Posts made by MrMazda

@flozen Don't threaten me with a good time! Haha!

@Richiroma They go into our photo approval module, which staff review as they have the time.

@Richiroma Pictures that are added after the torrent is uploaded require mod approval. You will only have this issue if adding the pictures AFTER the upload. All pictures added when you upload the torrent should automatically be approved.

@kalayaan Well... Luggage has size and weight restrictions before you start getting extra fees, so why shouldn't the passengers too? I'm all for this.

@raphjd Stating biological fact does not all by itself. The problem (at least under Canadian law) is that gender identity is a bit of a protected hot button topic. It is protected in the same way that sexual orientation, biological gender, race, country of origin, age, disability, etc are. Under our current dictator's rule, any speech which displays intolerance of a group of people based on one of the protected criteria is classified as hate speech. It's a bit extreme, but it is what it is.

@raphjd Knowing the way the Canadian courts have been for some time now, I don't see this going anywhere anytime soon. He effectively wants to use "religious freedom" to fan the flames of hate. That kind of thing has long ago been barred in Canada.

@Vin20 Video DownloadHelper

@rtim Also, it should be noted that if you see that kind of thing in the torrent comments, we encourage you to click the report button. We have rules surrounding user conduct, which apply to EVERYONE on the site. We do not tolerate threats, harassment, flaming, or any other such disruptive behaviour from ALL of our users.

@rtim The only thing a studio can do is submit a DMCA request. Even if they create an account with us, as a regular user, they are not able to see the uploader on any torrent, even if the uploader comments on the torrent. We do not ever give out user information to anyone for any reason.

@Vin20 I have a paid extension for Firefox that allows me to download from almost any site, including Netflix. It's not a free extension, but it's not very expensive either. It's well worth it.

@raphjd The only reason why a government would want to disarm you is because they want to do something that would make you want to shoot them.... Just sayin'

@lololulu19 Worst photoshop ever lol

@hubrys When people say "I'm Christian" I can't help but ask "Classic Jesus, or Republican Jesus?" LOL

@HUGOBASS-0 Your ratio is a calculation between the amount you have uploaded and the amount you have downloaded. Any time you download a torrent that is not on freeleech, your ratio will go down. This is why.

@lololulu19 What site are we talking about? Perhaps they only accept a plastic payment method from certain countries?

@raphjd You mean libt**d?

@ianfontinell If you only saw the content that I actually did remove...

Also, did you not see in one of my previous posts that the poster of said post removed it himself, so it's a moot point now?

@flozen While SlamRush wasn't really my thing (mainly because the guys were all too young for my liking), I couldn't necessarily knock it either.

I'm a big believer in a person's right to choose what is right for them. That said, I am NOT a fan of someone trying to take the stand that because it's not right for me, YOU can't do it either.

Having once been a bit of a party pig myself, I get the appeal of letting loose and letting what happens happen. For me, that used to be part of the thrill. If you know what you're going in for and you get what you want, is it really that bad? Now, that being said, this is a very different thing than going in blind and not knowing what's going to happen or what has been planned until it's too late to consent or object. In my case, I knew what I was going in for and I let it happen. I don't know where SlamRush fell in that regard.

@trevor613 Send me a DM with the information so that I can test your theory. I'm curious about this.

@frostycab Yes... It was me. Some of the comments were starting to get way out of line, which is why I removed them. The comment that remains that he's taking offense to does not quite meet the threshold of being too far off as nowhere does it say or even imply that he is referring to underage boys.

Also, the user has now commented out that comment, so it's a moot point anyway.