You can read it here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
All I can say is WOW. (I'll think of more later lol)
You can read it here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
All I can say is WOW. (I'll think of more later lol)
The biggest single denominator in carrying racism forward is the fact that no "honest" dialect can take place.
Racism by definition:
Racism is the belief in the superiority of one race over another, which often results in discrimination and prejudice towards people based on their race or ethnicity. As of the 2000s, the use of the term "racism" does not easily fall under a single definition.
The idea that most "blacks" , "people of color", "African Americans" do not accept that racism against "Whites" is a thing MAKES them racist by definition. They have laid claim to the term, made themselves it's sole benefactor and there can be no other, for THEY are the greatest.
BAM - Racism.
Affirmative action should have been ended 20 years ago. Most truly honest black scholars have gone on record saying it is crippling future generations in the worst way possible via lowering of expectations, The girl in that video is living proof. Yet as long as no honest dialog can take place it will continue. It is the biggest inside joke in black culture.
What having laid claim to that "tag" has really done to their culture, they choose to ignore. No other group in human history has laid all the burden of their life failures on one word, one notion. Were the Jews given their own "Tag"? Their own free ride? No. Incredible. SIX MILLION PEOPLE murdered in the MOST heinous act of racism the world has seen (not to diminish others) - I don't see Jews on "Maury" trying to find their baby daddy, or ignoring the orders of police en mass. They got zero affirmative anything. Yet they thrive. Now why is that? I can certainly lay down numerous examples but they would brush them off just as easily. That is what professional victims do.
But they managed to take it one step further, and bolster their claim to the tag with a lot of loud bullying and ranting.That is what will keep them as a people exactly where they are for an eternity. When I was a child, if I fucked up - my parents made me own it. They can talk all the shit they want, from just about birth they are taught to blame others for their mistakes and shortcomings. I can say these things, and I will immediately be branded a racist. I call bullshit - I am simply stating the obvious, it is your choice to hide behind a word that is making you a cripple.
I referred to the Jews, because they are a prime example as to how a people can move on, and BE a contributing factor as opposed to an ongoing handicap. These people were left with nothing. They picked themselves up and moved on. Anne Frank, arguably the most visible representation of this slaughter does not have a day. No Anne Frank Day. A woman tried to bring the notion to Congress, it garnered only 92 signatures on Facebook. This girl faced horrors the likes none of us will ever know, and nothing. Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat because she was tired. Granted it touched off a series of events that changed history - but Anne Frank nothing? If you don't see the irony there check your moral compass.
People complain that Donald Trump represents racism, no - he represents a voice that has been forced into silence. I think he is a buffoon, but he represents a sector of Americans who have grown weary of handing a "Mulligan" to people who don't respect it and openly abuse it. They are tired of hearing excuses over people who routinely break the law and fall on the race card. Mind you most of the "broken laws" are one black on another black. That's right I'll say it - you routinely prey on each other and blame everyone else but yourselves. THAT is what sent Donald Trump to office. A silent group who just simply had enough.
Their needs to be a new dialect, one where both parties are secure that things they say will not be excoriated under the continued guise of racism. Until that happens there will be no end to it. I don't see it happening any time soon, most probably never at the rate things have evolved. Black people need to take ownership of the behaviors that are REALLY hurting them as a people. Stop waving the victim flag already, it hasn't helped you, rather it is crippling you. I have a lot of black friends, many of whom feel this way but will never say it in a public forum for fear of getting flamed - they voted for Trump too. They voted for change.
The sad part.. Trump was the lessor of two evils. What depth have we sunk to as a nation when such a man represents the best of our best. THAT really is the scariest part of the equation. America, for all it's greatness, all it's higher thinking - Donald Trump? It is humiliating.
As for the black students and teachers, well as long as this air of total denial prevails - they will continue to run in place. That level of toxic thinking will continue to keep them down. Nobody who lives life as a professional victim will ever be complete. There comes a time you have to bury the past and own your future. When they get that, they will overcome. I think had MLK lived, he would be hanging his head at how this all wound up. He fought for equal rights, not a permanent victim status.
