Posts made by strangeloop

I'll tell you what, make a new post in a separate topic criticizing Obama for his dealings with Saudia Arabia and people will take you seriously.

Right now, you have no credibility for your intellectual dishonesty and double standards.

Oh dear lord you doubled down. Obama came up with the deal, Obama sold weapons to them throughout his presidency.  But you can only criticize Trump?

lol hypocrisy on full display here folks.  Sad!

"Obama’s Administration Sold More Weapons Than Any Other Since World War II"

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/obamas-administration-sold-more-weapons-than-any-other-since-world-war-ii

Are you going to criticize Obama now that you know?

@sutieday:

Your post is nonsense, I'm critical of the president and regardless of the party they belong to. I know Obama's admin was working towards the Saudi deal, but Trump was the one who signed it.

Obama didn't just propose a deal, he actively sold weapons to Saudi Arabia throughout his presidency.

Ah, so maybe you were being truthful about criticizing regardless of party, but were just ill informed?  Maybe you would've criticized Obama too, if you knew he also sold billions of dollars to SA?  Yes/no?

@sutieday:

How so? Opening a topic generally means you discuss that topic.

I'm talking about the comment made by the Trump WH towards this terrorist attack, not being partisan, just critical of it.

It's called being Intellectually Honest.

What you are doing is called Intellectual Dishonesty.  It is blatantly obvious to literally everyone that you wouldn't criticize any other democratic president in the same way, because, well you haven't.  Let's see if this post is something anyone could see you writing:

Oh the irony! Barack's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $115 billion+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Iran is fighting ISIS!

How will Libtards defend him?

No, of course not, you didn't write that post at the time, and you would never write that post about Hillary either.

Because, let's face it:

@raphjd:

@sutieday:

Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.

I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.

Your opening post declared your partisan view of the topic.

You didn't want to talk about anything other than Trump.

It's OK when liberals do it.

@Frederick:

Uh.. not quite.   Liberals accept anybody that will result in them picking up a sector of votes and getting donations.  Liberals are much like a group of little children.. who all want daddy (the successful wealthy people) to pay for everything and give them their ice cream and clean their diapers… and if they get a boo boo to make it all better.  If they DON'T get their way, the liberals WHINE and boo hoo hoo.  Just give them a balloon and they are happy again.  They are incapable and unwilling to deal with reality.  They have no consciences and instead follow the polls.  They love to flock together in densely populated inner cities.. because misery loves company.  They prefer to live like rats all huddled together.

That reminds me of the Mouse Utopia experiment.  Yup, living in crowded boxes is bad for bothhuman and mouse.  Humans are not as wise as we think we are.

http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9155

"American University has agreed to give students of color an extension on final exams and establish “a sanctuary for people of color” following a racist incident on campus.

According to The Black Print, about 50 students demonstrated Friday afternoon to protest the administration’s failure to address a list of demands issued by students in response to the racially-motivated hanging of bananas on campus recently, even causing a traffic jam by blocking off access to a parking garage."

Groups similar to Evergreen are being emboldened right now.  Blatantly racist policies are being pushed and administrations are caving because why not?  It's easier to cave, less backlash, and they're still making huge bank off of the system as administrators.

The adminstrators are a problem, small groups of radicalized racist students are a problem, and heck the system is a problem.

@Devken:

So congratulations, you've proven a point. You're just as meaningless a poster as DrWas

Your mind is blown, I'm sure.

Wow!  My mind IS blown!  The first person to call out DrWas.

It's almost as if I know some online debate etiquette!

Yup, I'm intimately familiar.  Which is how I know which buttons to press to get people like you so mad, and to get people to realize how hypocritical they are.  You know my entire post shows clearly how I was doing this on purpose right?  To prove a point, which I think everyone now gets.  HOPEFULLY, the spamming will stop now that it has been beaten to death.  If it doesn't?  Well I'm still here.

@strangeloop:

@Frederick:

After today, and the fallout that will result from it.  The moonbats are in full panic mode and having a meltdown.   They will probably have a secret summit meeting with their gods Barbra Streisand and Jane Fonda to find a new direction.

I had to start a new topic, because the moonbat that posted the other one is boycotting me..   :cry2:

Ay caramba, silly free market capitalists with their boycotts and shiet!

Or should I say Oy vey!  I forgot which one was least politically correct.

@Frederick:

After today, and the fallout that will result from it.  The moonbats are in full panic mode and having a meltdown.   They will probably have a secret summit meeting with their gods Barbra Streisand and Jane Fonda to find a new direction.

I had to start a new topic, because the moonbat that posted the other one is boycotting me..   :cry2:

Ay caramba, silly free market capitalists with their boycotts and shiet!

