Topics created by raphjd

@Drwas:

The only high ground the right have is the mountain off bullshit they produce.

the right wing has been manufacturing a jet-force stream of bullshit since at least the 1960's and it's astonishing that people still sip that poison tbqh.

You're right, most have been proven true due to government declassification.    That kills the argument of "the government can't keep anything secret".

Alex Jones proved himself right about the Bilderbergs and Bohemian Grove.  I haven't paid attention to his other CTs, but we now know the ridicule he got for over a decade was totally unjust.

It was never my intent for this thread, but it just got me thinking about something else.  We do we say that we can't accept CTs without proof, but we readily accept things like the UVA rape lie?  CTs need absolute proof to be declared true, but other things we accept countless lies as part of the "truth".

@magentas:

First of all, YOU are a SJW.
Here you are, constantly doing battle based on your political beliefs.
That makes you a SJW.

That's not the defining characteristic of a SJW.  Go look up the definition.

Youtube Video

Fascism has always been a tool of the left wing socialists.

@raphjd:

Not surprisingly, the liberals still won't condemn their fellow liberals for telling lies about me, and others.

It says everything about liberals.

While my leanings are liberal (but not always)- I for one condemn personal attacks since they are pointless and accomplish nothing. I respect that you've got your views and the better you express them, the more respect I have.

For whichever side you're on- at least be well informed and more open minded. Otherwise there's no point in having a discussion. As for lies- the most frustrating thing is that these past months and years have seen the erosion of the line between lies and truth so much, it's always a struggle to tell them apart- but we should never stop trying.

@Waltfore:

I usually don't post in these threads, but as a black male living in Detroit I can tell you all that Black on Black crime does exist (I'm not sure if that was a joke or not). We can't go one day here without hearing about how someone was shot on the news, and if it's not shooting it's people stealing from eachother. And a good amount of the time unfortunately it's bystanders and kids that are hurt and it's over stupid crap. There are people who are trying to help out in the community and church leaders and such, but ironically there was a BLM event here where someone started a fight.

For the record, I hate the term "Black Lives Matter.", especially when someone touting the mantra is going around killing anyone no matter what color. I also find it weird how some people jump on the "we need to come together as black people" bandwagon (not saying all do this) when if it's any other day of the week or any other situation they wouldn't really give a damn. As it is, I'm more cautious around people I don't know personally that share my skin color than anyone else, and I know people and unfortunately have family members that were killed by other black people for stupid reasons. I just thought I'd throw in my two cents. After thinking about it, maybe Black on Black isn't the right term after all. It seems like it's just crime in general. I don't know. In any case, I think all the violence needs to stop but unfortunately it's not going to happen.

I hope you know that most black people and all SJWs hate you.

@bostonpolar:

@Dene:

As I said it was in response to your comment re: violence - you said a few men get hit and i said so that discounts women?? THAT was my point - I have said to you 100x - it was IN CONTEXT

_As a gay man who was physically and emotionally abused by his male partner for many years, I want to say I wish when it comes to domestic violence that raphjd would just shut the fuck-up with his utterly willful-Ignorance and Stupidity on this subject.

But he obviously lacks the empathy to do so.

And NO, I will not discuss this further._

. . .

How pathetic.  You flame me, then say you refuse to discuss the topic.  Technically, you are spamming based on your own words.

Hmm, so you must be a woman then, because my "willful-ignorance" on the subject is that domestic violence is not a gendered issue.      Only ignorant anti male sexist ass clowns say it is.

I don't mind colleges giving credit for some sort of learning experience like a protest but what exactly are they getting out of this?  It's gross.

@Spintendo:

Sorry to disappoint you Henny Penny—but the sky is not falling.  :cheerup:

This suggestion came about when a pregnant patient born anatomically female but who identifies as male did not wish to be called "mother" several times during his visit with clinicians. An advisory notice was circulated, gently reminding clinicians that these rare instances can occur, and suggested not using labels like mother when interacting with them.

But 1 person requires a rule change?

Will they add "attack helicopter" to the tick box list for sex?  If not, why not?

Why won't the BMA bow down to me and tell everyone to refer to my hair color as  "similar to a sofa I once saw"?

