Posts made by bi4smooth

@raphjd said in Joe Biden WRECKS the Economy:

@manhandler

I support trans people who just want to live their lives.

I despise trans-trenders.

Yeah... those queer folk are fine so long as they don't do anything in public

@manhandler said in Alyssa Milano swoops in as Hero after Gay Rights Won.:

@raphjd Yea, it's just the liberal mentality in general when talking about issues like race and sexuality... oblivious. Alyssa Milano wants to act like a superhero, but the war for equality was settled when gays were allowed to marry, and that was many years ago. Now it's super easy for people like her. There's no struggle so it just looks pathetic. She's a washed up celebrity looking for attention and praise. It's the definition of self-centered. It's not about gay rights. It's about her, and it's lazy.

A LOT of celebrities are crazy...

• Charlie Sheen?
• Paris Hilton? (How did that crazy bitch get famous enough for people to care?)
• Shia LaBeouf
• Lindsay Lohan
• Kanye West
• Mel Gibson
• Gary Busey
  ... sheesh - this list got long fast! And I wasn't even TRYING!

Honestly, this list is missing one nut-job celebrity.... Donald Trump LOL

@raphjd said in Y Libs SO silent? They can't answer!:

@bi4smooth

Ah, so according to our resident fake conservative, discussing voter fraud is automatically about Trump.

It can't have anything to do with liberals being hypocrites and demanding audits and recounts in areas that they lost in. Let's not forget, you defended Democrats demanding recounts if they lost.

Clearly, you won't stop talking about your BFF, Pelosi's panties in every thread.

Show me a case of a loser (other than Trump) insisting on a recount after the election had been certified.

Couching your "Trump was robbed" message behind a thinly-veiled "this is about generic voter fraud" claims is so transparent as to be stupid.

@raphjd said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@manhandler

Liberals want to stop the audit because they have plenty to hide.

It's not about Trump, but protecting future voter fraud so they can stay in power.

No one's trying to stop the audit. There are no court challenges, there are no protests. You're arguing against a straw man.

No one pretends that the outcome of this partisan effort wasn't known ahead of time. Only the details remain to be seen. The real question is: just how far off the deep-end will they go? The farther they go, the less credible their results will be... but if they don't go far enough there may not be lucrative add-on contracts (with other States?) to follow! They need a balance!

But I say again: the "real" audits were done by the elections professionals - who, in AZ, happen to be Republicans.

@raphjd said in "You Trump supporters are TERRORISTS!" Roll eyes. Ridiculous.:

@bi4smooth said in "You Trump supporters are TERRORISTS!" Roll eyes. Ridiculous.:

@raphjd said in "You Trump supporters are TERRORISTS!" Roll eyes. Ridiculous.:

Oh yeah, even our resident fake conservative believes Trump supporters are evil.

Of course, he believes that he is wonderful because he voted for Honest Joe and Camel Toe.

Prior to Trump, the US Justice Dept was considered as a-political as you could be in Government Service. Nixon tried to turn it into his own political "army", but was rebuked by the career professionals. Trump tried to do the same, and was not met with as-much resistance.

One of the few actions Biden has taken that I can actually agree with is that he's ordered the Justice Dept to be re-de-politicized, and those career professionals who went along with the Trumpy, partisan crap (like seizing phone and email records of political enemies - and even political "friends", just so you can "assuage any doubts" you might have about their loyalty) will face professional sanctions.

There is politics - to some extent - in every area of Government, but the Justice Dept (and, by inheritance, the FBI) should be an area of the Government where outright partisan activity should be banned, avoided, and bum-rushed out the door!

Assuming Raphjd's comment about "resident fake conservative" is about me (that may be self-aggrandizing, but hey...) - I do not think Trumpites are evil, just that they're easily manipulated and intellectually lazy.

That's a joke (though, when the joke is at your expense, y'all seem to have absolutely no sense of humor!

