• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. Frederick
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 654
    • Posts 2497
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Frederick

    • RE: What's with Trump and Bloody Women?

      @pppucci:

      Presidents are subject to ridiculously false attacks all the time.  Think Obama as the founder if ISIS. That doesn't justify a public counterattack.  And even if it does, Trump stooped even lower than they did.  Either way, it is beneath the dignity of the President to get directly involved in such squabbles–that's what surrogates are for.  Even Nixon used Agnew to attack the press most of the time.

      As for the 25th amendment, even if Trump dressed up as Bette Midler ans sang the theme from Beaches, they would never use it.  The vice-president and a majority of the cabinet have to certify that the President is incapacitated.  Mike Pence's head is so far up Trump's ass that he can't tell whether it's night or day.

      There is not enough time in my day to put out every fire you start Pppussi.    If ISIS did not exist before the regime of Obama began, and Iraq and Afghanistan were under control of friendly forces.. who do you blame for ISIS?  Trump?  He was still hosting a TV show at the time.  Of course it's Obama's fault.  It didn't help that Obama fed the muslims hundreds of billion$ in a sneaky way to fund them.  Nor did it help that Obama flagrantly used very annoying, intrusive drones to attack wedding parties and make the entire muslim world hate the USA.    It was also cute how under Obama.. the Iranians were delivered one of our most sophisticated drones without a scratch.  Obama gave Pakistan our top secret stealth helicopter technology that nobody knew existed until the absurd attack on Obama Joe Biden's compound in Pakistan.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: CNN shifts tactics after last weeks decimating bombshells

      @pppucci:

      @raphjd:

      Cuomo then observed, “We couldn’t help her any more than we have. She’s got just a free ride so far from the media! We’re the biggest ones promoting her campaign, so it better happen.”

      Ok, that was 2014.

      HOWEVER, mainstream media as well as social media did absolutely everything they could to ensure Hillary would win right up until the polls closed in Nov 2016.

      I will agree that the major networks, NYT, WaPo clearly supported Hillary.  It didn't help that Trump attacked them at every turn.  There were outlets with large audiences–including FoxNews and Breitbart that supported Trump.  I think social media was more balanced.  There was a lot of fake news pillorying Hillary and certainly a lot of posts against Trump.

      And you didn't give me the references for the 'poor white people' and 'it wasn't a hate crime' quotes.

      If I didn't know better.. I would think you did not live in the USA. 
      I would hardly call Breitbart a major news outlet.

      As for the rest, they were ALL extremely against Trump except for Fox which was balanced.  Since the election, Fox is about 65% biased in Trump's favor.  People like Sauer Krauthampster  are hardly biased in favor of Trump.  Nor is Ms. Shepard Smith or Geraldo Riviera. 
      All the rest of the major news outlets hover between 80 and 97% biased towards the libtards.

      As for social media.. don't tell me it is balanced.  I lost half a dozen YouTube and Facebook accounts for posting the true facts.  One day, I hope to have some revenge upon Facebook in particular.  I can't believe that bozo Fuckaburger has aspirations of becoming President.  Not a chance.  He has far too many enemies (which was also Hillary's problem).  All the cheating, fraud, corruption, and money in the world could not offset the number of people that failed to show up at the voting booths for Hillary, or voted for Trump or Stein just because they hate Hillary so much.

      …and before you start on the massive number of votes (many fraudulent) in inner cities...  I would remind you that the demobat mooncraps dump massive amounts of government (taxpayer) subsidies into inner cities.. like Los Angeles, NYC,  Chicago, and Washington DC.. and we have seen how well that works.. crime capitals of the world...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: What's with Trump and Bloody Women?

      @raphjd:

      Trump is a child in an adult body.   I've never denied that.

      If you bothered to pay attention, I have always maintained that I hate Trump almost as much as I hate Hillary.  That's why I couldn't vote for either.

      Apparently Bill Clinton was an adult in a child's body.. aboard the pedophile "Lolita Express"
      http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262853/why-bill-clintons-26-trips-lolita-express-child-daniel-greenfield

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: When will Trump do something about Russian hacking?