Just for clarification, I thought I read somewhere that screen shots were to be kept down to 10? It was a post regarding screen shots that were deemed "spamming" I think, and had to do with people sticking things up just in order to drive up points. I am getting ready to do a rather large upload, if the cap is 20 that would make my job infinitely more easy!
THANKYOU!
See now we are getting somewhere! Is your hole towards your dick (front) or your butt crack top(REAR) or middle? For the sake of conversation, if it does not seem to be way one way or the other just use "middle". Have you ever been able to stimulate in with a toy?
Myself, I am at dead center. I seem to get the most stimulation on my back missionary style. My Man is the same as I but he thinks it is more the curve/shape of the dick. So HE is no help in this quest of discovery lol. I have of course been loosely monitoring it in gay porn, but given that much of what we see is acting that skews the results imo. From most sites, where the guys were so called virgins the fucking seems to get far more dramatic when they are missionary which I have come to believe is more than likely because the bottoms face is now "in" the camera lens. Thus compelling him to make it sexy lol.
Given that so much has been said by models regarding the scenes, there is no way of really using porn as a yard stick. Although SOME scenes contain a "realness" that can't be faked, which in my opinion makes them priceless - and they move to the front of my "spank bank" lol. I have fucked a lot of guys, my favorite position has always been missionary because I love to study their faces while I am fucking them, I can easily tell when I am nailing the right spot and when THEY get all wound up, I get twice as wound up. Nothing is more sexy than that kind of control - however you have to get it.
That was part of my point in this topic, or a secondary goal. I think people learn far more from discussion than they ever will from books.
I had a brief fling with an older guy when I was 22 and he was 48. He was WAY past the club thing, and a lot of other things that were part of my life then. Despite my best efforts to get him to come, he always encouraged me to go ahead with my friends, he would see me later.. and he always did lol. It was a fun summer, he spoiled me terribly - despite my repeated warnings it wasn't going anywhere. I had to return to College, and he knew that when we started seeing each other. A few years later when I was done with college my views and sights on pretty much everything were different. I was just starting life, he was closer to the back side of it.. We both wanted different things. We both lead very different lives.
So I guess what i am saying is what seems to simple and clear to you now - trust me it will change later and unless he is in complete denial he knows that. Want to have a fling? It can be a sweet experience, just don't get attached. In a few years time you will totally understand this conversation.. I swear.
If you are looking to begin an LTR, I would try to stay + or - 10 years of where you are now. Again, just friendly advise.
I am very sad that Russel dont have a x-rated past >:D
THIS!
I don't know about the rest of you, or even if there IS a rest of you - seems like I am the only one here most of the time lol. I am incredibly disappointed in gay celebrities, ALL these high highfalutin gay boys and not a SINGLE sex tape!? WTF! I mean REALLY! WTF!
We are supposed to be representing the fall of morality and NONE of our sexy stars have managed to leak as much as a quality dick pic. HOW is it POSSIBLE that this ignorant slut Kim Kardashian does a sex tape and parlays he slutty behavior into "Beverly Hillbilly's" realness, and we don't even see a decent "Dick in butt" picture out of Matthew Bomer?!
I'm talkin Anderson Cooper bent over a news desk with Andy Cohen drivin the bus on him. It is SCANDALOUS Charlie Carver has not taken one for the team. I'd have put MONEY on Colton Hayes doing something terribly hot by now, WTF.
End Rant.
That is a pretty broad question! If you are asking if the gay rubs off on them, the answer would be no - that is genetic. I only know a few couples who have adopted kids, they are remarkable parents. First of all, they are in just about every case more than able to provide for the children financially, I don't think I even know any broke gay guys. Second of all they are screened as if they are going to be handling nuclear warheads, psychologically and emotionally.
I'd venture a guess no less than 30% of the hetero couples who freely procreate would NEVER pass the requirements for adoption for all the reasons I just detailed. Next, you have the most important factor, THEY actually wanted kids badly enough to go through all that scrutiny. That by itself is an act of love, they are CHOOSING to be parents. If anything, the offspring of gay parents are more likely to be over-parented if there is such a thing.
