Posts made by Frederick

@raphjd:

@pppucci:

Treating women equally and with respect affirms your masculinity–-even if you are gay.

How would you define feminists then?   They hate equality for men.

One time while on summer break from my university, I sought employment assistance from EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission).  They looked at me like I was crazy and it was quite clear they were not going to assist a white male at all.  I tried applying for jobs with the county government.  There are millions of people in this county, and a LOT of job openings.  To apply for a county job, one has to take a test.  They issued the test three times for a batch of jobs to fill, each time they tested hundreds of people.  I did EXTREMELY well on the test, and got 99 out of a possible score of 100.  However, to be considered for a job, you had to have a minimum score of 150.  In other words, even if I got a PERFECT score, I still was wasting my time by even taking the test.  It seems that if you were a minority.. you got an extra 50 points.  If you were disabled.. you got an extra 50 points.  If you were a veteran.. you got an extra 50 points.  So, a person with the IQ of a turnip qualifies for a job while a genius such as myself is sitting their like a fool taking a test that can't possibly do me any good.  I don't recall if women got extra points or not.  But that leads me to my next point.  
Out of desperation, I went to a temp agency looking for work.  again, I did fantastic on all their tests.  However, the clients were calling in asking for temps.. and demanding people of a certain age, certain race, and women.  Unless the job entailed physical labor, they wanted women.  
There are other organizations such as the "Urban League" which give jobs to African americans.   Imagine if there were some group that only gave jobs to white people?  There would be a riot!

It is ironic that skills and intelligence don't get people jobs.. it's all that other crap that does it.

Oh, I forgot one other item…  even in offices which employ white males, they still have another massive bias.  They want white males who are MARRIED and with CHILDREN.  They are far more likely to get hired, and paid more.      Seems to me, they should have no business asking if someone is married or has children.  It used to nauseate me when someone would come in applying for a job.. and just by mere coincidence their wife and children would show up to meet daddy at the office while he's applying for the job.  I would recommend that any young man looking for employment should go hire a hooker with massive tits and get some pay some kids to go on job interviews with him.

@Devken:

… I mean, it's not as if Trump ever carried a grudge way past the first 100 days of a president's term.

Oh wait... how long did that Birther shit last? And what ever came of those investigations and reports?

Did the "birther shit" ever end?
Everyone admits that Obama was not born on this continent. 
Whether he was born in Hawaii is questionable since his certificate of birth was not produced until 1.5 years AFTER he was already president.
That certificate's checksum codes do not match the content of the certificate.  (the checksums show that some fields that WERE filled in were not filled in at the time the certificate was produced).
The nut that produced the certificate mysteriously died a year after producing it in a plane crash in which their were dozens of people on the plane, and the ONLY one to die was that woman who produced the certificate.
Obama never stepped foot into North America until he was 13 years old. 
Obama was raised in the muslim nation of Indonesia. 
Both Obama's biological AND adopted father were devout muslims.

With all of that being 100% true.. you still have the gall to suggest that Obama was a legitimate candidate for the presidency? 
They should make the man who pointed all of this out president!  Oh wait.. they DID!  Donald Trump!

@pppucci:

I think the commission is entitled to publicly available information as long as they collect it themselves.  Any cooperation from the states represents a federal intrusion on our state-based elections. Even the president is elected on a state-by-state basis with the electoral college. Congressmen and Senators are also chosen in state elections. The founding fathers made it clear in the Constitution that the election of federal officials be controlled by the states. For some Presidents, including Bush and Trump, this has worked to their advantage.
Trump, to justify a lie about illegal voting, now seeks to consolidate his power by either suppressing Democratic voters, or weaponizing the information for his re-election campaign.  (The commission seeks information on political party affiliation and voting history)
The voter rolls are glutted with people who have died or moved out of the state, but this is not the way to clean them up.

Your a trip..
When it comes to the election of Trump.. all the moonbats want to talk about is the fraudulent popular vote in which Hillary got more votes, while brushing aside the electoral vote that matters. 
But then, when it comes to examining whether those popular votes were valid or not.. they whine "oh, but that's not the RULES!  Wahh..  the states can do whatever they want and the federal government has no right to examine whether the votes are valid or not!"

I would hate to live in California.. after pissing off Trump, when not pissing on him…  and have a radiological bomb set off in their harbor by North Korea.  I don't think Trump would have a lot of sympathy for California.