      @sutieday:

      @raphjd:

      @sutieday:

      Only if they leak his tax returns!

      So sad.

      How far left do you require your "news" source be to know that Rachel Maddow had Trump's tax return months ago.   It was leaked, by Trump himself.

      Fucking catch up.

      It was not a recent Tax filling that was leaked. And it was assumed that Trump did it, but no evidence of such.

      I love this.. Sutieday says  "It was assumed that Trump did it, but no evidence"  !!!!!  What else is new?  That is the modus operandi of the moonbats.  assumed with no evidence…

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Hillary's E-mails

      @sutieday:

      I love how none of the Trump guys can defend him being on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express…

      Read all about pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express.. which BILL CLINTON took at least 26 trips on…

      http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/details-on-bill-clintons-ride-on-pedophiles-lolita-express-sought/article/2566852

      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html

      http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262853/why-bill-clintons-26-trips-lolita-express-child-daniel-greenfield

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: CNN shifts tactics after last weeks decimating bombshells

      @pppucci:

      There were instances during the campaign where reporters needed police escorts to leave Trump rallies after he riled them up against the press.
      Remember the first step in demagoguery is to discredit the press. Then the Supreme Leader asserts that he is the only reliable source of the truth. Once you buy into that, he can do whatever he likes.

      Nonsense.. but you reminded me of something.. the DNC was PAYING people to go to Trump rallies and stir up trouble.  Some were paid by the hour, some were paid a lump sum.  One notorious one was paid $2500. 
      Anybody ever heard of "inciting a riot"?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Hillary's E-mails

      @pppucci:

      @Frederick:

      @pppucci:

      If said this before and I'll say it again.  We all want to talk about Trump because he is our president.  And yes, we should learn from our past mistakes, but not use them to justify our current ones.

      You don't want to TALK about Trump.  All you want to do is make up stories and attack the man and his family.  Even if the stories were true (which they are not) you still have no business attacking him.   A sort of example of this is if you found out your boss at work was planting his turnip in the office secretary.  True or not, you have no business spreading that information publicly and destroying the man.

      We have every right to criticize him because we the people of the US are his boss. If you mean we should respect the office of the presidency, then tell Trump to start acting like a president.

      And yet.. you moonbitches complain incessantly when anybody criticizes YOU. 
      You are partially correct in that you have the right to criticize any CANDIDATE, but once elected, that right is pretty much gone.  After that, it's called "sedition" because the President has won the election.  When you imply that "Trump isn't acting like a President"… well, that is WHY he got elected!  Every other president for over 100 years has been nothing but a politician - expert liar - and often a lawyer.  The election selected who was wanted, and they got him.  There is a reason why societies have governments.. it is so that there is not anarchy in which everybody has their own set of rules and basically does whatever they feel like.
      And lastly.. if nothing else.. when you do criticize him, or anybody, you better be sure that your facts are correct.. that your facts EXIST, and that you aren't being deceptive.  There is nobody here with any reputable credibility who doesn't realize that you make things up, distort the facts that do exist, and are full of Pelosi.

      I got another tip for you.  It isn't going to get any better for you moonbats anytime soon, in fact, it's going to get worse.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • San Francisco pays the price for being stupid $190k!

      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/30/san-francisco-to-pay-190g-to-undocumented-immigrant-over-sanctuary-law-violation-lawyer-says.html

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Hillary's E-mails

      @pppucci:

      If said this before and I'll say it again.  We all want to talk about Trump because he is our president.  And yes, we should learn from our past mistakes, but not use them to justify our current ones.

      You don't want to TALK about Trump.  All you want to do is make up stories and attack the man and his family.  Even if the stories were true (which they are not) you still have no business attacking him.  A sort of example of this is if you found out your boss at work was planting his turnip in the office secretary.  True or not, you have no business spreading that information publicly and destroying the man.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Hillary's E-mails

      @pppucci:

      I know you guys hate facts, but here are a few from politifact:
      Illegally deleted?