Seriously, I've said before that I believe that even the insurrectionists of Jan 6 thought they were doing their patriotic duty - even if it was criminal and anti-democratic. Evil? no. Dumb (in some instances), maybe. Under the influence of evil people? Likely. (I believe the whole QAnon thing is run by a foreign government to destabilize our country - and it's working!)

You are an idiot or a blatant liar.

The FBI and other government orgs were extremely political before Trump became President.

Trump was not President before he was being spied on, based on lies and altered emails. The FBI lied to the FISA courts, so they could spy on Trump.

Hillary had more Russian collusion than Trump did.

The DOJ allowed Hillary to violate US law with the private email server.

Don't worry, we already know you are gonna spew some leftist bullshit to claim Orange Man Bad and that Hillary did nothing wrong.

You have the memory of a gnat (whose entire lifespan is about 7 days)...
I voted for Trump in 2016. That election, like the 2020 one, was (for me) more about protecting the country against one candidate than it was about voting for another. (I supported John Kasich in the primaries - canvased for him, held a fundraiser in my home for him).

Put any 3 people in a room and there will be some politics... but that doesn't mean you embrace and extend those political views - when your job is the FBI or the Justice Dept. Yes, there were examples of politics in both before Trump (it might have been a clue when I mentioned Nixon... who, this may come as a shocker to you: was the 37th President of the US.. and 37 is less than 45, so that means he was President before Trump)... No President before Trump had attempted to use the FBI and Justice Dept as a political weapon more than Nixon. Trump took what Nixon did and amped it up on steroids! It was wrong, regardless of your political beliefs. Politics and Criminal Justice shouldn't go together - at least not easily. Can they be kept completely apart? Only a Liberal would think such an ideal was possible in the Real World... but you can work to REDUCE its influence... and that's the tack a Conservative would take.

@manhandler said in Judge Joe Brown says Biden called Black People "Cockroaches.":

@bi4smooth Your excuses for your poor judgement on voting day are pathetic. You voted for a racist. And now, you're not calling him out on it, like justice should be carried out. You are making excuses for accepting personal responsibility for your actions to vote in a racist. You can't admit you made a mistake.

I voted for a democratic-socialist because my only other real choice was an autocratic-fascist.

I call out Biden and Harris all the time - but not for made-up shit like what you seem to like to come up with... I can be against his politics without making him (and her) out to be the Anti-Christ.

(Oh, and I don't make fun of people's religious beliefs either - not about "magical underwear", nor about "lightning" magically writing on tablets, nor about unfaithful women giving "miraculous" birth to a fatherless child. Attacks against someone's religion are base, borne of stupidity and ignorance, and are inherently Un-American).

@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:

@bi4smooth

How idiotic.

Of course, you need to consider the VP.

I do love how you need to use mental gymnastics to justify voting for the person that holds the same values you do.

You keep reminding us that you are a liberal collectivist, not a "conservative libertarian".

When a vocal advocate for cancel culture gets caught, you actively defend them to the hilt while never saying a word as that person actively cancels a conservative.

More of the same-shit, still in the same bucket.
I don't support cancel-culture when used against Liberals, I don't support cancel culture when used against Conservatives.

But let's go farther:

• I don't support cancel culture when used against Nazis
• I don't support cancel culture when used against Socialists
• I don't support cancel culture when used against pedophiles
• I don't support cancel culture when used against murderers - even mass murderers.

I do not like Cancel Culture, I do not like it, Sam-I-Am!

That doesn't mean I don't think people who do bad things shouldn't be punished... I just don't think "cancel culture" (where the general public, just on anyone's whim when it happens to "go-viral", decides on a punishment) is an acceptable way of determining the level of punishment.

The fact that I decry cancel culture when you support it against a Liberal doesn't mean I support the liberal - no, only that I do not support trying to use "social media" or "public pressure" to meet out punishment...

Indeed, I would posit that I don't *even support cancel culture when used against YOU!