Conversely speaking I know a shitton of hetero couples who NEVER should have had kids. They pop them out like candy from a pez dispenser with utterly no thought to how they will provide for them, let alone see to their educational needs. I swear I think everyone should be sterilized at birth, and the only way to reverse it is that you prove you have the means and the mental acuity to be a parent. It would have saved us all from Honey Boo Boo for sure.
Wow, I'm sorry. Mine had a hard time showing his emotions but it wasn't that extreme. I'd have to say yes, only because three friends of mine who grew up without or estranged from their Fathers all had serious grey fox fever. Not that it is a bad thing, older guys are typically more appreciative, better "fixed", and more shall we say "forgiving". My only warning would be that in most cases it fizzles because they are in two very different places in life.
LOL 22 people looked at this and it never crossed your minds? Okay, way to make a guy feel weird.
Cole Money had the PERFECT hairy ass. His hole was gorgeous, yet hairy! TBH I had a massive crush on that dude, he could take a pounding! His scene with Jerry Cabrera was perfection, the sight of Jerry's dick dragging Coles grippers out.. THAT was hot. I wonder how he is.. that flesh eating nightmare really looked horrible. :cry2:
I am new here (relatively) and this is an honest question that keeps eating at me. Is the general consensus that members prefer huge collection sets over individual or smaller sets? For instance myself, I have had certain scenes that I really wanted to see and looking forward and backward wound up having to download a set with things I tossed for lack of interest JUST to get that one scene, taking a pretty big hit on my ratio - sadly I didn't do the math before pulling the trigger. My bad.
I've seen lots of huge collections with one here one there I would love to see, but frankly that shit would redline my account lol. So I have a sizable collection I have already researched it to be unique in that nobody else has put it up. However I know this contains things others may not give a toss about. So what say you? 1 LARGE set, Multiple "Trio" sets, singles? Any input appreciated.
LOL well I salute your front hole use. How any right thinking human can re-write the natural law and paint Bennett as the "perp" is beyond rational explanation and really smacks of some EXPERT "spin speak". In no scenario is a minor going to be the responsible party, that is like getting rear ended at a red stop light and getting handed a ticket for impeding traffic. NEVER happen.
If this kid at age 12 WAS actually sending her dick pics, and she did nothing to stop it THAT by itself has her trafficking in child porn by legal definition. She accepted the images, and did not take steps to stop it. Now you and I both know that had this been a man accepting a 12 year old girls images, the maelstrom would be insane. So does anyone else with an un-impeded mind. Add the rest of what took place.. well that is pretty much what got Roman Polanski Exiled huh. Anyone trying to paint this differently is DEFINITELY guilty of flaming the victim, however loosely that applies.
Arguably 17 is not 12, he was hardly a child but it does not make what she did any less disgusting or illegal. The mere fact she tried to cover it up is an open admission so far as I am concerned. Case closed.
See THAT is kind of my point. He wasn't that bad - even by most accounts of what they purported he DID. I mean really, walking around naked, and here give me a massage? LOL! Some accounts have him wanking his cock.. yet he gets hung out to dry like the monster of the century. All of this with zero physical proof. Tried and convicted in the media. The end.
Asia by comparison is far more twisted than Harvey. To foster a 10 year friendship with a boy and then take him to bed.. well it's hardly unique but no less fucked up. You are right, if it had been a man at the very least there would have been an EPIC investigation, tons of media coverage,, well pretty much the whole "Harvey". (LOL@Raphjd <–--- He said "Front hole". BTW bitch you owe me a new shirt, I blew my espresso all over when I read that shit yesterday.)
