Posts made by Gianni89

THAT was fucking awesome. LOL

Personally if they can't do an "original" story line, just forget it and get to fucking.  The parodies that Men churned out are all such laughable shit, it is actually painful to watch. Paddy as the Winter soldier donning a dime store wig..  shit like that makes me want to punch someone in the throat. I'm so over all this "Turn the straight guy" shit - the general drift is just insulting, as if any actual masculine guy has GOT to be straight. Fucking moronic. Especially when all these so called straight guys ride a dick like a boss right out of the gate. Sadly it appears there is no immediate end in sight.

True, and duly noted. I didn't know you had the option to be able to only load specific segments of a torrent? I will have to look into this! I am still very green, much I need to learn.

For anyone to make the claim cigarettes are not addictive they would have to ignore an incredible amount of evidence to the contrary. I have co-workers and friends who smoke, and will brave an element to satisfy their craving. These are not stupid people, and most have gone to some extraordinary lengths to quit. Yet for all we know about this, cigarettes remain legal and readily available.

At some point you have to look at the system and make the obvious observation - it is still serving interests that are not in keeping with reality. Next you have to ask why, followed by WHO is responsible. We jail drug dealers based on the assumption that what they sell COULD kill people, while big tobacco continues to deal a drug we KNOW for a FACT kills people. It is pretty glaringly obvious the prolific killer has used his deep pockets to grease all the right wheels. At what point do we as a people identify these shoddy wheels, remove them and replace them with wheels that work? How long will this silent killer enjoy protected status at our expense?

Personally, I would rather see the lobbyists, politicians and corporate architects for the continued use of tobacco behind bars, and let the pot dealers go.

You know what WOULD be epic, a remake of "God's Country", with porn models actually interested in preserving the story enough to work hard and get it right. Then, perhaps edit down the face time for "mom and dad" and expand the sex. WHY does gay porn have to be so tragically bad any time an actual story line is applied!

I could totally see Ben Bateman and Dakota Payne in the lead roles, a little tweaking here and there to the story line, they wouldn't even have to work THAT hard at acting. You could cast pretty much the entire movie at Lucas, (they have the hottest models) and it would be raw, so none of this stupid pull out and jerk off shit.

@furio111:

They must be thinking hard how to ban guns there.

LOL! And blood. So the new version of WW2, a bunch of girls beat each other down with wooden spoons. We really need a "forehead smacking" Emoji :P.

I once picked up a guy in a club who was fucking stunning, got him naked and he was packing around 9", but the fucking thing was so thick I could barely get the head of his dick in my mouth! No exaggeration this dude's cock was almost as big around as a large Redbull can. I took one look at it and said, "Well I don't know where you had planned to put that, I hope you came prepared to bottom." LOL! He did, he said he is used to that response. I can't even wrap my head around sitting on that.

My man is around 9" and pretty girthy, I still have to be prepared to handle him - more often  than not I top and I am around the same, slightly longer, slightly less girth. He has always been a bottom and up till this past year I was a solid top.

I think that hetero married couples go into things with insanely unrealistic expectations to begin with. There is much truth to the adage "Men get married hoping she will never change, women get married CERTAIN she can change him." I have seen it first hand, and when the latter doesn't pan out as she hoped the discord begins. Gay men aren't stupid like that, we pretty much know that what we see is what we got.

Most hetero men wind up looking for some version of their Mom, because they want to be taken care of. The odd part about that is no matter how dysfunctional that woman was - they usually wind up with a very close facsimile. I have a high school friend who married a crazy bipolar bitch just like his Mom. Women have a different yard stick, they are all convinced they can mold men into what they want.

Add 2 or three screaming brats, a quarter measure of in-law turmoil, 1/3 measure of fiscal stress freshly squeezed from "keep up with the Jones's", top it off with a sprinkle of un-fulfilled dreams and broken promises and VOILA! You have the typical "American dream". What cracks me up is that people find this somehow surprising.

He was a pig who couldn't find her "G" spot with both hands and a flashlight before she said "I do", now she managed to SHOW him it's location, but he is no longer interested as the minute he said "I do" she pulled the ripcord, and her inner fat girl came tumbling out. She packed on 95 lbs of "baby" weight, her boobs look like a pair of blown out speed bags, and that sexy belly button ring is now enveloped in a ton of stretch marked flab, and her once snug little pussy looks like a scene from "Alien".

He on the other hand assumed his rightful place on the throne in front of the TV, his once svelte mid section hanging over his old sweat pants, he works a job he has come to hate, only to come home to the mayhem and a stack of bills. He can't be bothered to pick up the toy collection he walked over, or the mess he left on the end table from the day before - his Mom handled it just fine, she had better too. He will pull his least dirty clothes back out of the dirty laundry rather than actually washing a load, he will sit and stew over his disillusionment while watching gay porn. The American dream.

