 professional movie critics. It deserved Best Picture for many, many other reasons than that though. Political correctness had absolutely nothing to do with it. If that were the case, Fences or Hidden Figures would have won since those movies dealt with historical racism. Moonlight was mostly set in more recent years and had ZERO mentions of racism in it. Try again with that raggedy argument lol.
It's a movie that has an all black cast, and is homosexual related.
It was a politically correct move. Don't bullshit me.
I haven't even seen the fucking movie, and know that.
Whoa, someone's angry. And seriously, what's wrong with a movie having an all black cast and having a main gay character? Is something supposed to be wrong with a movie like that that also is liked by a lot of professional movie critics? And you haven't seen the movie, yet your angry about something. Very telling.
I never said anything is wrong with having a black cast and a gay main character. Hello?! Can't tell by my avatar I'm a gay black man?
What I mean is, the oscars, academy awards, golden globes etc. All this shit is supposedly there to award excellence in cinema.
Moonlight is not worthy in that category I'm sorry.
My point is, the movie somehow is cinematically excellent because it's pushing a politically correct agenda and removing all the current falsehods that America is a racist and homophobic, xenophobic country right now.
I'm not angry. I just really want you to wake the fuck up.
Just because I'm black and gay myself, I'm supposed to by default fawn over a black gay drama film winning best movie in a mundane award show controlled by white social marxists elites who work on politically correct ideals and motives?
I first heard about Moonlight a few months back by watching the teasers and shit and I just immediately thought of it as a cable television film, and I didn't want to waste my time with it.
Is it a bad movie? Hell no. Is it a movie that I think is what it's hyped up to be? I don't think I can say yes to that.
Upon reading synopsis and reviews and things, I felt my feelings were justified and I don't need to waste my time or piece of mind with this shit.
I'm very aghast that this film won all the awards it has and I'm sorry, I think you should be more aware and educated than that. This is completely a politically correct motive and rule to squash the lack of black centric media in white awards shows, and lack of gay media in white award shows.
The life experiences of Tarell Alvin McCraney, which Moonlight was mostly based on, are not some political agenda. HE LIVED THAT LIFE so how dare you say the movie has some political agenda? I need to wake up? You're calling someone's FACTUAL LIFE EXPERIENCES a political agenda. Ok. You're delusional.
-
RE: Trump Claims DNC Chair Race Was 'Totally Rigged,' Offers No Evidence
Republicans have a chance as long as they can replace ACA with something better and deliver on those tax cuts. THEY HAVE TO DO BOTH or things are going to get very ugly on that side of the political spectrum. They've been saying they will cut taxes for a very long time and they must keep their word on that. And I don't even have to say what will happen if they snatch away health insurance from millions of people, especially those in Republican majority states. They also need to stay away from decisions that effect sports in states where sports really matter or there will be many repeats of what happened in North Carolina. All of those Republican governors who won in 2010 and 2014 will get the boot if an important basketball, football etc. event gets ruined due to some stupid transgender bathroom ban or anti-gay legislation. Republicans should know by now that they do best when they stick to cutting taxes and gutting regulations, not social issues.
They can't do either… Look at Trump's discretionary budget... It's not cuts to reduce the debt, it's cuts to spend.
You're also forgetting he promised to "pay off the debt in 8 years."
Never mind the fact that is totally impossible.
So I'll play fair, currently all his plan does is shift spending around, so that shouldn't add to the debt, but the government already operates with a deficit, so that does absolutely nothing to reduce the debt.
A single penny of tax cuts to anyone, would increase the debt further, and devalue the US dollar (The Fed would have to print more money to cover it), causing potentially rapid inflation.
It's possible to erase the debt, but it will take some drastic and inhumane action such as changing the Constitution to deny rights to certain people and bringing back slavery. Not trying to be funny, seriously, that would erase the debt. You can get a lot done and make a lot of money with forced unpaid labor. Maybe that's something he's factoring in given that Steve Bannon is basically the big man in charge. You never know.