@manhandler said in I love Infowars and Donald Trump, and I'm Gay.:

@bi4smooth Biden is probably droppin diarrhea dookies and asking the SS to clean it up for him. That's worse than Trump? Killing jobs by the hundreds of thousands? That's worse than Trump? Massive spending and tax hikes... A dude who said the N word live on TV 13 times? That's worse? Want to takeover elections so the party in power of the Fed controls State Elections forever, ending the country? Or how about reducing CO2 to zero? Trees breath CO2. It's idiocy. It's lunacy. And why is Trump worse? Because he "demands" fealty, or loyalty. Which he gets anyway. And his racist policies that caused the highest employment of blacks, hispanics, and asians - of all time? Yea, you're ridiculous is what you are.

You can disagree with my reasoning, but yes... I choose a democratic-socialist over an autocratic-fascist.... and I would do it again.

@raphjd said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:

@bi4smooth

You seriously need to stop sniffing Pelosi's panties.

The Democrats spent a good part of 2017-18, and virtually ALL of 2019 trying to prove that Trump's win in 2016 was illegitimate.

At no point did they presume that, in proving that he cheated (with the Russians, or wherever), anyone other than Mike Pence would become President.

They were persistent and overreaching - even desperate - but they weren't delusional.

Remove Biden for any reason, and you get Harris. There is nothing - anywhere, any-how - that would provide for Trump being put back into office.... with the single exception being the natural one: that he wins in a different election: 2024, 2028, or whenever.

@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:

@bi4smooth

I think you are describing Special Rights, under the guise of equality.

Your type of "conservatives" said that marriage equality is where everyone is equal in their ability to marry a person of the opposite sex.

Me on the other hand, I say marriage equality is being able to marry the person you are attracted to and love.

Equality is NOT what Honest Joe and Camel Toe are doing by being racist toward whites. You voted for anti-white racism.

You continually claim I voted for Biden because I agreed with his politics.
I repeatedly describe how that's not true.

Same shit, same bucket.
Empty it yourself this time... I'm tired of typing the same replies over and over.

BTW: I've never mentioned it before, but your reference to Kamala Harris as "camel toe" is offensive to women - and to anyone who cares about treating other humans with even a sliver of respect. I may not agree with her Politics, but she is the VP of the country, and 1 heartbeat away from being the 47th President of the US. Call her dishonest, call her Hubris Harris... but camel toe (referring to her genitalia) is offensive.

@raphjd said in One Pallet of Ballots left to count.:

@manhandler

But our resident fake conservative loves censorship when it blocks conservative voices.

He like that back in the 1st time Congress held hearing about "big tech" censorship, of the 23 politicians that were banned from social media, only 1 was a liberal.

He loves the fact that "big tech", despite their lies about free speech, refuse to allow discussion that is outside of their world view, while enjoying 230 protection.

He loves that "big tech" acts as a publisher and a platform while, in extremely bad faith, enjoying 230 protections.

He loves that FB and Twitter are far, far more guilty of allowing organizing riots and other crimes, including the worst event in the entire human history; 6 Jan 2021, but Parler got taken down and falsely accused of what liberal tech was actually guilty of.

He claims to be a "conservative libertarian" while telling us that we need to fall, lock step in line with the liberal utopian collective. There isn't a liberal dogma that he won't defend.

Thanks again for assigning to me a position that I've never taken. This would be akin to my ascribing to you the position that the US Government should take over operations for Twitter, Google, and Facebook.

I am not in favor of censorship, but I am in favor of "individual rights" - even for Corporations.

When Twitter suspended Trump, I was not a fan of the move. I've never said they did the right thing, only that it was within their rights to do it. Sadly, I do not sit on the Board at Twitter, nor am I a stockholder... in fact, I'm not even a subscriber! Thus, I don't think Twitter cares any more than you do about what I think of their action.

