• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. Frederick
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 654
    • Posts 2497
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Frederick

    • RE: Trump is letting pothead Trudeau keep NAFTA. Justin's happy with his sugar daddy

      @sutieday:

      Pothead? Someone is pro drug war…

      I am no fan of pot.. Justin Trudeau is working on legalizing it and also opiods (heroin).

      They keep trying to shove the idea that marijuana is a good by calling it "medical marijuana".  Fine.. let them dispense marijuana extracts in the form of pills, creams, etc.  Not smoking it.  What other medication is delivered by smoking it?  NONE  It's just an excuse for drug addicts to have another drug to abuse.

      Ironically, the most abused drugs of all are the legal ones.  70% of Americans are prescribed some form of medication that acts upon the brain.

      A teenage boy (who was the leading character in 3 mainstream movies years ago), was asking me about marijuana on facebook last year.  Apparently his parents both use it and they say it is good stuff.  They live just outside of Los Angeles where potheads are everywhere.  Despite being in big movies, as the lead, actors under 18 get paid VERY LITTLE.  This kid knows the value of money. 
      He said "marijuana isn't addictive"… but then I pointed out to him that people with no jobs or minimum wage jobs are willing to pay $200 - $300 an ounce for that stuff.. so obviously it's addictive.  I've known people who have quit smoking cigarettes but they never quit smoking weed. 
      Then there are those that say it is not dangerous.  Well, not directly, but it is quite dangerous.  When I was a teenager, I saw this car flattened like a pancake on the back of a flatbed truck being hauled away from an accident scene.  I found out later that it was a friend of mine from the 6th to 9th grade whom I had not seen in a few years since I changed schools.  He was the smartest kid in school in grades 6, 7, and 8.. but became a stoner in 9th.  He had driven out of the parking lot of McDonalds, high as a kite, right into the path of a Semi truck.  RIP.
      Also.. I am frequently telling people that while drugs can be miracles - such as for pain, infections, and other things, they should only be taken for a short time.  After about 30 days, the body develops a tolerance for the drugs, and the beneficial effects are diminished.  The toxic effects don't diminish though!  Avoid any medication that is needed more than a few months.

      About the effects of medications including marijuana.  The liver and brain filter out almost all toxins in he body.  The brain has a special membrane that lets almost nothing through.  A good example of that is alcohol.  If you drink a little, your liver is able to catch it all and it doesn't get to your brain.  If you drink more (or if your liver didn't do it's job)  then the alcohol gets to the brain, but even then, the protective membrane stops it.  If you drink a lot, it gets to your brain and kills brain cells - a LOT of them,  which is easily demonstrated by the person's slurred speech, loss of cognition, and loss of motor coordination.  Brain cells do NOT regenerate.  The liver is the only organ that DOES regenerate, but if it's functionality is less than 17%, you are dead.

      I will cut this short.. mainly because I have other things to do.  But getting back to "drugs"... drugs are substances which are able to get to the brain and have an effect.  People have the false impression that marijuana is perfectly safe.. it is not.  Marijuana damages the brain - permanently - and is like inducing premature dementia / senility - in that it creates dead zones of activity in the brain.  In fact, this is ALSO why it has great medical uses!  For instance.. in people, especially children, who have seizures for whatever reason including epilepsy.. those seizures are like mini-strokes, and each one permanently damages the brain a bit more.  A seizure is TOO MUCH brain activity.  One way of reducing seizures is to have brain surgery.. essentially various forms of "lobotomies".  Doctors intentionally block or terminate activity in certain spots of the brain to reduce or eliminate the seizures.  Another way to reduce seizures is.. you got it.. smoke marijuana!  So.. just think of smoking marijuana as having a mini lobotomy.  It also affects the heart in a bad way, but I haven't done enough research on that to talk about it.

      If you don't believe me.. which is never a good idea.. then go ahead and spend a fortune on marijuana.. be a human vegetable,.  and slowly kill yourself.  Just don't be on the road when I am on it, or be my doctor or financial advisor.

