Posts made by MrMazda

Greetings Earthlings,

So long story made short, my room mate has really pissed me off, so I'm taking my time to plot some sweet, sweet revenge. For example, I'm in the process of scripting an original Rick Roll page because I can't seem to find an original one since YouTube took the original video down. It's since been re-posted, so I'm gonna have my fun with it.

Soon, every time my room mate tries to login to MY Netflix account, he will be redirected to http://www.tech911solutions.com/rr.html

The problem is that I'm trying to figure out how to get the exit popups like the original pages had where you get the lyrics pop up line by line in little popup dialog boxes. Can anyone help me with getting the basics (such as a basic template) for how to do this? I really want to make sure he has the FULL Rick Roll experience lol

Also, don't forget that when creating a .torrent file for the manual upload process, you need to remove the torrent from uTorrent, then download the .torrent file from the site to use to actually seed the torrent. This is the most common mistake that people make when uploading a torrent manually.

I don't really have a racial preference really…. It's all about having a big cock for me hehe

My favourite thing is to relax and enjoy the sensation of it going in and out

@groovedware:

"why should your irresponsibility for your own health be a burden on Medicare", are there no prisons?  are there no work houses?

Just to set the recotd straight, keeping someone in jail is MUCH more expensive to the system than jut providing their medical needs. Not only that, but I can tell you first hand that jail is definitely NOT a place you want to be when you're HIV+, especially since they are not exactly all that with it with medications in jail. I happen to be lucky enough to have survived 12 months of such an ordeal, without somehow developping a resistancy to the medication.

The other question that comes to my mind is do you mean to say that there should be no provisions to make accomedations to subsidize medical coverage for HIV meds, which easily run more than $3000/month? Most people don't even make that much in a month before taxes, yet alone being able to pay for rent, food, etc. on top of the cost of the medication.

You also seem to have the assumption that everyone who is infected with HIV got infected as the result of negligence. This is simply not the case. The whole point of this article was to establish that there is too much stigma surrounding the subject of HIV, since it's a proven fact that in the last 14 years or so, there has been not one case of HIV transmission (even through unprotected sex) when the person has been on HIV meds and maintained an undetectable viral load.

There's much more to consider than just negligence as well. As I have mentioned in other forum posts, my HIV infection was definitely NOT the result of my negligence. In fact, I actually declined sex with the man who infected me several times before it was physically forced upon me anyway, despite my refusal. While it may be true that a lot of HIV infections are the result of negligence, it is not a fair assumption to just assume that everyone who is infected with HIV is infected because of some kind of negligence on their part. At this day and age, we should be breaking down that kind of barrier, stigma, and incorrect way of thinking, rather than promoting it.

@antstorm:

and Mr Mazda to answer your question ..for me personally undetectable is not safer sex , i will always use protection.

As you wish… I'm all for the freedom of choice, which includes a person's right to choose if they want to engage in a risk, and if so, the extent of the risk that they're willing to take. As long as you make that decision knowing all the actual facts, then it is an informed decision as it should be.

@regnomraw:

Unless theres 1 bottom and an indeterminant number of tops - in that case doesn't matter if it's odd or even. It's hot all the way

So true…. Can I volunteer to be that 1 bottom in a room full of hung, horny tops?

Yes…. Voting for categories will give you 2 SBP per torrent voted. These SBP will add up to be able to be used for things like building your ratio.

Also, on the topic of torrent voting, this measure was put into place to help automatically filter torrents into their respective categories. When it receives enough votes for one particular category, the system will eventually change the default category to the most popularly voted one. In short, it helps keep things running in many ways, both for us and for you.

The sad reality to the internet is that once something is out there on the internet, good luck getting it back off the internet. I do understand your frustrations with respect to only wanting to share content here. The only problem is that ultimately, we cannot control what our users do.

@beansquezada:

I used to be able to vote on completed downloads but now I can't. Everytime I go back on my previous torrent downloads, the option to vote isn't there anymore. Any advise? Thanks.

It seems that you have already voted on all of your torrents up to the first one that you completed on December 21. Are any of the other torrents that you finished downloading on or after December 21 doing the same thing to you, or is it only torrents that you finished before December 21 that are doing this?

