Best posts made by frostycab

Just thought I'd bump this as it's been well over a year now and the information on seed points still hasn't been updated. I know there are other things to do, but it doesn't take much to remove a single line from a bulleted list.

https://www.gaytor.rent/rules.php

"Discussions and requests how to hack or rip a web site; crack or remove copy protections and Digital Restriction Management (DRM) systems; remove invisible watermarks in media files; and requests or offers to share passwords, logins or invitations are prohibited. Do not request or offer to share files obtained by these activities."

@timothyc65 From the site rules:

Discussions and requests how to hack or rip a web site; crack or remove copy protections and Digital Restriction Management (DRM) systems; remove invisible watermarks in media files; and requests or offers to share passwords, logins or invitations are prohibited. Do not request or offer to share files obtained by these activities.

@thor9023 said in upload ratio help:

@frostycab yeah about that, I might just keep it running till I reach like 10.0 ratio something absurdly high

While I wouldn't say not to do it, there was a discussion somewhere in the forums a long time ago about how much is too much when it comes to ratios.

There were some well though out arguments in there, but I seem to remember the best practice was agreed to be that while "artificial" methods like seedboxes give you a boost, once you've got a healthy download buffer then enjoy that and just seed normally. This shares seeding more effectively with other users who do also need to maintain their own ratios.

For example, I have a ratio of 1.172 right now. That means I have a download buffer of over 53TB. That represents about 40% of all my downloads over the last 17 years. If you look at it another way, if I keep up the same average amount of downloading and never upload so much as a single byte that buffer would last me another 7 years before I drop to my minimum 0.8. As such, there's no real benefit to putting effort into boosting my ratio.

Like I said, there's nothing stopping you going for the record if you like, but in reality there's not much point in chasing ratio just for the sake of it.

The thing with sites like AAB is I believe that most of the models never pursue what could be considered a career in porn. It feels like they may have answered a classified ad because they wanted a quick injection of cash, and either satisfied their immediate financial concerns or simply didn't enjoy the experience of being on film.

@BKisalive Well, I'd say nobody is taking note of any of this anyway. When I get reseed requests (which is most days) it certainly feels like many of them are from people who just like clicking buttons over and over again. I've had up to 5 requests in a single day from the same member for the same torrent. In a way I can understand why, because the last time I tried pressing it there was no feedback at all on the page, leading me to question whether or not the button had in fact registered the click at all.

The obvious way to sort the whole issue out would be for someone to simply change the button behaviour so that once pressed (by any member) it would be disabled for all members for a set period of time and/or add a popup or message on the page that lets the member know their request has been registered by the site. Sadly I see neither option being implemented as even the most basic housekeeping tasks for the site seem to be too much effort. It feels like the mods are the only staff who ever do anything, and they don't have the power to touch this sort of thing.

@ubdc said in For Plex Users - Awesome Metadata Matching Agent:

As far as scenes go, that's kind of a mess due to relying on blogs, but what can you do?

I only use Plex for mainstream films and TV. All my porn goes through Stash, which handles scenes quite well.
https://github.com/stashapp/stash

@ikpooo Yes, as long as you've already connected to the swarm you should be able to download. I had a svandylove collection come up as unregistered about 10 minutes after I started it, but there were about 20 people already in the swarm and I managed to download to 100%

@mearsfan25 Um, it'd take forever to compile a list, but I seem to remember seeing a series of torrents uploaded over the last few months called "cumming Inside......" which might suit you. I haven't grabbed them myself so I can't testify as to the content or quality, but it might be what you're after.

Or there's ones like these:

https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=e5a3c4eea0ed13b831aab4170a5875fb736887865bb656cd&hit=1
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=b8b228680545566c31aab4170a5875fb6fc03e8b220bb789&hit=1

Worst VR headset design ever!

@jokuihmemies Looks a bit like fagboi. Think he was in a few PBR films

I'm not going to pretend to understand all of the details of how torrents actually work or the running of this site. However, there are a couple of things in your post that struck me.

Firstly, your idea sounds virtually the same as renting a seedbox, which can be done for significantly less than $1 per GB. I've been shopping around recently, and have seen deals for around £9 per month for a TB of storage and 10 Gb/s up/down speeds with no traffic limit. Granted, the speeds may vary, but it's still a good way of seeding properly and does wonders for your ratio.

Secondly, if this site was to actually offer (or require) you to rent server space off it then I suspect this might have detrimental effects. In general most torrent sites are only able to operate based on the fact that they don't host any copyrighted material. If they start renting out server space that you need to put your uploads into then even if hosted externally it might be argued that the site itself is, by proxy, hosting such material, which could open it up to enforceable legal action.

Hopefully more knowledgeable people will be able to weigh in on this.

@ianfontinell-0 LMAO!!! The big difference is that it's 3D, and very 3D at that. I did download a load of it when I first got my VR kit, but I don't watch it and never wank with it on. It's a novelty, really.

As for the technical aspect of it, it's always from a fixed camera (because I reckon if you tried moving the camera at all you'd vomit all over your lovely VR headset thank to motion sickness!) and usually shot with a 180 degree viewing angle, so turning your head to look out to the sides just shows black beyond the limits. Since a lot of it is POV it's geared towards just looking ahead as the performers do their thing.

Don't get me wrong, sometimes a video can be nice to watch. I think my fave was one with Johannes Lars doing a solo by the pool. He climbs out of the water in front of you, kneels on a towel, wanks (I seem to remember him playing with a dildo too) until he cums, and there are points where you feel like you could actually touch his cock with your tongue.

Of course it might all be a bit more interesting if you didn't have to wear a sodding big VR unit on your head, but if I manage to replace my Valve Index with a Bigscreen Beyond 2, which is more like a pair of swimming goggles than a helmet, I might revisit VR porn.

@adrian1990 Requests have been banned on the site for some time. You might want to delete/edit this.

PupDavey?

Could I suggest, in the nicest possible way without sounding like I'm having a go at all, that you have a read through the site and forum rules again?

From the rules:

"Requests for uploads are strictly prohibited. This includes the torrent descriptions, comments, forum and shoudbox."

If I understand your question correctly, it's possible that the listing was removed. Could be DMCA, duplicate, rule break....

Over the course of today one user (I assume) has attempted to upload and seed around 15 torrents, all themed on twinks including videos from both studios and fan sites such as OF. I have seen, and can still see, many uploads on the site featuring the same studios and performers. Every single one seems to have been removed from the site, often within 30 minutes of being added.

I can appreciate that DMCA requests must be taken seriously and acted upon, but it seems suspicious that so many torrents from (what I assume is) a single user, spanning such a range of studios and independent performers should be jumped on so quickly. It does raise the question of whether or not this is a disgruntled user simple being a bit of an ass.

My question is if a DMCA request is received what is the actual process for removing the torrent? Does the claimant need to show that they are indeed the copyright owner? Is there a due diligence process that is followed to verify that the takedown request is legitimate? If not then presumably anyone could spam the site with random DMCA requests, decimating the list of available material.

I'm not looking to complain and start an argument over this. It's just genuine curiosity. I completely understand that the site needs to err on the side of caution in order to protect itself, but I just wonder if someone is abusing the system.

@jokuihmemies Damn. Looked up a couple of his vids and I think PupDavey and Fagboi are one and the same anyway.

@lololulu19 That sounds like a "you" problem. hehe