The same can be said for Kevin Spacey, I mean by Rapp's own account, the man - drunk as fuck, picked him up and laid on him. No "He grabbed my junk", No "He tried to tear my clothes off", but "I felt he was trying to seduce me" AND then adds (I don't know if I would have used that language)WTF?! BAM, one pretty stellar career DUST over night. The succession of bullshit accusations that followed were even more lame. By Bullshit, I mean silly, pretty much baseless. OOoh he showed me his dick.. for real? Of ALL the allegations against him, it sounds to me that his biggest crime is having TRAGICALLY bad gaydar, and horrific judgement. ZERO ACTUAL sexual acts.
I was never really all that big a fan of his, but I gotta say my heart went out to him. Of virtually ALL of my gay friends, young and older - they ALL get ridiculously forward when you put a few drinks in them. I have had my ass and dick grabbed and generally got felt up by total strangers at many gay events. The difference here, I am not famous, and I am not tagging my story to an overblown movement for pity and face time.
His penchant for young twinks, gay porn is BUILT on that shit or the illusion of it! It's never been my thing, I have always been into guys older than myself, but bitch I know 50 homo's who's favorite game is cruising gay clubs for jail bate. Kevin's "vice" is hardly unique in gay culture. Yet despite ALL of the publicity it still never yielded a soul who had ACTUAL sex with him. Not a soul. This poor bastard lost his life's work over things I had "straight" friends do to me in high school, and a shitton of shock journalism. Mostly, he lost it all to a poser with raging daddy issues and a line of baited bullshit longer than his career credits, who wanted to add his face to a story.
Anthony baby, when Karma comes for you - and she will, I hope you got your big boy pants on.
Asia's bullshit is so far out there even Rose McGowan was throwing her under the bus, and I am pretty sure SHE leaked the texts that set Asia's do on fire. It is all such hypocrisy it's nauseating. Children, ACTUAL children have been tried, convicted and sentenced as ADULTS for murder as young as 12. Asia - nobody knew her name before this magnum-opus of vitriolic excrement she tossed out there landed on the front page. In a desperate attempt to get their names out there, one washed up has been after another started spinning stories.
If you ask me, Weinstein is a total piece of shit, but instead of listening to his so called "legal counsel" he should have fired back immediate with the EXACT nature of every one of these accusations. Sure, he would still look like a horned up desperate old creep, but at least he would have gone down as an HONEST desperate old creep. These women are not stupid. There is no bloody way a grown ass woman goes to a hotel room to meet a man she knows bloody well has a storied reputation as a pervert for ANY other reason than to exchange for services rendered. "I felt I had to go in order to get the part." Um NO, NO you didn't. Jesus. Seller's remorse much?
Harvey Weinstein was a man wealthy enough to BUY and KEEP any 10 high priced call girls who would likely EASILY have made 3/4 of the women look like old cows. But what call girls lack is the prowess to trade on their looks and bodies for something infinity more valuable. Nobody knows their names, so there is no "rush", no power stroke to the ego. THAT was something only these women had to give and they knew it. Even Gwyneth Paltrow as dense and wretchedly self absorbed as she is could not possibly expect she was going to meet what she KNEW to be the biggest pervert casting director in Hollywood and get what, a Mulligan cuz she was dating Brad Pitt? LOL fuck me to tears, what a load.
Harvey would have been much further ahead to just stand up and say, "Yes it's true, I agreed to exchange sexual favors for preferential casting. It was by THEIR request that our arrangement NEVER be made public, but due to their sudden need for cleansing I too feel I need to unburden myself. They threw themselves at me and I was powerless to refuse." In doing so, the whole thing would have come down to "He said, She said - which is pretty much where it belongs. Harvey has got to have the WORST PR team in recorded history, coupled with the most morbidly stupid legal team ever. He is a pig which is bad enough, but a stupid pig? That is just sad.
I just can't hang with the level of desperate journalism has fallen to. It's a sad new world when the New York mutha fuckin Times is now competing with The National Enquirer for "Shock Journalist of the decade". The children's story of "Chicken Little", the famed line "The sky is falling!!" popped into my head when these headlines all first started breaking. Ha I just looked it up, cuz hey that is a LONG time ago That story had two fabled "morals". One - Don't be a chicken, have courage. The other "Don't believe everything you are told." The reader is left to decide which to apply. Ain't that some shit.