@flozen:

@raphjd:

a computer science professor at the University of California at Berkeley

And that is where you lost the argument.

Anything and everything associated with Berkeley (the town and/or university) can not be trusted.    It'd be best if we nuked the place and were done with it.

I'm surprised MSN.com didn't quote Yvette Felarca and Eric Clanton for the story.

Mississippi.  Texas.  More than half the states.  Winning.

Very interesting comment on your part.
You consider that most states refuse to allow their votes to be examine for FRAUD to be a win?  Hmm? 
That IS a huge win for Democrats!  "Hooray!  Trump can't nail us for voter fraud!  Whoopee!"  That's yet one more bullet dodged by the democraps!  They could take a piece of shit and get it elected.  Oh wait, they already did that with Obama.

@pppucci:

I now can add illogical to the list of your attributes.  Trump is an ass.  You are an ass.  Are you Trump?

If someone that mattered criticized me.. it would hurt.
When you criticize me.. I take it as a compliment!  It shows that I've gotten under your skin.

Youtube Video

@sutieday:

The Trump administration took a big step towards repealing water protection rules on Tuesday. The EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers unveiled a proposal to rescind the Waters of the US - WOTUS rule - following an executive order signed by President Trump in February. This comes on the heels of the Flint, Michigan water crisis where state and city officials were charged just a few weeks ago for mismanaging the drinking water supply.

Research also suggests that 47 locations in 27 states are exposed to drinking water that has been affected by highly toxic perfluorochemicals. The study by the non-profit organization the Environmental Working Group and Northeastern University in Boston says the contaminated water is being consumed by 15 million people. Some estimates show that the WOTUS rule is actually protecting the drinking water for one-third of Americans, so will the regulation for rolling all of this back by Trump and Pruitt lead to more pollution and toxins in American drinking water?

http://therealnews.com/t2/story:19437:Trump-Places-Drinking-Water-on-the-Deregulation-Block

Obama sure handled that Flint, Michigan problem with the water.. NOT!
Even more absurd.  Flint Michigan is the hometown of washed up moonpig Michael Moore - where he still is headquartered.. and what did HE do about the water problem in Flint Michigan?  NOTHING!
People like Obama and Moore only like attacking other people.  They don't want to hear about their OWN massive failings.

@sutieday:

@Frederick:

Meanwhile.. is Hillary indicted yet?  When is she going to prison?

Questions you should be asking Trump, no?

Last week, Trump WAS wondering why Hillary isn't being investigated.  The media didn't pay much attention to that comment that Trump made. Should I go find it for you?  Or you think you can find it yourself?

@pppucci:

Treating women equally and with respect affirms your masculinity–-even if you are gay.

Must we get into a debate about how men differ from women mentally, in the structures of their brains, and hormonally? 
I think I'll pass on that one for today.
In the meantime… go plant your turnip in a cabbage patch.

I don't consider you to be equal to me, nor do I respect you.. so.. does that mean you are a woman?

In fact.. quite a few moonbat men are feminists.

@pppucci:

Whether the hotel was paid for the event or not, This is just ethically wrong.  His business either benefited from his own campaign, or his business made an in-kind contribution to his campaign.  Plus I also think he is using the Office of The President to generate free publicity for his properties by visiting them whenever he gets the chance. He is spending this weekend at his country club in New Jersey.

Oh boo hoo..
Is that the best you can come up with to attack Trump with?
Hmm.. come to think of it.. that IS the best thing you can come up with to attack Trump with!

Meanwhile.. is Hillary indicted yet?  When is she going to prison?  What about Obama?  Oh, I keep forgetting.. we aren't allowed to talk about Hillary or Obama..

@pppucci:

I assume you are talking about Time-Warner, which owns CNN.  Its stock, however have been climbing slowly, and are more affected by the possible merger with AT&T

That is actually true.. that's the 3rd mistake I've made this year!

However..  my message is still valid in that when the stock DOES start to slide, investors will blame CNN and heads will roll.

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

When the hormonal rollercoaster of a female kicks in, their inferior brains have great difficulty processing reality.  This is why women tend to make decisions that are not necessarily wrong, but made for the wrong reasons.  They are known to buy cars based upon the number of cup holders… buy computers based upon the color of the case... vote for a candidate based upon abortion rights, etc.

