Posts made by Frederick

Transfers have been mighty SLOW for the past couple of days..

One weird thing though, I had a few files that were over 98% complete that had stopped for several days, and suddenly they completed.

@rgeregerbil:

Read that "recent privacy concerns were enough to have the operating system banned from several torrent trackers" - TorrentFreak.com.

Should I not upgrade?

Thanks 

I have downloaded several hundred torrents with Windows 10.. and no problem.
I have also seeded them.

@778939:

Lately television has made great progresses and I for myself wouldn't have believed in 3D television. But now that at least it's here with glasses, I can't wait to see it out without such.

These new technical possibilities make me greatly anticipate where porn's going to in the future, regarding 3D - yet there are as good as no BluRay ones out yet even if it has been on the market now for several years.

This makes me wonder: Why are there as good as no such movies on BluRay out yet though it has been said that the porn industry would be the drive in the propagation of new media formats?

Probably because the increase in visual quality is not noticable.  Also, mobile devices and laptops have become the norm - instead of desktop computers.  Mobile and Laptop screens are small, and don't deliver the "effect" of having higher resolutions.  I use an external 42" screen with my laptop.

At some point, enough is ENOUGH.  We don't really need better resolution.  A 90 minute video encoded to a size of 1 GB is just as good as a 90 minute move encoded to 4.7 GB.. which is just as good as a 90 minute movie encoded to be 1 TB.

@Popper:

1 to 2 years is for recordable DVD media, not "pressed" DVD, which are much longer keeping data.

I didn't think of that!  I know that there are ink CD/DVDs and metallic ones, and the re-writable ones that rarely ever work.  It didn't occur to me that "pressed" ones would have a much longer life.

I wonder if those future 1 TB Blurays will be pressed or recordable?

I also don't like DVDs because they get scratched seemingly just by BREATHING on them.  Too fragile. 
I once had a magneto optical drive which had a sealed tray that contained a re-writable 1 GIG disc inside.  It was far too slow and cost about $1000!  That was probably the stupidest thing I ever bought!

@pittstop17:

I am using u Torrent. Anything better?

Not really… but Utorrent does have a few bugs, which never get fixed because the admin tech of Utorrent is a prick power mad punk that lives in his mother's attic and plays video games all day long when not insulting anybody who has a suggestion or question.  If you go to their forum and search the posts of Dreadwingknight, you will see what I mean.

When utorrent doesn't work, I use either Vuze or Transmission QT (for Windows)

I think the current standard size for a BluRay disc is 50 GB.  The goal is to put 1 TB on a bluray disc. 
That may sound great.. but consider that a DVD is only supposed to maintain it's data reliably for ONE year - two at best.  I don't expect that bluray discs are any more reliable. 
Can you imagine popping in your 1 TB BluRay disc.. only to find that it will not load!  EEEEEK!

I almost never download any movie that is encoded to be over 10mb per minute.  That is 900 megs for a 90 minute long movie.  A DVD sized rip is 50mb per minute!  That is ridiculous and does nothing but take 5 times longer to transfer, and 5 times as much storage.  Unless the movie is a DVD rip with VOB files and intact menus, I don't think there is any justification in having movies of that size.

Once someone downloads the tiny torrent file itself, why does the website have to be "up" to transfer the files? 
It seems to me that the torrent website (in this case GTRU) is only hosting the tiny torrent files.  Why is it that when a torrent website is down, the files associated with the torrents don't transfer?

@Popper:

Basically the one initial seeding client is giving out mostly* different pieces to the different downloading peers. Then the downloading peers share the pieces among them. That leads to every downloading peer getting all the pieces which the initial seeding peer gave to the others.

In this process, peers with high free bandwidth get most of the pieces and will redistribute them to the other peers, often multiple times, which makes all getting a piece sent out by the initial seeding peer fast(er).

• = if the initial seeding peer has set the "initial seeding" (aka "superseeding", "strict initial seeding") function, he'll send out first each piece only once and it requires the downloading peers to ensure it's distributed further. This setting usually slows down the upload if there are only a few peers, but if there are many (~10) and the uploader got a slow upload connection, it optimises the use of it.

Having the initial seeder only send out each piece only once could easily be a disaster!

@Spintendo:

Timing-out and then requiring a login back to the site is a security measure meant to protect the integrity of your account.

That is a great feature.. but I wish there were a way to turn that feature OFF because my computer is accessible ONLY by me, and i have no security issues.

There should be a setting for how long a duration of inactivity results in a time out.  I would suggest 12 hours.

The best way to find duplicates is to compare file sizes.  There are programs that do binary compares also.. and tag the dupilcates.  One thing that drives me crazy is when there are two movies..  the exact same size.. and the same movie, but someone has editted the files so that they are not a 100% match… only 99.999% match.  Quite annoying.

@raphjd:

Please be aware that many of the videos have multiple names due to them having multiple distributors.

Here are a few examples;

Allez les bleus!
aka: Screw Balls
aka: Kicker = Ficker
aka: Soccer Fuckers
aka: They Came From Behind

Bains douches
aka: Bareback Sauna
aka: Cum Inside: Bareback Members Only

Le Gland bleu: Deep Down Under
aka: Divers Go Down
aka: Diving Lagoon
aka: Plunged: Deep Down Under

Hard Sex
aka: Down on Your Knees: Forbidden Desire
aka: Leather Muscle Studs

Internat
aka: Dirty School Boys
aka: Further Education

I just found this out because I was sorting through my porn collection and found a lot of duplicates.