The Republicans have a small window to make good on the promises they've made. One of their biggest problems is the courts. #45 pissed off the courts and he's now an enemy in many of their eyes. So the Republicans have to make careful legislation that cannot be challenged in the courts because it's looking like they will continue to lose (i.e. the Obamacare SCOTUS ruling). They have the numbers to get a lot of what they want through as long as the controversies at the White House stop. If these leaks get worse, it's going to continue spacing the Republicans from Trump and they'll end up in the GW Bush 2006-2008 situation. Republicans abandoned him and their party lost everything, leading up to Barack Obama getting elected. Now they've built a flimsy majority with far-right Congressmen and they are on a time limit.
-
RE: Rachel Dolezal is Broke and on Food Stamps
Facing universal issues, such as heat or eat (a non-racial issue that many face in colder climates), doesn't make a normal person want to be "trans-racial".
What "barrier" did she face? The eduction system was feminized in the early 1970s to help improve girls' learning. This is why there was a total flip in the grades between boys and girls. This happened across the western world.
Women, despite the education bias, have Affirmative Action to help them get into college. This is despite the fact that over 2/3rd college students are women. If AA had an honest purpose, it would be used to help even out the situation.
If she's in a domestic violence situation, the western world will arrest the male regardless due to the west using, officially or unofficially, the Duluth model of DV.
As far as work goes, there's plenty of male dominance in the dirty jobs. She could fight the good fight and make sure men don't dominate the street sweeping and trash collection industries.
I do have to give her credit though, as least she didn't steal a scholarship like Talcum X did.
Okay I have to ask, do you have some kind of vendetta against women? Seriously, all you do is trash anything and everything that has to do with a woman, no matter what the woman's ideals are. There are women who go through struggles that have absolutely nothing to do with any of the feminism stuff you hate so much. What about serious medical problems that are unique to women? Some women can't have children and it effects them psychologically. Who are you to demean them and constantly nitpick radical examples of feminism to discredit the hardships of all women? It's very disturbing that you do that. Do you have a mother or sister or aunts? I'm sure you wouldn't want someone discrediting their experiences just because they're women and feminism is a thing.
Back to the point I was making, it's not about her wanting to be "trans-racial" to me, that part I do not agree with. What I'm saying is we are more alike than we are different. Only racists believe people are genetically bad or good because of their race. I believe the reason why you're having such a hard time believing that she's genuine is because you dismiss the reality of black culture or you see it as something racist, when it's really just the black experience–-good, bad and in between---in this country. Black culture in America is unique but a lot of our issues truly are similar to issues white people typically have. When people don't get hung up on attributing characteristics to an entire race, they realize that fact and decide to work in connection with those who do not look like them but share the same struggles. Yes, a white woman from a well-off white family can actually have similar if not the same struggles as a black woman living in poverty. White privilege does not apply to every single aspect of life. I remember you saying on here that your partner couldn't get a visa due to the illegal immigration here and as a result, you're stuck in the UK. Do you honestly think no one else of a different race has that exact same problem? I feel like you're trying to make it seem as if that's impossible. That's just not the reality. You can't honestly believe that people of different races can't relate to one another.
Rachel did go too far with the changing of her appearance and all of that, but she did not deserve the hatred she received. Maybe she needed some counseling to help her understand you can relate to people without becoming exactly like those people. However, I can't dismiss her for wanting to be a part of black culture because she wasn't appropriating due to her being a member of the NAACP and helping black people gain opportunities that they normally get excluded from. I've been in situations where I was having a problem with something and a white person was having a similar problem and when I find a solution, I make sure to help that person by telling them about the solution. I don't first stop and say, "Ew, they're white so I'm not going to do that. White people have done so much crap throughout history so I'd never help one." That doesn't mean I'd walk around in whiteface and change my identity lol. The only time I wouldn't help a white person is if that person does or says something highly ignorant and even then I may still help, especially if it's a life or death situation.
-
RE: Police: Gay basher tells couple, "You live in Trump country now"
kaworun83, you are 100% correct. So called President Trump has made people believe it's ok to say whatever they want and behave in any way they want. America is quickly going to devolve into a third world nation.
Well, I am pretty sure that with Killary Klingon world would quickly develop into WWIII.
We live in reality, not an alternative world. SHE DID NOT WIN. HE DID. He is the president which means he's going to be held accountable. Using the Hillary would be worse excuse is tired, lame and kills any argument on the spot. There is no Hillary anymore, she is a private citizen with absolutely no power; therefore, any reference to what "would have, could have," is alternative reality and weakens arguments when mentioned.
