Posts made by bi4smooth

@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:

@bi4smooth

You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.

You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.

This is not the Straw Man you are looking for...

Again, you attribute things to me that are demonstrably untrue. Not being interested in Tucker Carlson's show is not equivalent to being a Liberal Democrat.

@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:

@bi4smooth

Yeah, but you forget that you claim to be a "conservative libertarian" while at the same time demanding that everyone be part of the liberal hivemind and create shrines to Honest Joe.

I am not the straw-man you are looking for

(waving hand calmly in front of your face)

I have never said I supported Joe Biden, only that I preferred him over the Authoritarian-Fascist that is Donald Trump... only in your twisted mind are those the same thing.

In your dogma, anyone not completely faithful to Trump is a RINO and a Liberal... your labels do not hurt me, because they do not "stick" to me...

There is not a bit of liberal dogma that you won't defend.

Obvious hyperbole - and being anti- "The Big Lie" doesn't make me a liberal. It makes me a realist.

You have defended more than a few liberals who actively pushed Cancel Culture from getting a dose of their own medicine when they get caught being hypocritical scum.

I have never - not once - supported Cancel Culture attacks against people - including Donald Trump. Your claims otherwise are sad, pathetic attempts to make me your straw-man boogey-man...

You want them protected, while I want them to get the equality they keep screaming for.

I believe that 2-wrongs do not make a right (though I do sometimes think Karma can be a bitch... Hear that Donald?)

Clearly, you are a typical racist white liberal who thinks blacks have no agency.

Another straw-man label. I swear, you think of me as your own personal Boggart (reference: Harry Potter monster who takes the form of your biggest fears)... I suggest you learn that I have no magical powers and I am not every form of evil that you fear in this world...

In my life, I was mugged at gunpoint twice (Chicago and Miami) by black guys. Your world view is that they didn't actually mug me, but my whiteness oppressed their guns into my face as they demanded my wallet.

I am sorry you were attacked... Since you only harp on a TINY FRACTION of my World View (the part that does against some of Trump Doctrine), you would have no idea what my views would be on that matter.

As with many other topics on here, you spout off (stupidly) against your Straw Man mask that you put on top of me...

@raphjd said in Y Libs SO silent? They can't answer!:

@bi4smooth

It doesn't matter if you "support" AOC directly or not, you are spewing the same crap she does on her Instagram.

The pair of you are a matching pair of liberal clowns. Maybe you should ask her to sponsor you as the newest member of the squad.

Well, again you attribute a source to me that I am not capable of using:

• I have no Facebook account (nor do I have a Messenger account - since when are those separate?)
• I have no Instagram account
• I have no Twitter account
• I have no SnapChat account
• I have no WeChat account
• I have no TicTok account
• I have no Pintrest account
• I have no YouTube acount (tho I watch videos there occasionally - unlike many of these, I don't think you need a YouTube account...

However,

• I do have a WhatsApp account (used it to talk to my daughter while she was in Europe for a Semester. I also use it to talk occasionally to my Uncle in Ireland)
• I let my Tumblr account expire - it was fun when it was all porn, less so now
• I do have a Reddit channel - no, I will not share it with you
• I do have a LinkedIn account - I get well over 100 views of my profile and 1-2 "cold" job offers monthly

Full disclosure: I looked up the most popular Social Media apps to generate this list - I'd never even heard of a few of those, and I didn't include some of the Chinese ones...

The point being - you have your "hoards of cannibal pedophiles" and "mind controlling big pharma" to be scared of.... I have my social media autobots (who target me with advertising targeted to my every move)... there's a boogey-man in everyone's life, I guess,

But those apps are all free for a reason - you are profiled by their algorithms, and then targeted. Not just with ads, you're also targeted with information - ANYTHING to keep you connected to their app longer!

@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:

@bi4smooth Again, nobody cares about your opinion, and to add, nobody cares about your feelings. Sorry. Big Pharma is a disgusting institution that you THINK is run by scientists, but have corporate boards, which you just don't get. You just don't get it.

If getting it means I have to live my life in fear of all the evils you have articulated over the past weeks (much less months), then I'm happy to live in oblivion...

Like I said: your life - as you describe it - really sucks.

@manhandler said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@bi4smooth Oh, so you're basing your belief system off of politician's words. How stupid are you? I guess if it fits the narrative that you wanna believe, it's the truth. That isn't delusional AT ALL. Let's just all stand down and say, "the democrats and Rinos SAID, it's all good." They have no vested interest in power, whatsoever. Jesus you are fucking stupid.

You just do not understand our Government, do you....
There really isn't any excuse for your level of ignorance, given the vociferousness of your claims.

