Posts made by SemenDemon

Yes, it's true. Hillary Clinton is a sociopathic witch. She makes Trump look positively "okay" by comparison. But what is the point of endless threads like this?

Look, I'm glad this ambitiously, psychotically self-serving phony didn't win. But don't expect me to lose my shit and jump on the Trump train just because of it. Even if I were in love with the man, he's already won. The election is over. Settle down. The only people left standing by Clinton are lying scum and idiot rubes.

I'm more concerned about people on both sides who could have a more direct impact on things in the near future (The Elizabeth Warren Marxist Liberals and Mike Pence PTL Club Conservatives, both of which have massive wealth and influence behind them). Hillary will most certainly continue to use her wealth ad influence to con the public and to get people like Warren (or even her own daughter) elected to political offices, but she's hardly a threat outside of that anymore as far as I'm concerned. I mean, she's not going to be the president at this point.

@raphjd:

These bitches would be hated today, but feminists still portray them as saints.

Well, contemporary (1960's+) feminist logic would tell you that "It's the 'sins of the the father', not the mother". In other words, you get a pass for being a poor, oppressed woman. You can't be held accountable for anything. Every wrong action can somehow be attributed entirely to someone or something else ("the patriarchy", "privilege", "capitalism", etc.). Things get even dicier when you bring Intersectionalism into the picture.

To be honest, I haven't heard the speeches you're referring to (let alone the quote the OP posted), nor am I especially motivated to seek them out to confirm your claim. I'm perfectly content to bitch about the hypocrisy and Cultural Marxist doublethink within certain sects of modern feminism, though.

The irony of therealajrey having his totally unhinged, possibly borderline meltdown in this thread was not lost on me. I have to say, I found it amusing, and that's not just me being catty.

I'm embarrassed to confess this openly, because it's pretty sleazy and nasty and over the top. But I really want to suck off and swallow a bunch of guys' loads. Enough that I can feel my stomach becoming filled with their cum. Like, enough guys that I end up swallowing a pint of jizz! :bj2: :-[

You need help. :blink:

@nolimitfag:

wet ones, with electronic ones you'll leave hair everywhere on sink , ew.

I have a short trash bin in the bathroom where I shave, and I set that on the sink while shaving. The bulk of my hair falls off into that.
I typically use a personal shaver because my skin is very sensitive. Once in a blue moon, I'll do a wet shave, but it's pretty rare, because I don't like the skin irritation it causes.

I'm content with the personal shaver, even though it doesn't achieve nearly as close of a shave as a razor.

Certainly not surprising… I mean, I didn't know, or even suspect (or even care), but it's no shock to hear it.
I am not any more of a fan now than I already wasn't because of this.

I'm "pro-choice" (read: pro-abortion). I believe in the right of women to have an abortion. I don't, however, believe in tarting it up by substituting words like "choice" for the name of the actual procedure (I can't think of any example apart from abortion where this is done–purely for political reasons, I might add). Abortion is frankly a pretty benign issue for me. It doesn't even warrant such manipulative linguistic games.

It's only partial birth abortion that I have any reservations about. And even that I support under most circumstances, regardless of my lack of enthusiasm for the topic.

I prefer guys close to my own age, but that doesn't mean older guys are out of the question either. I'm still young, though. I think ~55 would probably be my current age limit, though I'm sure that number will go up as I get older. As long as an older guy is healthy, and not a geriatric skeleton, I am not that concerned with numbers.

I can't get into any of the "new" Doctor Who series at all. I can't get into much of any action/sci-fi/fantasy stuff from the 90's on. Everyone's dialog is written like that of comic book characters (fitting for comics and kids animated television, but generally insufferable in live action film and TV), and all the affected, snappy one-liners are interspersed with so much exaggerated soap opera melodrama. It's become an epidemic in modern fantasy/sci-fi (see: The CW, new Doctor Who, every single thing Joss Whedon touches, every single superhero movie made since the 90's, etc.)… I can't take it!

But I didn't come here just to bitch... I do like older Doctor Who series.

@cannonmc:

Heavens, life is complicated enough without having to invent problems.

/thread

@raphjd:

When a man does something bad, it's "toxic masculinity".

That's only if a non-white male does it. When a white person does something bad, it's good old fashioned racism/sexism every time. And don't forget, whitey invented toxic masculinity!

@raphjd:

Real trans-sexuals aren't the problem/issue.  It's the gender trenders, gender terrorists and all the other ass clowns.

Of course not.

In my admittedly limited experience, all the honest, uncontrived, "real" trans people that I've known personally can't stand these utterly fucking impossible "trans trender" and "gender terrorist" types.  Because "real" transgender/LGBTXYZ individuals don't build their whole identity/ego around "being trans" or "being LGBTBBQ". They actually have lives and substantial personalities outside of that. That, and a halfway decent sense of humor.