I would say it is more than likely a result of his man handling his dick while masturbating. You could exorcise your brains out and never tighten your sphincter enough to compensate for that. Especially if he is spankin a lot when you aren't available. Hard as it might be (pun intended) make him swear off his dick for 2 weeks. By the time that's up a slight wind could probably get him off. Then slowly start increasing the frequency you have sex. He needs to recondition the level of friction it takes to get him off. Just to keep it interesting, and yeah lol a little more torturous, you might start edging him as well. Maybe throw in some ass play for HIM.
I was a "DEDICATED" top until just this past year. Bad experiences early on combined with my love of fucking ass and the fact that most guys took one look at my junk and wanted to ride it all converged to keep it that way. This is the first "real" LTR I have had, and he was the first guy I really trusted. We started off slow, toys etc, and without all the gory detail I can honestly say I am fully verse now and can't believe I waited so long. It opened a lot of new doors in our relationship as well.
Just friendly suggestions.
LOL! Well I'm a big boy I can deal. I'm afraid people tend to look where the media points them all too often instead of looking at the facts and using their own common sense. Sure in an ideal world none of this would ever happen, such a place does not exist. I have often found myself in uncomfortable situations with both men and women, some I could/should have predicted - some I never saw coming. As a grown ass man I accept responsibility for those I KNEW were sketchy choices.
I was sexually active very early in life (12), ALL of the people I was with were older than I, MANY had no clue I was so young. THAT was by design. There are certain situations where naivety is believable - none of the above fits that outline. Horrible judgement? Yes Bad form? For sure. But mostly what I see is people putting their asses on the line to get ahead, and crying foul after the fact. Cashing in on the sensationalism in an attempt to bolster sagging or dead careers.
I mean Rose McGowan? Please. Her 15 minutes was up so long ago you can't see it's tailights. Ashley Judd aged out of the prime roles despite pumping her face so full of injectables she is almost unrecognizable. Anthony WHO? Never even a blip on the radar. It's all a bunch of WAY overblown bullshit, in your face complements of Twitter. Go figure the commander in chief uses it to fire people, why the hell not.
It is the world we live in now.
I have a thing for butt holes lol, but it is probably not what you think - well that too, but my query for this topic is probably best answered by verse couples:
In my butt hole studies, I could not help but notice that no two butt holes exit the body at the same location, this is to say some are very near the "taint" or the base of the ball sack, while others are much further back - some are very near the top of the butt crack even. I am curious as to how that effects the prostate stimulation? I mean it seems like guys who's holes are located almost where the ball sack ends would be getting far more stimulation as the cock has to about nail the prostate on the way in? But then if it is at the "high crack" location it might be that the cock is then aimed directly AT the prostate. Yes I am being serious.
Discuss ;D
I will probably get flamed for this, but I find the entire Weinstein scandal ludicrous on more levels than I can enumerate. Is what he purportedly did right? Decidedly not in any court of moral opinion. He should have been stopped dead in his tracks eons before he was. My Issue is with all the actresses that piled on after the fact and the notion that they supposedly walked like innocent lambs into his clutches. Sorry - no sale. The majority of these women knew exactly what the scene was going to be before they agreed to meet with him. Alone. In his suite. It's nothing short of prostitution, and it went on in Hollywood and really all walks of life for far longer than Weinstein was an issue. Does it make what he did right? Of course not, but then by definition prostitution is still illegal in most states.
These women agreed to meet with him under the pre-conceived notion that said meeting would provide them access to roles they would likely NEVER have access to under ANY other circumstances. A situation that has prevailed since the beginning of time. I doubt Monica Lewinski said to her 5 year old self, "Ya know, ONE day I am going to grow up and blow the PRESIDENT." Don't kid yourself, the differences are only veiled by a little more "grooming". Powerful men AND women have taken advantage of their stations forever. actually - the one GLARING difference, Monica got trick fucked, she had no clue. These women knew fucking well. Does that make it right? No - but there was a trade off. Granted some of the women went off to fail anyway, more than likely because they sucked anyway.
