Topics created by strangeloop

@raphjd:

I'm not an EX-classic liberal, I am a classic liberal.

I refuse to wear the liberal name tag because of what modern liberals have done to it.

++++

Let's not forget the threads that called out conservative members, which were before this thread.    Would you have been happy if I punished those users?    I think not.

One of the rules is about lying about other users and staff.  Twice no Sutie has publicly accused me of using my admin status to "dox" him.  The first time it was explained that it was info open to all.    Shall I punish him for it, like I did for the last person who did a similar thing?  Liberals would have a fit.

Both sides have done many wrongs, but it's the liberals that are always crying for their enemies to by punished, while ignoring the sins of their own.

Here you go again with your "shoe on the other foot" arguments. I do not pretend to speak for others, but as for me, if you explained to sutie that the voting statistics were available to all and how to access them, and he again accused you of doxxing him, then he should have been reprimanded.  As for my own topics calling out certain member's  BEHAVIORS, I felt I had no recourse since there had been no response to my reports to the moderator and the perceived abuses continued to escalate.  If I remember correctly, I did not use the offending person's name, nor did I attack them personally in the title of the topic, the OP or thread, only the manner they chose to express their opinions.  If you, as moderator, thought the topic to be inappropriate and closed it or even deleted it, I would not have minded, because at least I would have been assured that my message had reached its intended target.  Hell, I would have accepted a warning if it meant my message was heard.

Now let me contrast the title of my topic complaining about mhorndisk with strangeloop's about Sutie.  I can't find mine exactly right now, but it  was something like "Replying to your own Posts," whereas his is "Sutieday surpasses Drwas as the biggest Troll on these Forums." Within my thread, I don't remember even calling mhorndisk a spammer, much less a troll throughout my entire thread. If strangeloop had started the thread with :downvoting has become Robotic, or some such thing relating to the offense rather than the offender, it would have been much less objectionable.

I don't know if you can setup a send-only email account on this site or any other.  If not I suggest you setup a gmail account that you will never read but would use only as administrator of the forum.  I think if we could get answers to our reports to the moderator, even if they are just a few words, you would see much less, if any, complaints about your role as moderator posted publicly.

Finally, again speaking for myself, I am not interested in having anyone "punished." The most I have sought was correction of behaviors that offend me and compliance with the rules to which we all  agree.

The number of injured officers has increased to 500.

Source: https://sherbrooktimes.com/g20-close-to-500-police-officers-injured-in-total-in-hamburg/9407

Source: https://www.ft.com/content/7a001566-648a-11e7-8526-7b38dcaef614

Is this OK with liberals on this board?  Are liberals still going to argue that conservative violence is anywhere near far-left violence?

@pppucci:

I am not saying he was the aggressor,

You very clearly chose your diction to suggest that the victim was the initial aggressor.  Here are words in case you forgot:

I already debunked your beer-bottle bar brawl as nothing more than a guy pushing another guy's girl and getting into a fight.

I respect your intelligence enough to respond as best I can with citations and statistics.  Respect mine enough to not playing these retarded word games and lie about what you said, because this is uninteresting and tedious.

It is only pertinent to the extent that it acts as a "character witness."  I am not condoning his crimes.

I realize that this protest was organized by the left and turned into a riot. I realize that both sides :engaged." And while this event certainly promoted the concept of liberal violence, this particular encounter shows "conservatives" not only engaging in violence, but engaging in two of the most despicable and cowardly acts in "fist-fighting."–-punching a woman, and kicking someone when they are down.

If it was on YouTube, it would have been caught, just like they did with CNN.

CNN still downplayed her message, in the "corrected" reporting.

CNN had an agenda in the way they originally edited and reported the story.

They only "fixed" it because they got caught, not because it was the honest thing to do.

@raphjd:

As we saw in a previous thread about hate crimes, it's a massive case of over reporting.

If a 1 eyed, 3 nippled, trans, lesbian, muslim, woman is mugged (no hate based intent, just robbery) it's still recorded as 6 separate hate crimes.

Hate crimes are always listed against the right, even when it's 4 blacks against a mentally challenged white male.

Thanks.  I have been making this argument about the OP.  The man was attacked because he pushed the other guy's girlfriend, not because he was wearing a MAGA hat.

Believing that gays don't deserve equality, of any kind, is prejudice.

It was funny that for 30'ish years, in the UK, I couldn't get married but muslims could have 5 wives, despite the law banning bigamy and polygamy.  Special rights for some, while denying equal rights to others.

I think the correlation is too broad.  There is no evidence that the guy attacked in Philadelphia because he would not "bow" to liberals. I am sure he either got in their fgace, or was attacked by thugs who were just looking for an excuse to commit violence.

As for the post that I thought has misplaced bracket, your reply to my post appears in the same grey box as my quoted post.  Since it is not in a black background, it does not appear as a reply, but as part of the my quted post.  I know those words are not mine. It looks to me like you wrote your reply above the
"" code.

@strangeloop:

Questions for liberals – is this bald faced bias acceptable to you?

Looks like a funeral at which everybody there found out they were dis-inherited.

Queer for Muslims = Nazi Jew.

Nothing is more stupid and hypocritical than a SJW.

Let's see, POCs get this, but whites don't.  White privilege.  :crazy2:

Drwas doesn't have the balls to discuss any topic.  He just posts some crap article then hides while down voting his enemies.

@aadam101:

Strangeloop is Frederick.  I'm certain of it.  I have a strict policy about ignoring Frederick and will be ignoring Strangeloop too.

You sure don't ignore me blue waffle.  And just how many people are you going to say are me?  According to you, I must have at least 4 accounts here.  Anybody who agrees with Trump is called Hitler, and anybody who is intelligent is accused of being me.

@sutieday:

There is no Politics or Debate in this thread!

Free SPB tho 🙂

Youse a liburul.  Happy now?