@Frederick:

@Frederick:

@sutieday:

@Drwas:

plummeting Monday morning, well below the margin of error compared to the rising level of support for impeachment. The results follow Trump's controversial decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord; the ongoing investigation into his campaign’s possible ties to the Kremlin is also a factor.

The president's approval rating dipped from nearly 42 percent to just 36 percent over the weekend, according to a Gallup daily tracking poll published Monday. Trump's declining popularity is inching closer toward his all-time low of 35 percent as president in March, when Gallup had the president’s approval at just 35 percent. What's more, nearly 43 percent of American voters support the idea of beginning the official impeachment process for Trump, according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll published Wednesday.

http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-impeachment-support-odds-removal-approval-rating-white-house-620913

I wasn't polled, but I too support Trump's removal from office. Unfortunately, Trump is not likely to be removed from office as he is the puppet master's useful idiot.

You should be poled.

WHOOPS!  you said polled.  I was thinking of what Vlad Tepes used to do to his dinner guests.

lol

To recap, DrWas continually spammed this forum for almost two days straight with low effort posts.  Liberals refused to call him out, and one person even doubled down:

And I wholly disagree with you on posting an article title and quotes from an article without stating a personal claim on said title and/or quotes.  
…
Why not discuss the merits of that article? Why not make an attempt to prove the article wrong? If a professor prompts the class on a topic, your first response shouldn't be, "this topic is stupid in my opinion; therefore, I want the topic dead."

Okay, so maybe they'll be consistent?  Maybe they'll accept other people doing the exact same thing?  Maybe I have the definition of spamming wrong?

Nope.  They refuse to criticize DrWas, but  in direct response to someone on the other side doing the exact same thing, they let the insults, shitposting and absolute childishness flow freely.

Just a few out of the many examples:

• Strangeloop is Frederick.  I'm certain of it.  I have a strict policy about ignoring Frederick and will be ignoring Strangeloop too.

• Strangeloop and Frederick are the same person right? (Nothing against Frederick, but calling someone a sockpuppet of someone else is just childish)

• I wonder what state secrets traitor tRump will hand over this time?

• Traitor tRump will be impeached very soon!

• tRump SUCKS bigly

• Are you tweaking?

• Funny that none of the repigliKKKlans here seem to want to discuss this.

• RepigliKKKlans are corrupt SCUM

To be fair, one person did eventually apologize.  But the majority did not, and NONE of the liberals on this forum called out DrWas, who did the same thing.

In short, this forum has become so toxic and incivil because of liberals who refuse to call out their own.  Even when your side are clearly in the wrong, being violent and threatening other people, such as at Evergreen, such as at Berkeley, such as Kathy Griffin.  You guys refuse to speak up.

You guys are treating politics as if it is a team sport, only cheering when your side makes a good point, never criticizing your team for foul play.  You like to have one set of rules for your own team, and a wholly different set of rules for the other team.

Not just on these forums, but in the wider political discourse.

It's a worrying trend to put it mildly.

@aadam101:

Strangeloop is Frederick.  I'm certain of it.  I have a strict policy about ignoring Frederick and will be ignoring Strangeloop too.

Cool, more echo chamber for you!

@royalcrown89:

Flipping out on reporters after being asked simple questions is showing restraint.

Have any specific event in mind?  The first search result was this: http://americablog.com/2017/02/trump-flips-jewish-reporter-asking-anti-semitism.html

In which he didn't actually """flip out""", despite the click bait title lol.  And also? The reporter later said he wasn't even offended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YK2Rl2je-Q

@abcddddd:

@strangeloop:

I understand, I'm sure it must have been very complex and intricate for you to say that it would require more effort to explain than the nonsense you just typed.

I came back to apologize. You asked for civility, albeit in a questionably uncivil way. I feel bad for being so condescending.

I hope you have a good night.

Have a good night too!

@aadam101:

Donald Trump is a man of faith.

"Righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no distinction, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." Romans 3:23

I'm not even Christian, and even I know the obvious response.

sexual assault victims.

Straight up lies.  SJWs always lie.

@royalcrown89:

But seriously, he showed great restraint today given today's events. I and many others would actually like it if he showed this much restraint on a day-to-day basis because it looks more presidential than freaking out on Twitter over everything.

He is actually very "restrained" almost all of the time.  Go through the White House channel and pick literally any of his addresses to the American people.  They're all exceedingly restrained.  The only reason you think he's not "restrained" is because the media cherry picks and total non-stories and exaggerates everything.  "Covfefe" anyone?  Two scoops of ice cream anyone?

@royalcrown89:

I have always held the belief that his actions make him look guilty

Got it.  Feelz over realz.

@royalcrown89:

I never in this thread claimed the president himself was being investigated. Do you see otherwise?

Yes.

If the president does this, it will make him look guiltier.

Guiltier or what?  If he wasn't under investigation, as you say, how can he be guilty?