Posts made by Frederick

@royalcrown89:

The picture you posted which includes Trump and Weinerstein is interesting.   Trump has a LARGE head, but look at that photo you posted.. Trump's head is tiny compared to that of Weinstein, because he is standing about 5 feet behind him.  Hardly and warm embrace.. not any friendship there.. more like a photo bombing on the part of Weinstein.  
The photo you posted reminds me of a guy that said he met Frank Sinatra and is friends with him.  I found out later from the guy's son that what really happened is they went to a Frank Sinatra concert - and his dad WAVED to Frank from 20 feet away.

By the way, I'd bet money that Weinstein is in that photo because he's interested in the woman in the black dress that is next to him.. NOT Trump - whom he hates.

@raphjd:

Where is my Congresswoman's (Sheila Jackson Lee) tax return?

How do I know she has no conflict of interest.    She could be donating to BLM or Antifa for all we know.

I wonder if Auntie Maxine Waters tax returns would reveal where the money came from to buy her $4.3 million mansion.  That's pretty good on a salary of $175,000 per year.  She must have put away every penny she ever earned to buy that place.

@sutieday:

Donald Trump is to address the annual conference of an anti-LGBT group which has been classified as a hate group.

who classified them as a hate group?  Let me guess…

Meanwhile.. where's your criticism of leftists who praise the terrorist / racist "Black Lives Matter"  and shield mega sexual offenders such as Harvey Weinstein?    Eminem is some kind of hypocrite.. he is so anti-gay that his career went into a nosedive, and he had to beg Elton John to make nice with the gays for him.  He probably sucked Elton's cock and then turned around and took Elton's member up his slim shady ass.

By the way.. how many of you are aware that Eminem's predecessor - Marky Mark - used to be a male escort - for males?

When you go to insure your car.. would you expect to pay more for insurance if you:
A.  had no accidents, had no citations, owned a car that cost $10,000, and drove 5000 miles a year…
or
B.  had some accidents, some citations, owned a $100,000 car, and drove 80,000 miles a year?

Apparently, moonbats think you should pay the same regardless of whether you were A or B
....
Just today, the moonbats are whining that Trump's order will result in healthy people paying less for insurance but will also result in sick people paying MORE for insurance!  Well.. boo hoo!  Of COURSE they should be!

I can tell you that the profit margins of small businesses are quite often less than 5% per year.

Which business do you think would go out of business first in regards to paying for employee health benefits?
The one that hires young healthy people? 
or
The one that hires eldery people, and those that take advantage of maternity leave and workman's comp?

At one small office I worked in, everyone in the office suffered because of one woman and her litter of little bastard kids making more health insurance claims than everybody else in the office combined.  Why should I as a single male be penalized because this bitch has 7 kids from 2 marriages?    (that company went out of business less than 2 years after I left.. basically.. I set up all their computers and software for them.. but once they needed to get new computers and update the software.. the whole operation imploded because they couldn't find anybody do to it right.  What they had me doing for FREE on my own time, they paid an outside computer service $20,000 in just labor costs to upgrade their system.. which failed.  I had set something up on the computer which would do in 30 minutes perfectly. what it took a person 40 hours to manually complete with errors).

@royalcrown89:

@Frederick:

@royalcrown89:

I have another question: Would you all take the same stance with our next president, regardless of which party (or no party at all) he or she belongs to? Just for the sake of argument, would you support Gavin Newsom or Deval Patrick not releasing their tax returns or disclosing any financial information about which companies they are invested in or have divested themselves from upon becoming president or is this one president the exception?

There are dozens of things far more important than one's tax returns.  Such as.. producing a birth certificate BEFORE 1.5 years after they have been elected president (and even then.. a controversial one).  Also far more important is where they were raised for the first 13 years of their life.  Such as a muslim nation like Indonesia.

Well, if that's important then so is the possible corruption of a sitting president. How do we know he is not being blackmailed by Russia to behave erratically to weaken our position around the world? This is a serious problem and it's dangerous to blindly follow someone who is the current president and we have no idea if he's being controlled by a foreign government. You can't argue that the former president who has no power now is more of a danger to our democracy than the current one sitting in office who is going out of his way to hide financial statements that other presidents have provided easily. How come President Obama–-no longer in office---is still being subjected to conspiracy theorists and birthers such as yourself but it's crazy to want to see the sitting president's tax returns which is something every other president in modern history has provided to the American people to establish trust?  :pleasant:

I've been WAITING for someone to set up this argument so I could squash it. 
You are suggesting that the Russians could blackmail a president.  Really?  Do you honestly think that anything the Russians could possibly do more damage than the relentless daily attacks made from WITHIN the USA by the "Fake News" of CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, and ABC?

