@raphjd said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:
Maricopa County has fought every inch of the way to prevent the audit, but of course, the "news" you get informed of doesn't tell you that. Oh no, they rehash the "Russia stole our election" bullshit from 2016.
Yes, they tried (past-tense), and they lost in court.
Unlike Trumpites who also lost in court, but keep whining about it!
Next!
@raphjd said in Y Libs SO silent? They can't answer!:
And the bitch is still saying it was stolen from her by white supremacists.
She claims that white supremacists (ie; far right) are the ones responsible for the law that purges voter rolls. Of course, that is a liberal lie, since it was the DNC that controlled the House, the Senate, and Governor Mansion when the law was passed.
We have one of your fellow liberals here who claims that DNC at the time was actually racist RNC, who hid away their costumes to trick the good liberal folk of GA into voting for them so they could pass racist laws.
And there you have it, you being a hypocrite yet again. You know more about QAnon than I do.
I guess your pea brain is rotting from the Pelosi panty fumes that you keep sniffing.
you're getting pathetic. We should try a new thread. you're just out of anything reasonable add here...
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
Umm, you keep telling me what I believe and have said, but that's ok, you're a liberal so you can do no wrong in your "mind".
You know more about what QAnon says, yet you keep trying to portray me as one of their followers. I've only ever heard of pizza-gate and I know the pizzeria in question doesn't have a basement.
You claim Tucker Carlson is a liar, but you claim you never ever watch his show. Not shockingly, you spew proven liar talking points from the scum bags like Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, the losers at CNN, and countless others.
Count them, please (I have never, knowingly, quoted Rachel Maddow - I don't HAVE cable, so I can't watch her show). I have never called Tucker Carlson a liar about a single thing I've heard him say on-air - because I don't have cable, and can't watch his show. I guess I could READ CNN online... and I don't even know why Joy Reid is.. she's a D-List newsy at best...
I've provided my international sources before... but, of course, they're all liberal to you! The WSJ is too liberal for you!
@raphjd said in Joe Biden WRECKS the Economy:
@bi4smooth said in Joe Biden WRECKS the Economy:
@raphjd said in Joe Biden WRECKS the Economy:
I support trans people who just want to live their lives.
I despise trans-trenders.
Yeah... those queer folk are fine so long as they don't do anything in public
I support trans people and you clearly support attention-seeking ass clowns.
You love the fact that rapists (only men can be rapists in the UK) can claim to be a woman so they can commit more rapes in Prison.
You love the idea that a dude can grow his hair long, call himself Tiffany, and get into women's sports.
You think that a lesbian won't suck cock is a transphobe because creeps like Riley Dennis claim to be lesbians, then uses "transphobe" as a weapon to get stupid liberals to suck his cock.
You are so trans-phobic your eyes are pink, cyan, and white!
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
Well, you do love to defend the liberal dogma.
Ah, Camel Toe the Ho is every woman. (queue the Whitney Houston song) She is a whore, as she slept with a married man, Willie Brown, the then Mayor of San Francisco, to get what she wanted. Are you saying that makes her every woman too?
Also, let's not forget that you said we aren't supposed to think about the running mate, so why did you point out she could become the new President?
She's VP because of her vagina and her color, not because she is qualified.
She is VP because Biden chose her. Most historians agree that VP candidates aren't nearly as important in the late 20th and early 21st Centuries as they were even 60 years ago.
You think Dan Quayle was qualified to be President? But he could have been! 1 heartbeat away, for 4 long years!
I look forward to the time when Trumpism is dead and you go back to being just another anarchist...
@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
And yet, you only ever call out cancel culture when I bring it up against a liberal advocate of it, saying they should get a dose of their own medicine.
You also side with social media banning conservatives because it's a private platform.
I don't decry the waste of good hamburger meat at McDonalds (where they simply are incapable of grilling a decent burger)... but then, no one ever brings that up, so there isn't much point in it.