      "Clinton’s email record remains incomplete. FBI investigators found thousands of work-related emails that were not among the 30,000 Clinton turned over to the State Department, and many more might still be out in the ether. Comey said there is no evidence these emails were deleted in an attempt to conceal information."

      Hacked by Russia?

      "Had Clinton used an @state.gov email address, it’s very likely that it would have been hacked. In fact, it’s known that Russian actors recently hacked the State Department email system. According to the New York Times, some State Department employees turned to private email addresses at least temporarily in order to avoid Russian hacker disruptions."

      http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/19/politifact-sheet-hillary-clintons-email-controvers/

      You guys rail about fake news, but propagate it yourself.  But at the very least it is old news.  You act like Hilary was president.  Her political career is over.  Move on!

      Hillary continues to be political.. and has formed her own PAC. 
      Your statements are absolutely ludicrous.  For instance, you said "HAD she used a state.gov email address, it's very likely that it would have been hacked".  Well guess what.. her e-mail WAS hacked.. by several different hackers, you idiot!  Don't talk to me about rules about calling someone an idiot when you make such an idiotic statement.  It pisses me off when someone has zero regard for the truth, and then accuses ME of having no regard for the truth!  Go plant your turnip in a minefield!  Don't talk to me about Comey.. his ass got fired for good reason.  Even HILLARY and John Pedosta were calling for Comey to be fired. 
      Hillary was ORDERED by Congress to turn over those e-mails.  AFTER she was ordered to turn over those emails by Congress, instead of turning them over, she blatantly obstructed justice, and committed a major crime, by hiring a firm (that didn't have any security clearance) to delete those e-mails off the server she illegally had in her basement.. and not only that use "bleach bit" to make sure that nobody who got access to her hard drives could ever retrieve the data.  That is an EXTREMELY important point!  An online hacker can't retrieve e-mails that have been deleted.  If Hillary's intention was to prevent hackers from getting her e-mails, then all she had to do was delete them (which is also illegal).  She was clearly obstructing justice and belongs in prison for making sure that even when the US government got physical possession of her hard drives, they STILL could not retrieve the e-mails by physically pulling the magnetic information off of the platters of her hard drive and re-constructing it.  Even more absurd than that is… she blatantly lied to Congress about the mobile devices she was using - illegally - while abroad.  Those mobile devices are not secure at all, and she was using them while in hostile regions.  She told Congress she only used one.  Bullshit.. she had about 15 of them, and literally used a HAMMER on them to prevent the US government from getting ahold of them and reconstructing what she had used them for.  It's bad enough that Hillary let vital information get into the hands of our enemies, but it is extremely important that the US Government knows WHAT information got leaked out, so they can deal with it.  Just a hypothetical example:  if Hillary messaged that agent X was going to enter Libya on a certain date, at a certain location, and assassinate Muammar Khadafy... the government of the US must know that so they can do something to protect the life of Agent X, and prevent retaliations and repercussions from those leaks.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Hillary's E-mails

      @pppucci:

      @raphjd:

      Her political career is over.  Move on!

      Isn't she still on her "everyone but me caused me to lose" tour?

      Exactly.  Not really a political tour, more like a tease for her upcoming memoirs.  Whenever you guys don't want to talk about Trump, you deflect to Hillary and Obama.

      Oh bullshit.  We have gone over this before.  ALL you moonbats want to talk about is Trump.. and sweep everybody else under the carpet.  Hillary and Obama are still mouthing off within the past week, when they should be keeping their mouths shut!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Hillary's E-mails

      It's fascinating to watch how moonbats twist facts into fiction.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Workers in Ivankas factories are beaten with high heel shoes!

      @aadam101:

      @jazuko:

      @aadam101:

      Everybody knows that the Trump family has been making China great again for decades.   JOBS JOBS JOBS! Apparently things aren't quite as great as Trump would have us believe.  Luckily the nightmare these Chinese workers have to endure on a daily basis working for the Trumps will be over soon enough.  Ivanka is moving her production to Indonesia where workers have fewer rights and lower wages.