By the way lol, THAT was my older adopted sister's description of her first marriage (I added the gay porn thing lol). She is now on number 5, with 4 kids by two husbands, and 2 tummy tucks and a boob job later I am seeing signs that 2 years in number 5 is about out of runway - I expect once he pays for her butt lift he is toast.

HOW could anything be wrong?  :crazy2: :cheers:

LOL.. OR maybe he was just mentally ill, I know it is a thin line between the two.

Perhaps they need to get out of gaming. They are begging for a lawsuit.

I can honestly say I have never watched a soap. Never really even watched TV much until this. We also have a Firestick but I found it lame because most of the movies were terrible copies, horrible sound, people getting up for pop corn - I couldn't hang, I'd rather pay to see the movie at the theater.

@nick75:

@Gianni89:

LOL Okay, perhaps flaming over turned cars was an extreme example, but to follow someone out of "Politics and Debate" all over every area of the forum down voting and mad facing everything they write is exactly that, a form of vandalism. You are attempting to deface that party via what ever means available.

Once again I don't condone the "stalker's" behaviour. All I'm saying is your conclusion is far-fetched!

@Gianni89:

Again, you are entitled to your opinion. My opinion is that up/down votes really never should have been part of this particular area of the forum.

I don't necessarily agree with you here but I can begrudgingly accept they remove the system for that part of the forum…

Also you said this earlier:
@Gianni89:

In short, the up vote/down vote function really never had a place in a debate forum as debate is not a popularity contest,

In theory you're right and I wish it were still the case but the public debate has become more or less a popularity contest. Were you sleeping during the 2016 presidential race!?

@Gianni89:

**_LOL as you pointed out this is a porn sharing site, not the Supreme Court's blog, this SECTION of the forum is for members who wish to discuss/debate current affairs. Obviously Raph has chosen not to ban the stalker, rather it is pretty obvious at least to me he is trying to bait him into a battle of wits.

Calling people names is baiting him into a "battle of wits" to you!? Not sure if we've got the same meaning of the term.

@Gianni89:

If this were an old movie these two would wind up fucking for sure.  ;D THAT is conjecture on my part of course.

Conjecture, perhaps. Unlikely, maybe not. Who knows. ;D
A very hackneyed ending though.

@Gianni89:

As for the banning - if it were going to happen I suspect it would already have been done - as a Mod he has that authority. The little red thumb? Also his call. Personally I won't miss it.

I know he has the authority, my problem is the matter is up for debate.

But I have an idea, instead of getting rid of the system what about not linking the votes to the reputation? At least for this section of the forum.
I'd be totally on board with that!

I am not sure if you can set features by section I suppose it must be possible, however that still leaves him only one option in dealing with his would be nemesis. I don't think you can remove the option by user. De-linking it to reputation would seem to sort of disable the reputation "feature" all together. The obvious "grown up" answer to this is that said party historically known as "wafflez" just quit behaving like a 14 year old school girl. <–- NOTE: Nothing sexist in that comment, if you know any ACTUAL 14 year old girls you know that is a statement of relevant fact. I have a little sister, I have seen first hand.

The mere fact I felt compelled to add that last part. :-X_**

If I were only able to choose one site for the rest of all time, Sean Cody hands down.

As others pointed out, the "acting" in gay porn coupled with the ridiculous story lines is a boner killer. Take ANY "Men" scene as an example, their "parodies" are just plain embarrassing. Watching Paddy O'Brian in a bad wig.. I'd cut a bitch for making the suggestion. BelAmi was once my favorite site, but the fact they "purged" pretty much all the really hot scenes of the past from their site - big deal killer for me. Fuck that. I love the fact SC has maintained EVERY scene right from the rip.

Corbin Fisher.. admittedly has some of the hottest fucking online, but lacks the fantastic spontaneity of Sean Cody's scenes. I love that randomly the guys get so caught up they loose their load in each other's asses once in a while. I am there to watch them fuck, not complete a series of orchestrated moves before jerking off to a finish. Chaos men, while they have the dirty ingredients, lacks the magnitude of hot men that SC has.

@nick75:

@Gianni89:

As a "Mod", yeah he has pretty much that power, however you will note he has not "banned" the individual in question. I think the point Raph is trying to make is that using the upvote/downvote system as a sort of cyber vandalism is not free speech. Much like the bands of thugs who over turn cars and set things on fire during a protest it contributes nothing to a conversation.

Cyber vandalism is another term for defacement. That's not what's happening here?
Did you mean abuse of the upvote/downvote system. If so are you sure you are able to contribute to the conversation when you're conflating that with the destruction of other people's property?
Just like when social justice warriors say freedom of speech means death for minorities because feelings… and offence... and stereotypes... and death. You fill in the gaps!

LOL Okay, perhaps flaming over turned cars was an extreme example, but to follow someone out of "Politics and Debate" all over every area of the forum down voting and mad facing everything they write is exactly that, a form of vandalism. You are attempting to deface that party via what ever means available.