Anyway, since leaving office, Sheik Obama has been on a non-stop 7 month, ultra expensive, globe trotting vacation.  The man will do anything to avoid facing reality (and his husband Michelle).  At some point, it's going to sink in that he is the worst president ever, and their probably will never be another president as bad as him.  He is an expert at playing the "black card", but black people have a dim view of people that behave like pimped-out gangstas unless they are a pimped-out gangsta.  What's next?  Obama will get solid chrome wheels on his car and have them encrusted with diamonds, rubies, and emeralds?   Will he get a gold grill for his teefus?  Perhaps a wide purple felt hat with an ostrich feather in it.. with a vest made out of leopard skin?  Maybe he will dye his hair blonde?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/27/obamas-under-fire-from-left-for-never-ending-sizzling-ultra-luxury-vacations.html

Youtube Video

Incredibly sexist

I apologize for insulting your female hormones pppussi

Trump and Reagan are quite a bit alike.
Trump is more aggressive, but then, Reagan was given far more respect and didn't  have to battle the media.

Back in the day of Reagan, the "mainstream" media was mainstream… now it is radical.

Youtube Video

When moonbats are decimated, they don't fade away gracefully.. they melt away into a puddle of goo like the wicked witch in the "Wizard of OZ".

So goes Kathy Griffin
Youtube Video

When the hormonal rollercoaster of a female kicks in, their inferior brains have great difficulty processing reality.  This is why women tend to make decisions that are not necessarily wrong, but made for the wrong reasons.  They are known to buy cars based upon the number of cup holders… buy computers based upon the color of the case... vote for a candidate based upon abortion rights, etc.

Anyway, since leaving office, Sheik Obama has been on a non-stop 7 month, ultra expensive, globe trotting vacation.  The man will do anything to avoid facing reality (and his husband Michelle).  At some point, it's going to sink in that he is the worst president ever, and their probably will never be another president as bad as him.  He is an expert at playing the "black card", but black people have a dim view of people that behave like pimped-out gangstas unless they are a pimped-out gangsta.  What's next?  Obama will get solid chrome wheels on his car and have them encrusted with diamonds, rubies, and emeralds?   Will he get a gold grill for his teefus?  Perhaps a wide purple felt hat with an ostrich feather in it.. with a vest made out of leopard skin?  Maybe he will dye his hair blonde?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/27/obamas-under-fire-from-left-for-never-ending-sizzling-ultra-luxury-vacations.html

Youtube Video

@pppucci:

No one has answered the original question of this post.  I will grant, for the sake of discussion, that Don Lemon is an ass and should be kicked off CNN.  Now let's get back to the original question:  Even if you thought their editorial choices were biased, did you trust the facts of the mainstream media before Trump?
You all conflate political commentary with real news.

These days.. nobody is covering the news as "real news" because that is not sensational enough.  It has become like "Fleet Street" in London or the "National Enquirer" (which now has more credibility than CNN).

While on the topic of CNN.. expect to see some big changes there.  The reason is that CNN is a publically traded stock.. and their stock took a big dive in June.  I know a bit about stocks, and CNN's has been rising steadily for a long time… until June 2017.  When stocks that were going up start going down, stockholders get very upset, panic, and demand that changes be made.

@flozen:

@mhorndisk:

So you don't care about the people in China. I thought not. Look man, I've heard you guys make these arguments for almost two years now, and I'm just tired of having to go over it again and again. You're just wrong. You're not looking at all the facts, and you're not listening to both sides. What you are doing, is looking at the facts you want to look at, and listening to the mouthpieces that you want to hear. Anything that doesn't fit the narrative that you want to believe, goes in one ear and out the other. You are not capable of comprehending the information. You're just not. You act like the hundreds of millions he put into charity was unethical and fraudulent, and you base it off of this totally ridiculous nonsense that you heard from your fake news. You don't know what you're talking about. There is blatant evidence of Hillary's charity scams that you completely ignore, and there is no evidence of Trump's. There is only your imagination. The idea that he had multiple bankruptcies is stupid. He has over 500 companies and what 5? 5 went bankrupt? Do you know how many people failed 100 times before succeeding once? That's a stellar record. You just don't make any sense. Your perception of reality is distorted.

You have crammed so many howlers into one paragraph, it is swirling into a black hole of false claims about your hero, as well as assumptions about me of which you own no knowledge.  But since you reference the next point specifically, I need you to produce, as verification, some detailed data on the "hundreds of millions he put into charity."