      I have to add one more thing about drugs.  Almost ALL of them have a negative effect upon one's libido / sex drive, and even one's ability to get an erection.  That is some price to pay to get high.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: The REASON Obama did nothing about the about the election being corrupted

      @pppucci:

      @Frederick:

      There were all sorts of allegations about the election being rigged by different groups - including the DNC that blatantly stole the nomination away from Bernie Sanders.  Donald Trump pointed out how their was fraud on BOTH sides of the campaign which was all working to prevent him from being the nominee, and after being the nominee to prevent him from being elected.  Trump also pointed out that the election was rigged against Bernie.  It's safe to say that there was a lot of allegations being made, some of them provable, some needed to be investigated, etc.

      BUT Obama did NOTHING!
      Why?
      Because it was universally expected that Hillary would win the election easily.. in a landslide.  Obama wasn't about to risk doing anything at all because that might change the lead that Hillary THOUGHT she had. 
      In other words, rather than do the right thing, and what he was obligated to do.  Obama chose to IGNORE all the allegations just to play it safe and preserve Hillary's lead.  Well. that plan BACKFIRED!

      You find debating easy because you ignore facts.  We now know that the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign for possible ccooperation with the Russian meddling since July of 2016, but all indications are that they kept that information from the White House.  (that was back in a day when the WH did not try to intervene or be kept abreast of FBI investigations).  Apparently, Obama did not become aware of the Trump campaign ties to Russia until a month AFTER THE ELECTION.  The fact that Russia was behind the hack of the DNC was made public at the beginning of October.  So you can't state that he did nothing.  You guys are again swallowing whole whatever Trump tweets out without examining it critically.
      And the whole Hilary-Bernie thing came out before the convention and was well litigated there.  You can't argue that Obama hid anything.

      Your response contradicts itself.  First of all.. if the FBI knew something since July 2016 and didn't say anything - the head of the FBI should have been fired.  What you are referring to  is that they think Russia managed to hack into Hillary's e-mails and get them and post them.  They say that as many as 7 different parties / countries did the same thing.  WikiLeaks got them from someone other than Russia.  How about this?  Why not focus on Hillary Clinton deleting 30,000 government e-mails from the server she illegally had in her house AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over?  That should have put her in prison instantly.  "Oh dear!  Someone has hacked Hillary's computer and found what she illegally deleted!"

      The theft of the nomination from Bernie Sanders was not litigated.  Bernie just didn't complain because as we now know, Bernie and his wife are whores for money and can easily be bought.  Right after endorsing Hillary, Bernie magically pulled $600,000 out of thin air to purchase house #3.

      Your saying that Obama did not keep abreast of FBI investigations.  Hmm.. that is part of the job of being president.  The president has daily briefings about such things.  If that information wasn't important enough before the election (when he was certain Hillary would win), why did it suddenly become so important that he would antagonize Russia with sanctions after the election?  Sanctions he knew would be rescinded because they were absurd.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • The REASON Obama did nothing about the about the election being corrupted

      There were all sorts of allegations about the election being rigged by different groups - including the DNC that blatantly stole the nomination away from Bernie Sanders.  Donald Trump pointed out how their was fraud on BOTH sides of the campaign which was all working to prevent him from being the nominee, and after being the nominee to prevent him from being elected.  Trump also pointed out that the election was rigged against Bernie.  It's safe to say that there was a lot of allegations being made, some of them provable, some needed to be investigated, etc.

      BUT Obama did NOTHING!
      Why?
      Because it was universally expected that Hillary would win the election easily.. in a landslide.  Obama wasn't about to risk doing anything at all because that might change the lead that Hillary THOUGHT she had. 
      In other words, rather than do the right thing, and what he was obligated to do.  Obama chose to IGNORE all the allegations just to play it safe and preserve Hillary's lead.  Well. that plan BACKFIRED!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Donald Trump is attacking President Obama…...

      @pppucci:

      I think Obama acted in the last month of his term because e knew Trump wouldn't, and wanted to send a message to Russia for the good of the country.  It appears that Michael Flynn's efforts to reassure the Russians about these sanctions and his subsequent lies about it to the VP and FBI are what got him into trouble.  And what's with Jared wanting to use the Russian embassy to communicate with the Kremlin?  And Trump's refusal to criticize Putin when he throws all of our other allies under the bus?  There's a lot of fishiness in this administration when it comes to all things Russia.