If you are so worried about blackmail… you must be terrified that Hillary got $145 million donated from Russia to her personal Clinton Foundation right after giving Russia 20% of the USA's uranium reserves.    You must also be terrified that John Pedosta - who was Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff,  Barack Obama's counselor, and Hillary Clinton's campaign manager was a board member of a Russian corporation - and lied about it?

Tax returns indeed...
Let me clue you in.  In tax returns, the idea is to minimize one's net worth to lower their tax burden.  EVERYBODY does that.  That does not mean they lie, it means they invest and divest, and do whatever it is legally permitted to minimize their net worth. 
Do you think Trump wants people to start saying that he is only worth $2 billion instead of $10 billion?  That would devastate his power and influence in the real estate industry. 
Here is one simple example:  If someone purchased a building for $5 billion and sold it for $2 billion.. but also made $4 billion in other ventures.. should that person be taxed for $4 billion for that year?  Or for $1 billion?  (taking the $3 billion loss into account).  Moonbats would say $4 billion.  Trump would say $1 billion. 
That is ironic, because you can bet that the moonbats would want to tax him for $6 billion if that $5 billion property INCREASED in value by $2 billion.

Again.. someone's taxes are between that person and the IRS.  If they committed a crime, then let the IRS reveal the crime.  Nobody has a right to do their own analysis of someone's records.  Besides.. publishing tax returns would hurt a successful businessman, while doing no damage to some moonbat that never had a legitimate job in their entire life.  Where do you suppose crooked Hillary got her hundreds of millions from?  Baking cookies?  or crooked political donations?

@flozen:

@Frederick:

People seem to think they need a gun for protection.  I know of a lot of people who carry knives for protection.   I would like to see people post examples where a gun or knife was ever used to PROTECT someone.

In my experience, no weapon would have improved my situation in any altercation.  A weapon would only have exacerbated it.   One must assume that the attacker has a better weapon, and is better skilled at using it, and would be more prone to using it.   Shit happens.. having a weapon is not likely to avoid the shit.

I wonder how many people who insist they need a gun or knife for protection when they are out on the streets at night wear a bullet proof vest? or carry a flashlight?  i bet almost NONE.    Yet they have their gun or knife!

Frederick, you're speaking truth to power (which, appropriately enough, is a term of early use by the peace-loving Quakers).

http://www.quaker.org/sttp.html

The push to allow guns into stores (!), churches (!!), and bars (triple !!!), etc., in the guise of people feeling "safer," is madness.

Surely it is a sign of the "end of times" that we agree on something!

I would add that nobody without at least a 2 years associate college degree should be permitted to have a gun - that includes POLICE.  Around where I live, county police used to be required to have a 4 year college degree.  Now, they typically have nothing but a high school diploma or even a GED.   That law would certainly take legal guns out of the hands of a lot of people of certain ethnic groups - not mentioning any because I'm not racist.   I'm sure mentally retarded people are not allowed to own or carry a gun (with the exception of police).  People taking certain medications including marijuana (even medical marijuana) are prohibited from owning or carrying a gun.. as if that law is enforced!

Lastly.. who should be put in prisons?   I would say that the priority would be to imprison people who are dangerous - such as those that break the weapon laws.  After they are put away, then put the sex offenders away.  If there is still room left in the prisons after putting them away, then stick the crooks in there - such as Hillary.

@royalcrown89:

Because the 2nd amendment  ;D No seriously, I think it's about the feeling of safety you get from having the gun.

I suppose that weak minded people would feel more secure with a gun - a false sense of security is quite dangerous.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/12/anthony-bourdain-blasts-hillary-clinton-s-shameful-interview-regarding-harvey-weinstein.html

Celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain bashed Hillary Clinton on Twitter Wednesday calling her interview on CNN about Harvey Weinstein “uninspiring,” “shameful” and “disingenuous.”

Hillary is currently in her 11th month of her pity party.  

People seem to think they need a gun for protection.  I know of a lot of people who carry knives for protection.  I would like to see people post examples where a gun or knife was ever used to PROTECT someone.

In my experience, no weapon would have improved my situation in any altercation.  A weapon would only have exacerbated it.  One must assume that the attacker has a better weapon, and is better skilled at using it, and would be more prone to using it.  Shit happens.. having a weapon is not likely to avoid the shit.

I wonder how many people who insist they need a gun or knife for protection when they are out on the streets at night wear a bullet proof vest? or carry a flashlight?  i bet almost NONE.    Yet they have their gun or knife!