Yeah, I really need you to prove that claim, and not in generalities.  To own that high ground for Trump, you better pony up some published, line-item research that supports that charitable claim, or I'm calling total BS on you.  And I am talking HIS OWN money.  Too bad you don't have his tax forms to rely on.  (Well, those might be a tad disappointing.)

Good luck.

I was going to take the time to reply to Flozen, but since he has less than zero credibility, and nobody takes him seriously, I'm not going to waste my time.  
I will mention one thing though.  Trump has always been very charitable.  Just the fact that he doesn't sit back in an office and revel in his money shows that he is charitable.  He puts his resources to work, and doesn't mind losing money if the cause is worth it.   Contrast that to someone like Bill Gates or Mark Fuckaburger who have sucked 10's of billions of $$$ out of everybody, and rather that do anything useful with their money, they do silly things like process sewage into drinking water in countries where they value the lives of animals more than they do human beings.  Bill has a habit of talking big.. pledging money, and then pulling out leaving the agencies he was supposed to be helping in the lurch, and doing more harm than good.  Fuckaburger never gives a dime to anybody unless he has a massive film crew with him to capture it.  I was stunned to find out that Zuckerberg has a dozen full time employees who do nothing but maintain his own personal Facebook page.  He's got the world's most expensive team of PR morons blowing smoke up his own ass.

@pppucci:

Yopu mentioned this in another thread, about Don Lemon shutting down a black commenator necause{according to you} he didn't agree with his liberal agenda}

Yopu was correct, and Don Lemon was being very hostile to the black commenator Necause.  As commenators go, Necause is one of my favorites.

Seriously though.. Don Lemon is constantly hostile to his guests.  If things don't go his way, he stomps and whines like a 2 year old.  CNN has a big problem with Don Lemon.  He doesn't learn, he only gets worse.  They can't get rid of him because of his tan,  and because his show is in prime time.  CNN created a beast that they have no control over.  I was never a fan of Bill O'Reilly either.  Bill's biggest flaw was that he would throw people like Trump under the bus just to make himself look like he was being "fair".  Any host that comes off as thinking or being better than his guests is a host that needs to go.  This is why Ed Sullivan was so successful, and why Letterman became so horrible.  Bill O'Reilly suffers from Limbaughitis.

@pppucci:

@raphjd:

CNN routinely has Symone Sanders on.   She's clearly on contract.    She doesn't think blacks can do any wrong and if they do, blame the crackers.

Don "sourpuss" Lemon also claimed that the Chicago kidnapping was NOT a hate crime.

CNN is shit.   20 years ago they had global respect, now they are little more than the DNC's "news" outlet.

And they also have Paris Denard, Jason Miller, Jeffry Lord, Jay Sakalow,  The like to have extreme liberals and extreme conservatives because a discussion among moderates would be boring.
You either have selective hearing, or are basing your impression of the network on YouTube clips that only show one side.  I think you will admit that when it comes to reporting pure news–which they often carry live and unedited--they are unbiased.  The talk-show hosts like Don Lemon and Anderson Cooper are clearly liberals, but they always have commentators across the political spectrum.  Whether they are under contract or not, the commentator's opinions are not necessarily those of the network.

The core of CNN's problems could be eliminated just by eliminating Don Lemon.   Anderson Cooper manages to be liberal without being antagonistic.    CNN won't touch Don Lemon though.. because he is their "token".    If I were black, I would not want Don Lemon representing me.  I don't think Don Lemon considers himself to be black.

@pppucci:

@raphjd:

"It ain't no hate crime" was said about the Chicago kidnapping, after the kidnappers admitted it was a hate crime.

Again, spoken by Symone Sanders on January 5, 2017.  She seems particularly obsessed with differentiating politically driven hate crimes from racialliall motivated hate crimes and only considers the latter legitimately labelled as such.  In this case, however, the attackers were equally shouting "Fuck Trump" as "Fuck you white boy.  Buta again, she is a political commentator..  CNN is actually pretty good at having a spectrum of political commentators.
I suspect you think CNN is liberal -leaning (and I agree) but not fake news.  But the egregious "offenses" you cite do not support that argument.

CNN is fake news, and is likely to go belly up in a few years.

@jazuko:

Trump for sure. tall blond daddy with a nice thicc ass who wants to MAGA :love:

You left out multi billionaire.

The demoboobs wanted KFC…  two small breasts, a left wing, two fat thighs 
Youtube Video