This is largely due to a combination of two different factors:

1. Some of our uploaders (such as myself), do not have a very fast upload speed, while some of the leechers have an amazing upload speed. In the case of uploaders such as myself who don't have a decent upload speed, it is only possible for me to upload any of the parts of the file to any given user at a slow rate (usually about 45KB/s). When there are one (or more) leechers who can crank out speeds of say 1MB/s and there are several leechers, eventually those leechers with the quick upload speeds will help get other users caught up to where they are in the process as the torrent traffic tends to favour the fastest connection, generally preferring active and connectable nodes, often ignoring the passive ones that use follow-back packets.

2. In light of the last portion of #1, there are a large number of users who are running behind a NAT, which is most often found built right into their broadband modem to masquerade a /24 subnet (say 192.168.1.0/24) issued to each computer connected to the modem's built in router behind a single IP address visible from the internet. This is not necessarily a problem though, if the NAT is configured correctly. In my case, my torrent program listens for incoming connections on port 22791. When my computer announces to the internet through the NAT, it can get an outbound connection no problem to announce that it's listening on port 22791. If you do not program the NAT in the router to forward inbound connections from the WAN (Internet) on TCP & UDP 22791 through to my laptop in some way, the NAT will drop them by default because it does not know where to route them to, since it does not use these ports itself for anything. The result is that you end up becoming a passive node. More often than not, passive nodes are unable to upload if they have SPI/Firewall protection enabled on their router and have not properly confiugred the port forwarding in the NAT. Some connectivity will be lost to discovering the passive nodes and sniffing out active ones to take preference over.

@controlxxx:

Okay, do you made it freelech? OMG thanks.  :cheesy2:

Our pleasure. At GayTorrent.ru, we aim to please.

Haha… My bad... In that case, yes... I would suggest uninstalling QTM, then installing it again by running the installer as an admin and putting it in C:\QTM when it asks where to install it. From there, you shouldn't have to run QTM as an admin, but if it fails when you reinstall it as an admin, as a last ditch effort, then try running it as an admin. There is also a way to tell Windows to automatically run QTM as an admin when you open it normally. If you'd like, I can help you with that if running QTM as an admin is required to make it work after installation.

If just running the app as an administrator and not minimizing it seems to work, it would stand to reason that you should be able to get away with just doing that. If you need to re-install it a later point, I would deal with it then as long as it works when you run as an administrator.

The number of download locations is irrelevant. What does matter though is how many torrents you're downloading at one time or in a 24 hour period. I will check into that to see if maybe you've hit the maximum number of permitted torrents for your profile.

It could also be that the uTorrent Mobile app doesn't support SSL trackers. If that's the case, disabling the SSL tracker in your Profile Settings then downloading the .torrent file to use again should do the trick.

If I'm not mistaken, this is a known issue that is somehow caused by minimizing QTM after being opened. You may need to try running QTM again as an administrator, and make sure that you do NOT miniize it at any point.

If this fails, you may need to uninstall QTM, then re-install it to somewhere OTHER than the Program Files or Program Files(x86) folder. Be sure you run the installer as an administrator to avoid potential issues when finalizing the install process.

I think the pictures not displaying the way you prefer them on the torrent information page is something that you can revert back to the old method yourself.

Go to your Profile Settings and uncheck the "Pics 2.0" box. That will make all the images come up all at once on the torrent information page.

If you prefer the method with the auto play, then make sure that "Pics 2.0" is turned on.

As well, you may want to make sure that the radio button just above that is set to "Pics appear over mouse position" is set. I think this will render you something closer to what you prefer.

All I will say to this is check the sources and citations carefully… There's a lot that's lost in the summarizations. That being said, my personal conclusion is that it lacks much explanation on some key aspects.

The chances of anything from a wound of that nature are almost immeasurable, they're that slim. By the same token, there has not been so much as one documented case of HIV transmission from oral sex alone, unless you count the very not well documented case where a woman alleges to have received it from a man she later found out was HIV+ with whom she had oral sex the day after dental surgery while everything was still bleeding…..

Needless to say, the chances of it being transmitted even if they are HIV+ are damn near nonexistent.

I agree… Sex is also way more fun too