The problem here is you LOVE Cancel Culture when it goes against Liberals, and you hate it when it hurts Trump... I dislike it all of the time, no matter who it's aimed at - including Trump!
@raphjd said in One Pallet of Ballots left to count.:
Ah, you are one of those "corporations have human rights" people.
You are against cancel culture, but you aren't really upset when it happens to people you don't like, such as Trump.
I know that the 1st Amendment only applies to the government. DUH.
That being said, your beloved liberal social media constantly lie about free speech. Twitter, FB, and YouTube have all said that "free speech" is a human right. Of course, what they won't say is that they really mean it's their "human right" to have their platform in every country and they get to decide what we the scum get to say.
Parler is allowed in Nigeria, but not FB and Twitter. Your beloved liberals hate this.
Your side hates the Hobby Lobby ruling, but then uses it to say that corporations they like have human rights globally.
You must be illiterate. I quite literally said, just a few posts above, that I didn't agree with their censoring Trump.
I don't believe in "situational ethics" - which is why, as a pro-lifer, I believe that "exceptions for rape and incest" are ridiculous! Since when do we sentence children to death for the crimes of their fathers?
The person who seems to be wishy-washy about "freedom" here is you: you love it when it helps your side, you decry it when it hurts.
@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:
@bi4smooth Constitutionally written, he would have to wait until 2022, however, fraud vitiates everything, and becomes null and void, and the election can be decertified. Fraud is one of those common sense things that doesn't need to be written in the Constitution, like "People have the right to breath air." The remedy is written and implied in the 9th and 10th Amendments.
The remedy is in the 25th Amendment - and Kamala Harris assumes the Presidency if anything happens to Biden.
But again, thanks to his predecessor, we now have legal precedent that sitting US Presidents cannot be charged with a crime - not even criminal conspiracy to steal an election!
@raphjd said in I love Infowars and Donald Trump, and I'm Gay.:
@bi4smooth said in I love Infowars and Donald Trump, and I'm Gay.:
autocratic-fascist.
We clearly live in a liberal clown world.
I didn't claim that you considered him an autocratic-fascist... just me.
Now, if you're telepathic and know my thoughts better than I do, tell me what I'm going to have for dinner???
Nope! Breakfast for dinner! Scrambled Eggs, Bacon, & vegetables, covered in Southern Gravy... plus Rye Toast, and Hominy Grits! YUM!
@raphjd said in Judge Joe Brown says Biden called Black People "Cockroaches.":
But you spew liberal lies about Trump as if they are going out of style.
Not even worth a significant reply...
"I know you are, but what am I"
@raphjd said in "You Trump supporters are TERRORISTS!" Roll eyes. Ridiculous.:
LOL, you tune keeps changing as you get proved wrong.
LOL, you seem to have forgotten that Obama existed.
Do you remember that you said you supported "political punishment"? Do ya?! Political punishment is exactly what the name says, political. It has nothing to do with facts.
The FBI was anti-Trump before and after he came into office. Even if we ignore what they did to Trump, their actions surrounding the Hillary crap prove the FBI has a political agenda.
I support "political punishment" of politicians, not regular citizens. And that's limited to the impeachment process and/or elections. Voting someone out of office is legitimate "political punishment".
Storming the capital with a gallows built near the steps and chanting "Hang Mike Pence" isn't political punishment... it's anarchy.
If I could find one instance where you've proven me wrong.... nope! You mostly howl at the wind and then blame some straw-man for conjuring up the storm that doesn't even exist!
You go boy! You're doing great! Here... have some more straw!
@raphjd said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:
Ok sweetheart, keep playing mental gymnastics as told to you by liberal MSM.
You keep arguing with your Straw Man... I haven't said once that they should be forced to stop the audit in AZ... all I've said is that they did an extremely poor job of setting it up and executing it - so poor that no one NOT ALREADY convinced of the fraud Trump claims is there will believe their findings are anything but a political hack-job. The facts won't matter... they've tainted themselves as overtly partisan already... even if there IS fraud -- on a scale large enough to sway the election -- no one (outside Trumpites already) will believe it. Thus, it's a waste of time and money.