Supervisors of Elections are considered non-political. In many jurisdictions, the "party affiliation" of candidates is not allowed to be on the ballot. That doesn't mean that candidates cannot belong to a political party, but it does mean that the position is apolitical.

That said, just listen to yourself! I could understand a level of distrust if these Supervisors were Democrats... but they aren't! And in GA, the whole damned State is run by Republicans, save for the Atlanta area! They recounted the whole damned State - and Trump lost... so they counted again (manually) - and Trump STILL lost!

I get it: your definition of a "free and fair election" is one where your candidate wins, no matter what.

Yeah... that's the ticket! (You ARE a John Lovett fan, aren't you... come on, admit that, at least!)

@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:

@bi4smooth Oh, sure! You sound like a spokesperson for Big Pharma. You literally act like they're "science," when science changes every day. I'm not even reading everything you posted because you start out with nonsense nonsequitor bullshit. Oh yes, I'm sure you'll wait for the "reviewed research," by the same people that spout off all day that there are too many people and we're overpopulated and we're killing the Earth. They certainly are most definitely interested in your well-being and not their corporate trillions. God damn you're dumb.

I am educated enough to know about how dumb I really am... you, however, are just sad... is there any crackpot conspiracy theory you DON'T believe?

I must say, if we were to take as fact that we're both delusional, I'd much rather live in my delusion - where there aren't armies of cannibalistic pedophiles in positions of power trying to inject me with DNA-altering drugs...

I'm just saying: your life - your world - as you describe it, really sucks!
I'm glad I don't live in that world...

@manhandler said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@bi4smooth Oh really? Then why bother with a forensic audit using science and technology? It's just a bunch of unhappy Trump supporters that are unhappy with the results and can't let it go. Bullshit. We know thousands of dead people voted. We know that there were more ballots than voters. We know lots of things. And you're delusional. It's the fox guarding the hen house and it's obvious. You're just wrong.

I don't claim to know all that much about the audits - I've not said that I have audited a single ballot.

I have repeated the statements of the Republican Supervisor of Elections of Maricopa County, AZ what she and her staff completed a machine recount "audit", and then a manual recount "audit" of the 2020 election results.... and found no evidence of fraud.

Those are her statements - I've never claimed them as otherwise.

The delusional part of this isn't the audit itself, but rather the belief that the result - whatever it is - is somehow going to trigger some cascade of events where Trump is reinstalled as President. THAT is delusional.

@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:

@hubrys Nope, I've had about 20 vaccines in my life, and this one is not by definition, a vaccine. It's just not. It modifies the genes and is totally different. It's not what you think it is, and you think that way because trillion dollar drug companies told you so.

You moron. The mRNA vaccines do not change the genetic material in your body!

The mRNA is how they make the vaccine, not what it does to you!

The resulting mRNA material is specially designed to "teach" your immune system to recognize a very specific protein as an "intruder"... that protein isn't the virus itself, just one component of the virus... but, since your body's immune system is already "attuned" to that protein, when the virus DOES invade the body, the immune system is "ready and waiting'.

Indeed, one of the reasons the vaccine is injected deep into your muscle (usually in your arm) is to prevent it (the vaccine itself) from spreading all over your body... the pain most people feel in the muscle where it is injected is because that's where the immune response is, and part of that immune response is inflammation.

If they wanted it to "course throughout your body" it would be injected into your bloodstream - like antibiotics are when you get them via "IV" injection.

And if I'm going to be gone by 2025, and literally HALF the US population is as well, then you're going to need an awful lot of immigrants to come in and make all this shit work! LOL

As for the crackpot who made the projection that those who took the vaccines would be dead by 2025, well he made an incredibly stupid remark given that the vaccines made by Moderna & Pfizer - while both utilizing the mRNA technology - are different (target different proteins), and that they are wholly unrelated to the "traditional" vaccines made by Johnson & Johnson, or the Russians, or the Chinese, or the Australians, or the Indians... indeed many other countries developed their OWN vaccines - ALL of which would be different from each other.

I'll begin to worry when reviewed research shows there are problems.

In the meantime, I'm protected from COVID-19, and a whole lot of Trumpites in Red States are getting sick again!

@manhandler said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:

@bi4smooth And what part of what you just said is factual? The part where you think Trump is a loser? Nobody gives a fuck about your opinion. It's like a snowflake, or an asshole.

You are moronic and (again) incapable of reasoned conversation.

Twice is enough.

@manhandler said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@bi4smooth No. They did not. Why don't you put your teeth where your mouth is and back up anything you say? You can't. You just claim crap that isn't true.

ROFL - A Trumpite, QAnon believer claiming others spout crap that isn't true.