-
RE: So called President Trump: "Nobody knew healthcare could be so complicated"
I agree Medicaid should not be a safety net where people who get seriously ill have to quit work just to qualify for it. The problem is exactly what you said in the first post of this thread, ACA aka Obamacare is the healthcare plan Republicans used to endorse before President Obama endorsed it. They've put themselves in a serious box but they seem to think they have enough room, as well as political capital, to have this fight. One of their biggest problems is going to be distancing themselves from what #45 promised. He promised coverage for everyone and a competitive market place for health insurance that will lower premiums, and that the government would pay for it after he made significant savings in other areas. He said that in a televised interview seen by millions and millions of people. That is a huge promise that he made and Republicans have to figure out a way to subtract that from what they want to do. If they even think of attempting to make good on the promise #45 made, they will lose their corporate sponsorship and those who don't worry about their health insurance because they have the money will jump ship as well. There are people who voted for Agent Orange who do not like ACA because it didn't effect them at all but it has President Obama all over it and they want it gone.
-
RE: Trump Claims DNC Chair Race Was 'Totally Rigged,' Offers No Evidence
The Democrats are going to realize that their constant attempts to demonize and disparage Trump are destroying their chances of being able to participate in any legislation with him.
They're never going to … Trump completely broke the political system in the US. Granted, it was broken before, but now it's just going to seesaw every election cycle. I firmly believe that there's going to be a very bad day ahead for conservatives in 2018. I hate to say this, but if the democrats ever gain control of the house and senate, they're going to employ every tactic the republicans used and it's going to be a decade before it gets sorted out. Trump is very bad for the future political situation in this country... If he can't turn his presidency around, then he might as well give the government to the democrats. The voter suppression tactics will not work twice. The democrats thought they had the election won easily, (I thought they did too), but they're seriously pissed off now... And nothing Donald is doing is helping...
Republicans have a chance as long as they can replace ACA with something better and deliver on those tax cuts. THEY HAVE TO DO BOTH or things are going to get very ugly on that side of the political spectrum. They've been saying they will cut taxes for a very long time and they must keep their word on that. And I don't even have to say what will happen if they snatch away health insurance from millions of people, especially those in Republican majority states. They also need to stay away from decisions that effect sports in states where sports really matter or there will be many repeats of what happened in North Carolina. All of those Republican governors who won in 2010 and 2014 will get the boot if an important basketball, football etc. event gets ruined due to some stupid transgender bathroom ban or anti-gay legislation. Republicans should know by now that they do best when they stick to cutting taxes and gutting regulations, not social issues.
-
RE: Rachel Dolezal is Broke and on Food Stamps
How does a lily white blonde girl identify as a black person? If you listen to race baiter and sexist Francesca Ramsey from MTV Decoded, Rachel was the most privileged type of white girl.
It is odd though, that Rachel has been completely shut out while Talcum X steals an Oprah scholarship for black males and TYT hire him while maintaining the lie that he's black. Talcum X also sued Moorehouse College for not letting him in as a white person and lost. I guess this is why he decided to pretend to be black.
She identified with black culture more than being an actual black person. Granted I wasn't a fan of her whole "trans-racial" thing, but I understood where she was coming from. You don't have to be black to realize black people and white people often have the same struggles and can therefore relate to one another. How many times have you worried about a utility bill or mortgage payment? How many times have you or someone you know had to skip a meal or two because they have children and put the needs of their children before their own? These are not black problems or white problems, these are simply problems. Financial struggles know no race. Many economic opportunity barriers effect white people just as much as they effect everyone else. Yes, we do have differences and not everyone is treated fairly, but a lot of our struggles are universal and often times are connected.
I believe Rachel faced barriers as a white woman and she realized that her struggles mirrored the struggles of black women, and she wanted–-in her own way---to show that she wants to help find solutions to those struggles; hence why she worked for the NAACP. I wish more people would have seen it from that perspective instead of bashing her the way they did. Black people were especially mean to her, including people in my personal life.