That said, the guy who owns the company doing the audit is doing quite well! In spite of the outrageous real estate prices in Fla today, he'll be able to buy Mara Lago when he's done!
@raphjd said in Y Libs SO silent? They can't answer!:
See, you are the clown that is making it about Trump, not about election fraud.
Also, you ran your mouth, slagging of Trump for disputing the election while defending your beloved fellow Dems who were also contesting their loss.
Stacy Abrams is still screeching that she actually won and white supremacists are keeping her out of office.
Stacy Abrams contested her loss... until the results were certified. Though, you are correct that she never conceded the race. Still, she didn't wander about Georgia proclaiming herself the "rightful" Governor of GA, either... she marshaled her resources, and somehow managed to get enough lunk-heads in GA to vote Democratic that the formerly reliable RED state voted for Biden in one race, and TWO Democrats for SENATE!
She's got us out-maneuvered in GA for now... hopefully that's temporary, tho I do not follow GA politics much anymore (I left Atlanta in 1987).
That you can't tell the difference between someone contesting a result BEFORE it is certified, and someone who continues to do so AFTERWARDS speaks volumes about your ability to comprehend even simple issues. No wonder you were so easily led into the QAnon wilderness.
@raphjd said in Alyssa Milano swoops in as Hero after Gay Rights Won.:
@bi4smooth said in Alyssa Milano swoops in as Hero after Gay Rights Won.:
@manhandler said in Alyssa Milano swoops in as Hero after Gay Rights Won.:
@raphjd Yea, it's just the liberal mentality in general when talking about issues like race and sexuality... oblivious. Alyssa Milano wants to act like a superhero, but the war for equality was settled when gays were allowed to marry, and that was many years ago. Now it's super easy for people like her. There's no struggle so it just looks pathetic. She's a washed up celebrity looking for attention and praise. It's the definition of self-centered. It's not about gay rights. It's about her, and it's lazy.
A LOT of celebrities are crazy...
- Charlie Sheen?
- Paris Hilton? (How did that crazy bitch get famous enough for people to care?)
- Shia LaBeouf
- Lindsay Lohan
- Kanye West
- Mel Gibson
- Gary Busey
... sheesh - this list got long fast! And I wasn't even TRYING!Honestly, this list is missing one nut-job celebrity.... Donald Trump LOL
You forgot every one of you people with extreme TDS.
If I had 1% of the "following" you attribute to me, I'd run for office!
But I'm not the one telling other people what they think... you are the telepathic one
So tell me - what am I thinking now?
@raphjd said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:
As I keep repeating, Corona Virus is one of the 3 oldest virus types on earth.
Humans have had to deal with it throughout our entire existence.
Over the last 20 years, we have had several quasi pandemics based on it.
We've had the common cold and flu forever and a day.
Other than the Gain of Function part, we should know quite a lot about corona viruses.
Also, we have been lied to by WHO, CDC, and many others, which is hindering science.
Let's not forget that your beloved, saintly Fauci previously said the gain of function engineering was worth a pandemic. He also, without approval, funded gain of function research in China, despite it being banned in the US.
Then, of course, there's the issue of Biden and family being owned by China. He won't lift a finger to get to the truth, if China says NO.
NOW you're on to something! All 193 members of the UN collaborated to inflame the world-wide populace into ousting Donald Trump! From the smallest, most backward country to the likes of China, Russia, Iran, and even N Korea! Once sworn enemies, they have come together to pull the wool over the world's population about this COVID-19 thing... and all to ensure Trump didn't win re-election!
Why, it's the most impressive conspiracy I've ever even heard of! Even Alien Invaders wouldn't get such a unified response from every-single-country in the world!
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
LOL.
I refuse to accept the lies a liberal says because they are liars. Their actions tell the truth.
I do notice you have a single narrative. You think that if liberals don't support my stance, I should not post it.