@Gianni89:

When said party pretty much just relents, and instead of continuing a debate backed with fact and an opposing argument in favor of a blanket statement flatly denouncing his/her opponent without ever presenting a cohesive opposing argument then yes, it is the equivalent of saying shut up, the party in question has on more than one occasion done exactly that.

Freedom of speech and expression is also the freedom to express yourself the way you want (or not to express yourself). So if they want to downvote, so be it.
Personally I think it's cowardly and stupid but not everyone has the capacity to express themselves in a clear and coherent way.

Again, you are entitled to your opinion. My opinion is that up/down votes really never should have been part of this particular area of the forum.

@Gianni89:

In short, the up vote/down vote function really never had a place in a debate forum as debate is not a popularity contest, rather a place to present ideals and promote open discussion. Whether one opinion rises or falls over another's opinion should be based on presentation and fact, not some little red thumb in the corner of the page. Furthermore, certainly not as a tool to stalk someone in an attempt to do some perceived damage to his/her reputation out of frustration that you bit off more than you could chew.

So what will it be? Banning the "stalker", the downvote part of the system or the system altogether?
Also allow me to remind you where you are: this is a gay porn torrent website where people can talk about men and their body parts, jokes or films. This is NOT the US Supreme Court's blog. So this is why the voting system is in place.

LOL as you pointed out this is a porn sharing site, not the Supreme Court's blog, this SECTION of the forum is for members who wish to discuss/debate current affairs. Obviously Raph has chosen not to ban the stalker, rather it is pretty obvious at least to me he is trying to bait him into a battle of wits. If this were an old movie these two would wind up fucking for sure.  ;D THAT is conjecture on my part of course. As for the banning - if it were going to happen I suspect it would already have been done - as a Mod he has that authority. The little red thumb? Also his call. Personally I won't miss it.

Did he try Honkey or Cracker?

Maybe they were using the urban dictionary and it scared them.

I can't even pretend this is not the stupidest thing I have read today, which makes me a little sad. At least he didn't cut his dick off.

@nick75:

@raphjd:

Ana doesn't like non-leftist, no matter what.

Not sure.
What do you think she'd say about libertarians (or others) who voted for Hillary?

That people have a right to "burn" their vote in effigy however they please?

@raphjd:

I don't like leftists that refuse to have a proper discussion.   Not quite the same. 
If you (generic) can't defend your beliefs in a proper manner, then I have no respect for you.

Who gets to define "proper manner"? You?
As long as violence or infringement on free speech aren't involved, I don't care. People can react however they like.
As a "Mod", yeah he has pretty much that power, however you will note he has not "banned" the individual in question. I think the point Raph is trying to make is that using the upvote/downvote system as a sort of cyber vandalism is not free speech. Much like the bands of thugs who over turn cars and set things on fire during a protest it contributes nothing to a conversation.

@raphjd:

If you forget about the violence part, then my little bitch stalker is just like the bike lock professor.   Neither will have a discussion, they just react to shut up any descent.

They are not even remotely close!!!

When said party pretty much just relents, and instead of continuing a debate backed with fact and an opposing argument in favor of a blanket statement flatly denouncing his/her opponent without ever presenting a cohesive opposing argument then yes, it is the equivalent of saying shut up, the party in question has on more than one occasion done exactly that.

In short, the up vote/down vote function really never had a place in a debate forum as debate is not a popularity contest, rather a place to present ideals and promote open discussion. Whether one opinion rises or falls over another's opinion should be based on presentation and fact, not some little red thumb in the corner of the page. Furthermore, certainly not as a tool to stalk someone in an attempt to do some perceived damage to his/her reputation out of frustration that you bit off more than you could chew.

Wow, can't imagine limiting myself like that but hey everyone gotta scratch their itch. Personally I find so many things sexy, it can be distracting at times. A guy in a great fitting pair of jeans in line at the grocery store the other day was giving me a chubby LOL! I don't think I could ever narrow it down. I do tend to go for athletic builds, not at all into heavy muscle and definitely no twinks. I describe my favorite build as "lean muscular"  but then Aspen/Solomon  back in his early days had me feelin some kinda way so I can't even REALLY narrow down body type other than to say they have to be at least athletic.

I think there are only a few things that really turn me off - overly "plucked & shaved", dude don't come at me with bitch eyebrows I just can't do it. Fake tans - another big turn off, a guy who caught some sun is hot, love a hot tan line - a pretty white tight bubble butt with the outline of a pair of board shorts.. SO sexy. Fair skinned guys with dark hair are another huge turn on - Eric Clark was perfection. Guess it really is a good thing there is such a huge selection huh.

I'm going to have to call big brother little brother weirdness on that little pair LOL! Sorry, they look so much alike it is just wrong - get back on Grinder and stay on it till you find a dude that does not look like you separated in the womb.

So if you are broke it looks like in Hungary you can still be a decent wino.