@di3di3di3 said in Goodbye, SlamRush:
i digress. what is issue with these providers /censors?? they deemed themselves worthy to choose what is allowed and what isn't?? is bb sex without testing/prep any safer than what this site had?? why are such bb sites allowed to run and have been allowed to run?? majoral stupidity.
adults can choose what to do with their bodies and as a non drug user myself, i believe in free will and choice.
ps : in countries where public health systems are in place to offer free healthcare, i think it gets more complicated, but the site was run in USA so it doesnt affect any taxpayer if a adult chooses to ''get high'' and ''fuck''
Someone who is high is incapable (at least in US case law) of giving consent.
As @flozen clearly & correctly pointed out, while we mostly know that in the real world kids are getting high, getting fucked (partly why we call it "getting fucked up", no?) -- and sometimes being raped (used in ways they object to and didn't / couldn't consent to)
And let's face it, often the rapists are equally as high...
But, by most accounts, this site tried to INFER that, without actually DOING that...
So, I agree with the majority that the site was "morally offensive" to me... and I'm not "sexually" sorry that it's gone.
HOWEVER - I also do not believe that a BANK should be the one making those decisions. So I am "intellectually" (in the sense of wanting to keep a free and open society) sorry that it left us this way - and I would like to see steps taken to curtail the ability of banks to do this to other businesses.