Clearly, you have no clue exactly why Liz Cheney had to go. Maybe you should look it up.
Your silence on countless matters that I have posted about shows what your stance is.
LOL, you are such a clueless clown. No one is blaming Hillary for our lives. Hillary is proof that if you are a liberal, you can get away with anything.
Of course, you are too stupid to get any of this since you only listen to MSM.
You are SO GOOD at telling other people WHAT they are and WHAT they believe... if you had a clue about yourself, maybe you could talk intelligently about your own ideas...
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
Trump only wanted people to treat him like they did other presidents.
They did not. He had about 15 times the leaks that other Presidents had.
96+% of the reporting about him was negative, even to the point that they lied about him at every turn.
The fact that you don't seem to know this proves to me that you are not a conservative.
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
Trump only wanted people to treat him like they did other presidents.
They did not. He had about 15 times the leaks that other Presidents had.
96+% of the reporting about him was negative, even to the point that they lied about him at every turn.
The fact that you don't seem to know this proves to me that you are not a conservative.
Trump overall had more media coverage than any other President.
In his time, Obama had more media coverage than any other President.
In his time, Reagan had more media coverage than any other President.
In his time, Carter had more media coverage than any other President.
If you can't see the pattern... well, I don't suspect you will. But, Trump, unlike previous Presidents, didn't bristle at the coverage, he reveled in it! And he (as most people in Marketing know already) knew that there was a wide-line between "good" publicity and "bad" - and that nearly ALL publicity is good!
Being the butt of every late-night talk-show host's jokes wasn't new. Complaining about it - in the media - was new. (Other President's eviscerated by the "comedy circuit" date back to our origins... the first President to really "adjust" to it was, ironically, Richard Nixon - who appeared on a TV show (Laugh-In) that regularly lampooned him! (Sock-It-To-Me!)
And, quite honestly, it worked for Trump! All that media coverage made him one of the most polarizing people of our time! There are few people EVER in American History that have more people diametrically opposed in their opinions of him! You would be hard-pressed to find an American who didn't have strong views - pro or con - about Trump!
Contrary to your insistence otherwise, I do not hate Trump. I disavow his politics as autocratic and borderline fascist... and I think he was harmful to our democratic form of Government. But, I don't think he's evil (nor, is he a mastermind - more of a megalomaniac who came upon the Political Stage at an opportune [for him] time).
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth For starters, he didn't have to demand fealty. He got it. His "sexist, racist, nationalistic policies" led to more hispanics, african americans, women, etc to be employed than ever before. Just stop. You're wrong.
You're deluded.
We can agree we disagree with each other?
Can we agree not to bring it up farther? I find you tiring and exhausting.
@manhandler said in FL Judge declares masks unconstitutional.:
And Covid Vaccines are now the deadliest vaccine in human history.
And the Chicken-Pox vaccine causes Autism...
You go boy!
@manhandler said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:
@bi4smooth In case you didn't notice! One of those links I provided was to NIH.GOV. I guess you didn't notice.
In case you didn't notice, your NIH article was from 2020.
In case you didn't notice, the science on COVID-19 is moving quickly - as we're learning more and more daily ... and that means a LOT of what we thought early was wrong (like contact transmission? Why aren't we wiping down our groceries any longer? Because we know *better now!...
In case you didn't notice, I never said it wasn't effective as ANYTHING - just not against COVID-19 (esp once you get actually SICK from it).
And, in case you didn't notice, I never claimed that we didn't legitimately believe - for a short while - that it would be effective. Unfortunately, the evidence that it worked turned out to be mostly anecdotal, and didn't bear closer scrutiny or testing.... not that it was worthless: it does help in the very early stages - e.g. if you test positive for COVID-19 and have few, if any, symptoms at all yet.
Science was wrong (as it often is)... but it corrected itself!
For a humorous reflection on how Science gets is wrong sometimes, take a listen to Mike Rowe's podcast "The Way I Heard It" - Episodes 181 and 185