WOW, who would have thunk it.  A liberal with no argument, just personal attacks.

You proved my point about liberals refusing to have any discussion.  THANK!!!! :cheers:

Man…

I don't know if I should laugh at this poor sod...or weep because there are actually people like him who refuse to take responsibility of their acts (and then come up with these far-fetched excuses)

Yeah, he's a crap speaker.  He's not so bad when he has rehearsed script.  He's a pretty good writer though, even if nothing he says or writes can ever be trusted.

I still don't understand why TYT hired this fraud.  Did they think that hiring him would give them street cred with blacks?  It was blacks who named him Talcum X.

iam very confused

:afr:

@raphjd:

http://www.fox32chicago.com/news/crime/227116738-story

4 blacks knidnap a mentally disabled white guy, yelling FUCK TRUMP and FUCK WHITE PEOPLE.    Oh yeah, the police aren't sure if it's a hate crime, despite the video evidence.

YouTube and Facebook keep removing the video.   I guess because it makes blacks look bad or something.

It make you wonder why no left leaning "news" outlet is talking about this.   Could this be the reason why so many SJWs claim they don't know things like this are happening?

it certainly doesn't help that it's being called the BLM kidnapping because it's not that.

you have a very good point but everyone on the internet is going to act like they know everything that happened and bullshit isnt' fixed with more bullshit.

@Eridanos:

Well, at least it shows that there are women who actually advocate for true equality. (And I'm refering to the author, since she actually pointed out stuff in the most neutral way possible)

So…male-only groups have to actually admit women, while women-only groups just need to accept applications and then throw them into the recycle bin without facing administrative consequences. And even got the permission to do that?!

Yeah because admitting males to female only groups would be akin to open the door of a barn full of lambs to big bad wolves.  Is funny how supposed these women who claim are 'liberated' and 'empowered' call the 'weak, helpless victim' card whenever they see fit.

Gender-only groups already polarize the sexes (though there might be gender-specific groups that actually have a reason of being if their cause is related to issues pertaining one gender exclusively)

If college is teaching students how to move in the real world, I'm afraid they got it wrong when it comes to work and live with others.

yep, and now they're saying that gays are misogynistic. the plot has been lost.

This is so sadddd. Especially will and grace is back.  I miss her.

One of my idols growing up. RIP.

@kinky4play:

So much misinformation as usual. Where to begin.

A large number of the "anti-trump" protesters were actually the local anarchist who are very common in the NW region. They joined the protest strictly to cause damage and had nothing to do with the actual protest. The one story about this (all the rest were just repeats of the original story) stated that "they didn't vote.. in Oregon". Many of the protesters were from Washington State, the border being a 10 minute drive from Portland. A large number of protesters were college age and therefore vote in their permanent state of residence, not the one they may be attending school in. 3rd party fact checking sites view the original claim as "unproven" at best

It's also interesting that the vast majority of damage and harassment since the election has been towards the minority communities including many attacks on LGBT people. I still can't understand why an LGBT person could support a Neo-Nazi group, but then I remember there were actually gay men in the upper ranks of the Nazi regime of Hitler.

1.  Ok, so how do you explain the other riots that weren't in the NW?

2.  HUH?  Are you saying the links talking about other cities with riots were actually talking about Portland?  If Portland was part of the article, it doesn't mean the entire article was only about Portland.

3.  You need to prove this, because you can register in either.  At least that was the case back when I was in the Marine Corps and college.

4.  I hope you aren't claiming Snopes as a fact checking source.

@alibix:

@raphjd:

Vocal Minority? To be honest, the only time I EVER hear about SJWs is when other people on the internet complain about them.

And you still deny what that says.    :blink:

WOW, just WOW.  :crazy2:

Anyway, as I have repeatedly said, you don't notice SJWs because they fit perfectly in your echo chamber and match your confirmation bias.

You see black people forcing white to walk through a creek to get to class and you think; too fucking right, crackers need to learn to obey black people, nuttin' wrong wit dat.

What the fuck? I REPEATED that quote to you. When did I deny it?

Now you spout some bullshit I never said. Jesus fucking christ.

I'm just explaining why you never see anything as SJW, because you agree with their antics.