      GANZHOU, China (AP) — A worker with blood dripping from his head marked a low point in the tense, grinding life at a southeastern China factory used by Ivanka Trump and other fashion brands. An angry manager had hit him with the sharp end of a high-heeled shoe. :bithfight:

      Workers from the factory, including one current and two former employees who spoke to The Associated Press, reported overtime that stretched past midnight, steep production quotas and crude verbal abuse at Ganzhou Huajian International Shoe City Co. They said beatings were not unheard of, but the shoe attack, which all three say they witnessed last year, was violent enough to stand out.

      "He was bleeding right from the middle of the head," the current worker said.

      "There was a lot of blood. He went to the factory's nurse station, passing by me," said a second man, who said he quit his job at Huajian because of the long hours and low pay.

      http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/politics/article/Making-Ivanka-Trump-shoes-Long-hours-low-pay-11251242.php

      this reflects more on the Chinese and Chinese culture honestly.

      Gotcha. So  it's China's fault that Ivanka abuses her workers?

      Everyday.. you go misstating facts.. and turning them 180 degrees.

      Do you think Ivanka lives in China?  Do you think she speaks Chinese? 
      By your definition.. anybody who invests in China or purchases a product made in China is a monster.  How about blaming China for how workers are treated in China?  Oh, I forgot.. your a moonbat.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Trump plasters fakes news all over his walls

      @aadam101:

      The only thing they were guilty of is being black.

      WOW!  you are pretty racist there aadam101!  You consider being black to be a crime?  Gee whiz!    😮

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Derrick Porter and Justin Styles.. LIVE!

      The guy topping Justin Styles in this video is the one and only DERRICK PORTER, who is Justin's real life boyfriend.  
      They will be performing live and in color on June 30, 2017.. at 8PM EST,  5PM Pacific time  on Chaturbate..  It's free to watch.. but I think there is a way you can tip if you want.
      They will attempt to make a baby.

      https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=f130162088a5484f08da995e632c1e4b72d74a441235647d&viewcomm=262920#comm262920

      posted in Chit Chat
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Angela Merkel Fact-Shames Donald Trump, Again

      @aadam101:

      @mhorndisk:

      Seriously, he had 30,000 people on average at his rallies, Clinton could barely get 3,000 without having Beyoncé open for her, because most of them left after the concert. It was in no way improbable that he won. It was SO obvious, that you clearly do not have a grasp on REALITY.

      As far as struggled, that's a matter of perception as well. He has kicked major ass and honestly you are being delusional. Are you really going to waste your time trying to convince us that he's weak or something? Do you REALLY think that's going to have any effect, whatsoever? Again, you are living in a dream world, far away from REALITY. You're just not even close to an accurate perspective of things and you're trying to manipulate ours.

      Yeah and he also had millions of people at his inauguration!  Do you really believe the things that you say?  Clinton got 3 million more votes.

      Not that the popular votes, which included an estimated 6 million votes from people who had no business voting, mean anything…
      or that Trump knew he could not win the states of New York and California so he intentionally didn't waste time or money campaigning there.  There is also the issue at the inauguration.. it was RAINING!  Don't you remember Dubbya Bush putting on his rain poncho?  Also, for the first time ever, Trump was smart enough and considerate enough to provide areas of cover for the people attending so they would not get rained on.  For that reason a lot of them went under those enclosures - leaving bare spots of open grass.  Then there is the issue that the inauguration was held in Washington DC.. which is populated by an almost entirely Moonbat community.  Hillary got 91% of the votes of Washington DC.. Trump got just 4%.. and you wonder why there might not be a lot of Trump supporters in Washinton DC?

      Washington DC (like other capitol cities) is like a steaming pile of Pelosi, where all the people wanting free handouts, government giveaways, etc. go to live.  They figure they can get their welfare checks faster if they go to the belly of the beast.

      https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/district-of-columbia

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Angela Merkel Fact-Shames Donald Trump, Again

      @raphjd:

      I wonder if Merkel will admit the facts of her "ya'll come on in" open borders policy.

