Best posts made by hubrys

@manhandler said in Fauci put flies that laid maggots in Beagle's brains.:

Don't act like a lawyer for Fauci. That's EXACTLY what you're doing here. He knew EXACTLY what was going on. He's the DIRECTOR. Ok? Do you not fucking get that? He DIRECTS it.

So, your argument is that Fauci is the head of the agency, so he knows, or should know, about these atrocious acts?

You know who was also the head of the agency when these tests were performed? That's right, Trump. NIH is an Executive Branch agency, which means that Trump is the ultimate head of the organization.

I'm so glad that @ManHandler is voicing his hatred of Trump. I mean, he'd have to be against Trump on this; otherwise, it would mean he's just a huge hypocritical asshat.

More newsmen leave FOX News over the increasingly incendiary "fake news" being spewed by the network. You know it's pretty bad when the boat gets so full of shit that even the rats start jumping ship.

It's strange that ordinary Joes think that Tucker Carlson really understands them and is their advocate...you know, the Ivy League-educated heir to the Swanson fortune Tucker Carlson.

[https://www.npr.org/2021/11/21/1052837157/fox-resignations-tucker-carlson-patriot-purge-documentary](link url)

@raphjd You dominating this forum with your shitposts and personal attacks reminds me of a very dumb dog barking at every sound while sitting in a tiny backyard covered in his own shit.

That's you; that's how you appear to anyone who happens to stroll thru here.

If any new person did want to come in here and have an enjoyable experience, then you constantly ensure that that will never happen. Frankly, I don't know why the 3-4 people that ever come here keep interacting with you. If they would just stop, then this place could become the corpse you are trying so desperately hard to make it.

Crap like this doesn't help anything. MTG is enough of a shitshow all on her own; you don't need to make up stuff. Now, her defenders will constantly refer back to this in order to deflect attention away from the next bullshit thing she says.

@raphjd I have no doubt that the WSJ newspaper, overall, is read by more liberals than conservatives, since it's written at a college degree reading level and read by mostly affluent persons (which happens to have more liberals in its demographics). However, the WSJ's Opinion page (which is where what I linked is located) is notoriously conservative. It's owned by Rupert Murdock's News Corp., you know, the same company that runs FOX News. It also endorsed Trump for president.

@bi4smooth said in Trans serial killer strikes again in NYC:

why are Liberals letting serial killers out of jail? Permanent probation?

How is this Liberals letting her out? She was in jail for 34 years for the second manslaughter charge (1985-2019). She wasn't let out of prison early because of being trans.

@bi4smooth Is the point of this post to let us know NY has another serial killer, or is this a commentary on trans persons? Crazy knows no demographic boundaries.

@bi4smooth said in Trans serial killer strikes again in NYC:

I assumed that the earlier convictions had also been for murder.. and my own personal belief is that 1st-degree murder convicts should not - ever - be eligible for parole.

Even those "liberals" down in Texas allow parole for murder. For example, if she'd been given the maximum sentence (non-capital and non-"without parole" that is) according to TX guidelines for murder, she'd have only spend another decade in prison compared to New York. I don't think NY's criminal justice system was as "liberal" here as you think it was.

@raphjd said in Levin Calls For Schiff To Be Disbarred Over Doctored J6 Committee Text Messages:

Clearly, you have a pathological need to defend the DNC/CCP at every turn.

Actually, it seems he's just interested in pointing out blatant falsehoods, particularly when they come from you, a verified and proven liar on this Forum.

I don't like him because of his stances against right to privacy, gay marriage, abortion, freedom of the press, and the separation of church and state. If Thomas had his way, then a state could not only adopt an official religion, but also make being gay a crime.

I don't wish upon him calamity, but I also don't wish good health to him.

@bi4smooth said in US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is hospitalized:

I agree @hubrys was a little hyperbolic in his depiction of Justice Thomas believing that the US should have a religion (after all, he is an originalist) - but he certainly DOES think religion (and specifically christian beliefs) should play a larger role in US law and policy.

Justice Thomas notoriously does not believe in the Incorporation Doctrine, i.e., the judicially created legal framework that interprets the 5th and 14th Amendments as having incorporated the Bill of Rights against the states. In Thomas's judicial philosophy, the First Amendment applies only and exclusively to the Federal Government, not state governments. If Georgia wants to make Baptist its official religion, then it can do so under Thomas's interpretation of the Constitution. If Utah wants to make Mormonism its official religion, then it can do so. You can Google and read for yourself his dissent in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow.

As an attorney that has both studied Constitutional law as well as practiced it, I have no doubts about what Thomas's judicial philosophy is. You can Google it yourself. It shouldn't be hard to find explanations. His perspective is unique amongst his fellow justices. It is why he so often concurs with the results reached by the Conservative majority, but does not agree with their reasoning.

As for believing gay should be illegal, he dissented in Lawrence v. Texas which struck down anti-gay sodomy laws (previously upheld by the SCOTUS in Bowers v. Hardwick).

I don't understand why so many gays here on this site have such hatred toward trans people. It's just silly.

Tinker v. Des Moines - Students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

More specifically:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views.

@raphjd Your statement displays that you've never participated in a seizure of evidence under warrant or subpoena.

For example, a warrant will tell law enforcement to seize specific documents, but it will also include language that tells LE to seize any documents within the same container or containers stored similar to those containing named documents. This catch-all language is almost always included in warrants, and excess property is routinely seized. This is why the owner is given a receipt for all of the property seized, which Trump did, in fact, receive.

Were you under the impression that the FBI were going to pop a squat in the middle of the room and go thru each box of voluminous materials before removing them from the premises? Not even back at headquarters are the agents going thru the boxes. That's a task that some poor document review attorney had to do.

I'm sure you thought this was something, but you've got nothing here.

@raphjd I hate to break it to you anti-woke zealots, but Disney's already reimagined Robin Hood as a red-furred fox.

@raphjd Do you come here just to spout random nonsense because Tucker Carlson can't hear you talking to him thru the television?

@raphjd said in Trump sued for "staggering fraud" against lenders/banks:

all she could come up with was a stupid civil lawsuit.

She doesn't have the power as NY's Attorney General to bring a criminal prosecution of Trump; she can only bring a civil suit. Do you not understand what a state's Attorney General is?

She's transmitted her investigation to the Federal US Attorneys for the Southern District of New York for them to see if they want to bring a federal criminal action against Trump. We will see what the US Attorneys decide to do.

https://www.wearecentralpa.com/news/regional-news/armed-pa-man-in-wig-trying-to-restore-trump-as-president-arrested-at-dairy-queen/?10974

Armed man in wig and yellow vest seizes a Dairy Queen with his handguns in his campaign to restore Donald Trump as the President King of the United States, promising to kill all Democrats. This is the stage that we're at now, apparently, in America.

@raphjd To each of your points:

(1) The warrant was only necessary because Trump ignored and/or failed to comply with the subpoena.

(2) Whether all of the documents were declassified while Trump was still President is yet to be determined. Trump doesn't retain the power to classify or declassify documents after he's left office, and it isn't something he can just say, "If I brought it home, then ipso facto I declassified it." He will have to have done the official act.

(3) As far as I am aware, the only "documents" being returned are the three passports that were seized amongst the other documents.

And the thing which must be stated is that the potential crimes which may or may not be brought against Trump don't require the documents to have been classified. The fact that he has documents in his possession that belong to the People (i.e., the National Archives), then he's still committed a felony. A felony, by the way, that he strengthen while in office during his "Lock Her Up" frenzy.