Topics created by raphjd

@zerocoo666:

@raphjd:

Ah, typical leftist.    Now she only matters if she has published "scholarly works".

Always moving the goal posts.

You do know that now you are required to only post things from those who have had "scholarly work" published and peer reviewed.

I do.

Good.  I'll remind you every time you post ANYTHING that is not scholarly and peer reviewed.

@zerocoo666:

@raphjd:

:police: Hit that report button and I'll have a look at it.   :police:

How is it off topic?   I'm just showing the lunacy of the left and identity politics.

Remember, it's your side that set a building on fire, with people in it, to prevent wrong speak.  It's your side that covers your faces to have violent protests.    It's your side that down votes ANYONE (left or right) who condemns the violence.

That's part and parcel with the problem as it seems to be on the forum though–you actively participate in the forum with a clear bias to your posting. I've actually never been part of a politics forum in which mods were allowed to participate like you have. Do you not see an issue with participating like you do in maintaining a semblance of balance though?

If you're showing the lunacy of the left, I'd hope you'd even remotely approach something that's real instead of making up a bunch of ridiculous nonexistent stuff.

Both sides get treated the same.  I don't punish for disagreeing with me, otherwise 2 conservatives wouldn't have warnings right now.  In fact, I have bent over backward in pandering to the left so you people don't claim I'm biased.

Are you serious?  Do you really believe the stuff I'm saying is fake?    You either live under a rock or you just have no clue what you are talking about.    It sounds like you are using the "it's not a hate crime" logic found on CNN.

Both.

Good or bad, it's part of history.

Just as racism has come to be, and will continue being so as long as there are those teaching it…and anyone there to listen to the crap, carrying on the ugly practice.

(Regarding the images…just examples in some quick random grabs from the internet...none I necessarily have an opinion about, although a couple were amusing.)

index.jpg
index t.jpg
tumblr_nqd8zpxbd31r3yi0jo1_500.jpg
rebel-flag-rainbow-meaning.jpg
rainbow-confederate-flag-1393706324.jpg

BAMN is also a "progressive" group that advocates for violence.    They also advocate for selectively banning free speech.

@Drwas:

Someone was told they couldn't have have a certain vanity plate. This is a national tragedy!

lmao right? he probably also thinks that proudly displaying a symbol of slave ownership (which is in reality a thinly veiled white supremacy icon anyway) is an "American virtue"

@Drwas:

The only high ground the right have is the mountain off bullshit they produce.

the right wing has been manufacturing a jet-force stream of bullshit since at least the 1960's and it's astonishing that people still sip that poison tbqh.

You're right, most have been proven true due to government declassification.    That kills the argument of "the government can't keep anything secret".

Alex Jones proved himself right about the Bilderbergs and Bohemian Grove.  I haven't paid attention to his other CTs, but we now know the ridicule he got for over a decade was totally unjust.

It was never my intent for this thread, but it just got me thinking about something else.  We do we say that we can't accept CTs without proof, but we readily accept things like the UVA rape lie?  CTs need absolute proof to be declared true, but other things we accept countless lies as part of the "truth".

@magentas:

First of all, YOU are a SJW.
Here you are, constantly doing battle based on your political beliefs.
That makes you a SJW.

That's not the defining characteristic of a SJW.  Go look up the definition.

Youtube Video

Fascism has always been a tool of the left wing socialists.

@raphjd:

Not surprisingly, the liberals still won't condemn their fellow liberals for telling lies about me, and others.

It says everything about liberals.

While my leanings are liberal (but not always)- I for one condemn personal attacks since they are pointless and accomplish nothing. I respect that you've got your views and the better you express them, the more respect I have.

For whichever side you're on- at least be well informed and more open minded. Otherwise there's no point in having a discussion. As for lies- the most frustrating thing is that these past months and years have seen the erosion of the line between lies and truth so much, it's always a struggle to tell them apart- but we should never stop trying.

@Waltfore:

I usually don't post in these threads, but as a black male living in Detroit I can tell you all that Black on Black crime does exist (I'm not sure if that was a joke or not). We can't go one day here without hearing about how someone was shot on the news, and if it's not shooting it's people stealing from eachother. And a good amount of the time unfortunately it's bystanders and kids that are hurt and it's over stupid crap. There are people who are trying to help out in the community and church leaders and such, but ironically there was a BLM event here where someone started a fight.

For the record, I hate the term "Black Lives Matter.", especially when someone touting the mantra is going around killing anyone no matter what color. I also find it weird how some people jump on the "we need to come together as black people" bandwagon (not saying all do this) when if it's any other day of the week or any other situation they wouldn't really give a damn. As it is, I'm more cautious around people I don't know personally that share my skin color than anyone else, and I know people and unfortunately have family members that were killed by other black people for stupid reasons. I just thought I'd throw in my two cents. After thinking about it, maybe Black on Black isn't the right term after all. It seems like it's just crime in general. I don't know. In any case, I think all the violence needs to stop but unfortunately it's not going to happen.

I hope you know that most black people and all SJWs hate you.

@bostonpolar:

@Dene:

As I said it was in response to your comment re: violence - you said a few men get hit and i said so that discounts women?? THAT was my point - I have said to you 100x - it was IN CONTEXT

_As a gay man who was physically and emotionally abused by his male partner for many years, I want to say I wish when it comes to domestic violence that raphjd would just shut the fuck-up with his utterly willful-Ignorance and Stupidity on this subject.

But he obviously lacks the empathy to do so.

And NO, I will not discuss this further._

. . .

How pathetic.  You flame me, then say you refuse to discuss the topic.  Technically, you are spamming based on your own words.

Hmm, so you must be a woman then, because my "willful-ignorance" on the subject is that domestic violence is not a gendered issue.      Only ignorant anti male sexist ass clowns say it is.

I don't mind colleges giving credit for some sort of learning experience like a protest but what exactly are they getting out of this?  It's gross.

@Spintendo:

Sorry to disappoint you Henny Penny—but the sky is not falling.  :cheerup:

This suggestion came about when a pregnant patient born anatomically female but who identifies as male did not wish to be called "mother" several times during his visit with clinicians. An advisory notice was circulated, gently reminding clinicians that these rare instances can occur, and suggested not using labels like mother when interacting with them.

But 1 person requires a rule change?

Will they add "attack helicopter" to the tick box list for sex?  If not, why not?

Why won't the BMA bow down to me and tell everyone to refer to my hair color as  "similar to a sofa I once saw"?

WOW, who would have thunk it.  A liberal with no argument, just personal attacks.

You proved my point about liberals refusing to have any discussion.  THANK!!!! :cheers:

Man…

I don't know if I should laugh at this poor sod...or weep because there are actually people like him who refuse to take responsibility of their acts (and then come up with these far-fetched excuses)

Yeah, he's a crap speaker.  He's not so bad when he has rehearsed script.  He's a pretty good writer though, even if nothing he says or writes can ever be trusted.

I still don't understand why TYT hired this fraud.  Did they think that hiring him would give them street cred with blacks?  It was blacks who named him Talcum X.

iam very confused