      Here's Merkel's favorite song "Ya'll Come!" 
      Youtube Video

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • CNN shifts tactics after last weeks decimating bombshells

      CNN got caught red handed in several scathing comments from it's producers, reporters, and contributors last week.. all admitting that the Trump / Russia thing is a non-story that they are only pushing for ratings.  They also just fired 3 reporters at CNN after being hit with a $100 million lawsuit that they will probably lose.  You can bet their stockholders are shaking in their boots.

      Anyway..  I was watching a bit of CNN this morning - which I RARELY do.  They have shifted tactics.   They seem to be abandoning their Russia attacks on Trump other than to say "it COULD have happened".   Instead, they have begun to focus on.. the 2020 election!   The campaign starts now!   They just will not accept that Trump is president, and they are looking past him.  
      UNBELIEVABLE!  
      I wonder if CNN will still be around in 2020?  Now THERE is a story.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Moonbats in mourning.. they are so sad.. Trumpcare will be GREAT!

      @abcddddd:

      This thread is not getting enough coverage.

      Thanks for this, pppucci.

      This thread, nor any other thread, benefits from your superfluous spam. 
      I just got done posting a long and very meaningful post in this thread..  it's all ready for you nasty, parasitic moonbats to give a "thumbs down"  and tag it with inane replies.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Moonbats in mourning.. they are so sad.. Trumpcare will be GREAT!

      @pppucci:

      A good number, about 15 million would forego insurance due to elimination of the individual mandate.  While this may seem good, remember that if these people do get sick, the burden of their care will eventually fall on the taxpayer.
      Another 4 million would loose their employer-provided insurance, again because it will no longer be mandated.  And not everyone's premiums would go down.  In fact, those nearing retirement age would face an astronomical increase in premiums and may price them out of the market.

      Here we go again.  I'm going to tackle this a different way this time:
      Anytime that "insurance" gets involved, costs SKYROCKET.  When people pay "out of pocket" they demand to get their money's worth.  When they have insurance, they want the most expensive options available to them.  A simple example of this is eyeglasses.  If you have no insurance and go to buy frames, you might pay something like $50 for the frames.  If you have insurance, they often have a separate area in the store to buy frames which cost $250 and up - for virtually the same frames.   
      Does it make sense that the government should FORCE you to purchase health insurance like they force you to buy home and car insurance? NO!  Obama forced people to buy insurance even if they did not want it, did not need it, or could not afford it. 
      As for employers paying for it.. do employers magically produce the money to pay for it?  NO!  That money ultimately comes out of the workers one way or another.  Just look in stores and restuarants.. they have far fewer employees than they used to.. because the employers cannot afford to pay for more than skeleton crews.  Aslo, employers are extremely reluctant to give people full time jobs because when a worker is full time, the employer gets stuck paying the tab.  Because of that, employees work only part-time, and are stuck working 2 or 3 jobs - none of which have the "free"  health insurance. 
      Here's a brief list of some medical costs and how outrageous they are:
      LASIK -  $2200 per eye..  takes about 1 minute to perform and you are with the doctor about 15 minutes.  That's $4400
      Dental Implants - all teeth replaced with an upper and lower arch  that is screwed into your jawbone.  The entire procedure takes about 10 hours - done in one day - and the cost?  $48,000
      Heart Stent - a one hour procedure.  a small incision is made in the thigh, a tiny metallic "balloon" is fed through up into your heart, and when in position, expanded where it keeps a valve open.  Cost:  about $78,000  (which includes 2 days in hospital for observation)

      Who has money to piss away like that?  It sickens me that anybody is paying that amount of money.  Those insurance companies are getting their money from somewhere.  Wouldn't you like to have that money in your pocket rather than have it sucked out of you like a vampire for your entire life and given to the insurance companies?

      Let me summarize all of this.  Moonbat democrats would like the government to tax away all your money either directly or indirectly, and "give" (force) you to have things like health insurance and other programs.  They want the government to control your life, take your money, and take the power away from the citizens.  You know what the term for that is?  COMMUNISM!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • 1
    • 2
    • 82
    • 83
    • 84
    • 85
    • 86
    • 124
    • 125
    • 84 / 125