As for the 17 year old in question.. I sincerely doubt he was traumatized by his hookup with Mrs. Robinson. Rather he likely bragged a blue streak to anyone who would listen. THEN made 380K to keep his yap shut? I bet his head exploded. Does that make her right? Nope, but I don't believe for a second this kid was laying there saying OMG I am being raped. Please. His guy friends were all like "Fuck yeah bro!" his girlfriends all thought that made him somehow more "worldly". There was no down side in this for him. She's a stupid hoe - the end.
I think it is pretty easy for a bunch of women to file complaints after they already made bank on the arraignment they made, it isn't hard to paint themselves damsels in distress. But for me - they made a deal with the devil - how is it they now get to drag this sorry looser without having their own culpability called into question? Blame the victim? I think not. How many prostitutes MALE AND FEMALE laid down with fat, ugly, sweaty old men for 200.00. These bitches walked off with roles that made them millions. I can't feel even a little sorry for them. They got to keep their reputations when they left his room. The prostitute not so much, and they made a HELL of a lot less. Want me to feel sorry for you? Donate the millions you made as a result of your exchange with the degenerate Mr. Weinstein to a rape victim's fund. Otherwise shut your damn mouth. You got paid for sex, you are a hooker.
Bottom line, this is a fucked up world with a lot of REAL injustice. Harvey is now laying in the bed he made, for he too knew that this shaky "honor" system of implied silence was a huge gamble. He is now reaping what he sowed. I am certain there are a lot more "Asia Argento" type secrets out there that may never see the light of day. Will this put a halt to the "Casting couch"? Oh I am sure it will on the surface, but more than likely it will just add a lot more layers to the guise, and a lot more legal paperwork before the "deed" is consummated. THAT much you can be sure of.
To be fair - I am equally giving the "side eye" to Anthony Rapp. First let's address the biggest white elephant in the room, I don't buy for a second he had no clue Spacey was gay. I think the fair Anthony knew exactly how that evening was going to go, and he chickened out. I'm sorry but the whole "I was shocked he tried to seduce me" thing.. I was a horny 14 year old twink once too. I can tell you I put myself in a lot of situations I was no where near adult enough to be in with men older than my father. I thought it was exciting, and sexy, and SO grown up! Right up until it wasn't.
The idea he was innocently sitting on Kevin Spacey's bed watching TV? In what known universe does that make sense. When I was 14, if I found myself at a party and bored? I was dust. Off to the next big idea. I certainly would not be going to watch TV in a bedroom, let alone long enough for everyone else to be gone! I think it is pretty easy to retell a story after the fact and feign innocence, leaving out any points that may make one culpable.
I am not saying it never happened, and it was certainly WAY wrong, morally and legally. But would it be the first time a 14 year old gay boy bit off more than he could chew, hit the panic button and ran? Hardly. But it's pretty easy to leave all your intentions out of the story when it suites you. I'm sorry, I just can't drink the coolaid. He stated he "thinks" he gave his mom some BS story as to where he was going that night, (funny that part of his memory was fuzzy) and that it was common for him to travel all over NYC to jobs and such "alone". So yeah, Mom of the year she wasn't. But I find it hard to believe he didn't cook up some mad shit to be sure he was well covered for the night. I know my "A" game at that age was fierce.
The worst part for Spacey was that there WAS no possible way he could explain THAT mess and not make it worse. He KNEW Rapp was under age, he knew in any frame no matter what, he would come out looking like the pedophile he maybe was. Was he the FIRST gay guy with a penchant for underage twinks? LOL seriously. Can you imagine? "Oh he was coming on to me for weeks, and I finally decided to hit that shit." Not exactly going to help his case, and ANY attempt by him to explain would look like he was flaming his victim. He met his perfect storm. But like this story was some unheard of thing? Hell even today, if you were to walk into ANY gay club just about ANYWHERE, turn on the lights and start carding it's population - my money says more than 1/3 of them are under legal age, and they are not there to watch TV.