      You really aren't very good at debating. 
      This is too easy. 
      Everything you said above is quite flimsy.. and ignores the fact that Obama did noting BEFORE the election when it would have made a difference.  You know why he didn't?    Well.. I'm not going to waste the reason in a reply to you.. I will reveal the reason in a NEW TOPIC.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Project Veritas NEW 3 Min CNN PRODUCER EXPOSED UDERCOV ADMITTING to LYING BIG!

      @pppucci:

      First, mhorndisk, stop imitating Frederick and replying to your own posts.  It is bad form. Second, Frederick, 77 year-old men harass women by suggesting that sleeping with him will advance their career, as Alles did with Allisyn Cammerota.  And, third, not to piss on your parade, CNN has tood by its employee.  He is not involved in political reporting at all ( his a CNN Health producer) and his opinions are his own..  As quoted in USA Today. "The news network issued a statement Tuesday afternoon standing by its employee and noting he is not involved in coverage of Trump or the Russia investigation. “CNN stands by our medical producer John Bonifield. Diversity of personal opinion is what makes CNN strong, we welcome it and embrace it,” the statement said.

      Also, Project bVeritas is being sued for violating wiretapping laws.

      Contrary to what you guys think, liberals do not insistent that everyone march in lockstep.  In a corporation as big as CNN, there is bound to be some dissenting opinions.  This producer's ideas do not affect CNN's political editorial content.  Calm Down!

      Do you believe your own garbage?
      You are being an apologist for CNN when they were blatantly exposed for the extremely biased moonbats that they are.
      Liberals DO march in lockstep - and that is common knowledge. 
      Who said I wasn't calm? 
      Don't you get tired of being wrong all the time?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Donald Trump is attacking President Obama…...

      @aadam101:

      @Frederick:

      @pppucci:

      Trump is just looking for a way to muddy the waters, especially with his base, which at this point are the only ones who believe anything he says.  He accuses Obama of collusion and obstruction with Russia, so when the hammer falls he can say, "See Obama did it too!."

      There you go again.. what's this "TOO" about?

      Trump didn't collude with Russia.

      And yet Trump is whining that Obama didn't do anything to stop him from colluding with Russia.

      There you go again.. misstating things.

      Trump was pointing out that if Obama was aware of Russian collusion BEFORE the election, why didn't he do anything about it? 
      Also, as I have pointed out.. After Trump was elected, Obama took the extremely unusual move of putting sanctions on Russia.  In those last 2 months, when a new president has been elected, the sitting president is not supposed to be stirring the pot.. and furthermore.. after the election.. during those 2 months.. the sitting president is supposed to consult with the president elect (Trump) about everything going on.. and he did NOT.

      As time goes on, Obama will replace Jimmy Carter as the worst president of all time.  Jimmy Carter is a brilliant man.. but was a horrible leader.  Basically, Jimmy Carter was acting as a Secretary of State during his 4 years instead of as a president.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Trump plasters fakes news all over his walls

      @aadam101:

      He is truly a sick man.  Trump hangs fake Time Magazine covers on the walls of his clubs to impress people.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-time-magazine-with-trump-on-the-cover-hangs-in-his-golf-clubs-its-fake/2017/06/27/0adf96de-5850-11e7-ba90-f5875b7d1876_story.html

      You are really getting desperate to find something to attack Trump with.  Pathetic.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Where's the Scat?

      :laugh:@MrMazda:

      @berz82:

      scat is a bit gross anyway  :puke:

      Different strokes for different folks… 😉

      What you talkin' bout Mazda!?

      arnold.jpg

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Support Discussions
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Project Veritas NEW 3 Min CNN PRODUCER EXPOSED UDERCOV ADMITTING to LYING BIG!

      @mhorndisk:

      Youtube Video

      Even Mark Dice commented on this report about it, so it's going to explode. The demoncrats are totally finished. Hooray!!!