Read any LEGITIMATE coverage of the Cyber Ninja audit - that includes the back-story of the Maricopa County Supervisor of Elections (a Republican), and you'll confirm my statement: they audited the results TWICE: once with a machine recount, and once in a manual recount.

The same happened in GA! Only in GA, it was STATEWIDE!

@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:

@bi4smooth Everything you just said is your opinion. "Trump is a loser." Wow. I guess I'm incapable of arguing against your opinion! Wow. That makes you SUPER smart, doesn't it? You didn't insert one fact into all that opinion. You defend the Democrats calling them "smart." "Magical" is another word you use. Who the hell do you think you are? There are no numbers, no factual datas, no nothing. Just "sore loser" and "democrats impeached him" so it's "SORE." What part of that was factual? None of it. It's all your delusional "OPINION." "What remains to be seen is whether he has trashed the Trump Brand." Ok... So what part of what you just said is factual? None of it. Just none.

You truly are illiterate, aren't you...

Sad little man... sad...

For the record: The dems lost in 2016... (fact) and were mad as hell (opinion), because Hillary was supposed to win handily (fact). They were smart only in that they didn't match the lunacy of the Trumpian challenge to the whole electoral process (to Democracy itself!) (fact)...

And the "magical thinking" (opinion) is attributed to the Trumpites, like yourself, who think that Trump will somehow be re-installed as the rightful winner of the 2020 election. That is impossible (fact).

Trump lost in 2020 (fact). Trump is a loser (fact). Trump can't handle the fact that he lost (fact-based, but opinion-based as well). Trump is a sore-loser (opinion).

You're an idiot (opinion) for not being able to gleam this from the posting above (fact).

@manhandler said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:

@bi4smooth No, you see, the problem is, you say one thing, but then out of the other side of your mouth, you reveal yourself. Why bother? You're not convincing us. The Democratic Party is the most disgusting, the most filthy organization to exist on the face of the planet, next to the Vatican. Nobody is putting words in your mouth. Every time a liberal does something shitty, you either have nothing to say, or deflect. Why don't you answer the post about Lori Lightfoot's Chicago? Why not about Uygher Genocide in China? Just for starters. You don't because you're complicit in the coverup.

You are moronic and (again) incapable of reasoned conversation.

I've never once claimed any intention of convincing you of anything! You may as well try to convince the Pope that there is no God!

Your entire reason for living right now is knowing in your heart of hearts that your Lord and Savior, Donald Trump, isn't a failure and a loser, but in fact was the victim in a broad (81 million voter broad), far-reaching (aliens, if i'm to belive some Qanon fanatics) conspiracy.

But that doesn't mean I'm going to sit back and let you bad-mouth honest, America-loving Republicans who have come to the unwanted, but true, conclusion that Trump lost the election in 2020, and for the first time in Presidential Election history, did so while his party WON in a majority of lower-level balloting.

So, you keep spouting your lies and I'll keep answering them (to a point)... you really are getting to the bottom of your intellectual capacity, which starts to make this just sad and boring...

@manhandler said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@bi4smooth No, they were not audited fully or forensically. Period. They were audited fractionally. I posted a quote here by Jovan Pulitzer earlier this week that you ignore: "You cannot find fraud in a fraction. When a bank does an audit, they don't just count the tens. They count the twenties, the fifties, and the hundreds, every single dollar. The audit you refer to was not a true audit. Votes are like money." Say you audit 1,000 ballots in one county... What if the fraud was in the other 100,000 ballots somewhere. It's just ridiculous that you try to say such garbage.

You stupid F**k... Maricopa County did a complete audit - and a complete manual recount - in the 2020 election aftermath.

I suggest you check your facts.

BTW: Georgia just told you and your ilk to go fly a kite... get used to it!

@manhandler said in AZ Lawmaker tells Garland that he BETTER NOT touch AZ ballots.:

@bi4smooth You're implying that Trump stole the 2016 election or what? You sound like Hillary. Who paid a British agent, who paid a Russian operative, who overheard a story from two guys in a bar. It's just dumb.

Jeeze... you're incapable of intelligent conversation, aren't you...

DEMOCRATS claimed Trump stole the election in 2016. But they were smart enough to realize that after he was sworn in, their only recourse was to impeach him - which they managed to do TWICE!

Trump, and is Trumpster Divers, like yourself, aren't so smart. You seem to think that there is some other MAGICAL way that Trump is going to be put back into office.

Trump is a loser. And a SORE loser at that.

What REALLY remains to be seen is whether he has actually trashed the only REAL asset he had coming into office in 2016: the "Trump Brand"...

@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:

@bi4smooth

I am against cancel culture UNLESS it is used against a person that has practiced it themselves against others.

