@blablarg18 It's a bit of a hard one to call really. On one hand, one could praise them for taking an active role in trying to reduce the crime rate of the store. On the other hand, one could argue that doing so potentially puts their safety at risk.
Personally, if I were in the same position, I can likely say that I would have done the same thing. When the perps involved become known to management as repeat offenders, something more needs to be done. After all, this was not just a one off situation. If it were, that may make things just a little different.
I mean, I know that businesses have insurance for just such things, but when the issue becomes a repeat or frequent occurrence, you really can't blame the employees for trying to do something about the problem. I do agree though with their husband's point that if this kind of thing continues to be allowed to happen unchecked, then they will end up like any other major US city with a raging crime problem. That's where it begins to get complicated on what side to take.
That said though, even saying that these employees did engage in a way that is contrary to company policy, termination seems a little harsh. You would think they would at least skip the initial disciplinary steps and go straight to a final written warning as a more acceptable solution to the breach of policy. After all, you could reasonably argue that these employees were looking out for the best interest of the store by trying to do something about a recurring issue.