It is scripted! Every people that do sex on camera is paid and is a porn actor. And it's not just BigDaddy, they are no productions that uses strangers in their movies. First of all, it would be illegal to film yourself having sex without the other person's consent. Secondly, don't you find it strange that people you are supposed to be straight ( most of the time ) would be so ready and open to have gay sex? Plus, we all know that the hole doesn't clean by itself which means there would be a lot of videos that would have ended up in the fetisch category of this site  :hehe:

If you have done some researches you'd have found the answer a long time ago 'cause it has already been answered and there are even sites that gives the actors' names in each scenes in case you want to see more about him

BigDaddy is a Czech production. Which is why most of the actors that are filmed aren't really known. But I assure you, they are all scripted.

Since everyone last one of them are porn actors, no it's not

@Olitommy:

"It's wonderful that they CAN christen their child in the faith of their choice, but why WOULD they choose one that considers their family wrong?"

Because at its core this religion isn't based on hate? That even though the majority is against homosexuality it doens't mean they should ostracized themself.

If people were thinking like you, we never would have had any rights anywhere… I don't want to be rude, just to make you realize that agreeing to change your beliefs because of your sexuality would have been exactly the same that leaving a country that doesn't allow gay people to even exist... Which only 30 - 40 years ago didn't exist at all.

Besides the acceptance of gay's children the very fact that they are allowed to preach hate and teach it to children is wrong. If by keep on trying to get them to accept people only on their religious views and not their parents' sexual orientation may lead them to change that, I'm forced to say I totally want them to get their kids in those schools.

Plus, it may be Catholicism but they are still following the bible which says that you may not judge your neighbors for it is god's right only. Therefore, excluding someone because they judge homosexuality is a sin is going against their own religion which is totally dumb.

@cumpigboy:

@Bisougarou:

I agree about the search term but the other important fact is Google! In "rich countries" gay newbies will surely use the general search words "gay porn" but not on Google! If you take a look around you now ten years old know about torrent and sites for torrent. Those youngs won't count in the study because they already use a specialized site.  :blownose:

I realize this is a tad late/old but just now returned.  How do you think they found those specialized sites in the first place no matter where they are?  Google…  Especially curious/closeted ones that don't have any open gay relationships to find out that way.  I've used other torrent sites, but I chose to use Google to find this site and another one with very similar terms to the "study" while at the same time NOT being closeted.  I'm not saying it's a perfect study or representation, but I still think it has potential merit and is not surprising in the least.

It has been said but most asian countries don't use Google, they've got their own sites for research on the net. And there are others like yahoo search or seek which don't count here because this study only used google as a reference. Therefore those countries aren't the ones that watch the most gay porn, they are the ones that watch it the most through google. In that case, either it has to be renamed or it doesn't count as a study. It's like doing a survey on LGBT rights in the USA while asking only a gender and not the other : it would become too specific to be called a LGBT survey

Les livebox sont chiantes en général… C'est la 1ére fois que j'entends un utilisateur d'orange avoir des problèmes avec ça.

Essais ce lien, c'est pour ouvrir un port et pouvoir seeder et normalement une fois ouvert le port marche dans les deux sens  ;D

http://www.geek-community.eu/viewtopic.php?id=3837

Le site a énormément baissé en popularité… déjà qu'avant c'était pas trop son truc donc moins de gens qui payent pour y accéder, moins de chance d'obtenir des vidéos sur les sites de partage...

Essais quand même de récupérer les titres des vidéos qui t'intéressent sur le site et de faire une recherche google pour pouvoir les télécharger c'est ce que je fais pour les vidéos de GayHoopla et en général je les ais deux trois jours avant qu'elles soient sur GT.

Après les vieilles vidéos de fraternity X sont très bien, surtout celles avec Dayton O'Connor  :cheesy2:

@MrMazda:

Call me a conspiracy theorist if you must, but the "issue" so to speak that I see there is that it sounds like a classic case of trying to milk the hands of the medical system. I guess there are some areas that do not believe in a person's right to refuse services and/or treatment. Not to mention it also brings the question of who ends up paying the bills for these visits? Is there some sort of universal medical coverage in Japan, or is it funded by either the employers or the person being sent directly?

It's just really hard to wrap my brain around any other way of looking at such a law.

It's true indeed that each and everyone of us have the right's not to be treated or to go to a doctor (I, myself, am not a doctor person and prefer to take the carrot to keep him away  ;D ) but this law has been made after seeing the consequences that the work's stress has over almost all the employees in Japan.

Obesity is just like… A red flag. It's what alarms the autority and what they'll use to warn people but basically they intend to fight all bad consequences that goes with work! Japan is still one of the countries where people go harakiri over work  and they're like in top 3 if not first...

I guess they're revoking a basic right to fight obesity and all the shit that goes with stress... I really think it's a good thing but I see why it could bother someone ^^

For the bills, if treatment/monitoring is needed there is a part for the company and the other part for the health care system.

@MrMazda:

That's insane… More insane than the fact that ALL McDonald's in the USA as of January 1, 2015 require that passengers be weighed on a scale to determine if they're "obease" enough to be refused service.

No it is not. What you heard of it surely is but the truth isn't. This law has been created to force large business groups to send their employees on medical examination. Which isn't useful only to discover if you're obease but also to do a check-up with a medical expert.

The consequences of the law are : 1° Employees that don't force their workers to go are being charged with a heavy penalty (which is pretty much like every other law )

2° People that shows sings of obeasity are to be listed for further examinations and advices. Meaning that a dietician will explains how/why being over-heighted can be really bad and what are to be changed in your life if you want to live longer.

Sincerely, I don't see what's bad in all that

Personnellement, je me fiche de qui sera présent! Si j'y vais c'est par compassion pour les victimes et pour montrer aux terroristes qu'ils ne nous font pas peur malgré tout.

Pendant quelques heures essayons tous de mettre de côté ce qui dérange pour être d'accord sur ce qui nous convient : l'unité, la compassion et le refus de se taire face à l’oppression.

Après tu es loin d'être le seul à ne pas vouloir y aller, ça c'est évident et chacun fait comme il le souhaite/sent et ça n'empêche pas d'avoir une pensée pour les 17 victimes de ces derniers jours.