You, on the other hand, believe that it's ok to use CC against others, as long as you are a liberal. Once you are found out to be a piece of shit, you must be shielded from CC because you are a liberal.

I believe in equality and you believe in special rights.

You are illiterate.

My quote JUST BEFORE your claim that I like Cancel Culture was literally

• The problem here is you LOVE Cancel Culture when it goes against Liberals, and you hate it when it hurts Trump... I dislike it all of the time, no matter who it's aimed at - including Trump!

So, your claim that I believe it's ok to use CC against others is farcical on its face.

Your tactics of purposefully putting other words into my mouth (e.g. dressing me up to be your straw man) is getting old, repetitive, and boring.

@manhandler said in Why try to suppress the Audit? If it's all good...:

@bi4smooth It's not a straw man, which you keep blabbering on about. Not one Democrat has challenged the fact that the audit is on 13 or so cameras, live for the world to see, totally transparent, triple checked. The only thing they can say is that the Republicans are funding it so therefore it's not legit. It's not only that, but they're giving tours to anyone interested to see if they aren't doing it right. They are doing everything under a microscope and showing everyone everything they're finding, so the idea that you'd complain is ridiculous.

You don't actually read what I type, do you.

That's why I referenced a "straw man"...

The Arizona elections were already audited - by professionals - TWICE. Including a manual recount.

This ain't that - but my complaint isn't that it's happening... it's that it is so clearly partisan, and invested solely in proving that something DID happen - not in determining whether or not something happened.

Auditors don't go in looking for some specific cheat... they go in looking for the POSSIBILITY of a cheat! And they are (by their code of ethics) supposed to be just as open to the idea that there is no cheat, as that there is one.

This ain't that.

Republicans - more and more, even those in AZ - are beginning to say the same things...

Oh, and the millions of dollars being spent (mostly earned and kept by the miscreant owner of "Cyber Ninjas", Doug Logan - a Trumpite who said at the beginning of the process that he was there to find the fraud (not determine if there WAS fraud).

But this dude has been collecting $MILLIONS in "donations" - even though the VAST MAJORITY of the people doing the "auditing" are volunteers (e.g. unpaid).

And to be clear, the Republican Party of AZ is not a part of this farce, it is a group of AZ Republican Senators who are driving this "Crazy bus"...

But there is nothing illegal about this fraud (yes, in my mind, the one committing the fraud here is Doug Logan & Cyber Ninjas)... at least not yet. Once the precedent of this "hits the road" - and Democrats start doing the same things in future elections, this shit will come to a stop. "Freedom of Information" will cease to include actual ballots... (just my prediction).

But, for now, it is perfectly legal, if a colossal waste of time... esp since this is a "witchhunt" more than an "audit" (for the reasons I laid out above).

@raphjd said in Y Libs SO silent? They can't answer!:

@bi4smooth

Please, you haven't added anything to the politics section that I can't get from AOC's Instagram.

Just because you don't like the truth, about your High Priestess, doesn't make it a lie.

I don't support AOC, and you don't think I do either.

Your inflammatory, self-serving, self-deluding comments are (at the risk of repeating myself from @manhandler above) getting boring.

@manhandler said in Y Libs SO silent? They can't answer!:

@bi4smooth Yea, you said, name one person on the DNC side... So I said Stacey Abrams. Then you said, she's not contesting anymore, Raph replied correctly that yes she is, and I'll add that she did just last week. So you are actually and factually incorrect, a double whammy against you for not knowing what the hell is going on.

You are so inept at debating a topic that you're boring.

@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:

@bi4smooth Oh like you need cable to watch Rachel Mad-Cow. Hello, it's called the internet. Ever heard of Youtube?

Yes, I know YouTube - but to watch their shows on YouTube would imply that I'm searching for that content!

I am not interested!

I no more want to watch Rachel Maddow than I want to watch Tucker Carlson.
They are not news, they are "opinion" shows... and I don't need their feeble, partisan interpretations of the news.

Call me Joe Friday... "Just the facts, ma'am"...
(Reference: 1960's TV cop show called "Dragnet")

@raphjd said in "You Trump supporters are TERRORISTS!" Roll eyes. Ridiculous.:

@bi4smooth

YES, you support innocent politicians being politically punished. So when the Repubs get in office, you will keep totally silent when they impeach every single Dem.

Of course, not. You only support political punishment for those you don't like.

First of all, impeachment is just the first step - like being charged with a crime (though, in this case, it's more of a political crime)... then you have a trial!

You may have heard of those... they present evidence?

Not like the crowds chanting "Hang Mike Pence!" - they didn't have (and didn't need) evidence!

BTW: I've yet to ever meet an "innocent" politician... in my experience, they all turn out to be crooks eventually! It's a job that just brings out the worst in most people....