@royalcrown89:

I have another question: Would you all take the same stance with our next president, regardless of which party (or no party at all) he or she belongs to? Just for the sake of argument, would you support Gavin Newsom or Deval Patrick not releasing their tax returns or disclosing any financial information about which companies they are invested in or have divested themselves from upon becoming president or is this one president the exception?

There are dozens of things far more important than one's tax returns.  Such as.. producing a birth certificate BEFORE 1.5 years after they have been elected president (and even then.. a controversial one).  Also far more important is where they were raised for the first 13 years of their life.  Such as a muslim nation like Indonesia.

@royalcrown89:

@cteavin:

@royalcrown89:

Yep, because the current president and his family have NEVER been ANYWHERE near Harvey Weinstein, right? Only those on the left have EVER been around him and have possibly invested in anything related to him, meaning there's NO evidence of our current president ever being in the same circle as Weinstein and probably doesn't even know him, right? TRY AGAIN!

Can you prove that Harvey Weinstein has NEVER given money to ANYONE in #45's family or to #45 himself? If you have the president's tax returns and can prove that he has never invested in The Weinstein Company, any of the films or shows produced by said company and/or hasn't received money from Harvey Weinstein, then you should probably produce those tax returns or it's perfectly logical for someone to assume the president is financially tied to Weinstein also. The president had a successful TV show and has been given money by many different banks around the world as well as individuals who have invested in his brand from time to time. We have access to every other president's financial records going all the way back to Nixon, with the exception being the current president. So no sir, YOU are the hypocrite for supporting a blatant liar and coward who has yet to prove to the Americans that he is supposed to serve that he is not a corrupt, immoral, lunatic bigot.

I'm relatively new to these forums and with the exception of the occasional "moonbat" and "Oasama" for "Obama" the tone in these threads has been civil, productive, and interesting. This is the first time I've read something openly antagonistic like this and it's a turn-off.

I'd like to see people interact on these boards but if anyone were to come here and see badly written shouting, they're not staying. Tone it down. There's an actual human on the other end of your computer.

Personally, I don't care if you like or dislike Trump, you're reasoning is flawed. You're mad that he didn't show his tax returns – he doesn't have to, and this thread isn't about his tax returns. It's not even about POTUS. It's a fact, a solid fact that Weinstein has given money to the DNC for decades. It's solid fact that the leftist, leftists were all around him. And those left-leaning celebrities are only now coming out against him, only now telling their decades-old stories. The point is that these very same celebrities were sitting on real evidence of a scumbag (Weinstein) while virtue signaling.

I've seen some of your actual titles and while you have been civil, I see no signs of a few others being civil. The main point of my post in this thread is about hypocrisy. It is widely known that the president and his family are also friends of Weinstein, yet you all have painted the left as his only friends. Well, once upon a time the president was a frequent leftist and whether he was a fake leftist or not; we do not know if he ever received money or gave money to Weinstein at any point because he is the first president to not release his tax returns. That's the point of my post and I do not appreciate you coming at me with some phony accusation as if this forum hasn't turned into a conservative echo chamber. And "badly written" makes you sound close to being a "grammar Nazi" so be careful.

What nonsense.   Being a billionaire and major TV personality in New York City, Trump has been photographed with just about everybody that one could think of including Harvey Weinstein.   I tried, but could not find even one photo of Trump with Weinstein.   The closest I could find was some social gathering in which Weinstein is standing in front of the camera, and a few feet behind him is Trump standing with his wife on one side, some other woman on his other side
In fact, Weinstein hates Trump.  Weinstein hates all people who aren't leftists or have big tits.  Weinstein produced several shlockumentaries with leftist pig Michael Moore including "Fahrenheit 9/11"
http://uproxx.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-donald-trump-hands-of-stone/

@cteavin:

The other day I was talking with my kids (I'm a high school teacher)

I'm sure that some of my school teachers were high also.

@raphjd:

I'm shocked.  I thought this started ages ago when all the male only groups were forced to take females, but not the other way around.

Feminism has always been a double standard..   They want everything that men get.. access to everything that men have access to… yet at the same time demand to get preferential treatment, get off light in courts, have doors opened for them, be protected from anything harsh, and be exempt from criticism.  One example of this:  Hillary relentlessly threw every imaginable insult, snide remark, and attack on Trump and men in general.. but when Trump simply calls her "Crooked Hillary" she plays the woman's card and suggests that Trump is a misogynistic bully.

Even Jimmy Kimmel did a tie in between Las Vegas and Feminism.  
Youtube Video – [00:24..]