Here's a great place to find out if you have any duplicates;

http://www.wtule.net/Intro

@jerkbud88:

What are some of your favorite ass-to-mouth scenes or movies? Any suggestion.

I'd suggest a scene from Treasure Island Media - Bad Seed.

You are the first person I have seen who likes Treasure Island Media!  Most people say that they nearly go straight after seeing a TIM video.

@Spintendo:

In the scenario you've described, where one client is giving out pieces to >10 leechers, each client will only be broadcasting the same "here's what I have" for each handed out piece, thereby ensuring that sometime after the 50% mark each leecher in the swarm will end up possessing the exact same pieces.

This is because it's the seeding client that determines whom gets what. Some believe that's the job of the tracker, but the tracker never participates in the actual exchange of data. It's for the individual clients to determine what data is given out, by communicating to other clients what pieces they have. The broadness of your scenario's distribution will always be limited to how many different pieces one client can distribute over its 4-20 individual upload slots allowed for in the settings. A broader type of distribution almost always occurs in scenarios where there are >10 seeders.

Yes… it's the seeding client that determines who get's what.  To be most efficient.. the seeding client should be giving different pieces to different leechers.. but that is not what is going on.  The client's are doling out the same pieces to all the leechers in the same order.

Straight people must go insane because there is zero chance that they could ever keep up with the amount of straight porn there is.

Even with gay porn.  It is unbelievable to me how much gay porn there is cumming to this site every day.  And that is not all.  I am on other gay porn torrent sites, and they get different gay movies than typically get posted here.  One site has a lot of low quality porn which thankfully doesn't wind up here that much.  Another site has an enormous library of gay themed movies with little or no sexual activity (like I am going to waste my time with that!). Yet another site is loaded with asian porn which very few people are interested in.

Quite often when I'm downloading a torrent, there will be one seeder with 100% of the file, and several others with a percentage of the file. 
That makes perfect sense to me.  HOWEVER, what does NOT make sense to me is that all the partial downloaders tend to have the same percentage of the file downloaded.  For instance..  all the partial downloaders will have 20%, then they will all have 21%, then 22%, 23%, etc.

It seems to be that the way torrents are supposed to work is that each downloader / leecher is getting DIFFERENT parts of the file instead of everybody getting the same parts in order.

Lets say that a file is 100 parts and there are 10 leechers.  If each downloader  / leecher got all the parts in the same order, then the original poster would have to seed that file long enough for all 100 parts to be downloaded.  If each leecher each got a unique set of 10 parts, then the original seeder could disappear in the time it takes to grab just 10 parts.  Each of the 10 leechers would have 10 unique parts… the original seeder goes offline.. and each leecher completes the file by getting the parts from the other leechers.

This is an over simplification, but it is supposed to be the way torrents work.  There is no advantage to having multiple leechers grabbing the same parts, because if the person with 100% goes offline before someone else gets 100%.. then all the leechers are screwed!

===
Can someone explain to me why torrent client's don't "randomize" their send packets so that there is a much better chance of all the pieces being distributed?  I go insane (well MORE insane) whenever I have an incomplete download and all the 100% people are gone.. and there is a dozen leechers all with the same incomplete file.

These are supposedly real Bieber nudes, but I think they have been modified.  The resolution seems to have been intentionally lowered, and there are missing tattoos.  Most obvious is the missing crucifix on his chest, and the vertical tattoo on his neck. Also, in the pic of his cock, seems to have a woodie with a cock ring on.

Most people only view the newest posts on a torrent site.

When a DMCA request is made, that post is removed…
If the movie was any good, it is sure to be uploaded again.. and again.. and again..
Not intentionally, but by accident.  If someone has that good movie, and they find that
it is not on the site.. they will upload it.

Consider if the DMCA request was never made.  Then, that movie would fade away into
the depths of the site, and very few people would see it since it is no longer new.  People
who have the movie who tried to upload it could not, because it would already exist, and
duplicates are not allowed.

So, effectively, these DMCA requests are actually causing those movies to be "Bumped" up
into the new posts so that they are seen by the people looking at the new posts. 
The DMCA takedowns often have the opposite effect of that the people reporting them are
after.

Quite often, I find I am downloading movies that are several years old.  Of course they were
posted before, but I would never have found them if they were not posted again now.  The reason
they are posted again now is that they are not on the site - because they were removed in the past.

Toronto has so many gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transsexuals, and others that when a kid is straight, they are bullied mercilessly in school.  It is extremely traumatizing for a child to come out to their parents as being straight in Toronto, Canada.  :cheers:

Why is it that sometimes a movie doesn't download.. typically about half of it downloads - then stops.. yet there are one or more peers that have 100% of the file?

Any ideas on how to forcibly pull that file from the peer?

Underage performers are very rare.  The main reason is, when they are found to be underage, all their movies become blacklisted and can no longer be sold or even given away.

The performers who are underage, tend to look older than they are, which is how they got away with performing underage in the first place.

Far more common are performers who are of legal age who LOOK underage.

It is ironic that the true underage performers don't look underage!

Pedophiles are interested primarily in performers who are underage.  It is a fetish that I don't understand. I don't understand a lot of fetishes such as scat, abuse, feet, etc.  I can't recall seeing any performer under the age of 16 which interested me.  I look for performers in good shape, attractive, energetic, enthusiastic, know what they are doing, enjoying themselves, etc.  Very few performers meet that criteria until they are in their 20's.