-
RE: Police: Gay basher tells couple, "You live in Trump country now"
Some of you need to be honest, it doesn't matter how much evidence of how true a situation is, you'd still doubt it. It's really sad how far we have fallen. You didn't doubt the circumstances around the Matthew Shepard case when it happened, did you? He really was the innocent victim of a hate crime in this country. Millions of people here dismissed what happened to him or didn't see the inhumanity of it, and then-President George W. Bush wouldn't even sign legislation to strengthen the hate crime laws here after it happened. We cannot start falling backwards as the result of #45 and his disgusting behavior. We have to move forward as a people or #45 will destroy what humanity we have left. It's highly disturbing to me that the first reaction to a possible hate crime is, "Liberals always make up stuff," instead of, "we need to try working together to make sure REAL incidents like this do not happen." I really hope nothing serious like what happened to Matthew Shepard happens again because with Jeff Sessions as AG, I don't even want to think of how damaging he'd be.
There's plenty of evidence that people lie about things, for various reasons.
Women lie about being raped.
Women lie about domestic violence.
Women lie about their husbands abusing their kids, sexually or not.
The problem is, these liars hurt real victims.
That's a good point and I agree with you; however, it has little to do with the point of my post. I'm under the impression that it doesn't matter how truthful a claim is, it is dismissed by people like you without even doing at least basic research. If someone told me they'd been raped, I would try not to dismiss them as a liar without first learning some details; especially if I knew that person. I've learned never to do that again after a very serious situation. There was a girl at my high school that I was close friends with who told me along with a few other friends that one of my close male friends raped her one day after his football practice. She'd given him a ride home and told me and some other friends that he raped her, and I flat out did not believe her and told her that to her face. Our friendship ended over that situation. I knew this boy and had been to his house and he'd been to mine because he was one of the first people I told I was gay back then, and I thought he'd never do something like that since he'd been such a good friend to me when I needed one. I chose to believe him and a couple of years later in 2010 while I was away in college, I saw on Facebook that he'd been arrested for sexually assaulting an intoxicated woman at a club. I looked up the case on my hometown's news website and it was very clear that he really did commit sexual assault against the woman in a nightclub bathroom. That situation proved to me that sometimes it's very hard to know when someone is being honest. I'm still not 100% convinced that he raped my former female friend, but I do feel like crap for taking his word over hers so quickly.
Edit: Also, domestic violence is very, very serious in my state. We have one of the highest domestic violence rates here, usually between husband and wife. We actually had a recent incident involving a state legislator who had to resign after viciously beating his wife in front of his children, and he co-authored legislation related to domestic violence:
-
RE: "MOONLIGHT" WINS BEST PICTURE
IMDB rating doesn't factor into Academy Award win lol. Moonlight was the most critically-acclaimed movie of 2016 by over 100 professional movie critics. It deserved Best Picture for many, many other reasons than that though. Political correctness had absolutely nothing to do with it. If that were the case, Fences or Hidden Figures would have won since those movies dealt with historical racism. Moonlight was mostly set in more recent years and had ZERO mentions of racism in it. Try again with that raggedy argument lol.
It's a movie that has an all black cast, and is homosexual related.
It was a politically correct move. Don't bullshit me.
I haven't even seen the fucking movie, and know that.
Whoa, someone's angry. And seriously, what's wrong with a movie having an all black cast and having a main gay character? Is something supposed to be wrong with a movie like that that also is liked by a lot of professional movie critics? And you haven't seen the movie, yet your angry about something. Very telling.
-
RE: So called President Trump: "Nobody knew healthcare could be so complicated"
I believe the Republican plan will ultimately be to have a hybrid law in place, where they keep Medicaid expanded in the Republican states that have expanded it and bringing back the old system that was in place before ACA. It's a big gamble and maybe they'll win big from it. If not and millions lose their health insurance for even a few months, Republicans will pay a hefty price. Remember, there were a lot of states with Democratic governors, state legislatures and U.S. Congressmen before President Obama took office and Republicans had him there to unify their base–-plus conservative Democrats who saw him as too progressive---against him. Well, he's no longer president, #45 is. This can either go one way or in a whole other direction at this point.
-
RE: African-American gun club says membership surged in Trump era
Yes, it is a real gun club. My partner isn't in that club but he is a member of another gun club with different races. He knows a few members in the national African-American gun club mentioned in that article. The Second Amendment is very, very important to a lot of us. We have the right to defend ourselves, especially those of us living in the South. Our Second Amendment right is one of the few things keeping many, many dark historical wrongs from coming back to haunt us today.