@royalcrown89:

Since July, there has been a strong possibility that special counsel Robert Mueller–-the head overseer on the Russia collusion investigation---has already obtained the president's tax returns. Remember, this president is the only president in modern history to NOT release his tax returns and after many blatant attempts at deflecting, has shown absolutely no signs of being upfront with the American people. Those two pages released by Rachel Maddow did not show everything and wasn't a full tax return; therefore, bringing that up is ignoring MANY other things involved in a standard tax return released by a sitting president.

If Mueller indeed does have the tax returns, I believe he should release them. He should definitely release them if it helps make his case to the public whether or not charges should be filed against the president and/or the people of his administration. I have my own personal beliefs about what's in the tax returns, but I'd still want to see them to see if I'm right or wrong. Releasing them could also take away a major argument the left has on this president, especially if the returns going back a certain number of years show no wrongdoing of any kind. It could potentially make the president's approval ratings go up, even higher than the 45% he came into office with. If there's nothing troublesome in the returns, then why not do what every president from Ford to Obama has done without a fuss? Mueller most likely has the returns and once the investigation concludes, I hope he does the right thing and makes them public to the American people. There is already a precedent set by previous presidents and it has clearly been taken advantage of because of how forthcoming those presidents were with their tax returns. We deserve transparency.

You have a real boner about Trump's tax returns. 
If Mueller did release them, Mueller would be put in jail.  He has no business releasing Trump's tax returns. 
It is pitiful and pathetic that you are so desperate to find something.. anything.. to attack Trump with, that you have to keep banging away on the tax returns.  Trump's taxes are between him and the IRS.  If he did something wrong, then the IRS would penalize him.

@royalcrown89:

Since July, there has been a strong possibility that special counsel Robert Mueller–-the head overseer on the Russia collusion investigation---has already obtained the president's tax returns. Remember, this president is the only president in modern history to NOT release his tax returns and after many blatant attempts at deflecting, has shown absolutely no signs of being upfront with the American people. Those two pages released by Rachel Maddow did not show everything and wasn't a full tax return; therefore, bringing that up is ignoring MANY other things involved in a standard tax return released by a sitting president.

If Mueller indeed does have the tax returns, I believe he should release them. He should definitely release them if it helps make his case to the public whether or not charges should be filed against the president and/or the people of his administration. I have my own personal beliefs about what's in the tax returns, but I'd still want to see them to see if I'm right or wrong. Releasing them could also take away a major argument the left has on this president, especially if the returns going back a certain number of years show no wrongdoing of any kind. It could potentially make the president's approval ratings go up, even higher than the 45% he came into office with. If there's nothing troublesome in the returns, then why not do what every president from Ford to Obama has done without a fuss? Mueller most likely has the returns and once the investigation concludes, I hope he does the right thing and makes them public to the American people. There is already a precedent set by previous presidents and it has clearly been taken advantage of because of how forthcoming those presidents were with their tax returns. We deserve transparency.

Apparently you missed the memo.. nobody gives a damn about Trump's tax returns anymore.. nor do they care about that idiot Mueller.

@cteavin:

@Frederick:

I wonder if boys will be allowed to be Girl Scouts.
"So Frank, I hear that your son is a brownie!  Ha Ha!  Tell him I'll buy a box of thin mints!"

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/us/boy-scouts-will-allow-girls-to-join/index.html

I am expecting the first gay porn movie with an all female cast.

Yeah right.. someone would watch a movie with lesbian sex in it?.. gross!

Gay porn movie with all female cast (cough, cough), lesbian porn (cough, cough).  ::)

I wonder if boys will be allowed to be Girl Scouts.
"So Frank, I hear that your son is a brownie!  Ha Ha!  Tell him I'll buy a box of thin mints!"

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/us/boy-scouts-will-allow-girls-to-join/index.html

I am expecting the first gay porn movie with an all female cast.

@flozen:

She's 19, for heaven's sake, and heading to Harvard, and you're calling her a "dumb b."

If you want to troll on Weinstein, surely there are better and fairer targets than Malia.

You enjoy clothing reviews?  Get a hosting gig on E! network's Fashion Police.   :twg:

At 19, I was a junior (3rd year) in Engineering at my University. 
I think it's time for Malia to get out of her diapers and pop the pacifier out of her mouth.

Seems that Malia is plenty old enough to be a boozer and stoner.

Oh Bob!
http://www.tmz.com/2017/10/10/harvey-weinstein-brother-bob-leak-new-york-times-story-sexual-harassment/

Democrats are such hypocrites!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/10/michelle-obama-called-weinstein-good-friend-was-silent-for-days-on-allegations.html

Take a look at this picture..
what a dumb bitch Malia Obama is…
Forget that she is an intern in pervert Weinstein's company...

In this picture, the weather is freezing, she's wearing a heavy hooded coat... and NO PANTS!