      They SHOULD be finished.. but they are like rats.. they get away with just about anything.  Anything something Trump does gets amplified by a factor of 1000.  Anything the moonbats do gets buried like nuclear waste and never heard of again.  If Bill O'Reilly says to a female, "wow you look hot today!"  He gets fired.  Likewise with Roger Ailes.   Roger Ailes had a 20 year career at CNN, was forced out at the end of July 2016, and died 9 months later at age 77.  Just what sort of sexual harassment does a 77 year old man do?  If he was chasing after women and caught one.. he wouldn't know what to do!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Have you ever heard of an openly gay white supremacist?

      @jazuko:

      Liberals will call any white person whos proud of their heritage/ lacking white guilt a white supremacist. many things non-white people do that white people will do is considered "supremacist" when white people do it but ok and encouraged if youre not white. ive seen articles telling white gay guys their racist supremacists just for dating other white guys.

      There are laws which make punishments extremely severe if a crime is designated as a "hate crime".  This often happens when the crime involves the use of racially charged words.  Seems to me that calling someone a "white supremacist" when they are not should be put under the category of a hate crime.  I remember about 5 years ago, someone I was arguing with on the telephone kept calling me a "cracker".  I had NEVER been called that before.  She got angrier by the second because I acted as if I had no idea what "cracker" meant.    "Why are you calling me a cracker?"  "Oh, because I'm white?"  "Well, then you can call me cracker all you like!"

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Have you ever heard of an openly gay white supremacist?

      There is a story floating around accusing this publicly openly gay man of being a white supremacist (which he denies).

      It seems to me that being openly gay makes one somewhat tolerant of all people, including other races.

      Have you ever heard of an openly gay white supremacist?  Doesn't that seem like a ridiculous accusation?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Donald Trump is attacking President Obama…...

      @pppucci:

      Trump is just looking for a way to muddy the waters, especially with his base, which at this point are the only ones who believe anything he says.  He accuses Obama of collusion and obstruction with Russia, so when the hammer falls he can say, "See Obama did it too!."

      There you go again.. what's this "TOO" about?

      Trump didn't collude with Russia.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Moonbats in mourning.. they are so sad.. Trumpcare will be GREAT!

      @aadam101:

      @Frederick:

      CBO says Senate Health Care Bill will reduce deficit AND decrease the number of uninsured!
      Wahh!  wahh!  WAHHH!!!   :cry2:

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/26/senate-health-bill-would-lower-deficit-increase-number-uninsured-estimate-says.html

      You may want to read that again.

      Senate Republicans’ health care bill would reduce the federal deficit and eventually lead to lower premiums, but would result in millions more Americans being uninsured a decade from now,

      Whoopsie!  I made a misake!!!  That is extremely rare.
      HOWEVER… there is a contradiction here.. if the premiums are lower.. then more people can afford insurance if they want it.  So, why don't YOU explain why more people would be uninsured if the insurance premiums are lower?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Are there any liberals who aren't @#$%&?

      @sutieday:

      Conservatives/Alt-right love to lower the reputation of their opponents, especially on this board.

      That is not necessary.  The moonbats are self-destructive and do it to themselves.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Moonbats in mourning.. they are so sad.. Trumpcare will be GREAT!

      CBO says Senate Health Care Bill will reduce deficit AND decrease the number of uninsured!
      Wahh!  wahh!  WAHHH!!!   :cry2:

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/26/senate-health-bill-would-lower-deficit-increase-number-uninsured-estimate-says.html

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: The sun isn't shining today. BLAME TRUMP.

      @pppucci:

      Frederick, you are missing the point.  Looking at county data is completely irrelevant.  First, the electoral college votes by state, not county.  Second, how can you put on equal footing a county with 10,000 people with one that has 10,000,000?  The county data is just a way to fill in the map of the US red.  Regardless of the popular vote, if a total of 100,000 votes had gone the other way in swing states, Hilary would be President.
      Again, I am not diminishing Trump's victory, which was epic, but it was not the massive mandate that you would like it to be.