However, they are a private enterprise, and are free to (within some limits) run their business how they see fit. And if that means they decline allowing certain people (and it's not based on some protected class) access to their platform, that is within their rights. (That is exactly the same principle as the Supreme Court ruled when they supported the right of the wedding cake shop to decline the customer who wanted a gay wedding cake.)

Your frequent claim of 1st Amendment rights in this case are moot: the 1st Amendment applies to Governments, not corporations (or individuals).

You also like to harp on "230 protections" - which some services (like Twitter, Facebook, and the YouTube part of Google) would need to have in order to be actually viable. Take away the 230 protections, and Twitter would need to hire thousands of "editors" to "review" every post to confirm that they don't break any laws that Twitter might be found in violation of, were it NOT FOR 230 protections....
In such a world, your Twitter post might become public in 2-minutes, 2-hours, or 2-months... depending on how far backed-up they were in their processing. And completely forget YouTube: more video is uploaded in a DAY at YouTube than a single person could watch in some number of YEARS (I've heard that statistic as 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years - all are plausible if you consider how YouTube is growing).

You want the Internet? You gotta accept it for what it is: a mix of free-minded, free-spirited individuals in-it-for-the-fun-of-it, and corporations in-it-for-the-money! I can assure you that, if sufficient subscribers dropped Twitter in favor of Trumpster, Twitter would change their tune!

And finally, I will briefly repeat that your argument about Parler is absurd on its face - if for no other reason than because it's alive-and-well - right now - on another platform. One of thousands of available platforms that are in competition with AWS. Parler was removed from AWS the same way HUNDREDS of AWS clients are "de-platformed" every day - for being in consistent and repeated violation of their Terms of Service. Parler just cried louder than the others - and for no reason but the publicity. IF the de-platforming had come as a complete surprise (it wasn't), it might have taken their tech team 48-hours to have transferred everything to another platform. Depending on how much data was involved, it might just as easily have been done in 2-4 hours (yes, two-to-four, not 24). When AWS de-platforms you, they disconnect your systems from the Internet - they don't confiscate your data!

Your repeated claims - disproven each time - that their is a mass conspiracy focused solely on Trump is tired and overworn. Find a new song... I'm tired of this one.

@manhandler said in "You Trump supporters are TERRORISTS!" Roll eyes. Ridiculous.:

@bi4smooth Total bullshit. When Obama came in he fired every federal employee who wasn't a Democrat. Trump did the opposite, so if you're saying it was political under Trump, you're right, but not because of Trump, rather, because of the Democrats who he didn't fire and tried to sabotage everything he did.

That is completely ridiculous. There are federal employees who are "political" appointees, and there are "career service" employees.

The former (political appointees) indeed serve at the pleasure of the President - and can be let go with the bat of an eyelash.

The latter, however, are protected by Federal Labor laws, and their unions. It's actually rather HARD to fire career federal employees... which is why those positions are sought-after, even though the pay is poor.

But listen to your moronic self...

• Obama fired all the non-Democrats
• Trump fired all the non-Republicans... but the Democrats who were left over sabotaged him...

You are delusional and a waste of time...

@manhandler said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@bi4smooth Who made you the decider of what is legit? Nobody.

... and you're a better arbiter?

Again, you are tiresome with your fantasies...

@bi4smooth said in Judge Joe Brown says Biden called Black People "Cockroaches.":

@manhandler said in Judge Joe Brown says Biden called Black People "Cockroaches.":

@bi4smooth No, it's about Joe Biden using the N word and you don't care. You can't answer because your hypocrisy is blatant and you know it.

LOL - I don't care because I already don't like Biden - never have. I don't care if he shits his pants every day and makes the Secret Service clean it up. I don't care if he brushes his teeth with cum collected from pre-teen boys. I don't care about Biden at all...

If he said the N word, so what! He's the President now, and I want (assuming Trump doesn't get the Republican nomination in 2024) to elect someone ELSE in 2024... but there's NOTHING I can do about him now, and I don't need any convincing that he's not a panacea - in fact, the more he's shown to NOT live up to Democrat's hopes and dreams, the better!