If I had a nickle for every under age twink that tried catfishing me online and in person I could probably buy a nice plasma TV. Does it make ANY of this right? No. But the idea the media can vilify people to the point of near extinction for things everyone sees going on around them 24/7 seems just as dirty, especially when the President of the nation has confirmed acts that make some of this look silly and - nothing. NOTHING. Priorities people.
So bring it, flame away. My thing is this, if you put yourself in a position knowing full well it could have negative results for you - own it. There are REAL victims out there that did none of that and you are taking attention away from people who can't afford to loose it.
As for Mr. Bennett, did he claim this money on his tax return?
I have a thing for loud bottoms, but it has to be something that comes as a result of what they are feeling. For instance, I fucking adore Tommy Defendi, but I have to mute MOST of his scenes because his insane carrying on is just always over the top. I also find it more than a little odd when the top is moaning louder than the bottom. Another peeve is when every other breath yields an "Oh yeah". Especially when their facial expression says everything BUT.
I find it odd and sad when the bottom just lays there. I have fucked a LOT of men, NONE of them ever did that. Especially in a first time hookup. But then you got crap like the trash talk on GayHoopla, much as I love Colin Simpson, he is another one I more often than not have to mute. His play by play type commentary is just weird, like he is describing a quiche he is making. No spontaneity.
If they are getting loud, it should be wild jungle type fucking, or a guy getting his ass turned out for the first time! THAT is probably my biggest turn on. There is something that just can't be faked when a new bottom is getting his hole riffled for the first time. (See the SC scene "Brody fucks Ollie") I don't care how much prep a guy does with a dildo, it will pale by comparison to the actual fucking. Mainly because HE is not controlling that dick, and it is NOW attached to 180 LBS of horny muscle (Hopefully) THAT sensation, that surrender. Fuck that's hot, and I don't care how manly you are, you loose your shit the first time THAT happens.
Another all time FAVORITE guilty pleasure/scene was the infamous SC "Dakota fucks Fuller" scene. THAT was a first time bottom who probably stuck the dildo in 2 or three times and said "yeah I got this". Fucking EPIC. Though I must advise, keep your hand near the volume control if your neighbors are out and about LOL, they will think you are killing someone.
Hmm, you know for me it really depends on the guy. If it is hairy, I do prefer it is at least somewhat groomed (IE trimmed a bit around the hole). I am highly visual, and love the sight of my cock going in his ass, but I don't want it to look like it is disappearing into the black forest! Also for the bottom having all that hair fucked into their hole can't be pleasant. Even that is easy enough to remedy while eating said prime ass, spitting on it and smoothing the desired path will often work! (See the Sebastian & Solomon Pure episode) His wet hair hole is mad hot. It makes for a smooth approach when you get to fucking too, although adding some lube to it will stick it down even better lol. Take Will Braun, one of my favorite bottoms, for a while there his ass hair was out of control, his more recent scenes he seems to be grooming it a bit.
Turn offs: Brandon Evans, my all time favorite bottom often shaves everything. It's a travesty. I know he does it to showcase his definition, but at least leave your gorgeous ass alone! His scenes while shaving always display terrible ingrown hairs etc, it isn't pretty. Although then you have Paul Walker who for some odd reason (Other than having shaved all his hair off above his cock) looked sublime getting his smooth ass fucked. I really hate it when they completely shave above their dicks, It makes them look child like, or worse yet leave a little landing strip - you ain't Beyonce.
As for smooth, it has to fit the rest of the picture. If the guy is naturally smooth - I have found it looks really sexy. For instance Darrin Silvers has always been pretty much naturally hairless save a few wisps. THAT is sexy. Connor from CF would be an example of a turn off for me. Handsom guy but between the fake bake and the waxed ass he looked like a "Ken doll" getting fucked. The big white ass cheek stripes - hard pass.
So I guess my best answer boiled down - as it occurs in nature within reason.