      What a ripe, steaming pile of Pelosi. 
      The left has been harping on the "popular" vote since election day.. when it means nothing.  The electoral count (which Trump won by a huge margin) is all that counts.  The left denied it.
      Then, when I point out that across the country, other than a few inner cities that are filled with illegal immigrants and crime… Trump won the at least 85% of the counties..  THEN you say THAT data is irrelevant. 
      I get it.. any data that you don't like is irrelevant.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • SUPREME Court affirms that Trump was right!

      Guess who got his travel ban?  T R U M P!
      They don't call it the SUPREME Court for nothing.   Those moonbat courts don't me a thing.

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/26/supreme-court-to-hear-trump-appeal-travel-ban-block.html

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Professor sasy that Otto Warmbier "got what he deserved"

      @jojojojo3:

      @Frederick:

      A whacko professor thinks that removing a banner from a wall of one's hotel justifies being severely tortured, sentenced to 15 years hard labor, and left in a vegetative coma for over a year until he ultimately died.

      Kathy Dettwyler, an anthropology professor, wrote Tuesday that Warmbier was "typical of a mindset of a lot of the young, white, rich, clueless males who come into my classes."

      I would suggest handing in homework assignments on time in that bitch's class!
      Soon Kathy Dettwyler will be like school in the summertime.. "no class!"  Hey Hey Hey! (My Cosby Kids homage).

      http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/professor-otto-warmbier-got-%E2%80%98what-he-deserved%E2%80%99/ar-BBD66To?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

      that's because the professor is a douche.  People lead short meaningless lives and some are so intimidated by it that they have to put partisan bullshit and "white privilege" in to situations because they need to reinforce their cult somehow.

      That douche will say she was "Blinded by the white, and wrapped up over Comey and the people on the right"

      Youtube Video

      Youtube Video

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Are there any liberals who aren't @#$%&?

      @pppucci:

      @strangeloop:

      @pppucci:

      Again, another obscure democrat–a NJ blogger.  From the same article " Several New Jersey Democrats criticized Devine’s comments and said they did not endorse violence. "
      Can we limit our discussions to comments made by our members or public figures?

      Stop pretending like it's some remote fringe who celebrate his shooting.

      Here's prime-time MSNBC host Joy Reid implying that Scalise deserved to be shot: http://www.dailywire.com/news/17649/msnbc-host-suggests-rep-steve-scalise-deserved-be-joseph-curl

      Are you going to downplay her relevance, too? A prime time host on one of the big-three cable news?

      There are tons of examples of SJWs celebrating, laughing and wishing Scalise died all over the place if you care to open your eyes – they are not fringe.

      Look at your tribe, and acknowledge there's a huge violence problem with it, this case being yet another example of endless examples.

      This is what she said,

      “_t’s a delicate thing because everybody is wishing the congressman well and hoping that he recovers, but Steve Scalise has a history that we’ve all been forced to sort of ignore on race,” Reid said. “He did come to leadership after some controversy over attending a white nationalist event, which he says he didn’t know what it was.

      He also co-sponsored a bill to amend the Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. He voted for the House healthcare bill, which as you said would gut health care for millions of people, including three million children, and he co-sponsored a bill to repeal the ban on semi-automatic weapons.

      Because he is in jeopardy and everybody is pulling for him, are we required in a moral sense to put that aside at the moment?”
      Not exactly saying he got what he deserved.  She simply states that his condition prevents people from criticizing his POLICIES.

      Nice try.. but you are WRONG!   If someone wanted to criticize the policies of Scalise, then they should have been doing it BEFORE he got shot.   The criticisms are only being made public AFTER he got shot.. as if his policies are any justification to attempt to kill as many people at that baseball game as possible, and shooting 4 of them.  _

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Why won’t Donald Trump rush to tweet criticism of attacks against Muslims?

      @pppucci:

      The murderous acts of Islamists need to be eradicated, not the religion itself.

      Except.. to the terrorists, their murderous acts and the religion are one in the same.  They believe their religion commands them to do those horrible things.

      Is it better to kill the people?  or eradicate the religion, or at least ban that interpretation of the religion?

      Here's an idea.. bulldoze any mosque in which they advocate killing people.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • 1
    • 2
    • 83
    • 84
    • 85
    • 86
    • 87
    • 124
    • 125
    • 85 / 125