You are quite tiresome... honestly, I think you just want someone to argue with...

@manhandler said in Judge Joe Brown says Biden called Black People "Cockroaches.":

@bi4smooth No, it's about Joe Biden using the N word and you don't care. You can't answer because your hypocrisy is blatant and you know it.

LOL - I don't care because I already don't like Biden - never have. I don't care if he shits his pants every day and makes the Secret Service clean it up. I don't care if he brushes his teeth with cum collected from pre-teen boys. I don't care about Biden at all...

If he said the N word, so what! He's the President now, and I want (assuming Trump doesn't get the Republican nomination in 2024) to elect someone ELSE in 2024... but there's NOTHING I can do about him now, and I don't need any convincing that he's not a panacea - in fact, the more he's shown to NOT live up to Democrat's hopes and dreams, the better!

@manhandler said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:

@bi4smooth

Everything that you just said is wholly false and demonstrably so. Here are just a few of the studies that show you're totally wrong.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/06/09/hydroxychloroquine-study-n2590700

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33042552/

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/19/100-of-patients-cautious-optimism-when-readily-used-drug-shows-promising-results-with-coronavirus-898988/

https://www.calais.news/new-covid-19-treatment-study-shows-100-patients-virologically-cured-drug-combination

Sure - and the media (and the CDC and other scientific outlets) claim that it is INEFFECTIVE do so solely because Trump said it was good... and they care more about making Trump bad than saving lives.

THAT'S why their chosen careers are in SCIENCE - to make Trump look bad and kill people.

Sad... just sad...

@manhandler said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:

https://banned.video/watch?id=60d0d41344f94c1c5c80d4b8

Last week, a Fox Reporter in Houston, Ivory Hecker, went to Project Veritas, exposing recordings of Fox Executives telling her not to talk about Hydroxychloroquine, even though doctors were literally using it with 100% success. This week, it's a CBS News Reporter, April Moss. Because they're liars. And they're funded by the DNC.

You are truly a moron - nothing, not even Aspirin, has a 100% success rate.

Hydroxychloroquine was never effective at treating COVID-19. It was worth a shot at the time it was first mentioned, but further testing showed it was wholly ineffective.

Since then, other treatments have done wonders at reducing the fatality-rate of COVID-19, but none of them contain Hydroxychloroquine - because it's ineffective, at best.

In SCIENCE you test theories out, and when you're wrong, you notate that fact and move on. Holding onto Hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment is DOGMA and IDEOLOGY ... not science.

When a scientist was searching for an HIV treatment and had literally tried 20,000 substances - all with no effect to the virus, he didn't say he'd failed - he said he'd successfully discovered over 20,000 treatments that would not affect HIV - and thus, eliminated them from further, future testing! There were now 20,000 fewer things to try!

@raphjd said in Alyssa Milano swoops in as Hero after Gay Rights Won.:

@manhandler

She is a piece of shit.

She demands we believe ALL women unless they accuse a Democrat.

She even defended sexual predator YouTuber, James Charles.

She defended VA Governor Ralph Northam wearing blackface.

She is partisan scum.

She is a celebrity - intelligence is not a job requirement.

@raphjd said in Y Libs SO silent? They can't answer!:

@manhandler

Now that Trump is out of office and liberal media is doing their Biden/Harris can do no wrong lovefest, people have no reason to watch the liberal "news".

You can tell MSM is desperate in that virtually every "news" report somehow drags Trump into it to slag him off and praise the current pair of losers.

Trump remains in the News for the same reason he remains the primary topic of this forum... He and his followers can't "let it go"...

@raphjd said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@manhandler

If they have nothing to hide, why should they be so desperate to kill any and all audits?

LEGITIMATE audits were already completed. By the AZ Secretary of State
Calling this an audit is like calling a wolf a puppy-dog.

In a "real" audit, the results are not a foregone conclusion.

This ain't that!