Not really funny or catchy, so much as it is nonsensical:
Lovable Furry Savage.

"Lovable Furry" was a calico cat from when I was a little kid (I didn't name her). We also had two dogs: Suzie, a doberman, and Broccoli, a black lab. "Suzie Savage" works for a female name, though it sounds a bit hackneyed.

@lovebearlove:

@SemenDemon:

I'm not into casual sex, and I'm not into having multiple partners, but I do not care if my partner does. I'm really easy-going, as long as people give me the basic respect and consideration I deserve. Honestly and consideration are what matter to me in a serious relationship. That's really the only thing I ask of guys who want a "serious LTR" with me.

Cheating (in other words, lying) and taking advantage of my good nature really pisses me off. But I don't consider it cheating or taking advantage if my partner is upfront about it.

but would it be so unfair for u? as ur partner has an open relationship with u while ur not

Nope. As long as they're honest and with me, I don't care. I don't expect hourly bone reports and constantly being told where they are and what they are doing, just that they let me know whether or not I should wait around for them, if it's okay with me to have someone over, etc. And would I expect them to use protection for hook-ups, if only for my own sake. That's not even up for discussion. I'd expect that of anyone worth being with as part of a committed relationship. I fully comprehend why people would think this sounds weird, "unfair" or like being taken advantage of. But openness and communication is really the mitigating factor of all that for me. Also, the fact that I'm really not into flings or multiple partners means I don't feel like I'm "missing out" or being cheated of anything.

Truth be told, in my perfect fantasy world, I'd be with a guy that's into single-partner relationships like I am. But guys like that seems to be incredibly uncommon. I'd rather have a guy who is honest about having multiple partners than one who lies about it. Seems like the best compromise. I am not prone to jealousy or insecurity in relationships, just so long as I don't feel like I'm being manipulated or lied to. I don't need to "have" my partner completely. Only to feel like I have someone who I can trust and be myself with, and who can trust in and be themselves with me as well. While I like the idea of sex with someone I'm that close with, I can even live without that. I'd rather have an intense platonic relationship over a casual, disconnected sexual one. I guess it's fair to say I wouldn't want a partner with multiple committed relationships, but I don't care about flings or "fuck buddies".

"If you're straight and you've never been to a gay club then you're homophobic."

I think that assumption is entirely baseless and totally idiotic.

@semurg30:

more like that feeling a black person probably gets when a white friend feels they've the right to use the N word.  Not the same thing at all

Uh, yeah. Not by a country mile.

I really couldn't give less fucks about it, personally. Frankly, I've got more important shit to worry about. It's only annoying when it's some girl who constantly wants to make a scene of herself for being the "loveable hag" who's "so down" and "omg, loves gay ppl!", as if it's even about her. Fortunately, most straight people don't do that in my experience. There's always going to be that minority of people who do. Yeah, it's misguided and annoying, but it's really not worth having a conniption over. I'm enough of an adult not to get "like, so triggered RN" over something so insignificant.

Full-on bush.

I'm not into casual sex, and I'm not into having multiple partners, but I do not care if my partner does. I'm really easy-going, as long as people give me the basic respect and consideration I deserve. Honestly and consideration are what matter to me in a serious relationship. That's really the only thing I ask of guys who want a "serious LTR" with me.

Cheating (in other words, lying) and taking advantage of my good nature really pisses me off. But I don't consider it cheating or taking advantage if my partner is upfront about it.

@tempbo:

Why would you behave so stupidly, when I might read this and decide never to upload anything here again - because why share with someone like you?

Because that's a very petty attitude to have. I'd expect anyone old enough to be viewing the torrents on this site to be more mature than that. This place is a tracker first and a forum second (possibly third). Punishing the entire community because of one person on the forums who may never even snatch your uploads is just childish.

I'm not so sure about the squealing part, but holding your breath is very normal. In fact, sometimes it can be hard to climax without holding your breath and "pushing". People die of auto-erotic asphyxiation trying to achieve more powerful orgasms by cutting off their oxygen supply manually (with a rope or something), so the phenomenon of holding one's breath is clearly not unusual.

I'm not sure how it works, but I've always guessed it might be that the pressure from holding one's breath causes more blood to flow into the penis (people who are hanged have spontaneous erections… for whatever reason, the strain increases blood flow to the penis). And that increased pressure inside the penis allows for greater stimulation of nerve endings in the glans = more pronounced orgasm.

Take what I say with a grain of salt, because I haven't studied this stuff in depth at all. Everything I've said is based on second-hand knowledge and intuition.